Thread: Microsoft MVPs
View Single Post
  #58  
Old October 22nd 08, 08:59 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
Twayne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,276
Default Microsoft MVPs

....

No offense Mike but ...


You have it all worked out, eh.

Some may not be public because their employers might think that they
would possibly do free work in works time.


But a good employee wouldn't allow that situation to come about. Firing
is a lot faster when deceit is involved.


Some employers may consider the MVP award status to be in competition
with what the company does/supplies.


A good employee would not endanger that consideration. Firing is a lot
faster when deceit is involved.


Some MVPs may not be in a position politically.


Same as above. To me, all of those define a deceitful person, not
someone I could place a lot of trust in. If any of the above are true,
then they should stop using the title. Using the "title" is where the
words for ego and narcissist come into play when apparently a title
becomes more important than a job and security.


PCButts is a wannabe..


And he's chosen a good nick too, IMO "^).

Cheers,

Twayne


Ads