If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
RAM & Browser revisited
Last Saturday I finally upgraded the XP RAM from 500M to 2G.
No more Firefox browser complaints. No more slow computer complaints. A vast improvement in performance. Like a new system Thank you all for your advice and for persuading me to upgrade. Paul, as you suggested, I got the RAM from Crucial. -- You know it's time to clean the refrigerator when something closes the door from the inside. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
RAM & Browser revisited
KenK wrote:
Last Saturday I finally upgraded the XP RAM from 500M to 2G. No more Firefox browser complaints. No more slow computer complaints. A vast improvement in performance. Like a new system Thank you all for your advice and for persuading me to upgrade. Paul, as you suggested, I got the RAM from Crucial. I wish all problems were this easy :-) ******* I've got a machine with plenty of RAM in it, and it's not in a rush to finish anything :-) The job the machine is doing, writes data at 1MB/sec and the program tells me it has 2400000 MB of data to write. (Even though it started with about 7000 MB of data.) So it may finish 28 days from now. And the CPU isn't maxed out. No idea what the program is actually doing, to waste the resources. I turned on NTFS compression in the folder it is working on, so it won't run out of disk. The reason I'm even running it, is to see if the program can actually finish what it set out to do. Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
RAM & Browser revisited
In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on 18 Aug 2015 16:46:08 GMT, KenK
wrote: Last Saturday I finally upgraded the XP RAM from 500M to 2G. No more Firefox browser complaints. No more slow computer complaints. A vast improvement in performance. Like a new system Congratulations. Coincidentally, last Saturday I noticed that only 3G of my 4G are still registering. I wonder when that started, and if it's the cause of some of my problems. I tried pushing the simms in farther, but that didn't work, so later I'll take the simms out and put them back in again. Is there a way to know which one isn't registering. I have memtest, for example. Will it tell me? Thank you all for your advice and for persuading me to upgrade. Paul, as you suggested, I got the RAM from Crucial. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
RAM & Browser revisited
KenK wrote:
Last Saturday I finally upgraded the XP RAM from 500M to 2G. No more Firefox browser complaints. No more slow computer complaints. A vast improvement in performance. Like a new system Thank you all for your advice and for persuading me to upgrade. Paul, as you suggested, I got the RAM from Crucial. I think the first GB is what did it. I've got 2GB on this computer, but didn't see much difference over the previous 1GB, in practice. But again, that probably depends on how many apps you're running and/or how memory intensive each app is. (But I think 500 MB of RAM is indeed a bit on the light side. :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
RAM & Browser revisited
In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:21:58
-0400, micky wrote: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on 18 Aug 2015 16:46:08 GMT, KenK wrote: Last Saturday I finally upgraded the XP RAM from 500M to 2G. No more Firefox browser complaints. No more slow computer complaints. A vast improvement in performance. Like a new system Congratulations. Coincidentally, last Saturday I noticed that only 3G of my 4G are still registering. I wonder when that started, and if it's the cause of some of my problems. I tried pushing the simms in farther, but that didn't work, so later I'll take the simms out and put them back in again. I also noticed just now that the harddrive light was flashing even though I wasn't doing anything. Checkeing the task manager I saw that MsMpEng.exe was running a lot. I'd never heard of that before but it turned out to be the Windows Defender scanner, or something from that program. I thought I got rid of that. It has no icon i the systray like it used to. And the task manager in the programs tab did't show it running. What's going on????? But I found it in All Programs and started the interface and turned off the scanning and the 2AM scan. I'm often up trying to use the computer then. Did I mention I Have AVG too? ----- Separately I looked in msinfo and there were 8 new programs in the startup page, all of them related to new all-in-one printer I installed. I looked in the software and couldnt' find any way to turn any of them off, so I just unchecked them in msinfo. Good enough? I figure they will start when I need them. Am I right? Is there a way to know which one isn't registering. I have memtest, for example. Will it tell me? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
RAM & Browser revisited
In message , micky
writes: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on 18 Aug 2015 16:46:08 GMT, KenK wrote: Last Saturday I finally upgraded the XP RAM from 500M to 2G. No more Firefox browser complaints. No more slow computer complaints. A vast improvement in performance. Like a new system Yes, can be amazing! Congratulations. Coincidentally, last Saturday I noticed that only 3G of my 4G are still registering. I wonder when that started, and if it's the cause of some of my problems. Are you sure 4G once registered? AIUI, XP - at least, 32 bit - can't use quite 4G; it can only _address_ 4G, but some of that is occupied by hardware, so you can only access about 3.5G (or on some systems, 2G). [] -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf She's showing her age a little bit. I always say she doesn't have teething troubles, she has denture troubles! - Timothy West (on their narrowboat!), RT 2014-March |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
RAM & Browser revisited
micky wrote:
