Nominations still being accepted for the MSMVPHOS!

DQoiTGV5dGhvcyIgPHZvaWRAbm93aGVyZS5sYW4+IHdyb3RlIG luIG1lc3NhZ2UgbmV3czpwYW4u
MjAwNS4wMi4yMS4yMy4wMS41Ny40NDEwNDJAbm93aGVyZS5sYW 4uLi4NCj4gDQo+IEFjdHVhbGx5
LCBJJ3ZlIHdhbGtlZCB0aGUgc3RyZWV0cyBhdCBuaWdodCBpbi BhbGwgb2YgdGhvc2UgbG9jYXRp
b25zIGluDQo+IHRoZSBsYXN0IGNvdXBsZSB5ZWFycywgYW5kIG 5ldmVyIGhhZCBhIHByb2JsZW0g
aW4gYW55IG9mIHRoZW0gLSBldmVuIGFsbw0KDQoNCldoYXQgd2 VyZSB5b3Ugd2VhcmluZz8gWW91
ciBzaXN0ZXJzIG1pbmkgZHJlc3MgYW5kIGhlZWxzLiBIb3cgbX VjaCBkaWQgeW91IG1ha2U/IERp
ZCBpdCBjb3ZlciB0aGUgY29zdCBvZiB5b3VyIGxpY2Vuc2UgdG 8gdXNlIE1pY3Jvc29mdCBwcm9k
dWN0cz8/Pz8/Pz8/DQoNCg0KRm9yIENocmlzdCdzIHNha2UsIGdpcmxzLCBnZXQgYS BsaWZlLg==

Oh my.....where did this thread begin and how did I miss it?

As per reading the top five posts, I agree with all said about David Candy.

--
All the Best,
Kelly (MS-MVP)

Troubleshooting Windows XP
http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com


"Its only me" wrote in message
...

"Leythos" wrote in message
news

Actually, I've walked the streets at night in all of those locations in
the last couple years, and never had a problem in any of them - even alo


What were you wearing? Your sisters mini dress and heels. How much did you
make? Did it cover the cost of your license to use Microsoft
products????????


For Christ's sake, girls, get a life.

Pj5JcmFxIHdhcyBzcG9uc29yaW5nL2hhcmJvcmluZyB0ZXJyb3 Jpc3RzIHRoYXQga2lsbCBBbWVy
aWNhbnMgYW5kIG90aGVyDQpjb3VudHJpZXMgaW5ub2NlbnQgcG VvcGxlcy4gV2UgZGlkbid0IHN0
ZXAgaW4gdW50aWwgaXQgaGl0IGhvbWUuIFNhbWUgd2l0aA0KQW ZnaGFuaXN0YW4gYW5kIHRoZW4g
bmV4dCB3aXRoIFN5cmlhLCBOb3J0aCBLb3JlYSwgYW5kIHRoZW 4gQ2hpbmEuLi4NCg0KDQpUaGUg
SVJBIHdhcywgYW5kIHN0aWxsIGlzLCBtdXJkZXJpbmcgcGVvcG xlIHdob2xlc2FsZSBpbiBOb3J0
aGVybiBJcmVsYW5kLiBZb3UgRipea2luZyBhbWVyaWNhbnMgZG lkIHRoZSBvbmx5IHRoaW5nIHlv
dSBhbHdheXMgZG8sIFlPVSBTVVBQT1JURUQgVEhFIEJBU1RBUk RTIGFuZCBzdGlsbCBkby4gRG9u
J3QgZ2l2ZSBtZSB5b3VyIHByb3BhZ2FuZGEuIEFtZXJpY2EgaX MgdGhlIGJpZ2dlc3QgdGVycm9y
aXN0IG9mIGFsbC4gT25seSByZWFzb24geW91J3JlIGluIElyYX EsICBBZmdhbmlzdGFuIGFuZCB3
YW50IElyYW4sIGlzIGJlY2F1c2UgdGhleSBoYXZlIG9pbC4gDQ oNCk5vdyBjcmF3bCBiYWNrIGlu
dG8gd2hhdGV2ZXIgaG9sZSB5b3UgY3Jhd2xlZCBvdXQgb2YgYW 5kIEkgaG9wZSBpdCBjYXZlcyBp
biBvbiB5b3UuIFBSSUNLISEh

David Candy wrote:
Gates isn't the greatest prophet, He is yet to come. But Gates will
return on the Day of Sucess and and help the Messiah and computers
will become user friendly. Saint Steve Balmer will guide us
unworthies till then. But don't expect it in our time.

