On 5/11/2013 18:12, ...winston wrote:
"xfile" wrote in message ...

...winston wrote....
As previously noted...a Start Button does not necessarily indicate a
Win7 type Start Menu.


Whether it's Win7 type is irrelevant and it's not the point, and the
main point is that the primary mission of an operating system in *the
business sector* is to serve as a stable "platform" for applications run
on it, and within the primary mission, the UI design is to minimize, if
not totally eliminate, user confusion and learning curve so they could
quickly access to data and applications to complete their tasks.

If the primary mission is failed, everything else is just BS.

Win7 style or not, it's their job to accomplish the above mission to get
paid (by licensing).

In the consumer sector, there is no hard rules because everything can be
subjective and base on personal preferences.

Microsoft, as an OEM software development company, miscalculated and
forgot their role, again, and tried to mix the two distinctive segments
together with one half-baked product.

They are the last one qualified to tell business how and if they need to
deploy resources for any stupid changes not to mention that it's for
their own interests.

In the business sector, Microsoft is just an OEM company and they are OK
if they just follow orders to do their work.


You're preaching to the choir.
I'm just providing the information by linking to the source (i.e MSFT
and those in control of what will happen)...everything else
is just hypothesis or an expectation based on a form of entitlement.

Here's another article from the source g May 10th, 2013.

The Official Microsoft Blog
http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_blog/archive/2013/05/10/staying-centered.aspx


Regarding getting 'paid' - after 100 million copies (all possible
channels - retail, licensing, upgrades, OEM pcs, System Builder
versions) sold
- even if just using the upgrade limited offer pricing of $40 ea. they
got paid about 4 billion dollars!

Afaics....nntp forums are fine for discussing issues...but expressing an
opinion here serves no purpose whatsoever to MSFT and hasn't for at
least 4 years.

Additionally, similar distress was expressed about the 'Ribbon'
deployment in Office and other products (Windows Essentials and earlier
versions)
***It's still here***
....and the person responsible for the Ribbon in Office is now the
person responsible for Windows! (link/video of her comments on Windows
8 past and future provided earlier)




Regarding getting 'paid' - after 100 million copies (all possible
channels - retail, licensing, upgrades, OEM pcs, System Builder
versions) sold
- even if just using the upgrade limited offer pricing of $40 ea. they
got paid about 4 billion dollars!


You do know that approximately 80% of MS client OS sales goes to PC OEMs
(e.g. Dell, HP. Acer, etc.), right?

How about do some cross-check on PC sales in recent years and months?

WOW, it has been declining even faster. So where are most of "100
million copies"? Sitting at PC makers' inventory list and eating their
profits.

Wake up.

And yes, most of those products are still there with shrinking market
share and MS is less relevant for any new developments.