In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on 18 Aug 2015 16:46:08 GMT, KenK wrote: Last Saturday I finally upgraded the XP RAM from 500M to 2G. No more Firefox browser complaints. No more slow computer complaints. A vast improvement in performance. Like a new system Congratulations. Coincidentally, last Saturday I noticed that only 3G of my 4G are still registering. I wonder when that started, and if it's the cause of some of my problems. I tried pushing the simms in farther, but that didn't work, so later I'll take the simms out and put them back in again. Is there a way to know which one isn't registering. I have memtest, for example. Will it tell me? Thank you all for your advice and for persuading me to upgrade. Paul, as you suggested, I got the RAM from Crucial. 1) The memory license is interpreted as an "address range license". The address cannot go over 4GB as a physical address. 2) The BIOS plans the memory layout. 3) The BIOS stops the mapping of RAM to addresses, using a five-bit upper address limit. That means it can select a size for the memory range with 128MB accuracy. 4) It allocates PCI and AGP and PCI Express bus addresses below 4GB. It allocates a minimum of 256MB, even if only one byte for a register is needed. If a bus is not populated at all (no device on that bus), the BIOS does not plan for it. Since the BIOS "sees" all the hardware at powerup, it can allocate the space needed. Selecting "PNP OS = No" in the BIOS, provides the justification the BIOS needs for doing this planning. If you select "PNP OS = Yes", then the OS can do some portion of this planning. But I've never tested that option. 5) Now, if you've followed this dribble so far, you can see that "stuff is nibbling away" at the area near 4GB. And if your chipset supports "memory hoisting", it does no good, because of the Microsoft insistence that the memory license be interpreted as an address license. They could have allowed addresses to use PAE, and traverse above 4GB, but no, it does not work that way. The license does not allow, say, 5GB of addresses and 4GB of RAM. It's "whatever you can manage to do, within a 4GB address range". 6) If your video card has 512MB of memory on it, addresses are needed to access it. These nibble away at your address space. So if you had one PCI Express register, that takes 256MB. If the card has 512MB of video RAM, then the addresses needed would cover 512MB as well, reducing system RAM that can be seen and used. The end result is, if you install 4GB of DIMMs, with the right hardware, you're down to 3GB mapped, just like that. And if you install two NVidia cards in SLI, with 512MB of memory on each card, before you know it, Windows reports only 2.75GB of system memory is available. In fact, if you were to install one of the really modern video cards, one with 4GB or 6GB of video RAM on it, WinXP would not be able to boot at all :-) Clever, what ? ******* Your memory is registering just fine. Welcome to Windows. Paul |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
RAM & Browser revisited
In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:29:22
+0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote: In message , micky writes: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on 18 Aug 2015 16:46:08 GMT, KenK wrote: Last Saturday I finally upgraded the XP RAM from 500M to 2G. No more Firefox browser complaints. No more slow computer complaints. A vast improvement in performance. Like a new system Yes, can be amazing! Congratulations. Coincidentally, last Saturday I noticed that only 3G of my 4G are still registering. I wonder when that started, and if it's the cause of some of my problems. Are you sure 4G once registered? 99.95% sure. AIUI, XP - at least, 32 bit - can't use quite 4G; it can only _address_ 4G, but some of that is occupied by Yes, that's my understanding too, but I'm just reporting what it says on the General Tab of Properties for My Computer. I'm 99% sure that says 4G if you have 4G even though windows dpes have limits on what it uses. hardware, so you can only access about 3.5G (or on some systems, 2G). [] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
RAM & Browser revisited
micky wrote:
In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:21:58 -0400, micky wrote: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on 18 Aug 2015 16:46:08 GMT, KenK wrote: Last Saturday I finally upgraded the XP RAM from 500M to 2G. No more Firefox browser complaints. No more slow computer complaints. A vast improvement in performance. Like a new system Congratulations. Coincidentally, last Saturday I noticed that only 3G of my 4G are still registering. I wonder when that started, and if it's the cause of some of my problems. I tried pushing the simms in farther, but that didn't work, so later I'll take the simms out and put them back in again. I also noticed just now that the harddrive light was flashing even though I wasn't doing anything. Checkeing the task manager I saw that MsMpEng.exe was running a lot. I'd never heard of that before but it turned out to be the Windows Defender scanner, or something from that program. I thought I got rid of that. It has no icon i the systray like it used to. And the task manager in the programs tab did't show it running. What's going on????? But I found it in All Programs and started the interface and turned off the scanning and the 2AM scan. I'm often up trying to use the computer then. Did I mention I Have AVG too? ----- Separately I looked in msinfo and there were 8 new programs in the startup page, all of them related to new all-in-one printer I installed. I looked in the software and couldnt' find any way to turn any of them off, so I just unchecked them in msinfo. Good enough? I figure they will start when I need them. Am I right? Is there a way to know which one isn't registering. I have memtest, for example. Will it tell me? The things you disabled might stay off. Printer software is not like malware - it doesn't necessarily have multiple means to put back the stuff that users turn off :-) ******* You can use CPU-Z to verify the contents of the DIMM slots. The "memory" tab shows the detected RAM. (Whereas the System control panel shows the usable RAM, as does Task Manager in its own way.) Windows doesn't generally like to admit to the physical configuration that is present. http://www.cpuid.com/downloads/cpu-z/cpu-z_1.73-en.zip Paul |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
