"Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
news
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:
On 24-May-18 10:29 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote:
[....]
Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this?
"Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden"
Ho hum. Nothing more or different than the hundreds of other
sites and forums where you have been BANNED.
I've been ignoring you for quite some time now; how about YOU do
the same for *me*.
Once you've removed my 'Special Page' from your web site I'll
take the pressure off you.
LOL! The only reason you even HAVE this 'Special Page' is because
you have *earned it.* Everything on the page is true. You have
(often) been told the page will go away if and when you *STOP
STALKING*.
I wouldn't expect that to happen anytime soon...
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=152728286700
One of several usenet sharing posts of his. The only issue is, he's
sharing something he *knows he doesn't have permission* to be
sharing. And! in that particular post, tried to blame me for his own
Mac editing ****ups! The original video wasn't done with anything
Apple, AND, had a working audio track; where incidently nobody else
claimed I had a lisp..(too funny) Only David has made such a claim.
And we all know how reliable those are.
It's a damn shame that he feels the need to do that, as it prevents
me from sharing some pretty cool (imho) videos of my doing various
things or semi showing off the work I've done on various projects.
I still get the last laugh because he is unable to extract the .zip
file which does contain the original video file.
I really cannot tell you how proud I was to read his post with shared
contents of a discussion between him and the lead malware researcher
of Malwarebytes. His post only helps to prove that what I've written
about Malwarebytes for several years now IS infact, true. They aren't
a replacement for AV, and, there crypto skills leave much to be
desired too; I've never seen someone forgo all known crypto analysis
methods and instead, opt for simply trying to unzip an encrypted file
with known, standard, archiving tools; and when it obviously fails to
accomplish this task, declare the file to be garbage of some kind and
not being what I told him it was.
I know for a fact that because David had no idea of what she was
writing about, he didn't take into consideration what sort of
exposure it was going to provide for the support of my argument. Had
he known, He would have kept the details he was so proud to share, a
secret. [g] He mistook what she wrote for slime on me. And shared it!
h0h0h0. And, icing on the cake for me, the individual he leaked a
conversation with happens to be the 'lead malware researcher' for
Malwarebytes Corporation. The company which markets a product that
boldly claims it is a replacement for your current antivirus product.
Outright, replacement. Uh huh. Proudly displaying the West Coast AV
labs certification, but, umm, the problem is; they don't do anything
with an actual virus so I can't fathom how they got AV certification?
Yes, the product doesn't know a ****ing thing about an actual virus.
It cannot do much to protect you from one. Your Antivirus knows about
them and can offer you some protection against them, as well as the
possible disinfection if you do catch a cold. Malwarebytes current
cold rememdy is the death of the bug. In this case, since this is an
actual viral beastie, that will result in the death of your computers
operating system files which are carrying it along with any other
executable program discovered to be carrying it; ASSUMING the virus
in question has a static block of code which Malwarebytes can secure
lock onto. If it's a poly/oglymorphic, sadly, the user who replaced
his/her current av with Malwarebytes as Malwarebytes suggests and
provides reasons to backup their suggestion as far as they are
concerned, is now fuxored quite nicely. They will be resorting to
backups (oh, they didn't make any? Oopsie!) or a fresh reinstall of
everything. Malwarebytes on a good day in hell might hit it once out
of every twenty or more thousand (or more) infections.
Or, the user, can admit they would actually rather use an antivirus
product, and pull one from the net, transport it's happy arse to
their infected machine and have a decent chance of saving it by just
killing the nasty cold. Obviously, their decision to make.
--
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
================================================== =
Artificial Intelligence? I'll be impressed when they invent
artificial cunning.