But there are challenges, the infidels of Linus. But Soldiers of
Gates, we defeated the infidels of Lotus, the infidels of
WordPerfect, and the infidels of Netscape.

One will arise among you, Yea, He shall carry the Cursor of Truth and
wield it without mercy. He will be the greatest Prophet, from a cyber
birth out of Melinda. Follow him, children of Gates and He will
defeat Linus after Linus tempt him three times.


Too Funny! Except I think there are people that actually may harbor
such thoughts.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Kelly wrote:
Oh my.....where did this thread begin and how did I miss it?

As per reading the top five posts, I agree with all said about David
Candy.

It's my fault. But I still haven't figure out how it descended into all
of this!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

Yall fight accordingly, but my mention was for the Windows side of David's
brain. w

--
All the Best,
Kelly (MS-MVP)

Troubleshooting Windows XP
http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com


"kurttrail" wrote in message
...
David Candy wrote:
Gates isn't the greatest prophet, He is yet to come. But Gates will
return on the Day of Sucess and and help the Messiah and computers
will become user friendly. Saint Steve Balmer will guide us
unworthies till then. But don't expect it in our time.

But there are challenges, the infidels of Linus. But Soldiers of
Gates, we defeated the infidels of Lotus, the infidels of
WordPerfect, and the infidels of Netscape.

One will arise among you, Yea, He shall carry the Cursor of Truth and
wield it without mercy. He will be the greatest Prophet, from a cyber
birth out of Melinda. Follow him, children of Gates and He will
defeat Linus after Linus tempt him three times.


Too Funny! Except I think there are people that actually may harbor such
thoughts.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 01:53:18 +0000, JW wrote:

of course you are free to do what you want, and i don't mean any
disrespect, but you have been mired in this flame war for about 6 hours
now. Leythos, your time and breath is much more valuable than to wasted
with this psychopath. you know that you never will convert somebody who
is so mentally sick that he considers the possibility that

"... who's to say that Bush wasn't behind 9/11. He couldn't have asked
for anything better to jump start his flagging presidency."

How is that "mentally sick" except on the part of Bush?

Yea, but once in a while I have to let the trolls have some fun and see
where they take it. I can't be technical 24/7, once in a while I have to
let what's left of my hair down :-)

You must admit that if an El Salvadorian can walk from El Salvador, cross
the US border and have a job waiting for him in LA and if he can do it broke
and with only clothes on his back, a terrorist could easily cross the
Mexican border what with having money, several changes of clothes, etc. and
attack at will. Hasn't happened. Most of the terrorists involved in 9/11
were Saudis. Does Bush attack Saudi Arabia? No. He attacks two countries
based on lies. I think Bush and Isreal were responsible for 9/11. They were
the only ones that had something to gain from 9/11. Had 9/11 not happened,
we would have a Democratic president right now and Bush would have gone down
in history as the most worthless president the US has ever had.

Who does the Patriot Act affect? How many innocent people has Bush rounded
up and locked up without legal counsel, bail or a trial? If Bush is willing
to trump the constitution of the USA and take away basic rights, he is
willing to sacrifice a few thousand lives in NYC to jump start his
presidency.

Alias

"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:34:05 +0100, Alias wrote:

Killing is not an enlightened way to do things.

It is when there is no alternative. Look at a rabid dog some time, it's
out of it's mind, wants to attack everything, has no concern for it's own
life.... The only solution is to kill it. Same with Terrorists and their
ilk.

So -- and this is really my last reply to you -- when are you going to kill
George WMD Bush, the Terrorist?

