If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for 'bad guys'! (was - 10 Sucks !)
On 10/01/2019 00:06, Paul wrote:
David B. wrote: The website tekrider.net is expected to be earning an estimated $0 USD on a daily basis. If tekrider.net was to be sold it would possibly only be worth $10 USD (the typical cost of the registration fee for the domain name). According to our moz rank analysis, the url tekrider.net currently has a moz rank of 1/10. tekrider.net possibly receives an estimated 0 unique visitors every day - this website is not very popular. This report was last updated 10th January 2019. I'm afraid they know absolutely nothing about the site. How sad. https://www.quora.com/What-is-Moz-How-does-it-work Â*Â* "MozRank quantifies link popularity and is Moz’s version Â*Â*Â* of Google’s classic PageRank algorithm. Â*Â*Â* Pages earn MozRank based on Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* the other pages on the web that link to themÂ* === Â*Â*Â* and the MozRank of those linking pages Â*Â* " Linking to a page, doesn't say *anything at all* about how often a page is loaded or visited. Only a *tracking beacon* placed on a web page can measure such activity. The web site owner places tracking beacons, if the web site owner needs information about the popularity of a web site. A second invention is the "Hit Counter", which a person coding a web page can implement. As a means of "impressing" visitors once they get there. In other words, only if a web site owner installs a measurement system, do you get an actual measure. MozRank is perfectly useless!!! It's like a hood ornament on an Edsel. Â*Â* Paul Thanks for your thoughts on this but I fear you may be mistaken, at least in part. That is NOT how *this* company gets its data https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo You've no doubt noticed by now that the 'Site Visitor Counter' on the www.tekrider.com home page is actually a joke? It changes by MILLIONS each time the page is refreshed! I did also try to understand what you were getting at .... https://www.businessinsider.com/less...d-edsel-2015-9 -- David B. |
Ads |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for 'bad guys'! (was - 10 Sucks !)
On 11/01/2019 15:12, David B. wrote:
You've no doubt noticed by now that the 'Site Visitor Counter' on the www.tekrider.com home page is actually a joke? It changes by MILLIONS each time the page is refreshed! *Oops*! https://tekrider.net/pages/index.php Sorry about the error. -- David B. |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for 'bad guys'! (was - 10 Sucks !)
David B. STALKER wrote:
You've no doubt noticed by now that the 'Site Visitor Counter' on the www.tekrider.com home page is actually a joke? It changes by MILLIONS each time the page is refreshed! I told you a decade ago it's a joke. Did you forget that again? Oh wait... you're just (*STILL*) stalking my web site .. you must really want your picture to be reinstated on my site - the one where you said you would *STOP STALKING ME* if I removed it. You have FAILED TO UPHOLD YOUR END OF THE BARGAIN. "We all see a lot of web pages with visitor or hit counters on them. So why should I skip that normally-useless bit of fluff? Therefo You are visitor number 6,113,122 since yesterday." -- -bts |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for 'bad guys'! (was - 10 Sucks !)
On 11/01/2019 16:31, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. wrote: You've no doubt noticed by now that the 'Site Visitor Counter' on the www.tekrider.com home page is actually a joke? It changes by MILLIONS each time the page is refreshed! I told you a decade ago it's a joke. Did you forget that again? No! frown I've just explained to Paul that it *IS* a joke! Oh wait... you're just (*STILL*) stalking my web site .. you must really want your picture to be reinstated on my site - the one where you said you would *STOP STALKING ME* if I removed it. You have FAILED TO UPHOLD YOUR END OF THE BARGAIN. IIRC, I said I wouldn't post your Facebook page, not that I wouldn't look at a website which is on-line for ANYONE to view. I know you are VERY clever, so will you please explain something to me? When I went here initially, https://uk.trustpilot.com ,it was to write a review for an on-line spectacle company from which I've recently bought some new glasses. Just for fun, I then entered YOUR company details:- https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.tekrider.net In the top centre of that web page is a link to YOUR website BUT, once I click and go there, there is *no mention whatsoever of me*. Why *IS* that, BTS? Btw, your photos AND reference to me ARE still up on the Internet! https://web.archive.org/web/20160315...ages/about.php -- David B. |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for 'bad guys'! (was - 10 Sucks !)
