(OT) Error message when using Safari

David wrote:
On 31/12/2019 12:14, Paul wrote:
David wrote:
On 31/12/2019 10:06, David wrote:
Randy Knobloch (aka: Siljaline)

Please explore!

https://www.google.com/search?q=Rand...A+Siljaline%29

Any thoughts?

Anyone?


They're obviously all lizard people.

And no question, this hobby is a lot more fun than stamp collecting.

It is indeed!

I understand the lizard people have to go back to
Arcturus once in a while to molt, and that's probably
why Googling them isn't working.

You should switch over to Bigfoot googling for a while.
Here is a recent sighting.

https://duckduckgrayduck.files.wordp...foot.jpg?w=584

Paul

Ha! :-) I can see the resemblance!!!

What do you make of this stamp from my collection, Paul?

https://i.imgur.com/eRBOSHJ.png (Items in red are 'malicious')

It's a serious question!

David

So you've scanned a site that has blog posts and who
knows, maybe forum posts, and some link points off into
the boonies. I can't see where the "bad" entries are
coming from. Some of the detections, are obvious
false positives (low rep AV products). Some lit up like
a Christmas tree, but on the face of it are Android
applications (perhaps). Who takes Android apps off
random web sites exactly ? That's what the Google Store
and its ilk are for. Where ever that content is
coming from (maybe some blog reference), the content
in the red circles involves Chinese text, so it's
not likely to be primary content from the site.

Not everything that appears on a webpage on
Virustotal is "golden" information. Lots of
stuff requires interpretation, in the sense
that some of the providers of information
have "low rep" and couldn't punch their way
out of a wet paper bag.

You need to trace those bunches of red circles
down to a particular web page or web site and
see where the reference comes from. I tried but
I can't see how that map was built and what leads
off to the bunches of circles. If there are pointers
to a collection of Chinese stuff, that's probably
not an ordinary entry on some web page.

Fortunately, your target site doesn't have
advertising, and unvetted advertising can be
chock full of red circles and dodgy stuff
(Adobe Flash scripting).

Paul

On 31/12/2019 19:08, Paul wrote:
David wrote:
On 31/12/2019 12:14, Paul wrote:
David wrote:
On 31/12/2019 10:06, David wrote:
Randy Knobloch (aka: Siljaline)

Please explore!

https://www.google.com/search?q=Rand...A+Siljaline%29

Any thoughts?

Anyone?


They're obviously all lizard people.

And no question, this hobby is a lot more fun than stamp collecting.

It is indeed!

I understand the lizard people have to go back to
Arcturus once in a while to molt, and that's probably
why Googling them isn't working.

You should switch over to Bigfoot googling for a while.
Here is a recent sighting.

https://duckduckgrayduck.files.wordp...foot.jpg?w=584

Â*Â*Â* Paul

Ha! :-)Â* I can see the resemblance!!!

What do you make of this stamp from my collection, Paul?

https://i.imgur.com/eRBOSHJ.pngÂ*Â* (Items in red are 'malicious')

It's a serious question!

Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* David

So you've scanned a site that has blog posts and who
knows, maybe forum posts, and some link points off into
the boonies. I can't see where the "bad" entries are
coming from. Some of the detections, are obvious
false positives (low rep AV products). Some lit up like
a Christmas tree, but on the face of it are Android
applications (perhaps). Who takes Android apps off
random web sites exactly ? That's what the Google Store
and its ilk are for. Where ever that content is
coming from (maybe some blog reference), the content
in the red circles involves Chinese text, so it's
not likely to be primary content from the site.

Not everything that appears on a webpage on
Virustotal is "golden" information. Lots of
stuff requires interpretation, in the sense
that some of the providers of information
have "low rep" and couldn't punch their way
out of a wet paper bag.

Understood.

