If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
On 2/9/14 10:14 AM, BillW50 wrote:
"Ken Springer" wrote in message ... On 2/8/14 9:02 AM, BillW50 wrote: On 2/8/2014 8:35 AM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: In message , BillW50 writes: "VanguardLH" wrote in message ... snip All very good and valid points Ken. Although here are some others things you can chew over. And yes, I do use the software that came with the meter and I personally find it very useful myself. And you don't have to input any data, as a cable runs between the meter and the computer. Then it downloads everything and imports it into the program. The problem is some doctors doesn't understand the data in this format and confuses them, go figure. I have Abbott's FreeStyle Lite meter, and used to use the Pro (for lack of a better descriptor) version of the software. I finally tired of dealing with it, especially keeping track of what foods I ate, when, etc. And, I never really could get into analyzing the results, so gave up. Plus, they don't have a Mac version of the software, and I got tired of using a separate computer of a VM just for this. What I've learned, for me, is physical activity is the best for keeping sugar down, assuming you do eat sensibly. So I now have a job as a janitor, which gives me lots of physical activity. But the body is hugely interconnected in its systems. I've had low testosterone levels for more years than I can remember, and one day I did some research. Found out, before the commercials hit the air, it can affect mood, energy, blood sugar, and blood pressure. When I learned that, at the next doctor's appointment, I told him "Let's fix this." And that has upset the whole apple cart!!! Ever since, even though I haven't changed any daily habits, with the physical activity, I sometimes will have a hard time keeping the sugar UP! There will be times when the sugar level approaches 50 and I don't know it, and it used to be when it got to the low 70's I would start to sweat, feel weak, and get the shakes. What they like to see is the commonly found log sheets. Sure I suppose you can create one using a word processor that supports tables. Although I prefer using a spreadsheet. Sure I can print a log without any data and fill it in by hand. Then later enter this data into the spreadsheet. Of course, it also uses the data and creates averages, max and min, etc. So in my case, printing empty log sheets or filled in logs from Excel makes total sense. It does, but that's because you do calculations on the data collected. But, suppose you simply need a simple check in/check out sheet to make sure every visitor that came has also left? Something for which there is no need for further use. For the average user, who probably uses a word processor more than a spreadsheet, I think tables is the better solution. Although you mentioned using the meter's software. And now that I think about it, it acts more or less like a database vs. a spreadsheet. So I was thinking if I could be doing this on a database instead? Surprisingly, I think that would work well too. Even printing blank log sheets too. In the above, if you define database as a collection of data to be manipulated, you're absolutely right. That's the purpose of database software. But with the dearth of inexpensive and easy to use database programs, plus people's ignorance of them, there aren't many programs around. Remember Apples HyperCard? Everyone seemingly could use it with little problem. I didn't own a Mac back then. I don't think there's anything quite like it anymore. :-( On Windows, for an old fashioned nonrelational database program, I liked Database Oasis when I was looking for a solution for church records for my brother-in-law. Report generator limitations at the time kept me from using it. I don't know what it's like now, other than more expensive. On the cheap relational database end, there is Brilliant Database. I found it hard to understand and set up. Plus, the report generator would only pull data from one database without some fancy scripts or something. Not suitable for the BIL, so it was eliminated. Finally found a simple dedicated church software, but it is/was buggy, and is no longer supported, and I can't find it on the web at all. Apple has FileManager Pro, for both OS X and Windows. Apple bought it, and the BIL used it many years ago. If I get back to trying to create something for him, I'm going to check it out. Here is something else to think about. I know lots of people and say my accountant friends who live in Excel all day long. And they will use Excel for tasks that you and I won't even bother with. I guess they know it so well, it just makes sense to them. I suspect