David B. STALKER wrote:
On 11/01/2019 16:31, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David B. STALKER wrote: You've no doubt noticed by now that the 'Site Visitor Counter' on the www.tekrider.com home page is actually a joke? It changes by MILLIONS each time the page is refreshed! I told you a decade ago it's a joke. Did you forget that again? No! frown I've just explained to Paul that it *IS* a joke! Oh wait... you're just (*STILL*) stalking my web site .. you must really want your picture to be reinstated on my site - the one where you said you would *STOP STALKING ME* if I removed it. You have FAILED TO UPHOLD YOUR END OF THE BARGAIN. IIRC, I said I wouldn't post your Facebook page, not that I wouldn't look at a website which is on-line for ANYONE to view. Wrong. Your fake Facebook page is far from the only stalking you are doing to me and my web site. You constantly use my name and domain name in posts everywhere, and you use online tools to probe my site. *THIS* is what you agreed to stop. You also said you didn't care what I wrote on your special page as long as the picture disappeared. Well, it did, so now is the time for you to fulfill your side of the agreement. I know you are VERY clever, so will you please explain something to me? When I went here initially, https://uk.trustpilot.com , ... Just for fun, I then entered YOUR company details:- STALKING! In the top centre of that web page is a link to YOUR website BUT, once I click and go there, there is *no mention whatsoever of me*. Why *IS* that, BTS? Feel grateful, and go away. Btw, your photos AND reference to me ARE still up on the Internet! https://web.archive.org/ ... You are more stupid than anyone could ever imagine stupidity exists in a single human brain. -- -bts |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for 'bad guys'! (was - 10 Sucks !)
On 11/01/2019 21:45, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
David B. wrote: On 11/01/2019 16:31, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David B. wrote: You've no doubt noticed by now that the 'Site Visitor Counter' on the www.tekrider.com home page is actually a joke? It changes by MILLIONS each time the page is refreshed! I told you a decade ago it's a joke. Did you forget that again? No! frown I've just explained to Paul that it *IS* a joke! Oh wait... you're just (*STILL*) stalking my web site .. you must really want your picture to be reinstated on my site - the one where you said you would *STOP STALKING ME* if I removed it. You have FAILED TO UPHOLD YOUR END OF THE BARGAIN. IIRC, I said I wouldn't post your Facebook page, not that I wouldn't look at a website which is on-line for ANYONE to view. Wrong. Your fake Facebook page is far from the only stalking you are doing to me and my web site. You constantly use my name and domain name in posts everywhere, and you use online tools to probe my site. *THIS* is what you agreed to stop. You also said you didn't care what I wrote on your special page as long as the picture disappeared. Well, it did, so now is the time for you to fulfil your side of the agreement. As OTHER people (like Shadow) are abusing what you've put on your site about me, I think it's time you removed ALL reference to me. I did ask you nicely before. Now I'm asking nicely again. I don't want to have to write formally to Webby Enterprises. https://my.webbytech.net/cart.php?a=...y=tekrider.net I know you are VERY clever, so will you please explain something to me? When I went here initially, https://uk.trustpilot.com , ... Just for fun, I then entered YOUR company details:- STALKING! *NO*! Not at all - *INVESTIGATING*! In the top centre of that web page is a link to YOUR website BUT, once I click and go there, there is *no mention whatsoever of me*. Why *IS* that, BTS? Feel grateful, and go away. I am, truly. :-) But I will *NOT* go away until you are straight-forward and honest with me. Btw, your photos AND reference to me ARE still up on the Internet! https://web.archive.org/ ... You are more stupid than anyone could ever imagine stupidity exists in a single human brain. I'm not really. I just like to tease you because you are so very easily wound-up. You must forgive me for my pretence! ;-) -- David B. |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
10 Sucks !
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:26:59 -0000, Wolf K wrote:
On 2019-01-10 17:43, Commander Kinsey wrote: [...] Nobody understands the question being asked. [...] What was the question again? I don't know, you snipped it. Please learn how usenet operates. Ask your parents if need be. |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for 'bad guys'! (was - 10 Sucks !)