You need to trace those bunches of red circles
down to a particular web page or web site and
see where the reference comes from. I tried but
I can't see how that map was built and what leads
off to the bunches of circles. If there are pointers
to a collection of Chinese stuff, that's probably
not an ordinary entry on some web page.

Fortunately, your target site doesn't have
advertising, and unvetted advertising can be
chock full of red circles and dodgy stuff
(Adobe Flash scripting).

Â*Â* Paul

Thanks for taking a look, Paul.
I'll spend a little more time digging and see what I unearth.

Happy New Year! :-)

--
David

David news Mon, 30 Dec 2019 10:40:19 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 30/12/2019 06:42, Diesel wrote:
David
Sat, 28 Dec 2019 09:47:04 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
[....]
The whole defamatory article about me was put on line for
spite - in retaliation for me finding malware on the Tekrider
site.

That's not possible. The very public timeline doesn't match your
latest, known to be false, claim, David.

You specifically requested he bring the site online. After he did
so, you tried to have the site removed, many times. When those
efforts failed, you concocted the malware story to try and deter
others from visiting the site and learning more about you and
your true nature.

There was never any malware on the site, and the site didn't come
into fruition after your malware claim, it came into being long
before it.

And you say you're honest.. ROFL!

You seem rather confused, Dustin.

I'm not confused, David.

The 'tekrider' site was put on-line way back in 2008 to promote
the MVP website.

The domain was brought online, years prior to your proven to be
false claims concerning malware ever being found on the tekrider
domain, correct.

Your page, a specific url on the 'site' (or domain if you'd prefer)
is not defamatory (it doesn't contain lies and/or falsehoods
concerning you, David. Every single sentence on the site
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php is a proven
to be true and one hundred percent accurate
statement concerning you AND your known activities and actions
you've taken as well as continue to take towards others. You
*SPECIFICALLY* challenged the site/domain owner AND demanded they
create the public warning concerning you. They only did, after a
considerable amount of prodding by you beforehand, as you demanded
of them, David.

At no time though, have they published anything which isn't true
about you. Sadly, everything that's available concerning you on

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

and

https://web.archive.org/web/20191209135823/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Is *ALL KNOWN TO BE TRUE* statements concerning you. It's quite
shameful that you're so proud to be such a person, David. Imho.

In other words, Your above story is a known, LIE. The site and your
special page existed BEFORE you made any claims of malware being
present via any specific urls or contained on the tekrider domain in
any way shape or form.

There's nothing defamatory in the material concerning you available
he

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

and

https://web.archive.org/web/20191209135823/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

The publisher/authors of said material aren't like you. By that I
mean, they fact check before publishing, and ONLY PUBLISH KNOWN TO
BE FACTUAL information on the subject matter. YOU, on the other
hand, have been caught publishing lies that you knew for a fact
prior to publishing were LIES, but you went and did it anyway.

The owner of the website, a shyster known only as Beauregard T.
Shagnasty (-bts) has no faith in Microsoft Windows system and he,
himself, uses only Linux distros.

I really don't know why Mike Easter hasn't gone ahead and called you
out for the lies you write before doing so as recently as he has. I
realize, you've tied his hands for the most part by continuing to
demonstrate that what myself and others have been writing about you
is true...You're really throwing him under the bus here, David. He
was, in fairness, warned as he began that you would.

He can claim you're incorrectly labeled a stalker, etc, all he
likes. He only looks more of a fool when he does so, and I suspect,
that's the real reason he's decided to opt for calling your lies out
for what they are, in plain english no less. You were never bullied
by me, or anybody else that I know of, and, Mike Easter recently
admitted you provided an illusion (due to your own behavior towards
others!) of being bullied, when in reality, what he incorrectly (and
tried to defend!) saw as bullying by me was nothing more than a
response to your actual, real life, STALKING efforts taken against
me.

He can't dismiss those bad acts on your part. Those usenet posts
exist, your admissions that you did exactly what I thought you did
and why (some years after the fact) aren't something he can explain
away for you. You sunk yourself on that, and his **** poor defense
of your bad acts against myself and others right along with it.
Leaving him looking like an assclown.