that also factors into the lack of use of a database program. And with MS dropping works, which had a database component, plus vendors not including packaged software anymore, even fewer people know what database software is, or any of its advantages. Heck I used to use WordStar for both light duty database and spreadsheet use too. It could only add a column of numbers for spreadsheet use. Although for database, you could sort on any column. So you could sort any field of data. Word also can do this and do more than just adding columns of numbers. ;-) And I use tables in this manner too. Usually, the data in the table includes too few entries to make the creation of a database the practical solution. -- Ken Mac OS X 10.8.5 Firefox 24.0 Thunderbird 24.0 |
Ads |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
"Ken Springer" wrote in message ... On 2/9/14 10:14 AM, BillW50 wrote: "Ken Springer" wrote in message ... On 2/8/14 9:02 AM, BillW50 wrote: On 2/8/2014 8:35 AM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: In message , BillW50 writes: "VanguardLH" wrote in message ... snip All very good and valid points Ken. Although here are some others things you can chew over. And yes, I do use the software that came with the meter and I personally find it very useful myself. And you don't have to input any data, as a cable runs between the meter and the computer. Then it downloads everything and imports it into the program. The problem is some doctors doesn't understand the data in this format and confuses them, go figure. I have Abbott's FreeStyle Lite meter, and used to use the Pro (for lack of a better descriptor) version of the software. I finally tired of dealing with it, especially keeping track of what foods I ate, when, etc. And, I never really could get into analyzing the results, so gave up. Plus, they don't have a Mac version of the software, and I got tired of using a separate computer of a VM just for this. I have an Abbott Precision Xtra which uses PrecisionLink (I think that is what it is called) software. And it runs on virtually any Windows version (new and old). What I've learned, for me, is physical activity is the best for keeping sugar down, assuming you do eat sensibly. So I now have a job as a janitor, which gives me lots of physical activity. I did a lot of experimenting with insulin, food, exercise, etc. And while experimenting, I was checking it almost every hour. I learned quite a lot and I pretty much know ahead of time what my blood glucose will be for the next 24 hours. And in that time, it usually will fall between 80 to 130. But the body is hugely interconnected in its systems. I've had low testosterone levels for more years than I can remember, and one day I did some research. Found out, before the commercials hit the air, it can affect mood, energy, blood sugar, and blood pressure. When I learned that, at the next doctor's appointment, I told him "Let's fix this." I don't recall ever having my testosterone levels checked. Everything else is doing just fine though. And that has upset the whole apple cart!!! Ever since, even though I haven't changed any daily habits, with the physical activity, I sometimes will have a hard time keeping the sugar UP! There will be times when the sugar level approaches 50 and I don't know it, and it used to be when it got to the low 70's I would start to sweat, feel weak, and get the shakes. Oh yes, and the symptoms can change over time. In the beginning my body just shutdown. Meaning I would just drop and I couldn't move or talk. Although later I could feel it like 3 minutes before it happened. Nowadays I feel it about 30 minutes before it drops low enough to cause a problem. So that is plenty of time to get some carbs. And yes, I could be in the 50's today and I don't know it either. As long as it is stable and holding then I don't know it. I only feel it if it is dropping over time. And yes, I too felt like you did in the 70's in the beginning too. What they like to see is the commonly found log sheets. Sure I suppose you can create one using a word processor that supports tables. Although I prefer using a spreadsheet. Sure I can print a log without any data and fill it in by hand. Then later enter this data into the spreadsheet. Of course, it also uses the data and creates averages, max and min, etc. So in my case, printing empty log sheets or filled in logs from Excel makes total sense. It does, but that's because you do calculations on the data collected. But, suppose you simply need a simple check in/check out sheet to make sure every visitor that came has also left? Something for which there is no need for further use. For the average user, who probably uses a word processor more than a