David B. STALKER wrote:
On 11/01/2019 21:45, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Wrong. Your fake Facebook page is far from the only stalking you are doing to me and my web site. You constantly use my name and domain name in posts everywhere, and you use online tools to probe my site. *THIS* is what you agreed to stop. You also said you didn't care what I wrote on your special page as long as the picture disappeared. Well, it did, so now is the time for you to fulfil your side of the agreement. As OTHER people (like Shadow) are abusing what you've put on your site about me, I think it's time you removed ALL reference to me. I did ask you nicely before. Now I'm asking nicely again. Your special page is gone. Now, LEAVE ME ALONE. -- -bts |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
10 Sucks !
On 12/01/2019 00:51, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:26:59 -0000, Wolf K wrote: On 2019-01-10 17:43, Commander Kinsey wrote: [...] Nobody understands the question being asked. [...] What was the question again? I don't know, you snipped it.* Please learn how usenet operates.* Ask your parents if need be. Oi! You'll need to learn some respect if you wish to enjoy your time here on Usenet! :-P Try to determine WHO you are talking to before being disrespectful. Wolf K is probably TWICE your age and a VERY knowledgeable man. https://www.blogger.com/profile/14869518575685752096 HTH -- David B. (A REAL Commander!) |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
The MVP question (was - 10 Sucks !)
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:30:13 -0000, David B. "David wrote:
On 10/01/2019 23:36, Ken Blake wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:52 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:37:31 -0000, David B. "David wrote: How have you fared with the Microsoft Communities forums? https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us I just get useless answers from there. Nobody understands the question being asked. That's if I'm thinking of the same place as you, I'm referring to where a M$ representative answers for you. They call themselves MVPs or something, and have no clue about anything. An MVP is *not* a Microsoft representative. MVP stands for "Most Valuable Professional" and it's an honorary title granted to people who have been consistently helpful in answering questions. Three other points: 1. Questions can be and are answered by anybody. It's not always an MVP. 2. MVPs, like any other category, vary in how much they know and how good they are at explaining something. Some know a lot, others know much less. But as a general rule, most MVPs are very good. And some ordinary, non-MVPs in the Microsoft forums are also very good. 3. Besides MVPs and other ordinary non-MVPs, occasionally a Microsoft contractor (not an employee) answers a question. There are a few exceptions--some of those Microsoft contractors are also very good--but most of those people are terrible at answering questions. For most of them, English is a second language, and besides expressing themselves terribly, they often don't understand the question. Fortunately, it's a small percentage of answers that come from those contractors. But the forums would be a better place if Microsoft would stop using them. I've several times suggested to Microsoft employees that they stop using them, but I've been ignored. What you say is correct, Mr Blake. There's no need to be quite so modest though. You should be PROUD of having being awarded the MVP accolade! :-) https://social.technet.microsoft.com...crosoft%20mvp/ I had a notion that you were once a member of the VSOPs too, but cannot find you featured on the 'rogues gallery', so perhaps I am mistaken! http://www.aumha.org/vsop.htm I expect you know some of the names listed there. There's one notable fellow missing on that particular showing though. Randy Knobloch aka siljaline (AH-VSOP) Randy Knobloch ROTFPMSL! Like that's his real name. |