Alias

"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:58:54 -0500, Tom wrote:

He was given an honorable discharge, cased closed, I showed you the
document
dated 1978, and it was made official in 2001. You either respect or you
Honorable Discharges.

Don't you find it odd that, and I had my dates wrong I think, he was
discharged in 72, I think her service was 67-72, 6 years, so, as a matter
of record his paperwork should indicate 72. Only someone that's had their
service record changed would have a date after their EAOS.

Kerry's service started (voluntarily) in "66".


If you check the facts, Carter was in office from 76-80 and Carter gave
amnesty to all the dishonorable and draft dodgers which meant their
service records were amended in the time period that you indicate above.
Not one previously HONORABLE discharge had to be amended to make it
HONORABLE.

So, Ford pardoned a criminal, that allowed him to keep some kind of honor,
but that is ok, since it is a presidential right to do so, as was Carters.
If you don't like it, then bitch at congress to change the president's power
in such cases.


Come on, you seem like a bright person, are you seeing the truth now.

Now you know why he won't release his records.

Do you know why Bush won't own up to being AWOL for 6 months, and cannot
(actually will not) provide records to show what he was doing, though he was
honorably discharged. You keep ignoring that by the way; so it honorable at
how Bush got away from Nam through power contacts while actually NOT doing
his total duty?


Before you try and explain how valiant and honorable he WAS and how his
medals stand, explain why any respectable service member that was given an
HONORABLE Discharge at the time of the separation would want to hide it.

I don't know, again, he got it regardless of yours or my dislike. The fact
remains he got it legally and it is honorable, refer to congress again for
changes. But you don't acknowledge whether or not our comedian and cheat
served honorably, though he got that type of discharge. You should be
appalled at him for avoiding (again through connections) real combat duty
based on how you hold such a high regard for those (as yourself) that have
been there.

"kurttrail" wrote

As the 911 commision reported Bush didn't do anything prior to 911 to stop
it, eventhough receiving a PDB warning that an attack was imminent
possibly involving airplanes, a full month prior to 911.

So he was responsible for his administration's inaction in trying to stop
it.

He didn't want to stop it. His handlers knew how much he would benefit from
the attack. It's kind of like what Roosevelt didn't do regarding Pearl
Harbor.

Alias

"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 06:59:29 -0600, Susan wrote:

What does this have to do with Windows XP?

Well, trolls, like terrorists desire to destroy things. There are several
trolls in these groups that seek only the destruction of them and/or MS
and it's methods.

Really, isn't calling other pirates and thieves a form of trolling?


Since the MSMVPHOS is actually an off-topic thread, what did you expect?

That you would continue on as usual!

"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:12:26 -0500, Tom wrote:


"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:58:54 -0500, Tom wrote:

He was given an honorable discharge, cased closed, I showed you the
document
dated 1978, and it was made official in 2001. You either respect or you
Honorable Discharges.

Don't you find it odd that, and I had my dates wrong I think, he was
discharged in 72, I think her service was 67-72, 6 years, so, as a
matter
of record his paperwork should indicate 72. Only someone that's had
their
service record changed would have a date after their EAOS.

Kerry's service started (voluntarily) in "66".

And it was state side until there was a political reason to go to Nam.

If you check the facts, Carter was in office from 76-80 and Carter gave
amnesty to all the dishonorable and draft dodgers which meant their
service records were amended in the time period that you indicate
above. Not one previously HONORABLE discharge had to be amended to make
it HONORABLE.

So, Ford pardoned a criminal, that allowed him to keep some kind of
honor, but that is ok, since it is a presidential right to do so, as
was Carters. If you don't like it, then bitch at congress to change the
president's power in such cases.

And the criminal isn't hiding the fact that he was a criminal either.
Kerry is hiding the fact that he didn't get an Honorable discharge - big
difference.


Again, so, since Bush is hiding 6 months of what he actually did during his
sefvice. there a commanders that don't ever remember hin being on duty
during that certain period. How honorable!

Come on, you seem like a bright person, are you seeing the truth now.

