On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:32:14 -0700, Ken Springer
wrote:

On 2/8/14 4:20 PM, Ken Blake wrote:
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:57:13 -0700, Ken Springer
wrote:

On 2/8/14 2:29 PM, Ken Blake wrote:
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:09:30 -0700, Ken Springer
wrote:


On the serious side of this discussion, what make a word processor a
word processor and not a "glorified text editor"?



In my view? Whether it's closer in features to a word processor like
WordPerfect or Word or to a text editor like Notepad.

Ah, but what features? Where is the line crossed from text editor to
word processor?



The line is in my head. If you can't see it, or don't have the same
view I do, that's fine. We are all different.

There's really nothing to discuss here. From my perspective, WordPad
is closer to a text editor than to a word processor. Your perspective
is apparently different, and that's fine with me. It's not a matter of
right or wrong; it's a matter of different views.

Knew you would say that. G


LOL!


Between two individuals, you are correct. But, with a group discussion,
everyone has to work with the same definition(s), whether you personally
agree with the definition or not.


I don't agree, but your view is fine with me. Wait for someone else to
answer your question. I've already expressed my view, so I'm done with
this thread.