Sounds very much like you were calling me a liar!....., you wrote, and I quote :

"I use TClockEX, and it works fine for me. Some slight display issues,
but nothing I can't live with."

So what does "slight display issues" mean?

You actually meant to write "it has no issues at all" did you?


I can only go on the information you supplied, as I have not used this program
myself.

Since you *did* originally say there were some [slight] issues with TClockEX and
display, I protracted that the program may use more memory resources than TClock
does.

TClock light has no issues with display, slight or otherwise, and is as reliable and
unobtrusive as a background application can be...

==

Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)



"Nil" wrote in message
...
On 17 Mar 2010, "Tim Meddick" wrote in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.customize:

Judging by what "Nil" wrote in his reply, that "TClockEx" has a
"Pop-up calendar", I am thinking the most obvious difference
between it and "TClock.exe" is probably going to be that it is
much lighter [smaller] and therefore tend to be more reliable, not
least on display quality (video memory).

TClockEx is perfectly stable. It has never been any kind of problem for
me.