View Single Post
  #60  
Old December 27th 03, 05:36 PM
kurttrail
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default using windows on two computers

Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:

If I had a customer like you, I would be glad to point you to any of
my competition.




"hypocritical" Your word not mine, now we know how you really feel
about yourself!


I was summing up what you saying, Lover. Email me, and we'll get
together, I let you experience how I feel . . . . inside of you! ;-)

Your website?
Waste of bandwidth.
However it is your money and there is free speech.
So go back and look at it and then check the hit counter.
Then you are sure it has incremented by at least one.


What hit counter? You must be seeing things, silly boy! Pre-occupied
day-dreaming of me! How sweet!

What I think about you is not relevant.


Finally, a bit of truth!

However your unethical twisting of the law and EULA should be detested
by all that respect any kind of law and order.


Since you have yet to demonstrate how my interpretation is unethical
twisting, why should anyone, who believes in the rule of law, do
anything *you* suggest?

Your precise thinking, attitude and actions was a partial cause for
this WPA that most everyone hates.


Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart wrote, "The limited scope of the
copyright holder's statutory monopoly, like the limited copyright
duration required by the Constitution, reflects a balance of competing
claims upon the public interest: Creative work is to be encouraged and
rewarded, but private motivation must ultimately serve the cause of
promoting broad public availability of literature, music, and the other
arts. The immediate effect of our copyright law is to secure a fair
return for an 'author's' creative labor. But the ultimate aim is, by
this incentive, to stimulate artistic creativity for the general public
good. 'The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in
conferring the monopoly,' this Court has said, 'lie in the general
benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors.' . . . . When
technological change has rendered its literal terms ambiguous, the
Copyright Act must be construed in light of this basic purpose." -
http://laws.findlaw.com/us/422/151.html

So to elaborate, without people like you, there may not be WPA.




Proud of yourself aren't you!


Not proud. More like enlightened, secure in my beliefs, and at peace
with the universe.


Your threat noted.


A warning, Sweetie! And you really got nothing to worry about, darling,
as loose as you are, you'll hardly feel little Kurt!

--
Kisses!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.kurttrail.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"


Ads