spreadsheet, I think tables is the better solution. Although you mentioned using the meter's software. And now that I think about it, it acts more or less like a database vs. a spreadsheet. So I was thinking if I could be doing this on a database instead? Surprisingly, I think that would work well too. Even printing blank log sheets too. In the above, if you define database as a collection of data to be manipulated, you're absolutely right. That's the purpose of database software. But with the dearth of inexpensive and easy to use database programs, plus people's ignorance of them, there aren't many programs around. Yes so true. Remember Apples HyperCard? Everyone seemingly could use it with little problem. I didn't own a Mac back then. I don't think there's anything quite like it anymore. :-( Vaguely, but I couldn't tell you anything about it. On Windows, for an old fashioned nonrelational database program, I liked Database Oasis when I was looking for a solution for church records for my brother-in-law. Report generator limitations at the time kept me from using it. I don't know what it's like now, other than more expensive. On the cheap relational database end, there is Brilliant Database. I found it hard to understand and set up. Plus, the report generator would only pull data from one database without some fancy scripts or something. Not suitable for the BIL, so it was eliminated. Finally found a simple dedicated church software, but it is/was buggy, and is no longer supported, and I can't find it on the web at all. Apple has FileManager Pro, for both OS X and Windows. Apple bought it, and the BIL used it many years ago. If I get back to trying to create something for him, I'm going to check it out. The only ones I know and have used is dBase, GeoFile, Works, and Access. Here is something else to think about. I know lots of people and say my accountant friends who live in Excel all day long. And they will use Excel for tasks that you and I won't even bother with. I guess they know it so well, it just makes sense to them. I suspect that also factors into the lack of use of a database program. And with MS dropping works, which had a database component, plus vendors not including packaged software anymore, even fewer people know what database software is, or any of its advantages. If one really wanted Works, I would guess eBay probably still has lots of them. Don't know if there are problems running them under Windows 7 or 8. Vista and Windows 7 users are lucky as they can run the free MS Office 2010 Starter. It came with one of my machines and I don't use it a lot, but it doesn't seem too bad for a lite version of Office. Doesn't have Access though. Heck I used to use WordStar for both light duty database and spreadsheet use too. It could only add a column of numbers for spreadsheet use. Although for database, you could sort on any column. So you could sort any field of data. Word also can do this and do more than just adding columns of numbers. ;-) And I use tables in this manner too. Usually, the data in the table includes too few entries to make the creation of a database the practical solution. Yes, exactly. -- Bill Gateway M465e ('06 era) - Windows Live Mail 2009 v14 Centrino Core2 Duo T7400 2.16 GHz - 4GB - Windows 7 Home SP1 |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
On Sun, 9 Feb 2014 12:46:46 -0500, "Mayayana"
wrote: | Sorry, I expressed myself badly. Visual Studio 2012 is the | only one available from MS ATM, but it probably compiles under the | previous versions. | Update: I found the 2008, 2010 and 2012 editions on MS | servers. All are 600-900 Mb isos. Wondering if they are worth my while | installing. VS or VC? Express or regular? I mostly use VB6 and only installed VC Express for little things like editing Sumatra. I don't remember exactly what the licensing terms are. I don't think there are any notable restrictions on VC Express, though it's possible that there's a non-commercial clause. All 3 are Express, and apparently give you a choice of components. So I could install just the C++ compiler. But it's a lot of software for just compiling Sumatra ..... All of them are free, 2010 and 2012 require a Microsoft account to obtain a license If you work in C++ and want an IDE/compiler then VC Express seems to be a good bargain. And a lot of OSS source code comes as one or more VC project version. Unfortunately, Microsoft keeps changing things around, so it can be a pain to convert a project from one version to another. | I fired up Ollydbg and removed the restriction on copying text | in about 3 minutes. It's a one-byte edit. Search for: | "Copying text was denied (copying as image only)" | the jump above that, make it unconditional. | I'm using v2.5.8*** portable. | That's impressive. I'll have to look into Ollydbg. The edit I had made in the source code was to just skip calling the functions to check the flags and assign "no restrictions" values to those variables. http://www.ollydbg.de/version2.html Load SumatraPDF.exe right click code window ---- search for ---- all referenced strings CTRL-F "denied" CTRL-L till you find "Copying text was denied" F2 puts a breakpoint on the line right click that and "follow in disassembler" A tutorial will help This will wrap badly: CPU Disasm Address Hex dump Command Comments 004272C5 |. 