View Single Post
  #29  
Old August 7th 04, 03:19 PM
David Candy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New Imformation on System Restore & Windows Installer Registry Corruption

"--(I'm not sure what that means because his eyes have all the tools
to handle that and more anatomically and physiologically)=20

How old are you? Under 40 I bet.
--=20
----------------------------------------------------------
'Not happy John! Defending our democracy',
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/...392635123.html

"Chad Harris" wrote in message =
...
I fail to see why people go nuts when you post in html if it's for a =

good
reason. I think html makes it a lot easier to read if you use italics,
underline or bold correctly. Does it create that much of a bandwidth
problem? It's not a large image. My posts in html weren't =

intentional on
this group although I have done it when I thought it was appropriate. =

They
were a function of that checkmark on the Send tab. And I still =

noticed the
html toolbar which *is native to OE messages* in rich text format, but =

since
I wasn't doing anything but hyperlinking, I didn't think it would be =

html.
The post that started the html question that Plato said "gave his eyes =

a
workout"--(I'm not sure what that means because his eyes have all the =

tools
to handle that and more anatomically and physiologically) but it came =

simply
from a font used on Kelly's web page when I pasted and I still cannot
understand why it is such a prodigious deal.
=20
Even with the checkmark out of the box on that send tab, this message =

opened
up to post in html and I changed it to plain text.
=20
So I'm still left with:
=20
1) Why is posting in html a huge deal? I can site two ocassions on =

these
groups when MSFT OK'd posting up an attachment and posting in html =

(one
wasn't a public group) and one was a word group for the purpose of =

being
able to review verbose logs.
=20
What's the problem for people if you use italics or a bold or =

underlined
word? I can understand Plato found that paste from Kelly's site =

small,
and it gave his eyes a "workout"--that I call normal physiology.
Particularly given David Candy's comments above (this being a binary =

group).
I thought that rich text was conceived for the same good reason that =

there
are multiple fonts.
=20
2) What was Kelly's point about testing in note pad first. Testing =

what?
For why? A hyperlink in note pad for what reason?
=20
Best,
=20
Chad Harris
__________________________________________________ _______
=20
=20
"+-J" wrote in message
...
=20
"Plato" |@|.| wrote:
| Chad Harris wrote:
|
| There have been a number of installation errors of the July 27th
|
| Since your going to post in html with a mini font, pick one that is =

even
| smaller to give my eyes an even better workout.
=20
Plato,
=20
I have set my newsreader to display posts in TEXT-only mode.
I fail to see why people insist on posting in HTML or RTF, (or even =

write
eMails in HTML).
=20
Unfortunately, MS Outlook Express insists on displaying graphic files =

which
are embedded in HTML posts!
(At least in MS Internet Explorer, displaying of graphic files can be
disabled.)
---
Jan
=20

Ads