On 2015-06-12 4:47 PM, Ken1943 wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 13:36:57 -0700, T wrote:

On 06/11/2015 12:56 PM, GreyCloud wrote:
The problem with Linux distros is that when they come out with a new version
they always introduce new bugs.

As opposed to Windows? Oh my goodness!!! M$ has a long history of
patches breaking all kinds of things. And their OS updates have
a habit of breaking most everything, which is the point, so you
have to buy updates and spend $$$$ on programmers, who have to buy
software from M$ to write those programs.

And as far as Linux goes, the things I have noticed getting broken
as trivial. And the new bugs that get introduced a far fewer
than the bugs that get fixed.

And, And, you can always get Red Hat Enterprise Linux (or clones),
where things are locked down from that sort of thing for 10 years!

I can't be sure, but Linux has a .0000005% of the desktop users at the
most ??

1.5%, give or take. People tend to try it out and lose their **** within
the first week of its installation because an update broke some of the
functionality or left them with an unusable desktop.

If you want to push linux, go somewhere where people give a ****. Linux
desktops suck and the software is unpolished to say the least. Windows
programmers have some problems, but even the crappy programs are better
than what get written for linux****.

Agreed. T is more than welcome to move his propaganda to
comp.os.linux.advocacy where us "wintrolls" can school him on how awful
Linux is on a daily basis. He's welcome to show us the contrary.

Hey, I like that name, Linux****.
Use it for servers and the science community, but never for general use.
Except for stupid people for surfing and email.

I prefer Linsux, but Lunix works too since the people advocating the
"product" have serious mental deficiencies and the inability to see the
stink lines the monitor emits when the "operating system" is installed
on one of their machines.

--
Slimer
Proud "wintroll"
Encrypt.