If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"Leythos" wrote in message ... In article , says... only law-abiding people will get screwed. And for some computer users, that will be the only sex they've had in years Speaking for yourself? Alias |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
"Leythos" wrote in message ... In article , says... That's not what he's saying. What he's saying is that he trusts himself more than he trusts his OS vendor. It's a question of who should have the keys to his computer, him or Microsoft. He chooses himself. I would too. But the vendor isn't doing anything that would impact anyone that isn't doing anything unethical - at least nothing anyone has mentioned points to the vendor blocking anything ethical. That may be the vendor's claim, but not only would we have to trust the vendor, but it is manifestly clear that this simply isn't true. One of the big things you're missing is that the OS vendor doesn't set the policy. The OS vendor writes the code that enforces the policy, but the policy is set by the content providers. (The people sending you advanced fee fraud scam emails.) DS |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"Leythos" wrote in message ... While I agree with your view - and don't believe they should be installing anything that the RIAA wants, since it doesn't impact those that don't violate the laws (at least as I read it), I don't have any significant issues with it. Tell me, how can a computer tell what is fair use and what is not? Are you for real? DS |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"Leythos" wrote in message ... In article , aka@[notme] maskedandanonymous.org says... So, this will prevent someone from sharing some music but I am sure it won't prevent the real thieves from copying any more than it prevented them from pirating XP. I guess I look at it like this - you said "will prevent someone from "sharing"... won't prevent the real thieves..... I don't see the difference between someone "sharing" a file against licensing rules and and pirates that copy entire CD's and sell them to kids. I'm sorry that you don't see the difference, but it is perfectly obvious to the rest of us. The first could easily be a legal example of fair use. The second is clearly illegal. If you don't see the difference between legal conduct and illegal conduct, your opinion that the software will only prevent conduct that is illegal is quite meaningless, no? DS |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"Leythos" wrote In article , aka@[notme] maskedandanonymous.org says... The only people who will be inconvenienced are paying customers. The real pirates that steal for a living will not, as usual, be affected. tell that to the hundreds of girls in the Sororities that swap songs and such that don't pay for them. So what? It was done with cassette tapes and the music industry still made trillions of dollars. I was copying songs off the radio back with reel to reel tapes in the early 60s and the music industry didn't go belly up. As one poster said, one can use the out jack from one's audio card to connect to a tape recorder and record off the internet radio or a cd. There's a difference between sharing music and selling music. How come you didn't address that? Alias |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"Leythos" wrote in message ... In article , says... I guess I look at it like this - you said "will prevent someone from "sharing"... won't prevent the real thieves..... I don't see the difference between someone "sharing" a file against licensing rules and and pirates that copy entire CD's and sell them to kids. I'm sorry that you don't see the difference, but it is perfectly obvious to the rest of us. The first could easily be a legal example of fair use. The second is clearly illegal. Actually, I see the difference, but I disagree that there is a "real" difference. I don't see any "real" difference between two kids making copies of CD's and giving the copy to the other and a pirate making a copy and selling it to anyone. In both cases there was an unpaid for copy entering the market. If you don't see the difference between legal conduct and illegal conduct, your opinion that the software will only prevent conduct that is illegal is quite meaningless, no? But I do understand your position, I just don't see it in "degrees" of being legal or not - making a copy for a friend is just as much illegal as is selling a copy. If the software blocks it, more power to it, as long as the software doesn't keep me from playing while doing so according to the sellers rules. Software won't prevent it, as others have mentioned, it will just make it harder for the "casual" thief to do it, which means that less people will become thieves. Sharer: does it to be nice. Seller: does it to make money. You still don't see the difference? MS still has no business being a copyright cop. That's the business of the legal system, not a software company. I will be curious to see how Europe reacts to this and I am hoping that we will have a legal version of Vista, not the illegal one you love so much. Last I checked, it is illegal to pass oneself off as a cop and that's what Vista will be doing. Course, you won't have a problem