Linux strikes back...

It it pushed through automatic updates ?
And your point?

If I need to explain that, well....OK.....

If IE was already the browser leader, and you have
automatic updates turned on, you are offered IE8. You
update to IE8.

Why? Offered and forced to update aren't the same thing.
You have no idea how many did or didn't update, do you.
You just like to parse your words to your liking.
Then you get caught in your own stupid, meaningless
diatribe. Everyone in here watches you do that all the
time.

1) *You* have no idea who updated or not either. If you were to
look, you could see that the 'market share' of earlier versions
goes down as IE8's 'market share' goes up.

2) It was a sensible hypothesis, and anyone that can be
objective I think would agree.

3) It wasn't a stupid meaningless diatribe. That's your job.



It could be because you (not you specifically) 1) blindly
apply all updates MS send out, 2) are told by MS that it
is the safest browser yet, or 3) (whatever reason).....

.......regardless, what would be so spectacular about what
was the most used browser, IE (all versions), being
upgraded to IE8 and *still* being the most used browser ?
I don't get it.

Did you miss the part where the OP claimed that IE8 had
recouped all the users they lost to FF...and more ?

And maybe you can tell me...what does all this have to do
with Linux ?

(But no, don't tell me anything. This threrad has been
beat to death and was obviously created to be just a troll
thread. Created by a Windows troll, not a Linux troll.)

Yeah, and you are the one of the ones who beat it to death.
Oh and it's "thread".

No, it was you and Alias and Pork Puller that killed this
thread. Do I need to count how many posts each of you made in
this thread ? Let's try to be realistic for once, can you ?

That was a typo. Of which you make constantly. Obviously you
knew exactly what I meant.

Do you have anything even remotely intelligent to add ?

(I didn't think so, now beat it son, you bother me.)

On 8/4/2010 3:38 PM, DanS wrote:

It it pushed through automatic updates ?
And your point?

If I need to explain that, well....OK.....

If IE was already the browser leader, and you have
automatic updates turned on, you are offered IE8. You
update to IE8.

Why? Offered and forced to update aren't the same thing.
You have no idea how many did or didn't update, do you.
You just like to parse your words to your liking.
Then you get caught in your own stupid, meaningless
diatribe. Everyone in here watches you do that all the
time.

1) *You* have no idea who updated or not either.

*I* never said *I* did! Keep parsing...the hole you're in is getting deeper!

If you were to
look, you could see that the 'market share' of earlier versions
goes down as IE8's 'market share' goes up.

Well DUH...How long did it take for you realize that market rule?

2) It was a sensible hypothesis, and anyone that can be
objective I think would agree.

There is something really wrong with you.

3) It wasn't a stupid meaningless diatribe.

Of course it was.

That's your job.

No, that is what you're in charge of...stupid, diatribes, and vile
disgusting insults to others family members.
You're a weak little coward...just like your butt-buddy alias, the
sheep-****er is.



It could be because you (not you specifically) 1) blindly
apply all updates MS send out, 2) are told by MS that it
is the safest browser yet, or 3) (whatever reason).....

.......regardless, what would be so spectacular about what
was the most used browser, IE (all versions), being
upgraded to IE8 and *still* being the most used browser ?
I don't get it.

Did you miss the part where the OP claimed that IE8 had
recouped all the users they lost to FF...and more ?

And maybe you can tell me...what does all this have to do
with Linux ?

(But no, don't tell me anything. This threrad has been
beat to death and was obviously created to be just a troll
thread. Created by a Windows troll, not a Linux troll.)

Yeah, and you are the one of the ones who beat it to death.
Oh and it's "thread".

No, it was you and Alias and Pork Puller that killed this
thread.

So why are you still posting?

Do I need to count how many posts each of you made in
this thread ?

Like I give a ****. WTF do you think you are, anyway?

Let's try to be realistic for once, can you ?

Something you certainly can't seem to do.

That was a typo. Of which you make constantly.

Blame your incompetence on others. You're famous for doing that.

Obviously you
knew exactly what I meant.

Keep ass-uming...you are getting good at it.

Do you have anything even remotely intelligent to add ?

Only that you're an arrogant asshole.
Got it?