8B08 MOV ECX,DWORD PTR DS:[EAX] 004272C7 |. 8B11 MOV EDX,DWORD PTR DS:[ECX] 004272C9 |. 8B42 50 MOV EAX,DWORD PTR DS:[EDX+50] 004272CC |. FFD0 CALL EAX ---- checks if protected 004272CE |. 84C0 TEST AL,AL ----- make it 1 004272D0 |. 75 1F JNZ SHORT 004272F1 ------or just unconditional jump 004272D2 |. 6A 01 PUSH 1 004272D4 |. 6A 00 PUSH 0 004272D6 |. 6A 01 PUSH 1 004272D8 |. B8 6C258400 MOV EAX,OFFSET 0084256C ; ASCII "Copying text was denied (copying as image only)" 004272DD |. E8 9ED40100 CALL 00444780 | I use 17 ESR. Yep, I know it's backdoored, but so are the more | recent ones. I don't understand. Could you explain that? Is 17 ESR a version of Firefox? Firefox is backdoored? Yes, it's a version for businesses, and only has security updates, no feature updates. Which makes bug control easier. http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.o...efox/releases/ Search for ESR. Latest is v24x Google "tor backdoor firefox esr". Mozilla built a backdoor into Firefox ESR, which gave the FBI the urls typed into the address line. So they could figure out who you were. It was fairly quickly white-hatted, but speaks badly of Mozilla. Also shows the NSA is more about businesses than terrorism. I doubt if terrorists or even pedophiles use ESR versions. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
| I don't understand. Could you explain that?
| Is 17 ESR a version of Firefox? Firefox is | backdoored? | | Yes, it's a version for businesses, and only has security | updates, no feature updates. Which makes bug control easier. | | http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.o...efox/releases/ | | Search for ESR. Latest is v24x Thanks. I'll give it a try. I'd never heard of ESR before. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
On 2/9/14 1:46 PM, BillW50 wrote:
"Ken Springer" wrote in message ... On 2/9/14 10:14 AM, BillW50 wrote: "Ken Springer" wrote in message ... On 2/8/14 9:02 AM, BillW50 wrote: On 2/8/2014 8:35 AM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: In message , BillW50 writes: "VanguardLH" wrote in message ... snip All very good and valid points Ken. Although here are some others things you can chew over. And yes, I do use the software that came with the meter and I personally find it very useful myself. And you don't have to input any data, as a cable runs between the meter and the computer. Then it downloads everything and imports it into the program. The problem is some doctors doesn't understand the data in this format and confuses them, go figure. I have Abbott's FreeStyle Lite meter, and used to use the Pro (for lack of a better descriptor) version of the software. I finally tired of dealing with it, especially keeping track of what foods I ate, when, etc. And, I never really could get into analyzing the results, so gave up. Plus, they don't have a Mac version of the software, and I got tired of using a separate computer of a VM just for this. I have an Abbott Precision Xtra which uses PrecisionLink (I think that is what it is called) software. And it runs on virtually any Windows version (new and old). That may be what I have too. There are two versions for my meter, one that talks to your doctor and/or hospital, and one that doesn't. What I've learned, for me, is physical activity is the best for keeping sugar down, assuming you do eat sensibly. So I now have a job as a janitor, which gives me lots of physical activity. I did a lot of experimenting with insulin, food, exercise, etc. And while experimenting, I was checking it almost every hour. I learned quite a lot and I pretty much know ahead of time what my blood glucose will be for the next 24 hours. And in that time, it usually will fall between 80 to 130. But the body is hugely interconnected in its systems. I've had low testosterone levels for more years than I can remember, and one day I did some research. Found out, before the commercials hit the air, it can affect mood, energy, blood sugar, and blood pressure. When I learned that, at the next doctor's appointment, I told him "Let's fix this." I don't recall ever having my testosterone levels checked. Everything