View Single Post
  #29  
Old February 12th 19, 03:47 PM posted to alt.windows7.general,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Neil
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 714
Default OT: internet panic (Was: Microsoft blackballs IE)

On 2/12/2019 9:24 AM, Wolf K wrote:
On 2019-02-12 05:36, Neil wrote:
On 2/10/2019 5:29 PM, Wolf K wrote:
On 2019-02-10 14:24, Neil wrote:
On 2/10/2019 7:16 AM, mechanic wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:31:18 +0000, Neil was quoted:

We're in a downward spiral as a result of the general acceptance
of Google's proposed revised structure for the internet.

What's that then?

Do a web search. It's off-topic for this group.



Can't find "Google's proposed revised structure for the internet."
The hits referred to Google's internal reorganisation.

So, you think the problem is that you found nothing based on quoting a
comment. That is so typical of folks that want someone else to do
their homework for them.


I used the phrase you used. What else? Obviously you didn't use enough
care to craft an adequate description. Don't blame me for your laziness.

The absurdity of that approach to a web search on a topic is incredible.
Who writes comments as a basis for a web search? If I use your comments
as one, such as "Obviously you didn't use enough care to craft an
adequate description." will I turn up anything useful? You just simply
want to argue instead of learn anything, and I really have no time to
spend on such people.

So, he

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP/3


If your phrase had been an adequate and accurate label for your topic
drift, this link should've come up. It didn't. Since it didn't, your
phrase was not only useless, it was misleading.

Perhaps you'll understand why it's OT for this ng.


Nothing is OT for any unmoderated newsgroup. It's polite to signal an OT
thread or drift, but that's entirely up to the poster. NB that I've been
polite an relabelled this topic drift. Just for you, so you don't get
confused.

Have a frabjous day,




--
best regards,

Neil
Ads