(I didn't think so, now beat it son, you bother me.)

Son? Wanna go a few rounds with me old man?
No? Figures. You're a really vile, disgusting, POS big mouthed loser.
Go **** yourself as I'm sure no one else in there right mind would want
anything to do with a ****wit moron loser like you.

Post your diatribe response here---

Do you have anything even remotely intelligent to add ?

I knew you didn't.

On 8/4/2010 4:37 PM, DanS wrote:
Do you have anything even remotely intelligent to add ?

I knew you didn't.

You must have missed it...I said you're a disgusting, vile, POS asshole
loser creep!
And that is almost a compliment to you.
Maybe you need to print that out and take it to an adult who will
explain it to you.

On 04/08/2010 6:42 PM, Alias wrote:
On 08/04/2010 06:57 PM, Boscoe wrote:
On 04/08/2010 5:52 PM, Alias wrote:
We don't buy computers for people. The computer business is a very,
very, very small part of what we do. The other businesses have nothing
to do with buying or repairing computers.


Is your other job a part-time matador? Because there's plenty of
bull**** flying.

I agree, Frank's full of bull**** and so are you.


I've got relatives in Spain and the country's bust.

You mean your relatives are unemployed. Spain owes less than California
and much less than the USA as a whole. Spaniards go to NYC for their
xmas shopping, the USA is so cheap.



Poor deluded fool. I could say my relatives own hotels - which
incidentally they do - but then again I could say anything I like on
here just like you do, but I'm not a fantasist. Your missive are all
fiction with a large dollop of fantasy content. And do you know the sad
part, you believe it?

Just goes to show that if you have enough advertising
money, you can sell anything. Remember how many idiots
bought AOL?

If it wasn't for those 'idiots', the internet wouldn't be what
it is today.....

Before AOL, it was 1200 baud BBS....(OK, maybe 9600)

AOL marketing is what opened up the entire online world to
America.

It was friggin' genius........pump out disk's and CD's millions
at a time making them cost very little per unit, then dump them
off at every POS location in the country and have them labelled
free....as well as a mailing campaign.

The shear numbers of AOL subscribers dwarfed any other single
online service, like Compuserve......

And AOL made a killing right up until the merger with T/W.

That being said, that doesn't mean they were the best provider,
but, I really don't think we'd be where we are today w/AOL.

.......(or Compuserve if that would have taken off and been the
leader, or maybe even some other company....but it was in fact
AOL.)

On 08/06/2010 01:21 AM, DanS wrote:

Just goes to show that if you have enough advertising
money, you can sell anything. Remember how many idiots
bought AOL?

If it wasn't for those 'idiots', the internet wouldn't be what
it is today.....

Before AOL, it was 1200 baud BBS....(OK, maybe 9600)

AOL marketing is what opened up the entire online world to
America.

It was friggin' genius........pump out disk's and CD's millions
at a time making them cost very little per unit, then dump them
off at every POS location in the country and have them labelled
free....as well as a mailing campaign.

The shear numbers of AOL subscribers dwarfed any other single
online service, like Compuserve......

And AOL made a killing right up until the merger with T/W.

That being said, that doesn't mean they were the best provider,
but, I really don't think we'd be where we are today w/AOL.

......(or Compuserve if that would have taken off and been the
leader, or maybe even some other company....but it was in fact
AOL.)

In the USA, yes. In Europe, AOL was only successful in Germany and
England. I don't think AOL had anything to do with the increased speed.
They died when broadband hit the scene and people realized how ****ed up
AOL was.

--
Alias

Alias wrote in
:

On 08/06/2010 01:21 AM, DanS wrote:

Just goes to show that if you have enough advertising
money, you can sell anything. Remember how many idiots
bought AOL?

If it wasn't for those 'idiots', the internet wouldn't be
what it is today.....

Before AOL, it was 1200 baud BBS....(OK, maybe 9600)

AOL marketing is what opened up the entire online world to
America.

It was friggin' genius........pump out disk's and CD's
millions at a time making them cost very little per unit,
then dump them off at every POS location in the country
and have them labelled free....as well as a mailing
campaign.

The shear numbers of AOL subscribers dwarfed any other
single online service, like Compuserve......