else is doing just fine though. Get it checked, if for no other reason than to know there's no issue. Then, if you're happy with how you feel, leave well enough alone. And that has upset the whole apple cart!!! Ever since, even though I haven't changed any daily habits, with the physical activity, I sometimes will have a hard time keeping the sugar UP! There will be times when the sugar level approaches 50 and I don't know it, and it used to be when it got to the low 70's I would start to sweat, feel weak, and get the shakes. Oh yes, and the symptoms can change over time. In the beginning my body just shutdown. Meaning I would just drop and I couldn't move or talk. Although later I could feel it like 3 minutes before it happened. Nowadays I feel it about 30 minutes before it drops low enough to cause a problem. So that is plenty of time to get some carbs. And yes, I could be in the 50's today and I don't know it either. As long as it is stable and holding then I don't know it. I only feel it if it is dropping over time. And yes, I too felt like you did in the 70's in the beginning too. I never reacted that badly. But before the testosterone prescription, I'd get the sweats and such in the 70's area. Now, it's got to get around 20 points lower. snip Remember Apples HyperCard? Everyone seemingly could use it with little problem. I didn't own a Mac back then. I don't think there's anything quite like it anymore. :-( Vaguely, but I couldn't tell you anything about it. Try this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMFscTOazS0 You won't get far into it before you realize it's a relational database, but with an interface that made sense to the ordinary person. You didn't have to be a semi-programmer to use it, like using dBase. Back then, before organizations got computerized, a fireman in an Anchorage, AK station started tracking the SCBA requirement for his station. And it got passed around to other stations. I may still have that HyperCard stack on a floppy here. The Atari platform had a couple of developers who were "cloning" HyperCard, I think it was called HyperLink but I can't find out anything at the moment. I had a copy of the software, but got rid of it long ago. Sadly, they never finished the project. From the website, I wonder if Filemanager Pro works similar. This is interesting... http://atarimagazines.com/startv2n3/hypercard.html On Windows, for an old fashioned nonrelational database program, I liked Database Oasis when I was looking for a solution for church records for my brother-in-law. Report generator limitations at the time kept me from using it. I don't know what it's like now, other than more expensive. On the cheap relational database end, there is Brilliant Database. I found it hard to understand and set up. Plus, the report generator would only pull data from one database without some fancy scripts or something. Not suitable for the BIL, so it was eliminated. Finally found a simple dedicated church software, but it is/was buggy, and is no longer supported, and I can't find it on the web at all. Apple has FileManager Pro, for both OS X and Windows. Apple bought it, and the BIL used it many years ago. If I get back to trying to create something for him, I'm going to check it out. The only ones I know and have used is dBase, GeoFile, Works, and Access. I've got dBase and an Atari clone for it. Works somewhere, but an old copy. And Access from various versions of Office. Geofile... Any chance that ran under Geoworks from Berkeley Software? I've got a copy of Geoworks I want to try to install in a VM someday. Same for OS/2 Warp 4. Here is something else to think about. I know lots of people and say my accountant friends who live in Excel all day long. And they will use Excel for tasks that you and I won't even bother with. I guess they know it so well, it just makes sense to them. I suspect that also factors into the lack of use of a database program. And with MS dropping works, which had a database component, plus vendors not including packaged software anymore, even fewer people know what database software is, or any of its advantages. If one really wanted Works, I would guess eBay probably still has lots of them. Don't know if there are problems running them under Windows 7 or 8. Vista and Windows 7 users are lucky as they can run the free MS Office 2010 Starter. It came with one of my machines and I don't use it a lot, but it doesn't seem too bad for a lite version of Office. Doesn't have Access though. Heck I used to use WordStar for both light duty database and spreadsheet use too. It could only add a column of numbers for spreadsheet use. Although for database, you could sort on any column. So you could sort any field of data. Word also can do this and do more than just adding columns of numbers. ;-) And I use tables in this manner too. Usually, the data in the table includes too few entries to make the creation of a database the practical solution. Yes, exactly. -- Ken Mac OS X 10.8.5 Firefox 24.0 Thunderbird 24.0 |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] Atlantis Word Processor