with that because MS can do no wrong as far as you're concerned. Alias |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"Leythos" wrote in message ... In article , aka@[notme] maskedandanonymous.org says... "Leythos" wrote In article , aka@[notme] maskedandanonymous.org says... The only people who will be inconvenienced are paying customers. The real pirates that steal for a living will not, as usual, be affected. tell that to the hundreds of girls in the Sororities that swap songs and such that don't pay for them. So what? It was done with cassette tapes and the music industry still made trillions of dollars. I was copying songs off the radio back with reel to reel tapes in the early 60s and the music industry didn't go belly up. As one poster said, one can use the out jack from one's audio card to connect to a tape recorder and record off the internet radio or a cd. There's a difference between sharing music and selling music. How come you didn't address that? Because it has nothing to do with Vista. Just because you "can do" something doesn't mean it's legit. And who is the person who decides what's legit and what isn't, Microsoft? You? "Legit" is a relative term. I used to live in Venezuela and every single music cassette was only about US 1.50. The music industry challenged it and was told that Venezuelans can't afford the high prices the industry wanted and to go fu*k off. In that society, casual copying is legal, even if you intend to sell the copies. They have giant, "legit", recording companies making the copies and selling them in all the stores. Even so, the music industry is making trillions of dollars every year. Alias |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
MS is not the only one that's going to have a problem with China. Due to
the fact that we have now taught the Chinese how to build everything for us, and we have a huge trade imbalance to show for that, not to mention their already huge and very rapidly growing military strength, and their coziness with Russia of late, my thoughts are that we should all be more concerned about our own tails, and not worry so much about microsoft's behind. "beamish" wrote in message ... | Hello, Thanks for the information. | Certain people do not understand the erosion of basic rights. No matter what | they state they "just don't get it". | Microsoft may have future problems but not with file sharing or copying in | the U.S. or Europe. Their problem will be with China, India and Google. | take care. | beamish. | | "GregRo" wrote: | | I apologize for the rant. | | http://snipurl.com/hbl7 | | I have made my decision | | Vista I will not be buying. | | No one is not going to tell me. I can't have access to a part of the | computer or the hard drive. Imagine if a virus, spyware or adaware | got into that protected area and a virus program could not clean it. | | I'm Sticking with xp & windows 98se forever. | | If I have to get a new computer it will be either mac or linux system. | | Greg Ro | |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"Leythos" wrote in message ... In article , aka@[notme] maskedandanonymous.org says... Even so, the music industry is making trillions of dollars every year. Looks like you have a problem with any company making LOTS of money, no wonder you an Kurt get along soooo well. I have no problem with companies making money. All I am saying is that casual copying doesn't affect their bottom line much, if any. They can only make money if customers support them. And accusing all the paying customers of being thieves until they prove otherwise is supporting the customers? Alias |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
"Leythos" wrote in message ... In article , aka@[notme] maskedandanonymous.org says... Sharer: does it to be nice. Seller: does it to make money. You still don't see the difference? And what is the difference - sharing or selling, they both deprive the owner of money. One does it for financial gain. The other doesn't. I don't know how much simpler I can put it. Personally, there are a number of artists whose CDs I would have never considered buying until someone sent me an MP3. I liked the music and went and bought the CD. So, in my case, had there been no sharing, the company would have lost the money I spent on the CD. I just don't agree that it's the same, and you won't change my opinion as I believe I'm just as right as you believe you are. It's not the same. Heh. Alias |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
