pothead Mon,
07 Sep 2020 13:23:44 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 2020-09-07, Gremlin wrote:
Snit
Sun, 06 Sep 2020 21:45:09
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Sep 6, 2020 at 1:58:25 PM MST, "Mike Easter"
wrote:

Bobby wrote:
regarding the phone call between Gremlin and snit.

Personally I don't have it figured out yet. And I'm not
looking for winners or losers; I'm looking to solve a puzzle.


To me it is pretty simple:

Yes, it is. You got caught lying about my involvement with the
bot. I grilled you for an apology. you wrote another lie, I
busted you again for that one too. I grilled you for an apology
for that one as well. I've succesfully proven you're a liar who
doesn't even care to save the lies for big stories, you'll lie
about simple **** just as easily. And when you're caught and the
pressure isn't taken off of you, you'll resort to trying to
intimidate your victim via doxing, besmirchment, stalking, and
sliming them. You've yet to do anything different.

You will lie your ass off, it doesn't matter how many times
others point out the fallacies in your stories, you'll stick to
it. Even when you're busted dead to rights, you'll still ignore
the facts and proclaim you didn't do what the evidence is clearly
showing you did! You couldn't possibly be any more dishonest with
yourself and others, snit.

Considering your direct experience with snit is limited, at least
in terms of time, that's an excellent deconstruction of snit and
how snit trolls. Snit is like a circuit that has a piece of solder
bridging 2 traces on a board and that prevents a certain function
from operating correctly.

Whiskers are a pain in the ass at times. G I've no doubt your
reply confused snit, and he most likely thinks i'm writing about a
cat in my response. G

In snit's case, that function is the ability to fully and
unconditionally admit when he is wrong and to apologize for his
error. The key word is unconditionally. There is always a
condition, a string, a trap attached to a snit admission or
apology. Always.

Of course. Here's a perfect example:

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,co mp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 27 Aug 2020 16:00:24 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass YyRp XnsAC1EBCDBAAD5EHT1@0ydV5Cg6OLqWT90unHZ34QVT6yqk8 KnKb.nd

I did incorrectly say he had not asked me to "research" or whatever -- not
considering such a quick look to really count. But from your perspective, I
suppose, where doing a quick search on a list is not completely trivial, it
counts. Sorry for my error on that.

Again, for comparison, this is what I wrote that he claimed was a direct lie:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.

This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

There was no direct lie by me, there was no lie of any kind by me.
Snit told two in those two sentences he wrote.

And you can clearly see, the apology doesn't match the context.

Sit back, observe and give it a little time and snit will actually
begin to behave almost exactly like the various snit lists
describe him to be.

He already is. His doxing me though, well, that just wasn't smart.

At some point people do figure snit out and KF him. And once again
snit becomes predictable when he gets ignored. He will start his
RainMain process, posting the same reply multiple times day after
day to various posts.

I'm not going to kf him. That would be letting him off for his
transgressions. That's just not going to happen. He's going to pay
with heavy interest. We're just getting warmed up.

As a last ditch effort snit will unleash his sock puppet army,
invade the group in a final battle, Armageddon of sorts, to bury
the group by causing fed up people to move on.

Won't work against me. I'm not going to back off, I've already got a
reputation, what's one more 'victim' in my long list of them?

Get ready for it because the signs are there.

Hehe. Snit is the one who should be getting ready for me. He's
started a fight with someone he has no chance in hell of winning. I
am legion, for we are many.


--
The cyber stalker, liar, and troll known as Michael Glasser (Snit) view below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
https://www.imgpaste.net/image/9tI2X - https://ibb.co/NTCVpvN - https://gofile.io/d/kE7vxh
The cyber stalker, liar, and troll known as David Brooks (BoaterDave) view below:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php