#161
|
|||
|
|||
10 Sucks !
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:42:26 -0000, Ken Blake wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:11:04 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:36:06 -0000, Ken Blake wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:52 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:37:31 -0000, David B. "David wrote: How have you fared with the Microsoft Communities forums? https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us I just get useless answers from there. Nobody understands the question being asked. That's if I'm thinking of the same place as you, I'm referring to where a M$ representative answers for you. They call themselves MVPs or something, and have no clue about anything. An MVP is *not* a Microsoft representative. MVP stands for "Most Valuable Professional" and it's an honorary title granted to people who have been consistently helpful in answering questions. I see, I thought it was a qualification - some kind of exam set by Microsoft that people use to get a job. No, nothing like that. As a matter of fact a Microsoft employee can *not* also be an MVP. An MVP occasionally becomes a Microsoft employee (I've known a few), but when he does, he loses his MVP status. But: "consistently helpful in answering questions" - funny how I've never seen a helpful answer by them (or anyone) on that forum. Then you looked at a very small sampling of questions and answers. Or considering how you've shown yourself here to know so little, more probably because you wouldn't know a helpful answer if you saw one. An incorrect assumption. I must have looked up many problems (I'd guess 30) over the years on that forum. I usually find someone else asking them same thing, then a completely stupid answer having nothing to do with the question (usually from some paki who didn't understand the English), then everyone else making fun of or dismissing the answer as utterly pointless. Three other points: 1. Questions can be and are answered by anybody. It's not always an MVP. I must have looked at about 15 questions on there, every single one was only answered by an MVP. As I said, you looked at a very small sampling of questions and answers. 15 (probably more like 30) is not a small sample. If I look at 15 or 30 examples of something and they're all rubbish, it's fair to assume everything there is rubbish. Would you buy a Renault after seeing 15 out of 15 Renaults break down? First, most questions are answered by several people. Not from what I've seen. Second, many of the regular answerers are not MVPs. Not from what I've seen. I just went to Windows forum and looked at a random page of questions. Here are some statistics: Question 1. Two answers, neither by an MVP Question 2. Three answers, none by an MVP Question 3. No answers Question 4. One answer, not by an MVP Question 5. No answers Question 6. One answer, not by an MVP Question 7. One answer, not by an MVP Question 8. Two answers, neither by an MVP Question 9. One answer, not by an MVP Question 10. One answer, not by an MVP Question 11. One answer, not by an MVP Question 12. One answer by an MVP etc. Unless we're talking about two different forums. There are many Microsoft community forums. I only participate in the Windows forums, and what I say is based on my experience there. But I would be surprised if the other forums varied much in that respect. I've usually got there by simply doing a Google search on a Windows 10 problem. But I'm sure it was a *.microsoft.com address most of the time. 2. MVPs, like any other category, vary in how much they know and how good they are at explaining something. Some know a lot, others know much less. But as a general rule, most MVPs are very good. And some ordinary, non-MVPs in the Microsoft forums are also very good. Then the means of giving them MVP status has failed. Showing your ignorance again. No, showing my experience of the ****e they spout. 3. Besides MVPs and other ordinary non-MVPs, occasionally a Microsoft contractor (not an employee) answers a question. There are a few exceptions--some of those Microsoft contractors are also very good--but most of those people are terrible at answering questions. For most of them, English is a second language, and besides expressing themselves terribly, they often don't understand the question. Fortunately, it's a small percentage of answers that come from those contractors. But the forums would be a better place if Microsoft would stop using them. I've several times suggested to Microsoft employees that they stop using them, but I've been ignored. Actually I've seen quite a lot of answers from non-English speaking people. They tend to use cut and paste replies and don't understand what they're being asked at all. Wow! Something we agree on! Or almost agree on. They are not non-English speaking. They speak English as a second language, and therefore often not very well. I call that "non-English speaking". I can communicate in French enough to order a beer or get my car repaired, but I wouldn't call myself a French speaker. They are not all Microsoft contractors, but most of them are. I'm just guessing since I've never met any of these contractors, but I think most of them have very little Windows experience. They simply do searches on questions and cut and paste whatever they can find. Why on earth is Microsoft paying people with "very little Windows experience"? |
#162
|
|||
|
|||
The MVP question (was - 10 Sucks !)
