Judging by what "Nil" wrote in his reply, that "TClockEx" has a "Pop-up calendar", I
am thinking the most obvious difference between it and "TClock.exe" is probably going
to be that it is much lighter [smaller] and therefore tend to be more reliable, not
least on display quality (video memory).

Even when I am using all it's options to choose :

*my own custom "Start Button" text and image,

*my own "Start Menu" scrolling image,
(a replacement image in classic menus that usually shows the words "Windows XP")

*and my own custom non-standard time format.
(including seconds - why I got it in the first place).

Again, here is the direct download URL (374k) below :
http://homepage1.nifty.com/kazubon/t...t-040702-3.zip

==

Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)



"Binyamin Dissen" wrote in message
...

clipped

I have been using tclockex. What are the issues, and why do you recommend
tclock above it (I have not examined tclock)?

clipped

Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com