Had he been your lawyer, David, he would have advised you to shut
the **** up and not answer/respond to any of my queries.

What I found on Bts's website was _/*a link to the script*/_ which
in turn leads to malicious websites and I apologise if I didn't
make that clear.

You found nothing of the sort. I'll explain it again for you, for my
own personal amusement though. And, it's another opportunity to rub
Mikes poor decision to defend and excuse your repeated bad acts.
Again.

You found NON FUNCTIONAL marquee 'html code' present at some point;
which didn't do anything, couldn't have done anything, wasn't in any
possible way malicious and didn't point to anything else malicious.

So, you JUST LIED AGAIN, David. What's worse, is, you know you're
lying as you write the material. And you post it anyway, KNOWING IN
ADVANCE it contains lies written by you, intentionally.

The image I copied - a screenshot - was NOT altered or changed in
any way by anyone - contrary to the recent lie expounded by
'Shadow'.

I've yet to find a single lie that I can attribute to Shadow, or
most of the other regular posters here. I can just about, almost
there, rightfully label Mike Easter as a liar, along with you,
though. I'm looking forward to the point when I can rightfully give him that label, too.

Hey, look at it this way; I'm not trying to be sneaky about my
dislike and intentions towards him. I'm not, say, trying to play
innocent, after 300+ posts in a thread, silently accuse him of
something while passing it off as a 'helpful' reply to a line wrap
issue. G

Now, don't get me wrong David, I can be as shady as the best of you,
on your best days, without really trying that hard; I'm a still a
grayhat after all. But, I like being able to remind you that i'm a
hacker, and still took the higher road compared to you or Mike
Easter. I can't tell you how good I feel knowing i'm the better
person, despite my known background. G It doesn't say anything
positive for either of you though. It really doesn't.



--
All probabilities are 50%. Either a thing will happen or it won't. This is especially true when dealing with someone you're attracted to.

David
Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:38:03 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 30/12/2019 15:10, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David , an astute investigator, wrote:

You seem rather confused, Dustin.

The 'tekrider' site was put on-line way back in 2008 to promote
the MVP website.

Lie.

Absolutely not! What OTHER purpose does it serve?!!!

Yes, your entire post is a lie. You fabricated all of the details
that you wrote he

Message-ID:

The whole defamatory "article" about me was put on line for spite -
in retaliation for me finding malware on the Tekrider site.

*** end paste

It's a known, and easily proven to be, lie on your part, David. Your
special page existed for a considerable amount of time before you
began making wild and unfounded claims of malware being present or
hosted on the tekrider domain.

There's nothing defamatory written about you on the site, according
to established definitions to the word. Mike Easter and Apd have
dictionaries which are 1st and only editions, so there's might agree
with you. Nobody elses will.

You cannot erase the past, m8!

Yes, you've learned this, finally; the hard way. You cannot erase
your known history of stalking, trespassing, copyright infringing,
excessively abusive due to excessive long term alcohol consumption.
NOTHING you ever do from this point forward is ever going to make up
for the things you did to people, irl, in your own inner circle,
while three sheets to the wind, drunk off your ****ing ass, David.

The great thing about the Internet is that it keeps a great record
of the truth. Other folk who don't REALLY know me can educate
themselves he-

They sure can:

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=david+broo...stalker&ia=web

First THREE links provided are WARNINGS FOR OTHERS concerning you. It
looks like your efforts to google **** me, much like your doxing
efforts did, are blowing up, quite nicely, IN YOUR ****ING FACE.

