Thread: tl;dr:
View Single Post
  #12  
Old May 21st 18, 08:12 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.uk.law
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,718
Default tl;dr:

In article , David B.
wrote:

Why the 'Hosts' chose to delete the whole discussion about ClamXav
intrigued me. It wasn't 'logical' as Spock might have said.

it was very logical. there was zero benefit.

I'm surprised that you followed the thread. It ran to many pages of
comments and queries. I saw no contribution(s) from you though.


there's no need to follow anything. every thread in which you are a
participant has a similar outcome, which is why you are banned in
numerous forums and/or the threads deleted.

In fact, there's nobody registered on ASC with the user name of 'nospam'


further demonstrating just how stupid you are.

The developer of ClamXav, if genuine, should have been only too pleased
to
answer questions on the forums.

not when they're from dumb**** trolls.

I'd never considered MadMacs0 to be a troll. He made some very
interesting posts IMO.


whoooooooooooooosh.

When one approves the installation of software like ClamXav onto one's
Apple machine, one is giving 'carte blanche' for that software to do
*anything it wishes* on one's computer.

no different than *any* software.

True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's
obtained from the 'App Store'.


absolutely false. that's not apple's advice at all.


You appear to be wrong on ALL counts, nospam! :-P


nope.
Ads