Now you know why he won't release his records.

Do you know why Bush won't own up to being AWOL for 6 months, and cannot
(actually will not) provide records to show what he was doing, though he
was honorably discharged. You keep ignoring that by the way; so it
honorable at how Bush got away from Nam through power contacts while
actually NOT doing his total duty?

I don't ignore Bush's service record, there's nothing in it that isn't
legit - and he wasn't AWOL at all, even CNN recanted that after they
reported it.

Hmm do search at http://factcheck.org/default.aspx and see what his serving
status was.


Before you try and explain how valiant and honorable he WAS and how his
medals stand, explain why any respectable service member that was given
an HONORABLE Discharge at the time of the separation would want to hide
it.

I don't know, again, he got it regardless of yours or my dislike. The
fact remains he got it legally and it is honorable, refer to congress
again for changes. But you don't acknowledge whether or not our comedian

Nope, he didn't get it legally, it was the first discharge that he's
hiding and that was also legal - why is he hiding it - ask yourself that
instead of hiding from it. His OTH was converted to H (possibly) by
Carter's actions, that doesn't change the fact that he was discharged
with an OTH and is clearly hiding from it. Just like he's trying to hide
how he got out of combat, you see no proof that anyone (other than
himself) put him in for those Purple Hearts.

Prove it (the 3rd request now) that he put himself in for the hearts!


and cheat served honorably, though he got that type of discharge. You
should be appalled at him for avoiding (again through connections) real
combat duty based on how you hold such a high regard for those (as
yourself) that have been there.

I actually do have issues with people using their connections to limit
their service stay or to pull strings, never said I didn't. What I care
more about is people asking me to trust them with the nation and then
hiding the fact that they were not Honorably discharged from the service.
There is a big difference between pulling strings and getting a OTH
discharge.

But he was honorably discharged when asked at the time!


I would rather take George into battle than Kerry, at least I know one
would not run away in a time of need.


Yes, a guy who actually thinks that doing what he does, will somehow find
honor with god.

Yes, you honor a patron of god, who served his country while others proably
died in his stead due to his cowardice to actually do REAL combat, where
Kerry ACTUALLY volunteered for that service. You complain about honor, while
ignoring the honor in a volunteer, who wasn't afraid to use his freedom of
speech you say he shouldn't have, that just as easily could have avoided
doing combat duty ala Bush.

You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke pot,
and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who avoided real
combat duty through the POWER channel, yes, I can see where a man of your
standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite!

"Tom" wrote in message
...

"Leythos" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:12:26 -0500, Tom wrote:


"Leythos" wrote in message
news On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:58:54 -0500, Tom wrote:

He was given an honorable discharge, cased closed, I showed you the
document
dated 1978, and it was made official in 2001. You either respect or
you
Honorable Discharges.

Don't you find it odd that, and I had my dates wrong I think, he was
discharged in 72, I think her service was 67-72, 6 years, so, as a
matter
of record his paperwork should indicate 72. Only someone that's had
their
service record changed would have a date after their EAOS.

Kerry's service started (voluntarily) in "66".

And it was state side until there was a political reason to go to Nam.

If you check the facts, Carter was in office from 76-80 and Carter gave
amnesty to all the dishonorable and draft dodgers which meant their
service records were amended in the time period that you indicate
above. Not one previously HONORABLE discharge had to be amended to make
it HONORABLE.

So, Ford pardoned a criminal, that allowed him to keep some kind of
honor, but that is ok, since it is a presidential right to do so, as
was Carters. If you don't like it, then bitch at congress to change the
president's power in such cases.

And the criminal isn't hiding the fact that he was a criminal either.
Kerry is hiding the fact that he didn't get an Honorable discharge - big
difference.


Again, so, since Bush is hiding 6 months of what he actually did during
his sefvice. there a commanders that don't ever remember hin being on duty
during that certain period. How honorable!

Come on, you seem like a bright person, are you seeing the truth now.

Now you know why he won't release his records.