On Sun, 9 Feb 2014 18:31:57 -0500, "Mayayana"
wrote: | I don't understand. Could you explain that? | Is 17 ESR a version of Firefox? Firefox is | backdoored? | | Yes, it's a version for businesses, and only has security | updates, no feature updates. Which makes bug control easier. | | http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.o...efox/releases/ | | Search for ESR. Latest is v24x Thanks. I'll give it a try. I'd never heard of ESR before. And now for something completely different SumatraPDF, PORTABLE version, tried 3 versions 2.4, all have this string: 8B088B118B4250FFD084C075 HxD it to 8B088B118B4250FFD084C0EB 75 = conditional jump EB = unconditional jump Text copy enabled. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
dBase, GeoFile, Works, and Access [ Atlantis Word Processor]
"Ken Springer" wrote in message ... On 2/9/14 1:46 PM, BillW50 wrote: The only ones I know and have used is dBase, GeoFile, Works, and Access. I've got dBase and an Atari clone for it. Works somewhere, but an old copy. And Access from various versions of Office. Geofile... Any chance that ran under Geoworks from Berkeley Software? I've got a copy of Geoworks I want to try to install in a VM someday. Same for OS/2 Warp 4. Yes the very same GeoFile. I had the Commodore 64/128 versions and I bought everything they put out (about $1000 worth of software in total). If these are the ones you are talking about, they are now available for free and runs under a Commodore Emulator. Later they produced two versions for the PC (v1 and v2). I never had the first one, but the second one was called GEOS Ensemble v2. That one I used a lot. Nor was it expensive like the Commodore ones and it included all of the applications in the package (for Commodore, you purchased them all separately). There was a later one called NewDeal, but it seemed more like a repackaged v2 to me. It should run on modern computers that can run DOS software. It was just a shell on top of DOS, like Windows used to do. There was a few changes to ini files I think for faster computers. It also might have to be on a FAT16/32 partition. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEOS_(...erating_system) Oh the database for GEOS on the Commodores was called GeoFile, on the PC it was renamed as GeoDex. -- Bill Gateway M465e ('06 era) - Windows Live Mail 2009 v14 Centrino Core2 Duo T7400 2.16 GHz - 4GB - Windows 7 Home SP1 |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] Atlantis Word Processor
| SumatraPDF, PORTABLE version, tried 3 versions 2.4, all have this
| string: | | 8B088B118B4250FFD084C075 | | HxD it to | | 8B088B118B4250FFD084C0EB | | 75 = conditional jump | EB = unconditional jump | | Text copy enabled. Thanks. I can guess what you're doing, but I don't really understand it because I don't have any real experience with assembly language. I'll have to stick with the source code. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] Atlantis Word Processor
Shadow wrote:
On Sun, 9 Feb 2014 18:31:57 -0500, "Mayayana" wrote: | I don't understand. Could you explain that? | Is 17 ESR a version of Firefox? Firefox is | backdoored? | | Yes, it's a version for businesses, and only has security | updates, no feature updates. Which makes bug control easier. | | http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.o...efox/releases/ | | Search for ESR. Latest is v24x Thanks. I'll give it a try. I'd never heard of ESR before. And now for something completely different SumatraPDF, PORTABLE version, tried 3 versions 2.4, all have this string: 8B088B118B4250FFD084C075 HxD it to 8B088B118B4250FFD084C0EB 75 = conditional jump EB = unconditional jump Text copy enabled. []'s That's not always going to help you, thanks to the work of this dude. The guy noticed you could have one thing showing on the screen (readable text), and when the copy feature is used, present scrambled text to the copy buffer. http://spivey.oriel.ox.ac.uk/corner/Obfuscated_PDF I've seen and worked on such a document, and it took about two weeks of work, with some scripts, to undo the scrambling. It means there is at least one word processing tool out there, that can produce a document, where you're wasting your time removing the copy prevention flag. Because the material to be copied, is obfuscated. I would agree with Mayayana, that OCR is your "last best hope" when stuff like this happens. It's slightly more practical, than what I was doing. Paul |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
