If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
tl;dr:
On 21-May-18 10:42 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2018 08:02:55 +0100, "David B." wrote: On 20-May-18 12:02 PM, Wolffan wrote: On 20 May 2018, David B. wrote (in article ): On 19/05/2018 16:21, Shadow wrote: On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:22:39 +0100, "David B." wrote: Do YOU agree with the prognosis/speculation of CUT_PERSONAL_NAME ? Don't know. Put YOUR technical opinion here and we'll discuss it. I'm assuming you are not posting OT, in which case you will probably be ignored. That is the rc.common script, which should be found he /etc/rc.common This is a script that is no longer used on modern macOS, but it's still present. It can be a means for providing persistence to malware (malware can add malicious lines of code to this script). However, I've tested this on systems from 10.7 and up, and that no longer works. I have been unable to get custom code added to rc.common to actually run on those systems. = That seems an adequate answer! :bananas: Gee, trollboy, weren’t you bloviating about how it might have been an eeeeevil malware script which might/might not have been dropped onto your system by that well-known (to you, anyway) malware distribution tool EtreCheck? Why, yes you were, in between more bloviating about ClamXAV and how _that_ is an even greater eeeeevil malware distribution tool. You’re a lying scumbag troll, and dimmer than a yard up a pig’s ass. Less hygienic, too. Good morning, 'sock' - how sad it is that you feel a need to hide your identity. Makes STALKING hard, heh ? It IS the norm on Usenet, though, for that very reason. (and weird, coming from someone with 20 nyms.) I'll simply refer you to Steve's post, he- Message-ID: YMMV -- David B. |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
tl;dr:
On 22 May 2018, David B. wrote
(in article ): On 21-May-18 11:27 PM, Wolffan wrote: On 21 May 2018, David B. wrote (in article ): True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's obtained from the 'App Store'. oh? Really? Where is this stated? Please ask your question on the Apple Support Communities forums. In other words you cannot support your statement, trollboy. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
tl;dr:
On 23-May-18 3:37 AM, Wolffan wrote:
On 22 May 2018, David B. wrote (in article ): On 21-May-18 11:27 PM, Wolffan wrote: On 21 May 2018, David B. wrote (in article ): True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's obtained from the 'App Store'. oh? Really? Where is this stated? Please ask your question on the Apple Support Communities forums. In other words you cannot support your statement, trollboy. If you stop being so rude, we'll get on far better, sock. Here’s how to manage your privacy. You’ll learn how to keep your devices, data and Apple ID secure, along with how to avoid phishing scams and how to control what you share and with whom. https://www.apple.com/uk/privacy/manage-your-privacy/ HTH HAND -- David B. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
tl;dr:
In article , David B.
wrote: True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's obtained from the 'App Store'. oh? Really? Where is this stated? Please ask your question on the Apple Support Communities forums. In other words you cannot support your statement, trollboy. If you stop being so rude, we'll get on far better, sock. then stop trolling. Here¹s how to manage your privacy. You¹ll learn how to keep your devices, data and Apple ID secure, along with how to avoid phishing scams and how to control what you share and with whom. privacy is not the issue and has absolutely nothing to do with your ignorant and baseless claim that apple's advice is to not install non-store apps. you are wrong. again. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
tl;dr:
On 23-May-18 2:57 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2018 06:25:16 +0100, "David B." wrote: [....] Here’s how to manage your privacy. You’ll learn how to keep your devices, data and Apple ID secure, along with how to avoid phishing scams and how to control what you share and with whom. Applies to any OS, and completely OT to your statement. Where does it say "Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's obtained from the 'App Store'." ??? It doesn't. Made you look though! :-P https://www.apple.com/uk/privacy/manage-your-privacy/ While you are at it, explain *WHY* you keep adding alt.comp.os.windows-10 to an APPLE discussion ? It's *MY* discussion and *I* use Windows 10. alt.comp.os.windows-10 reinstated. HTH -- David B. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
tl;dr:
On 23-May-18 7:17 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2018 18:16:37 +0100, "David B." wrote: On 23-May-18 2:57 PM, Shadow wrote: On Wed, 23 May 2018 06:25:16 +0100, "David B." wrote: [....] Here’s how to manage your privacy. Applies to any OS, and completely OT to your statement. Where does it say "Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's obtained from the 'App Store'." ??? It doesn't. Made you look though! I didn't, the link was a commercial link about privacy, not apps or policy. You SHOULD have looked. You would have learned some interesting things about Apple. It's still not too late:- https://www.apple.com/uk/privacy/manage-your-privacy/ I don't click on your links, unless I'm absolutely certain they are not spam/malicious (which they usually are, from comments from other posters). Then why bother trying to correspond with me? While you are at it, explain *WHY* you keep adding alt.comp.os.windows-10 to an APPLE discussion ? It's *MY* discussion and *I* use Windows 10. No, this is a public forum, you don't *own* anything. The fact that you can't abide by the *good-guy* rules and respect others is why you have been *BANNED* from so many places. I *DO* use Windows 10 - and I have NOT been banned from Usenet. You most certainly formed some odd views when you were in prison. You remind me so much of a fellow who once posted on Usenet as Aardvark. I must email his local pub again to see if he's still alive. It's eight years now since he came to visit me on my boat. -- David B. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On 22-May-18 11:46 PM, Shadow wrote:
PS Please stop removing my anti-STALKING warning. No. You are misleading people. It's tedious to have to paste it in every time I reply to your phishing/spamming/stalking/copyright infringement posts. TIA Hard cheese! Your warning has become tedious. To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s The site is NOT safe according to this warning. https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4...29.tiff?d l=0 -- David B. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On 2018-05-23 1:08 PM, David B. wrote:
On 22-May-18 11:46 PM, Shadow wrote: Â*Â*Â*Â*PS Please stop removing my anti-STALKING warning. No. You are misleading people. It's tedious to have to paste it in every time I reply to your phishing/spamming/stalking/copyright infringement posts. Â*Â*Â*Â*TIA Hard cheese! Your warning has become tedious. To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. Â*Â*Â*Â*[]'s The site is NOT safe according to this warning. https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4...29.tiff?d l=0 You are a liar. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
tl;dr:
On 23 May 2018, David B. wrote
(in article ): On 23-May-18 3:37 AM, Wolffan wrote: On 22 May 2018, David B. wrote (in article ): On 21-May-18 11:27 PM, Wolffan wrote: On 21 May 2018, David B. wrote (in article ): True, but Apple's advice is to install *NO* software unless it's obtained from the 'App Store'. oh? Really? Where is this stated? Please ask your question on the Apple Support Communities forums. In other words you cannot support your statement, trollboy. If you stop being so rude, we'll get on far better, sock. Doubt it, trollboy. You simply lie too damn much. Here’s how to manage your privacy. You’ll learn how to keep your devices, data and Apple ID secure, along with how to avoid phishing scams and how to control what you share and with whom. https://www.apple.com/uk/privacy/manage-your-privacy/ Still no nothing showing where Apple advised to install no software unless it’s obtaioned from the App Store. This would be because Apple has never, ever, made any such statement. And you’re a lying scumbag troll. HTH Didn’t answer the question. But you knew that, trollboy. HAND A good day would be the day that you stop posting to usenet. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
tl;dr:
In article s.com,
Wolffan wrote: On 23 May 2018, David B. wrote ... A good day would be the day that you stop posting to usenet. an even better day would be the day he stops using the internet entirely. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
"David B."
news alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 22-May-18 11:46 PM, Shadow wrote: PS Please stop removing my anti-STALKING warning. No. You are misleading people. How's that? It's tedious to have to paste it in every time I reply to your phishing/spamming/stalking/copyright infringement posts. TIA Hard cheese! Your warning has become tedious. The warning is valid. You're a potential danger to other people and their privacy. To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s The site is NOT safe according to this warning. You're lying about that, again. You've already been made aware of the fact that the tool you used is well known for generating false positives and other errors. You've also been told that it's a false positive hit on the tekrider site. And, various urls have been provided which back the statements up. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php ================================================== = Joshu's dog is chasing Scroedinger's cat around the yard again! |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On 24-May-18 5:31 PM, Diesel wrote:
"David B." news alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 22-May-18 11:46 PM, Shadow wrote: PS Please stop removing my anti-STALKING warning. No. You are misleading people. How's that? It's tedious to have to paste it in every time I reply to your phishing/spamming/stalking/copyright infringement posts. TIA Hard cheese! Your warning has become tedious. The warning is valid. You're a potential danger to other people and their privacy. To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net The site is safe. 10/10 on WOT. []'s The site is NOT safe according to this warning. You're lying about that, again. You've already been made aware of the fact that the tool you used is well known for generating false positives and other errors. You've also been told that it's a false positive hit on the tekrider site. And, various urls have been provided which back the statements up. Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? "Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net# |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
David B. STALKER wrote:
On 24-May-18 5:31 PM, Diesel wrote: "David B." wrote: The site is NOT safe according to this warning. You're lying about that, again. You've already been made aware of the fact that the tool you used is well known for generating false positives and other errors. You've also been told that it's a false positive hit on the tekrider site. And, various urls have been provided which back the statements up. Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? "Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" Ho hum. Nothing more or different than the hundreds of other sites and forums where you have been BANNED. I've been ignoring you for quite some time now; how about YOU do the same for *me*. -- -bts - owner, tekrider.net |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
On 24-May-18 10:29 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. STALKER wrote: On 24-May-18 5:31 PM, Diesel wrote: "David B." wrote: The site is NOT safe according to this warning. You're lying about that, again. You've already been made aware of the fact that the tool you used is well known for generating false positives and other errors. You've also been told that it's a false positive hit on the tekrider site. And, various urls have been provided which back the statements up. Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? "Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" Ho hum. Nothing more or different than the hundreds of other sites and forums where you have been BANNED. I've been ignoring you for quite some time now; how about YOU do the same for *me*. Once you've removed my 'Special Page' from your web site I'll take the pressure off you. How do you feel about that? -- David B. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri Warning (was tl;dr:)
David B. STALKER wrote:
On 24-May-18 10:29 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David B. STALKER wrote: [....] Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? "Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" Ho hum. Nothing more or different than the hundreds of other sites and forums where you have been BANNED. I've been ignoring you for quite some time now; how about YOU do the same for *me*. Once you've removed my 'Special Page' from your web site I'll take the pressure off you. LOL! The only reason you even HAVE this 'Special Page' is because you have *earned it.* Everything on the page is true. You have (often) been told the page will go away if and when you *STOP STALKING*. http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php How do you feel about that? I will let you know when you stop. -- -bts |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|