Do you know why Bush won't own up to being AWOL for 6 months, and cannot
(actually will not) provide records to show what he was doing, though he
was honorably discharged. You keep ignoring that by the way; so it
honorable at how Bush got away from Nam through power contacts while
actually NOT doing his total duty?

I don't ignore Bush's service record, there's nothing in it that isn't
legit - and he wasn't AWOL at all, even CNN recanted that after they
reported it.

Hmm do search at http://factcheck.org/default.aspx and see what his
serving status was.


Before you try and explain how valiant and honorable he WAS and how his
medals stand, explain why any respectable service member that was given
an HONORABLE Discharge at the time of the separation would want to hide
it.

I don't know, again, he got it regardless of yours or my dislike. The
fact remains he got it legally and it is honorable, refer to congress
again for changes. But you don't acknowledge whether or not our comedian

Nope, he didn't get it legally, it was the first discharge that he's
hiding and that was also legal - why is he hiding it - ask yourself that
instead of hiding from it. His OTH was converted to H (possibly) by
Carter's actions, that doesn't change the fact that he was discharged
with an OTH and is clearly hiding from it. Just like he's trying to hide
how he got out of combat, you see no proof that anyone (other than
himself) put him in for those Purple Hearts.

Prove it (the 3rd request now) that he put himself in for the hearts!


and cheat served honorably, though he got that type of discharge. You
should be appalled at him for avoiding (again through connections) real
combat duty based on how you hold such a high regard for those (as
yourself) that have been there.

I actually do have issues with people using their connections to limit
their service stay or to pull strings, never said I didn't. What I care
more about is people asking me to trust them with the nation and then
hiding the fact that they were not Honorably discharged from the service.
There is a big difference between pulling strings and getting a OTH
discharge.

But he was honorably discharged when asked at the time!


I would rather take George into battle than Kerry, at least I know one
would not run away in a time of need.


Yes, a guy who actually thinks that doing what he does, will somehow find
honor with god.

Yes, you honor a patron of god, who served his country while others
proably died in his stead due to his cowardice to actually do REAL combat,
where Kerry ACTUALLY volunteered for that service. You complain about
honor, while ignoring the honor in a volunteer, who wasn't afraid to use
his freedom of speech you say he shouldn't have, that just as easily could
have avoided doing combat duty ala Bush.

You honor a man who was an alcoholic womanizer, who used cocaine, smoke
pot, and was a failure at every business he ever started. A man who
avoided real combat duty through the POWER channel, yes, I can see where a
man of your standing would find such honor in GWB. You are a hypocrite!

It's useless to reply to Leythos. It's like trying to talk to a rock. The
truth probably is that he voted for Kerry and has a cracked version on every
one of his 100 computers he brags about except the one with Linux. I say
this because the lady protesteth waaaaaaaaaay too much.

Alias

Leythos wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 06:59:29 -0600, Susan wrote:

What does this have to do with Windows XP?

Well, trolls, like terrorists desire to destroy things. There are
several trolls in these groups that seek only the destruction of them
and/or MS and it's methods.

Since the MSMVPHOS is actually an off-topic thread, what did you
expect?

LOL! It was having a little fun in a tech forum! Then ya'll took it
too seriously!

In case you hadn't noticed the New inductee nominated himself. He
actually has a sense of HUMOR, and great legs!

Now you warmongering trolls get the hell out of MY thread! Go start a
War Lovers thread!

ROFL!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

"Alias" wrote in message
...
It's useless to reply to Leythos. It's like trying to talk to a rock. The
truth probably is that he voted for Kerry and has a cracked version on
every one of his 100 computers he brags about except the one with Linux. I
say this because the lady protesteth waaaaaaaaaay too much.

Alias

I don't believe that he has how many whatnot PC/servers in his home, and his
abilities. here is testament to my disbelief, when he hinted that a new MOBO
would need drivers!

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...df92f68491d7cc

"A change in motherboard, while it can be done with a repair/reinstall as I
clearly stated, is best done with a full reinstall due to the number of
changes in drivers and other functions."

Lamethos