dBase, GeoFile, Works, and Access [ Atlantis Word Processor]
On 2/10/14 6:36 AM, BillW50 wrote:
"Ken Springer" wrote in message ... On 2/9/14 1:46 PM, BillW50 wrote: The only ones I know and have used is dBase, GeoFile, Works, and Access. I've got dBase and an Atari clone for it. Works somewhere, but an old copy. And Access from various versions of Office. Geofile... Any chance that ran under Geoworks from Berkeley Software? I've got a copy of Geoworks I want to try to install in a VM someday. Same for OS/2 Warp 4. Yes the very same GeoFile. I had the Commodore 64/128 versions and I bought everything they put out (about $1000 worth of software in total). If these are the ones you are talking about, they are now available for free and runs under a Commodore Emulator. I never owned or used a Commodore product, although we got a Vic 20 for my mother. I've forgotten how that came about. Later they produced two versions for the PC (v1 and v2). I never had the first one, but the second one was called GEOS Ensemble v2. That one I used a lot. Nor was it expensive like the Commodore ones and it included all of the applications in the package (for Commodore, you purchased them all separately). There was a later one called NewDeal, but it seemed more like a repackaged v2 to me. What I have is probably v1, as it's called Geoworks Pro. A cursory look finds no mention of v1 or 2 on the Geoworks components. It should run on modern computers that can run DOS software. It was just a shell on top of DOS, like Windows used to do. There was a few changes to ini files I think for faster computers. It also might have to be on a FAT16/32 partition. I would like to install it in VM program here, just haven't gotten to it. HP had a competing desktop environment called HP New Wave. I'd like to find a copy of that, as well as DesqView. I do have a copy of Norton Desktop, and actually installed it at work, on a government computer. Really liked it over Windows for Workgroups. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEOS_(...erating_system) Oh the database for GEOS on the Commodores was called GeoFile, on the PC it was renamed as GeoDex. -- Ken Mac OS X 10.8.5 Firefox 24.0 Thunderbird 24.0 |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] Atlantis Word Processor
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:36:28 -0500, Paul wrote:
That's not always going to help you, thanks to the work of this dude. The guy noticed you could have one thing showing on the screen (readable text), and when the copy feature is used, present scrambled text to the copy buffer. http://spivey.oriel.ox.ac.uk/corner/Obfuscated_PDF I've seen and worked on such a document, and it took about two weeks of work, with some scripts, to undo the scrambling. It means there is at least one word processing tool out there, that can produce a document, where you're wasting your time removing the copy prevention flag. Because the material to be copied, is obfuscated. I would agree with Mayayana, that OCR is your "last best hope" when stuff like this happens. It's slightly more practical, than what I was doing. Yep. Though I had to search through a collection of pdfs before I came across one with simple "text copy disallowed". If I ever do come across one obfuscated by the idiot, I'll just print it. Unless that is obfuscated too. I've never understood the reason behind disallowing text copying. Everyone wants you to quote their work. The whole point of PDFs is not allowing people to change the contents of the original. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
dBase, GeoFile, Works, and Access [ Atlantis Word Processor]
"Ken Springer" wrote in message ... On 2/10/14 6:36 AM, BillW50 wrote: [...] I never owned or used a Commodore product, although we got a Vic 20 for my mother. I've forgotten how that came about. I really enjoyed the VIC-20, C64, SX64, C128, and the C128D in the 80's and early 90's. I used them more than my PCs and CP/M machines. Although the 128's also ran CP/M too. {...} What I have is probably v1, as it's called Geoworks Pro. A cursory look finds no mention of v1 or 2 on the Geoworks components. Yes Geoworks Pro didn't mention the version like the later ones. It should run on modern computers that can run DOS software. It was just a shell on top of DOS, like Windows used to do. There was a few changes to ini files I think for faster computers. It also might have to be on a FAT16/32 partition. I would like to install it in VM program here, just haven't gotten to it. HP had a competing desktop environment called HP New Wave. I'd like to find a copy of that, as well as DesqView. I do have a copy of Norton Desktop, and actually installed it at work, on a government computer. Really liked it over Windows for Workgroups. Yes I really enjoyed using them. I think they would have gone much further if they went to an 32 bit OS and used protected mode. Heck if they did, we might be all running GEOS today. ;-) -- Bill Gateway M465e ('06 era) - Windows Live Mail 2009 v14 Centrino Core2 Duo T7400 2.16 GHz - 4GB - Windows 7 Home SP1 |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] Atlantis Word Processor