On 12/01/2019 15:20, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:30:13 -0000, David B. "David wrote: On 10/01/2019 23:36, Ken Blake wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:52 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:37:31 -0000, David B. "David wrote: How have you fared with the Microsoft Communities forums? https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us I just get useless answers from there.Â* Nobody understands the question being asked. That's if I'm thinking of the same place as you, I'm referring to where a M$ representative answers for you.Â* They call themselves MVPs or something, and have no clue about anything. An MVP is *not* a Microsoft representative. MVP stands for "Most Valuable Professional" and it's an honorary title granted to people who have been consistently helpful in answering questions. Three other points: 1. Questions can be and are answered by anybody. It's not always an MVP. 2. MVPs, like any other category, vary in how much they know and how good they are at explaining something. Some know a lot, others know much less. But as a general rule, most MVPs are very good. And some ordinary, non-MVPs in the Microsoft forums are also very good. 3. Besides MVPs and other ordinary non-MVPs, occasionally a Microsoft contractor (not an employee) answers a question. There are a few exceptions--some of those Microsoft contractors are also very good--but most of those people are terrible at answering questions. For most of them, English is a second language, and besides expressing themselves terribly, they often don't understand the question. Fortunately, it's a small percentage of answers that come from those contractors. But the forums would be a better place if Microsoft would stop using them. I've several times suggested to Microsoft employees that they stop using them, but I've been ignored. What you say is correct, Mr Blake. There's no need to be quite so modest though. You should be PROUD of having being awarded the MVP accolade! :-) https://social.technet.microsoft.com...crosoft%20mvp/ I had a notion that you were once a member of the VSOPs too, but cannot find you featured on the 'rogues gallery', so perhaps I am mistaken! http://www.aumha.org/vsop.htm I expect you know some of the names listed there. There's one notable fellow missing on that particular showing though. Randy Knobloch aka siljaline (AH-VSOP) Randy Knobloch ROTFPMSL!Â* Like that's his real name. Difficult to believe, isn't it?!!!!! ;-) -- David B. |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
The MVP question (was - 10 Sucks !)
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 15:20:35 -0000, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote: On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:30:13 -0000, David B. "David wrote: On 10/01/2019 23:36, Ken Blake wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:52 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:37:31 -0000, David B. "David wrote: How have you fared with the Microsoft Communities forums? https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us I just get useless answers from there. Nobody understands the question being asked. That's if I'm thinking of the same place as you, I'm referring to where a M$ representative answers for you. They call themselves MVPs or something, and have no clue about anything. An MVP is *not* a Microsoft representative. MVP stands for "Most Valuable Professional" and it's an honorary title granted to people who have been consistently helpful in answering questions. Three other points: 1. Questions can be and are answered by anybody. It's not always an MVP. 2. MVPs, like any other category, vary in how much they know and how good they are at explaining something. Some know a lot, others know much less. But as a general rule, most MVPs are very good. And some ordinary, non-MVPs in the Microsoft forums are also very good. 3. Besides MVPs and other ordinary non-MVPs, occasionally a Microsoft contractor (not an employee) answers a question. There are a few exceptions--some of those Microsoft contractors are also very good--but most of those people are terrible at answering questions. For most of them, English is a second language, and besides expressing themselves terribly, they often don't understand the question. Fortunately, it's a small percentage of answers that come from those contractors. But the forums would be a better place if Microsoft would stop using them. I've several times suggested to Microsoft employees that they stop using them, but I've been ignored. What you say is correct, Mr Blake. There's no need to be quite so modest though. You should be PROUD of having being awarded the MVP accolade! :-) https://social.technet.microsoft.com...crosoft%20mvp/ I had a notion that you were once a member of the VSOPs too, but cannot find you featured on the 'rogues gallery', so perhaps I am mistaken! http://www.aumha.org/vsop.htm Nope, never was. I expect you know some of the names listed there. There's one notable fellow missing on that particular showing though. Randy Knobloch aka siljaline (AH-VSOP) Randy Knobloch ROTFPMSL! Like that's his real name. It is. I know (or at least have met) most of the people listed on that page. There are a few exceptions, including at least two who have died: Alex Nichol and Robear Dyer. And some of those who are listed there as MVPs no longer are. |
#164
|
|||
|
|||
The MVP question (was - 10 Sucks !)
