Tim,

I agree with you. I'm surprised MS hasn't put a printed copy of the EULA
right with the software in such a way that in order to use the software the
user would *have* to at least see there is a piece of paper there. Whether
they choose to read it or not is for another thread.

I honestly don't understand all the *itching about MS, and their products.
If you don't like their products, policies, etc., go somewhere else. Nobody
is forcing anyone to "buy" MS products or policies.

And before anyone asks, I'm not "an *ss-kissing MVP" either!

--
HTH,
Curt

Windows Support Center
www.aumha.org
Practically Nerded,...
http://dundats.mvps.org/Index.htm

"Tim Slattery" wrote in message
...
| Bruce Chambers wrote:
|
| Sarcasm aside, I'm glad to see that for once you agree that the EULA
| does so stipulate and that all users have given their consent. It's not
| often you let facts get in the way of your rabid anti-Microsoft stance.
|
| "Giving consent" in this context is nebulous. None of us reads every
| EULA we see, we just click the "I agree" button.
|
| And for an operating system's EULA, most people aren't even aware that
| it exists. They open the box, setup their new computer, and turn it
| on. They click any buttons they need to to get through the setup.
|
| --
| Tim Slattery
| MS MVP(DTS)
|
| http://members.cox.net/slatteryt