And AOL made a killing right up until the merger with T/W.

That being said, that doesn't mean they were the best
provider, but, I really don't think we'd be where we are
today w/AOL.

......(or Compuserve if that would have taken off and been
the leader, or maybe even some other company....but it was
in fact AOL.)

In the USA, yes. In Europe, AOL was only successful in
Germany and England.

It *was* called AMERICA Online, not Europe Online, or TheWorlD
Online.

I don't think AOL had anything to do
with the increased speed. They died when broadband hit the
scene and people realized how ****ed up AOL was.

No, not f'd up. How limited is was, or that it was only
usefull as a middleman to get to the internet, and that was
when other dial-up internet providers started coming out of
the woodwork and offering unlimited usage for $20/month.

On 08/06/2010 06:35 PM, DanS wrote:
wrote in
:

On 08/06/2010 01:21 AM, DanS wrote:

Just goes to show that if you have enough advertising
money, you can sell anything. Remember how many idiots
bought AOL?

If it wasn't for those 'idiots', the internet wouldn't be
what it is today.....

Before AOL, it was 1200 baud BBS....(OK, maybe 9600)

AOL marketing is what opened up the entire online world to
America.

It was friggin' genius........pump out disk's and CD's
millions at a time making them cost very little per unit,
then dump them off at every POS location in the country
and have them labelled free....as well as a mailing
campaign.

The shear numbers of AOL subscribers dwarfed any other
single online service, like Compuserve......

And AOL made a killing right up until the merger with T/W.

That being said, that doesn't mean they were the best
provider, but, I really don't think we'd be where we are
today w/AOL.

......(or Compuserve if that would have taken off and been
the leader, or maybe even some other company....but it was
in fact AOL.)

In the USA, yes. In Europe, AOL was only successful in
Germany and England.

It *was* called AMERICA Online, not Europe Online, or TheWorlD
Online.

But only one country in America was stupid enough to fall for it. It
wasn't called USA Online, now was it?


I don't think AOL had anything to do
with the increased speed. They died when broadband hit the
scene and people realized how ****ed up AOL was.

No, not f'd up. How limited is was, or that it was only
usefull as a middleman to get to the internet, and that was
when other dial-up internet providers started coming out of
the woodwork and offering unlimited usage for $20/month.



It was ****ed up, mouse oriented, gardened off from the real Internet
and a bitch to remove from a computer.

--
Alias

On 8/6/2010 9:40 AM, Alias wrote:
On 08/06/2010 06:35 PM, DanS wrote:
wrote in
:

On 08/06/2010 01:21 AM, DanS wrote:

Just goes to show that if you have enough advertising
money, you can sell anything. Remember how many idiots
bought AOL?

If it wasn't for those 'idiots', the internet wouldn't be
what it is today.....

Before AOL, it was 1200 baud BBS....(OK, maybe 9600)

AOL marketing is what opened up the entire online world to
America.

It was friggin' genius........pump out disk's and CD's
millions at a time making them cost very little per unit,
then dump them off at every POS location in the country
and have them labelled free....as well as a mailing
campaign.

The shear numbers of AOL subscribers dwarfed any other
single online service, like Compuserve......

And AOL made a killing right up until the merger with T/W.

That being said, that doesn't mean they were the best
provider, but, I really don't think we'd be where we are
today w/AOL.

......(or Compuserve if that would have taken off and been
the leader, or maybe even some other company....but it was
in fact AOL.)

In the USA, yes. In Europe, AOL was only successful in
Germany and England.

It *was* called AMERICA Online, not Europe Online, or TheWorlD
Online.

But only one country in America was stupid enough to fall for it. It
wasn't called USA Online, now was it?


I don't think AOL had anything to do
with the increased speed. They died when broadband hit the
scene and people realized how ****ed up AOL was.

No, not f'd up. How limited is was, or that it was only
usefull as a middleman to get to the internet, and that was
when other dial-up internet providers started coming out of
the woodwork and offering unlimited usage for $20/month.



It was ****ed up, mouse oriented, gardened off from the real Internet
and a bitch to remove from a computer.

hehehe...so you admit you were stupid enough to fall for the aol hell
scam huh?...Hahahaha...that's funny!