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 09:01:46 -0700, Ken Blake
wrote: It is. I know (or at least have met) most of the people listed on that page. There are a few exceptions, including at least two who have died: Alex Nichol and Robear Dyer. And some of those who are listed there as MVPs no longer are. And just to complicate things there are some people not listed who have been MVP's Steve -- http://www.npsnn.com |
#165
|
|||
|
|||
The MVP question (was - 10 Sucks !)
On 12/01/2019 16:01, Ken Blake wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 15:20:35 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:30:13 -0000, David B. "David wrote: On 10/01/2019 23:36, Ken Blake wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:52 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:37:31 -0000, David B. "David wrote: How have you fared with the Microsoft Communities forums? https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us I just get useless answers from there. Nobody understands the question being asked. That's if I'm thinking of the same place as you, I'm referring to where a M$ representative answers for you. They call themselves MVPs or something, and have no clue about anything. An MVP is *not* a Microsoft representative. MVP stands for "Most Valuable Professional" and it's an honorary title granted to people who have been consistently helpful in answering questions. Three other points: 1. Questions can be and are answered by anybody. It's not always an MVP. 2. MVPs, like any other category, vary in how much they know and how good they are at explaining something. Some know a lot, others know much less. But as a general rule, most MVPs are very good. And some ordinary, non-MVPs in the Microsoft forums are also very good. 3. Besides MVPs and other ordinary non-MVPs, occasionally a Microsoft contractor (not an employee) answers a question. There are a few exceptions--some of those Microsoft contractors are also very good--but most of those people are terrible at answering questions. For most of them, English is a second language, and besides expressing themselves terribly, they often don't understand the question. Fortunately, it's a small percentage of answers that come from those contractors. But the forums would be a better place if Microsoft would stop using them. I've several times suggested to Microsoft employees that they stop using them, but I've been ignored. What you say is correct, Mr Blake. There's no need to be quite so modest though. You should be PROUD of having being awarded the MVP accolade! :-) https://social.technet.microsoft.com...crosoft%20mvp/ I had a notion that you were once a member of the VSOPs too, but cannot find you featured on the 'rogues gallery', so perhaps I am mistaken! http://www.aumha.org/vsop.htm Nope, never was. OK - I accept what you say. :-) I expect you know some of the names listed there. There's one notable fellow missing on that particular showing though. Randy Knobloch aka siljaline (AH-VSOP) Randy Knobloch ROTFPMSL! Like that's his real name. It is. I know (or at least have met) most of the people listed on that page. There are a few exceptions, including at least two who have died: Alex Nichol and Robear Dyer. And some of those who are listed there as MVPs no longer are. Randy Knobloch was listed on LinkedIn as a Security Consultant In fact, we messaged one another! On 08/27/13 4:14 AM, David G Brooks wrote: -------------------- I'm delighted to advise that I found you, Randy - simply by putting a '.' between your first and last names. THEN discovered I got to the same place by not putting anything between your names - no space and no '.' !!! How do you feel about becoming one of my Facebook friends, Randy? David B. On 08/27/13 11:49 PM, Randy Knobloch wrote: -------------------- Let me think about it. You were not able to find me as I fly under the radar at Facebook. Have ya gotten over all the AumHa and Usenet stuff yet ? On 8/28/2013 8:42 AM --------------------- David G. Brooks sent the following message at 8:42 AM Thanks for replying, Randy. You say "Have ya gotten over all the AumHa and Usenet stuff yet?" I'm not sure I understand what you are getting at. You were supposedly a VSOP at AumHa - yet I never saw you post in the Forums. Did you actually do so? My biggest hang-up was with PABear - Robear Dyer - who almost single-handedly ran the now defunct AumHa Forums. Why? Because he lied. I rapidly lose trust in folk who do not tell the truth. You and I have participated in Usenet threads together - here's a single example: What, in Usenet groups, do you feel I need to "get over"? Please clarify. I'd appreciate that. Have a grand day! :-) David B. -- Sadly, he didn't respond and did a 'disappearing act'! :-( FYI http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=140835820700 PABear posted lies about me. I did not trust him. :-( -- David B. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|