Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man'selectrocution
In article
Snit wrote:
On 3/22/17, 2:34 PM, in article ,
"nospam" wrote:
In article , Snit
wrote:
The reason the woman was burned, if I recall correctly, is because the
coffee's temperature was too hot (obviously) and because the ****ty car
she was in had no cup holder. In the end, if McDonald's can be sued for
the coffee being too hot then the car manufacturer should also have been
sued for not providing a place for the old bag to put her drink.
Was the car manufacture doing something outside the accepted norms and
regulations of their industry? Had they been warned about this before? Were
they actively ignoring those warnings?
If so then I would say you are correct and they, too, could be held liable.
the car had nothing to do with it.
I suspect you are right... was just noting what they would have had to do
with it for the analogy to hold up.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
|