When are you going to learn not to play games with people like me
David? You WILL ALWAYS LOSE. - Since I'm not the shady ****er you
make me out to be, I'll just tell you now, in fairness; I plan to see
Mike Easter and Ant come up, automatically, right along side you;
Anyone who defends the **** you do should be known to others just as
you are, so they can be avoided, as you should be, for the safety,
and personal privacy of the other. I told you, I wasn't going to let
known to be false statements written about me just 'go' without a
response for it. and, if you think I bought the innocent post:

Mike Easter
Sun, 22 Dec 2019 17:05:07 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote:
This reply is not to your content, but to the wrapping problem,
which discussion arose in the android group.

I don't have a Win Opera Mail 1, but I have tested a linux Opera
Mail:

Opera 12.16 M2 Mail (linux): Tool icon for news account in the
folder pane for Mail (or R click for context menu): Account
properties window/ Outgoing tab/ Check 'automatically wrap
outgoing messages' .

The troll of many nyms has had the same line wrap issue brought to
his/her attention many times. There's no ****ing way, based on how to
the point, some might say, anal retentive M.E tends to be for details
that he somehow didn't notice for 300+ posts in one thread alone, and
randomly! selected some negative post towards me written by CK to let
him know he had a line wrap problem? I'm not buying that, David.

It's right along the same lines as this statement Mike Easter wrote,
previously:

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155278479000

OUAT onceuponatime BD mistreated/used various public personae,
then/now Diesel bullies BD (and others), now various mail2news
anonymizer/s bully Diesel.

*** end paste

Not only has M.E (Mike Easter) written such CONFIRMED BULL**** about
me, they went so far as to defend their statements when questioned
about it by two other people, upto a point where they backed off and
opted to go the ignore it and hope it goes away routine (it's not
going to work) - writing more **** as shown above, and again,
ignoring any inquiries I specifically raise to it. Recently, M.E told
another poster that they respond to the post contents, and the
attribution lines really don't matter that much.

If he was being honest, he wouldn't have written such bull****; he
clearly doesn't believe it, he's evasive with me concerning anything
I write, or ask him about in a reply to something he's written.

It sounds as if your life has just been one long holiday!

Much longer than that kid of yours was, eh? G If only parental
neglect which results in death was easier to succesfully prosecute.
None of us would have had the misfortune of ever knowing you had it
been. You'd likely, still be in prison for the homicide via willful
neglect of your son.

Maybe if you didn't start on the, 3rd, or was it the 4th bottle
earlier in the day? You might? have been sober enough to notice, oh,
maybe, he was kinda pale/ash looking and sought medical attention.
You know, when it would have, mattered the most; when he still had a
heartbeat and measurable brain waves, I mean.

When you went to the grave site to deposit him into his forever home,
did you apologize for sending him there so early? If you did, did you
basically fake it for your wife and other family members benefit?

David, has anyone else commented on your sociopathic behaviors, in
person I mean; and don't lie! What I'm asking specifically, is have
more than a xxx amount of people, in a non joking around with you
manner, once while on your boat, ever ask if you might have been
diagnosed as a sociopath? Think carefully before you answer. This is
one of those questions I already know the answer to, I just want to
see if you're actually lame enough to lie to me about this too.

Yes, I know, it's only going to be my word against yours. I don't
care, I'm not trying to prove anything to anyone else here and I'm
not even going to bring it up again, I just want to prove a point to
some very specific people who are lurking (You requested the rest of
us come, so, everyone is now available and lurking in 'your'
newsgroup. The stage is yours, you are free to make as much of an ass
of yourself as you like. Let everyone else in HHI see for themselves
that nothing I've shared with them via irc/email was taken out of
context; it's really you and how you are. G

I have a bet going with another member of HHI; I've got five bucks
that says you're going to deny deny deny. (They were on conference
call with me and your umm, 'friends' hehehehe) and they think, since
it doesn't matter and you can play it off as a a joke over a pint
that you might, just to **** with me, admit it. So, the bet is on.

This is going to be the easiest ****ing five i've ever made for doing
absolutely nothing. G


--
Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects.