On 08/07/2010 06:15 PM, Frank wrote:
On 8/6/2010 9:40 AM, Alias wrote:
On 08/06/2010 06:35 PM, DanS wrote:
wrote in
:

On 08/06/2010 01:21 AM, DanS wrote:

Just goes to show that if you have enough advertising
money, you can sell anything. Remember how many idiots
bought AOL?

If it wasn't for those 'idiots', the internet wouldn't be
what it is today.....

Before AOL, it was 1200 baud BBS....(OK, maybe 9600)

AOL marketing is what opened up the entire online world to
America.

It was friggin' genius........pump out disk's and CD's
millions at a time making them cost very little per unit,
then dump them off at every POS location in the country
and have them labelled free....as well as a mailing
campaign.

The shear numbers of AOL subscribers dwarfed any other
single online service, like Compuserve......

And AOL made a killing right up until the merger with T/W.

That being said, that doesn't mean they were the best
provider, but, I really don't think we'd be where we are
today w/AOL.

......(or Compuserve if that would have taken off and been
the leader, or maybe even some other company....but it was
in fact AOL.)

In the USA, yes. In Europe, AOL was only successful in
Germany and England.

It *was* called AMERICA Online, not Europe Online, or TheWorlD
Online.

But only one country in America was stupid enough to fall for it. It
wasn't called USA Online, now was it?


I don't think AOL had anything to do
with the increased speed. They died when broadband hit the
scene and people realized how ****ed up AOL was.

No, not f'd up. How limited is was, or that it was only
usefull as a middleman to get to the internet, and that was
when other dial-up internet providers started coming out of
the woodwork and offering unlimited usage for $20/month.



It was ****ed up, mouse oriented, gardened off from the real Internet
and a bitch to remove from a computer.

hehehe...so you admit you were stupid enough to fall for the aol hell
scam huh?...

Nope, a friend of mine from the USA came here with her computer and AOL
Hell on it. I removed it for her -- for free.

Hahahaha...that's funny!

What, that you guessed wrong again? Not funny, sport, pathetic.

--
Alias

On 8/7/2010 9:25 AM, Alias wrote:
On 08/07/2010 06:15 PM, Frank wrote:
On 8/6/2010 9:40 AM, Alias wrote:
On 08/06/2010 06:35 PM, DanS wrote:
wrote in
:

On 08/06/2010 01:21 AM, DanS wrote:

Just goes to show that if you have enough advertising
money, you can sell anything. Remember how many idiots
bought AOL?

If it wasn't for those 'idiots', the internet wouldn't be
what it is today.....

Before AOL, it was 1200 baud BBS....(OK, maybe 9600)

AOL marketing is what opened up the entire online world to
America.

It was friggin' genius........pump out disk's and CD's
millions at a time making them cost very little per unit,
then dump them off at every POS location in the country
and have them labelled free....as well as a mailing
campaign.

The shear numbers of AOL subscribers dwarfed any other
single online service, like Compuserve......

And AOL made a killing right up until the merger with T/W.

That being said, that doesn't mean they were the best
provider, but, I really don't think we'd be where we are
today w/AOL.

......(or Compuserve if that would have taken off and been
the leader, or maybe even some other company....but it was
in fact AOL.)

In the USA, yes. In Europe, AOL was only successful in
Germany and England.

It *was* called AMERICA Online, not Europe Online, or TheWorlD
Online.

But only one country in America was stupid enough to fall for it. It
wasn't called USA Online, now was it?


I don't think AOL had anything to do
with the increased speed. They died when broadband hit the
scene and people realized how ****ed up AOL was.

No, not f'd up. How limited is was, or that it was only
usefull as a middleman to get to the internet, and that was
when other dial-up internet providers started coming out of
the woodwork and offering unlimited usage for $20/month.



It was ****ed up, mouse oriented, gardened off from the real Internet
and a bitch to remove from a computer.

hehehe...so you admit you were stupid enough to fall for the aol hell
scam huh?...

Nope, a friend of mine from the USA came here with her computer and AOL
Hell on it. I removed it for her -- for free.

Sure you did...LOL!