"Leythos" wrote in message ... In article , aka@[notme] maskedandanonymous.org says... "Leythos" wrote in message ... In article , aka@[notme] maskedandanonymous.org says... Even so, the music industry is making trillions of dollars every year. Looks like you have a problem with any company making LOTS of money, no wonder you an Kurt get along soooo well. I have no problem with companies making money. All I am saying is that casual copying doesn't affect their bottom line much, if any. And in the literal scheme of things, that means that casual copying is no different that stealing. How you "feel" about the reason makes no difference - it's strictly a black and white thing - either it's paid for or it's theft. I guess the millions of people who taped music off the radio should be in jail, right? Would you testify against a friend in court if you knew they did that? Would you accept a reward for turning them in? They can only make money if customers support them. And accusing all the paying customers of being thieves until they prove otherwise is supporting the customers? And I'm not offended because I don't try and steal things, don't try and steal a COPY for a friend. I'm not offended by companies trying to gain sales or limit losses as long as the legitimate users can continue to use the product as purchased under the rules that it was purchased under. Would you be offended if your paid for and legit XP didn't pass a test and MS told you you had to buy another? Alias |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Alias wrote:
The only people who will be inconvenienced are paying customers. The real pirates that steal for a living will not, as usual, be affected. Why does this sound like the old gun control argument? eg crooks dont buy guns from legit stores but get them anyway and continue to use them. A law abiding citizen has to jump through many hoops to get a gun for his hobby tho. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Actually the ones it will affect are the small computer stores that built a
whole buch of computers, but only one copy of XP which they put on all of the computers. When I came back to complain about not having an XP disk, they tried to give me a copy they had made. I yelled enough that I got a retail copy from them, but never got around to installing it since it seemed to work okay. Of course I eventually got caught and had to install the legal version. I went back to the store and he tried to tell me he was 'allowed' to do what he did. "Leythos" wrote in message ... In article , |@|.| says... Alias wrote: The only people who will be inconvenienced are paying customers. The real pirates that steal for a living will not, as usual, be affected. Why does this sound like the old gun control argument? eg crooks dont buy guns from legit stores but get them anyway and continue to use them. A law abiding citizen has to jump through many hoops to get a gun for his hobby tho. Funny, I bought a couple rifles and only had to complete a simple form, wait about 6 minutes, and was able to walk out the door with it - but, I also don't have anything in my background that would limit me from purchasing a gun legally. -- remove 999 in order to email me |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
"Leythos" wrote in message ... In article , says... I guess I look at it like this - you said "will prevent someone from "sharing"... won't prevent the real thieves..... I don't see the difference between someone "sharing" a file against licensing rules and and pirates that copy entire CD's and sell them to kids. I'm sorry that you don't see the difference, but it is perfectly obvious to the rest of us. The first could easily be a legal example of fair use. The second is clearly illegal. Actually, I see the difference, but I disagree that there is a "real" difference. I don't see any "real" difference between two kids making copies of CD's and giving the copy to the other and a pirate making a copy and selling it to anyone. In both cases there was an unpaid for copy entering the market. The two kids making copies of CD's and giving the copy to the other could be an example of legally permissible fair use. For example, the second copy could be for a legitimate research purpose or for nonprofit educational purposes. It's exactly because it is hard to tell the real difference between these two cases that it's impossible for an automated mechanism to prevent only illegal copying. If you don't see the difference between legal conduct and illegal conduct, your opinion that the software will only prevent conduct that is illegal is quite meaningless, no? But I do understand your position, I just don't see it in "degrees" of being legal or not - making a copy for a friend is just as much illegal as is selling a copy. If you are making a copy for a friend to use for a nonprofit research purpose, it's not illegal. There are no degrees of legal or not, fair use is legal, period. If the software blocks it, more power to it, as long as the software doesn't keep me from playing while doing so according to the sellers rules. Software won't prevent it, as others have mentioned, it will just make it harder for the "casual" thief to do it, which means that less people will become thieves. So it is now your position that it the software will block some legal activity and that this is perfectly fine with you? That is not the position you took previously. DS |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VISTA Operating System | Peace | General XP issues or comments | 47 | January 14th 06 01:30 AM |
what programs will Windows Vista run? | [email protected] | General XP issues or comments | 2 | August 5th 05 06:10 PM |
Microsoft Windows Vista Bulletin Board | Frank Steinmetzger | General XP issues or comments | 4 | August 4th 05 09:55 PM |
Windows Vista Screenshots | [email protected] | General XP issues or comments | 1 | July 25th 05 04:31 AM |
buying ram | mathawk | Windows XP Help and Support | 4 | January 23rd 05 03:38 AM |