Shadow
Mon, 30 Dec 2019 23:52:38 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 23:38:41 +0000, David
wrote:

On 30/12/2019 22:56, Mike Easter wrote:
wrote:
Can you explain why he feels the need to keep disrupting topics
on uk.comp.sys.mac? They mostly consist of lively technical
debates which anyone who knows little or nothing of the topic
would surely ignore.

*- BD/David has no respect for usenet or its conventions. he
*uses*
groups disrespectfully to further his interests
*- exactly *what* his 'interests' are is part of the analytical
puzzle,
which involves the mystery of his /intent/
*- what he believes or pretends to believe is part of the
mystery of
why and how he tells the untruths
*- cross-posting off-topic to various groups is a part of
seeking a
larger platform to convey whatever it is he is trying to convey,
which falls into the puzzle category

You don't normally respond to Trolls, Mike. THAT is a puzzle.

No, the "puzzle" is why YOU didn't reply to M.E.'s post.
It will remain a "puzzle" to M.E. until you explain your
"puzzling" behavior.

I have a puzzle too. I'm puzzled as to why M.E wrote these two posts,
yet, will not, respond to any replies I write concerning them?

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155278479000

OUAT onceuponatime BD mistreated/used various public personae,
then/now Diesel bullies BD (and others), now various mail2news
anonymizer/s bully Diesel.

*** end paste

And

Mike Easter
Sun, 22 Dec 2019 17:05:07 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote:
Why any sane person ever gave you a job after writing a virus I
don't know.¶ÿ Nobody with any sense would allow someone like you
anywhere near their systems.¶ÿ How can they be sure you won't
take it out on them when there's a dispute with management?¶ÿ Or
did you hide your history?

This reply is not to your content, but to the wrapping problem,
which discussion arose in the android group.

I don't have a Win Opera Mail 1, but I have tested a linux Opera
Mail:

Opera 12.16 M2 Mail (linux): Tool icon for news account in the
folder pane for Mail (or R click for context menu): Account
properties window/ Outgoing tab/ Check 'automatically wrap
outgoing messages' .


*** end paste

I have a slight issue with the idea that Mike's reply to CK was
random and had nothing to do with the material he felt appropriate to
leave quoted; a nice, potshot, specifically directed at me. CK has
known about his wordwrap issues going back thousands, yes, thousands
of posts. This thread is over 300+ on it's own, and CK's first post
to it:

Message-ID: op.0b04w1bqwdg98l@glass

Had the same line wrap problem that Mike Easter, three hundred some
odd posts into this thread alone, has just now noticed? and decided
to bring to ck's attention; naturally randomly? (I don't buy that)
responding to a post by CK, sliming me...

PS Don't bother *LYING* to me. I know what a sociopath is,
*LIE* to M.E.

He has been the entire time. Nothings changed.

It's what a sociopath does.

Amongst other things, yes.

Tell me, what is the proper definition for another individual who
sees fit over a period of time, to defend such an individual? Upto
and including attempting to redefine the word, stalker, bully, etc?
It's a serious, legitimate question. As a professional in the medical
field.

---------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing
to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's
request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

64 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s



--
For reply, send a self-abused stomped antelope to:

Mike Easter
Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:15:45 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

David wrote:
Mike Easter wrote:
wrote:
Can you explain why he feels the need to keep disrupting topics
on uk.comp.sys.mac? They mostly consist of lively technical
debates which anyone who knows little or nothing of the topic
would surely ignore.

There is nothing trollish about the content of the above msg
query.

Â*Â*- BD/David has no respect for usenet or its conventions. he
*uses* groups disrespectfully to further his interests
Â*Â*- exactly *what* his 'interests' are is part of the
analytical puzzle, which involves the mystery of his /intent/
Â*Â*- what he believes or pretends to believe is part of the
mystery of why and how he tells the untruths
Â*Â*- cross-posting off-topic to various groups is a part of
seeking a larger platform to convey whatever it is he is trying
to convey, which falls into the puzzle category

You don't normally respond to Trolls, Mike. THAT is a puzzle.

