On 2015-03-12 5:45 PM, T wrote:
A rollback doesn't touch your documents at all. That is yet another
blatant lie.

Hi Shadow,

You got my name wrong, your first lie in this post.

What is with the name calling? Be a gentleman. If you want
me to go into detail, just ask. I will give you a hint: I
said nothing about documents being rolled back because
I wasn't talking about documents. Think r-e-g-e-s-t-r-y.
I was configuring things. Those configurations go into
the registry.

Goal post moved noted, lie #2.

By all means, provide a link to a single one and make sure to quote the
explanation as to _why_ they didn't.

Look through Info Worlds archives,

No evidence whatsoever to provide, lie #3.

Another shameless lie. Mac OS X is by far the _slowest_ operating system
I've ever used. On 4GB of RAM, Windows 7 is excellent. On 4GB of RAM, OS
X is slow as molasses. I get superior performance on a Core i3 with 4GB
RAM with Windows 7 running on NTFS than I could ever get on a Core i5
with 4GB RAM running OS X. Every single time I have to fix my parents'
Mac Mini Core i5, I am ASTOUNDED by how slow it is.

Again with the name calling.

Liars deserve no less.

I do not see a lot of macs, but I do see them. Their use of
solid state hard drive means they kick butt speed wise over
mechanical drive systems of any type. OSx is basically
Posix UNIX with an (extremely) proprietary GUI on top of it.

What you describe sounds like something is wrong. Do you
have an Apple Store near by that you can take it to?

The use of the SSD on OS X machines only allows it to run acceptably.
Use that SSD with Windows and it'll fly. Apple is simply making up for
horribly slow and memory-hungry OS X is by bundling most of its machines
with that technology. Use a typical hard disk and you'll feel the pain.

I have to set up nightly reboot on Windows servers their
quality is so bad.

My brother-in-law handles Windows servers and he never restarts them.
You're lying yet again.

Did your mother ever teach you any manners?

She did, and she admitted that liars such as yourself deserve none of them.

And ask him. I commonly have mine restart at 2:00 in the
morning automatically.

So because you do it, it means that everyone does. Right?

Complete bull****. My parents' Mac Mini, under my own recommendation,
was never shut down. I believed bull**** like yours for so long that I
actually thought OS X could perform well for weeks or months without
shutting down. Meanwhile, it becomes disgusting pig on day 2. Before
that, I had a G5 iMac, G4 Powerbook and G3 iBook also slowed to a crawl
if not shut down every day. My Windows 8 laptop is never shut down and
meanwhile remains fast at all times. It's not because I'm a magician
either.

Sounds to me like there is something wrong with it. Any Apple
stores near by?

It's not damaged. The hard disk and everything has been tested. The OS
is just slow. My students' Mac is the same way and no amount of your
lies has managed to speed it up so far.

That was true for Windows 8. A shutdown option was indeed available but
you needed to configure it in. However, everyone is running 8.1 since a
while now and your statement is no longer correct. Like everything else
you said, it's complete bull****.

I have to configure it in 8.1 too. And sometimes the updates
set it back. Anyone else see this?

Only you. Maybe you have no idea how to install 8.1? Hint: it's not in
the Windows Updates.

Every Windows OS can be infected if stupid users are at the helm. Which
is more impacted and which is less is inconsequential.

That was not the point. The point was that M$ marketing department
has stated that W7 is far more secure than XP and that is one
of the best reasons to upgrade. The statement is false.

And you are correct. The weakest security link is the user.

I don't see any difference in security between XP and 7. Considering
that only 8 allows for applications to run within a walled garden and
even then, only for applications in the modern interface, I can't
imagine what 7 provided in terms of additional security. It had a really
crappy malware protection built-in. Perhaps that's what Microsoft was
referring to?

--
Slimer
OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner
Encrypt.

- "Export-grade." Right. Not much of Winblows is "export grade"." -
chrisv, demonstrating that he has no idea what "export-grade" means
- "Both you and the POS that calls itself "GreyCloud" have *baselessly*
accused advocates of "lying" about their kill-file usage." - chrisv,
accusing someone who in his killfile of lying about his killfile
- "For some time M$ mandated that IE be the only browser installed, and
that it appear right on the desktop. OEM's had no choice in the matter
- M$ insisted on control of the boot process." - chrisv, lying shamelessly
- "Too bloated for the 386? X ran happily on lesser machines." -
JEDIDIAH, lying shamelessly
- "PnP hardware worked in Linux like it did in WinDOS." - JEDIDIAH,
again lying shamelessly
- "Are you still a homophobe or have you finally come out of the
closet?" - Donald Miller, too dumb to know the difference between a
homophobe and a homosexual.
- "Idiot. That (referring to software Creative Labs provided with its
Sound Blaster line) was needed because the MSDOS driver was too dumb to
figure out the parameters on its own. That has absolutely nothing to do
with "software which essentually configured the card"" - Peter Köhlmann,
trying in vain to change the meaning of the word "configure."