On 08/01/2019 13:50, Mayayana wrote:
"David B." "David wrote

| Did you watch the video?
|
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3_lIPESVTw
|

If you want people to follow your links then you
should explain them. I think I'm not alone in ignoring
links that are not explained. I figure that if people
don't have the time or interest to explain what they're
talking about then there's not much sense in my
researching it.

I accept your point! :-)

Even less so when it's described as "the worst thing
online". Why would I want to see the worst thing online?

I'm impressed by your stolidity! ;-)

THIS facility is recommended by BTS on his website (Tekrider.net)

http://websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze/

However, when using the tool to review the www.tekrider.net website, I
don't get the result which I expected. Can you determine the reason for
that?

Copy/paste from the site:-

Here is a small collection of Web page authoring tips, about HTML,
XHTML, CSS, and other stuff:

How to assign your font sizes
To XHTML or not to XHTML, that is the question
Three Logos and a Baby (how to align images in a banner)
A pixel grid with margin set to zero
A pixel grid with margin left at default
(Press your Back button after viewing a grid)
Do you validate your HTML ↗ ?
Do you validate your CSS ↗ ?
Do you test your pages for optimization ↗ ?
Remember, there are still people using dialup.

Designing/authoring for the WWW is fun, but we authors should take some
steps to be sure we create our pages correctly, with visitor
accessibility and usability in mind.

--
David B.