RAM & Browser revisited
In message , Paul
writes: [] 6) If your video card has 512MB of memory on it, addresses are needed to access it. These nibble away at your [] you install two NVidia cards in SLI, with 512MB of memory on each card, before you know it, Windows reports only 2.75GB of system memory is available. In fact, if you were to install one of the really modern video cards, one with 4GB or 6GB of video RAM on it, WinXP would not be able to boot at all :-) Clever, what ? [] I'm sure you are right, but it didn't have to be so; I always understood that video RAM was to be used (and thus addressed) by the processor on the video card, and didn't have to be _all_ individually addressable by the main processor. Pity that isn't the case. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf so that the vendors can "serve you better". As if you were a tennis ball, I guess. - Wolf K, in alt.windows7.general, 2014-7-21 |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
RAM & Browser revisited
In message , Paul
writes: [] You can use CPU-Z to verify the contents of the DIMM slots. The "memory" tab shows [] Belarc Advisor too. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf so that the vendors can "serve you better". As if you were a tennis ball, I guess. - Wolf K, in alt.windows7.general, 2014-7-21 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
RAM & Browser revisited
In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:37:04
-0400, Paul wrote: micky wrote: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:21:58 -0400, micky wrote: In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on 18 Aug 2015 16:46:08 GMT, KenK wrote: Last Saturday I finally upgraded the XP RAM from 500M to 2G. No more Firefox browser complaints. No more slow computer complaints. A vast improvement in performance. Like a new system Congratulations. Coincidentally, last Saturday I noticed that only 3G of my 4G are still registering. I wonder when that started, and if it's the cause of some of my problems. I tried pushing the simms in farther, but that didn't work, so later I'll take the simms out and put them back in again. I also noticed just now that the harddrive light was flashing even though I wasn't doing anything. Checkeing the task manager I saw that MsMpEng.exe was running a lot. I'd never heard of that before but it turned out to be the Windows Defender scanner, or something from that program. I thought I got rid of that. It has no icon i the systray like it used to. And the task manager in the programs tab did't show it running. What's going on????? But I found it in All Programs and started the interface and turned off the scanning and the 2AM scan. I'm often up trying to use the computer then. Did I mention I Have AVG too? ----- Separately I looked in msinfo and there were 8 new programs in the startup page, all of them related to new all-in-one printer I installed. I looked in the software and couldnt' find any way to turn any of them off, so I just unchecked them in msinfo. Good enough? I figure they will start when I need them. Am I right? Is there a way to know which one isn't registering. I have memtest, for example. Will it tell me? The things you disabled might stay off. Restarted just now, after a couple hours of use, and they're still unchecked. Later I'll look at what's actually running. Printer software is not like malware - it doesn't necessarily have multiple means to put back the stuff that users turn off :-) ******* You can use CPU-Z to verify the contents of the DIMM slots. The "memory" tab shows the detected RAM. (Whereas the System control panel shows the usable RAM, as does Task Manager in its own way.) Windows doesn't generally like to admit to the physical configuration that is present. http://www.cpuid.com/downloads/cpu-z/cpu-z_1.73-en.zip Great. Downloading it next. Thanks, Paul. Paul |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
RAM & Browser revisited
In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, on Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:23:59
+0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote: In message , Paul writes: [] You can use CPU-Z to verify the contents of the DIMM slots. The "memory" tab shows [] Belarc Advisor too. Hey, I have that already! I should run that once in a while. And it turns out, it shows each SIMIM but cpu-z only shows the total. And it turns out, I only have 512 in two of the slots! So I only have 3Gig and that's all I ever had in this one! Thanks. You've saved me the trouble and possible problems of removing each simm and putting it in again. I guess when I got the box it had 1 gig and I added 2. Another small reason to upgrade the computer. BTW, this belongs in another thread, but I still can't boot without the Hiren's CD. I found a webpage for Dell saying three ways to reset the BIOS, as advised here,= and I've done the first and third and nothing changed. **The first was just an F key while in the BIOS, and that worked because it changed the booting order of two things, but it didnt' start better. So then they had something about jumpers, but the diagram for my mobo didn't show the right jumper. So the third method, which it said reset more than the jumper method, was to unplug the cord, remove the battery, hold the on button in for at least 10 seconds to zero out the voltage there, and I did that and it forgot the date and time so it must have worked. But it boots no better. Another small reason to get a newer computer. I actually have one already. I just have to set aside time to move everything to it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|