Hahahaha...that's funny!

What, that you guessed wrong again?

I nailed your lying ass....again...as usual!

Not funny, sport, pathetic.

Yes, you are the most pathetic, lying, POS excuse for a human being to
ever post in any ng.
Oops!

On 08/07/2010 06:48 PM, Frank wrote:
On 8/7/2010 9:25 AM, Alias wrote:
On 08/07/2010 06:15 PM, Frank wrote:
On 8/6/2010 9:40 AM, Alias wrote:
On 08/06/2010 06:35 PM, DanS wrote:
wrote in
:

On 08/06/2010 01:21 AM, DanS wrote:

Just goes to show that if you have enough advertising
money, you can sell anything. Remember how many idiots
bought AOL?

If it wasn't for those 'idiots', the internet wouldn't be
what it is today.....

Before AOL, it was 1200 baud BBS....(OK, maybe 9600)

AOL marketing is what opened up the entire online world to
America.

It was friggin' genius........pump out disk's and CD's
millions at a time making them cost very little per unit,
then dump them off at every POS location in the country
and have them labelled free....as well as a mailing
campaign.

The shear numbers of AOL subscribers dwarfed any other
single online service, like Compuserve......

And AOL made a killing right up until the merger with T/W.

That being said, that doesn't mean they were the best
provider, but, I really don't think we'd be where we are
today w/AOL.

......(or Compuserve if that would have taken off and been
the leader, or maybe even some other company....but it was
in fact AOL.)

In the USA, yes. In Europe, AOL was only successful in
Germany and England.

It *was* called AMERICA Online, not Europe Online, or TheWorlD
Online.

But only one country in America was stupid enough to fall for it. It
wasn't called USA Online, now was it?


I don't think AOL had anything to do
with the increased speed. They died when broadband hit the
scene and people realized how ****ed up AOL was.

No, not f'd up. How limited is was, or that it was only
usefull as a middleman to get to the internet, and that was
when other dial-up internet providers started coming out of
the woodwork and offering unlimited usage for $20/month.



It was ****ed up, mouse oriented, gardened off from the real Internet
and a bitch to remove from a computer.

hehehe...so you admit you were stupid enough to fall for the aol hell
scam huh?...

Nope, a friend of mine from the USA came here with her computer and AOL
Hell on it. I removed it for her -- for free.

Sure you did...LOL!

Yep, I sure did. AOL wasn't offered in Spain, DUMB ****!


Hahahaha...that's funny!

What, that you guessed wrong again?

I nailed your lying ass....again...as usual!

See above, stupid.


Not funny, sport, pathetic.

Yes, you are the most pathetic, lying, POS excuse for a human being to
ever post in any ng.
Oops!

You just got punked and you are too stupid to realize it and too
arrogant to admit it.


--
Alias

On 8/7/2010 9:54 AM, Alias wrote:
On 08/07/2010 06:48 PM, Frank wrote:
On 8/7/2010 9:25 AM, Alias wrote:
On 08/07/2010 06:15 PM, Frank wrote:
On 8/6/2010 9:40 AM, Alias wrote:
On 08/06/2010 06:35 PM, DanS wrote:
wrote in
:

On 08/06/2010 01:21 AM, DanS wrote:

Just goes to show that if you have enough advertising
money, you can sell anything. Remember how many idiots
bought AOL?

If it wasn't for those 'idiots', the internet wouldn't be
what it is today.....

Before AOL, it was 1200 baud BBS....(OK, maybe 9600)

AOL marketing is what opened up the entire online world to
America.

It was friggin' genius........pump out disk's and CD's
millions at a time making them cost very little per unit,
then dump them off at every POS location in the country
and have them labelled free....as well as a mailing
campaign.

The shear numbers of AOL subscribers dwarfed any other
single online service, like Compuserve......

And AOL made a killing right up until the merger with T/W.

That being said, that doesn't mean they were the best
provider, but, I really don't think we'd be where we are
today w/AOL.

......(or Compuserve if that would have taken off and been
the leader, or maybe even some other company....but it was
in fact AOL.)

In the USA, yes. In Europe, AOL was only successful in
Germany and England.