No; I respond to msg *CONTENT* not to the attribution line's
author. Categorizing a particular poster as a troll or not is most
often misused; as I prefer the classical definition of a troll. A
usenet msg takes place on a public 'bulletin board' for everyone
to see; the attribution author isn't necessarily material to the
exchange.

Mike,

A slight correction is in order here. You selectively respond to
message content. You do consider the attribution lines author when
making the decision to respond or not, along with the message
contents, but not always. I've noticed that if the message contents
specifically disagree with your opinion of something, and get
specific as to why they don't; you're far LESS likely to respond to
the message 'contents'. I've also noticed that you have developed a
tendency to write posts that you're unwilling to discuss. I question
the point in doing this, if you're unwilling/unable to backup what
you opt to post?

Such, as this:

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155278479000

OUAT onceuponatime BD mistreated/used various public personae,
then/now Diesel bullies BD (and others), now various mail2news
anonymizer/s bully Diesel.

*** end paste

Your post wasn't directed to me, but it was certainly your opinion
concerning how you felt I treated another poster, and your opinion as
to why you felt the remailing coward was flooding a particular
newsgroup. I obviously took issue with what you wrote above, and
stated why I did, several times. At no time, did you ever, respond to
any posts *I* specifically wrote on the subject matter; but you did,
initially, try to defend what you wrote when others asked you,
essentially the same thing as myself, and also pointed out that you
were way off base and in factual error concerning what you wrote.

The icing on the cake, concerning my opinion that you wrote it to
troll is the individual, out of all possible individuals, you
selected to reply to and write that opinion. A specific individual I
have a long time, known history with.

I also don't think you selected this reply from CK to comment on his
word wrap issue at random; especially considering that by the time
you bothered to mention it and a suggested fix, the thread is well
over 300+ posts in!

And well, he's had this problem for a very long time. It's been
brought to his attention, many times before. He doesn't fix it, on
purpose.

Mike Easter
Sun, 22 Dec 2019 17:05:07 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote:
Why any sane person ever gave you a job after writing a virus I
don't know.¶ÿ Nobody with any sense would allow someone like you
anywhere near their systems.¶ÿ How can they be sure you won't
take it out on them when there's a dispute with management?¶ÿ Or
did you hide your history?

This reply is not to your content, but to the wrapping problem,
which discussion arose in the android group.

I don't have a Win Opera Mail 1, but I have tested a linux Opera
Mail:

Opera 12.16 M2 Mail (linux): Tool icon for news account in the
folder pane for Mail (or R click for context menu): Account
properties window/ Outgoing tab/ Check 'automatically wrap
outgoing messages' .


*** end paste

If one were to check your posting history, going back only a few
months in this newsgroup alone (alt.computer.workshop); they wouldn't
be able to reach the same conclusion as you have above.

On the other hand, as one might be able to see by the questions I've
raised along with sharing a couple of your own comments, that one
could easily, mistake (perhaps not) your posts for that of
intentional trolling?

I have seen w/ my OWN EYES your examples of posting 'disrupting
topics' all over usenet for YEARS. I don't need to ask anyone for
examples.

If that's the case, why did you defend him and dismiss his actions as
that of a misunderstood, misguided individual? Why are you only
changing your tune, ever so slightly, AFTER several regulars began
questioning your, umm, unique definition to stalker, bully, etc?

Does your change in attitude have more to do with other regulars
questioning what you've been writing, or the fact that Apd/Ant is no
longer attempting to defend David Brooks in the same manner as you
both did initially? In other words, is him basically smartening up,
fast, and realizing what's going on, and basically leaving you to
fend for yourself in any way, possibly, the cause of your change in
attitude? It's a recent change.. It is very curious.

What is YOUR interest in following me around the Internet as you
have done for years, Mike. Explain THAT to the Troll, please.