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:48:46 -0200, Shadow wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:36:28 -0500, Paul wrote: That's not always going to help you, thanks to the work of this dude. The guy noticed you could have one thing showing on the screen (readable text), and when the copy feature is used, present scrambled text to the copy buffer. http://spivey.oriel.ox.ac.uk/corner/Obfuscated_PDF I've seen and worked on such a document, and it took about two weeks of work, with some scripts, to undo the scrambling. It means there is at least one word processing tool out there, that can produce a document, where you're wasting your time removing the copy prevention flag. Because the material to be copied, is obfuscated. I would agree with Mayayana, that OCR is your "last best hope" when stuff like this happens. It's slightly more practical, than what I was doing. Yep. Though I had to search through a collection of pdfs before I came across one with simple "text copy disallowed". If I ever do come across one obfuscated by the idiot, I'll just print it. Unless that is obfuscated too. What about printing to PDF? The target PDF doesn't inherit the restrictions of its parent, does it? |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] Atlantis Word Processor
Char Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:48:46 -0200, Shadow wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:36:28 -0500, Paul wrote: That's not always going to help you, thanks to the work of this dude. The guy noticed you could have one thing showing on the screen (readable text), and when the copy feature is used, present scrambled text to the copy buffer. http://spivey.oriel.ox.ac.uk/corner/Obfuscated_PDF I've seen and worked on such a document, and it took about two weeks of work, with some scripts, to undo the scrambling. It means there is at least one word processing tool out there, that can produce a document, where you're wasting your time removing the copy prevention flag. Because the material to be copied, is obfuscated. I would agree with Mayayana, that OCR is your "last best hope" when stuff like this happens. It's slightly more practical, than what I was doing. Yep. Though I had to search through a collection of pdfs before I came across one with simple "text copy disallowed". If I ever do come across one obfuscated by the idiot, I'll just print it. Unless that is obfuscated too. What about printing to PDF? The target PDF doesn't inherit the restrictions of its parent, does it? I think that option is normally disabled. The closest I could get, was installing a PostScript print driver, do a print to file, then re-distill. And even that doesn't always work, as things can be generated on output which don't distill well. And if you check for modern "PostScript" print drivers, they generate bitmap PostScript and not regular PostScript, to prevent you from "doing your laundry" with the driver :-) If you distill such a PostScript output file, it's like a bunch of pictures. Doing a text search no longer works. And the output is only fit for OCR processing, if that. They think of just about everything :-) It's a matter of "hack it, if you can". I've been dragging the same old PostScript driver for Windows around for years, for this very purpose. Doing my laundry. WinXP is the last place I could make it work. Paul |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] Atlantis Word Processor
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:44:05 -0600, Char Jackson
wrote: Yep. Though I had to search through a collection of pdfs before I came across one with simple "text copy disallowed". If I ever do come across one obfuscated by the idiot, I'll just print it. Unless that is obfuscated too. What about printing to PDF? The target PDF doesn't inherit the restrictions of its parent, does it? Tried that, it prints to an image, 5 times the size of the original PDF. Flipping the no-copy-text jump does not help. For all you windows lovers, here is the 2Mb .pdf I tested on: http://principledtechnologies.com/Mi...affic_0613.pdf []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|