It *was* called AMERICA Online, not Europe Online, or TheWorlD
Online.

But only one country in America was stupid enough to fall for it. It
wasn't called USA Online, now was it?


I don't think AOL had anything to do
with the increased speed. They died when broadband hit the
scene and people realized how ****ed up AOL was.

No, not f'd up. How limited is was, or that it was only
usefull as a middleman to get to the internet, and that was
when other dial-up internet providers started coming out of
the woodwork and offering unlimited usage for $20/month.



It was ****ed up, mouse oriented, gardened off from the real Internet
and a bitch to remove from a computer.

hehehe...so you admit you were stupid enough to fall for the aol hell
scam huh?...

Nope, a friend of mine from the USA came here with her computer and AOL
Hell on it. I removed it for her -- for free.

Sure you did...LOL!

Yep, I sure did. AOL wasn't offered in Spain, DUMB ****!

You could use aol in spain.


Hahahaha...that's funny!

What, that you guessed wrong again?

I nailed your lying ass....again...as usual!

See above, stupid.

See about, stupid.


Not funny, sport, pathetic.

Yes, you are the most pathetic, lying, POS excuse for a human being to
ever post in any ng.
Oops!

You just got punked...


....yes, you did!
Oops!

and you are too stupid to realize it and too
arrogant to admit it.

Yes, you are!...LOL!
Oops!

On 08/07/2010 07:36 PM, Frank wrote:
On 8/7/2010 9:54 AM, Alias wrote:
On 08/07/2010 06:48 PM, Frank wrote:
On 8/7/2010 9:25 AM, Alias wrote:
On 08/07/2010 06:15 PM, Frank wrote:
On 8/6/2010 9:40 AM, Alias wrote:
On 08/06/2010 06:35 PM, DanS wrote:
wrote in
:

On 08/06/2010 01:21 AM, DanS wrote:

Just goes to show that if you have enough advertising
money, you can sell anything. Remember how many idiots
bought AOL?

If it wasn't for those 'idiots', the internet wouldn't be
what it is today.....

Before AOL, it was 1200 baud BBS....(OK, maybe 9600)

AOL marketing is what opened up the entire online world to
America.

It was friggin' genius........pump out disk's and CD's
millions at a time making them cost very little per unit,
then dump them off at every POS location in the country
and have them labelled free....as well as a mailing
campaign.

The shear numbers of AOL subscribers dwarfed any other
single online service, like Compuserve......

And AOL made a killing right up until the merger with T/W.

That being said, that doesn't mean they were the best
provider, but, I really don't think we'd be where we are
today w/AOL.

......(or Compuserve if that would have taken off and been
the leader, or maybe even some other company....but it was
in fact AOL.)

In the USA, yes. In Europe, AOL was only successful in
Germany and England.

It *was* called AMERICA Online, not Europe Online, or TheWorlD
Online.

But only one country in America was stupid enough to fall for it. It
wasn't called USA Online, now was it?


I don't think AOL had anything to do
with the increased speed. They died when broadband hit the
scene and people realized how ****ed up AOL was.

No, not f'd up. How limited is was, or that it was only
usefull as a middleman to get to the internet, and that was
when other dial-up internet providers started coming out of
the woodwork and offering unlimited usage for $20/month.



It was ****ed up, mouse oriented, gardened off from the real Internet
and a bitch to remove from a computer.

hehehe...so you admit you were stupid enough to fall for the aol hell
scam huh?...

Nope, a friend of mine from the USA came here with her computer and AOL
Hell on it. I removed it for her -- for free.

Sure you did...LOL!

Yep, I sure did. AOL wasn't offered in Spain, DUMB ****!

You could use aol in spain.

News to me.



Hahahaha...that's funny!

What, that you guessed wrong again?

I nailed your lying ass....again...as usual!

See above, stupid.

See about, stupid.

About what?



Not funny, sport, pathetic.

Yes, you are the most pathetic, lying, POS excuse for a human being to
ever post in any ng.
Oops!

You just got punked...


...yes, you did!
Oops!

No, you did.


and you are too stupid to realize it and too
arrogant to admit it.

Yes, you are!...LOL!
Oops!

No, you are.

--
Alias