Consider me one of your observers who has unsuccessfully attempted
to guide you to better behavior for years. I can join that panel
of amateur psychologists who try to figure out the mystery of your
behavior and your lies.

By unsuccessful, do you mean to say that you weren't successful in
white washing his stalking/bullying background and have been unable
to change others opinions of him for the better, despite the effort
you put forth?


--
Where does the fire go when the fire goes out?

Shadow
Tue, 31 Dec 2019 01:02:31 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:15:45 -0800, Mike Easter
wrote:

David wrote:
Mike Easter wrote:
wrote:
Can you explain why he feels the need to keep disrupting
topics on uk.comp.sys.mac? They mostly consist of lively
technical debates which anyone who knows little or nothing of
the topic would surely ignore.

There is nothing trollish about the content of the above msg
query.

**- BD/David has no respect for usenet or its conventions. he
*uses* groups disrespectfully to further his interests
**- exactly *what* his 'interests' are is part of the
analytical puzzle, which involves the mystery of his /intent/
**- what he believes or pretends to believe is part of the
mystery of why and how he tells the untruths
**- cross-posting off-topic to various groups is a part of
seeking a larger platform to convey whatever it is he is trying
to convey, which falls into the puzzle category

You don't normally respond to Trolls, Mike. THAT is a puzzle.

No; I respond to msg *CONTENT* not to the attribution line's
author. Categorizing a particular poster as a troll or not is most
often misused; as I prefer the classical definition of a troll. A
usenet msg takes place on a public 'bulletin board' for everyone
to see; the attribution author isn't necessarily material to the
exchange.

From the Troll's header: Injection-Info:
google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.241.249.42

Using a proxy and GG to post to usenet is 'dumb' IMO. The msg
content however was OK; correct and salient and worth replying.

You COULD have explained that I post in the 'uk.comp.sys.mac'
group because I use Apple products and live in the UK

When you post on-topic, that is one thing; however when you
recklessly x-post off-topic is quite another. So, you are telling
another one of your 'untruths' - LIE - in that the msg in question
has NOTHING to do w/ the mac .uk group's purpose. That is the
point.

You COULD ask the Troll to provide examples of me supposedly
"disrupting topics" on the aforementioned group.

I have seen w/ my OWN EYES your examples of posting 'disrupting
topics' all over usenet for YEARS. I don't need to ask anyone for
examples.

What is YOUR interest in following me around the Internet as you
have done for years, Mike. Explain THAT to the Troll, please.

Consider me one of your observers who has unsuccessfully attempted
to guide you to better behavior for years. I can join that panel
of amateur psychologists who try to figure out the mystery of your
behavior and your lies.

It's impossible to "cure" a sociopath.
Just accept him for what he is.

Notice he didn't answer a single one of your questions?

Quite the opposite, he accused one poster of being a troll(
R.
Soul's post was ON TOPIC, so not a troll), and you of "stalking"
him.
That's typical sociopathic behavior. He really does think
there's nothing wrong with his behavior. Nothing you say will
convince him otherwise.

Shadow! C'mon, now you're being a bully! Not only to David Brooks,
but to Mike Easter as well! Don't phrase your questions to Mike with
such a sarcastic and bully tone to them as you did he

"Notice he didn't answer a single one of your questions?

Mike Easter is well aware of the fact he stepped into a big pile of
**** when he tried to tell us all that David isn't a stalker, that he
was a misunderstood, and often bullied individual.

It's rude of us, no, it's bullish of us to rub his nose into that. We
should just 'let it go' and Mike Easter should be able to brush it
off, pretend it never happened and just go on. To hold him
accountable for his words/actions is tantamount to bullying him. And,
this is a 'safe space'; we can't be having that!

---------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing
to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's
request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

64 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s

Shadow, I just told you not to be a bully!


--
If 7-11s are open 24 hours, why do they have door-locks?