What'sa proper reader for Usenet?

On Mon, 1 May 2017 09:02:19 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

On 30/04/2017 21:28, Char Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 19:30:47 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

On 30/04/2017 18:13, Char Jackson wrote:

I'm not ready to be a passenger on someone else's train.

You are using the Internet, so you are ALREADY a passenger! ;-)

How so?

I feel fairly sure that I read somewhere you claim that you had been on
Usenet - on-line - since 1984. You were pretty much at the forefront of
things if what you say is true.

Seriously, I was delighted to find you he-

CUT_THREATENING_STALKING

WTF has this to do with the THREAD - USENET READERS ?????

It's the SECOND TIME you try to change the subject.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On Mon, 1 May 2017 12:09:07 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote:

Char Jackson
Sun, 30 Apr 2017
20:28:26 GMT in alt.windows7.general, wrote:

On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 19:30:47 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

On 30/04/2017 18:13, Char Jackson wrote:

I'm not ready to be a passenger on someone else's train.

You are using the Internet, so you are ALREADY a passenger! ;-)

How so?


Anticipate stalking efforts. But, I suspect you know that already.

Yes, I'm aware. Thanks. :-)

--

Char Jackson

On 01/05/2017 11:40, mechanic wrote:
On Mon, 1 May 2017 09:02:19 +0100, David B. wrote:

I feel fairly sure that I read somewhere you claim that you had
been on Usenet - on-line - since 1984. You were pretty much at
the forefront of things if what you say is true.

Seriously, I was delighted to find you he-

https://www.linkedin.com/in/charjackson/

Sure you got the right one? Linkedin lists several.

No, I am *NOT* sure. I had expected 'OUR' 'Char' to be male.

I'd expect 'genuine' folk to correct me and provide their correct
identity if I'm mistaken. Let's see if this Usenet character DOES do
this or continues to be anonymous.

If folk are not listed on LinkedIn or Facebook, or will not have a
discussion on FaceTime or Skype, they go into my 'shady characters' folder.

I like folk to be open and honest, just like me! :-)

--
David B.

On 01/05/2017 21:16, Shadow wrote:


WTF has this to do with the THREAD - USENET READERS ?????

It's the SECOND TIME you try to change the subject.
[]'s

This isn't your home turf, Shadow.

Are you STALKING me?

If so, *WHY*?

--
David B.

On 01/05/2017 13:09, Diesel wrote:
mechanic
Mon, 01 May 2017 10:40:30 GMT in alt.windows7.general, wrote:

On Mon, 1 May 2017 09:02:19 +0100, David B. wrote:

I feel fairly sure that I read somewhere you claim that you had
been on Usenet - on-line - since 1984. You were pretty much at
the forefront of things if what you say is true.

Seriously, I was delighted to find you he-

https://www.linkedin.com/in/charjackson/

Sure you got the right one? Linkedin lists several.


Please don't encourage his stalking efforts.

I'm getting quite good at tracking down bad guys like you, Dustin! :-)

Here's a part of one of 'our' emails you have shared on Usenet:-

=

From: Dustin J Cook

To:
Subject: Malware and BugHunter
Reply-to:
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:38:36 -0400

On 13 Aug 2007 at 17:13, wrote:

Hi Dustin

What a refreshingly honest reply. Thank you.

Hmm.. Your welcome I guess.

I must admit to having never heard of a Vxer, let alone a 'retired'
one - and at such a young age too! I just had a feeling that you'd be
around 30, so I was pretty close to the mark. g

I'm curious. What gave my age away to you before I said it?

Could you once have written this?

Hmm, I've considered it. But, i have to be honest with you. i don't
give a damn about most people; *people to me are like insects*, they
*deserve to be treated as cruely as I can possibly treat them*.
Notice i said most people not all. Perhaps it's the way I myself have
been treated in my short miserable life (ah **** it, go ahead
cracky, nail me, wide open freebie). But, I was raised with the "nail
me, nail
you" concept. I've been nailed since I began breathing.. if I had my
way, I'd long be dead... but, that's a different topic, so I won't
bore you with my life story.

*You do your homework well, I must say*. Yes, that's mine....

I think I spotted somewhere on the net a statement by an Indian (not
native American! g) who had a background rather like your own, in
which he said that if one opens a file in Notepad and it starts with
'MS' then it has been tampered with. I've looked at just about every

LOL. No Sir, sorry. it's a long running joke dating back to cp/m days.
All EXE based files begin with the letterz MZ for windows and dos
systems. Linux is slightly different.

=

Remember, it was you who personally published your own date of birth.

For the record, it is ** February 1978

--
I remember chastising you for getting your and you're confused. THAT is
the REAL reason you 'outed' me, isn't it?!! ;-)

David B. wrote:
On 01/05/2017 21:16, Shadow wrote:


WTF has this to do with the THREAD - USENET READERS ?????

It's the SECOND TIME you try to change the subject.
[]'s

This isn't your home turf, Shadow.

Are you STALKING me?

If so, *WHY*?


What is this ? Coronation Street ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronation_street

Paul

On 02/05/2017 11:13, Paul wrote:
David B. wrote:
On 01/05/2017 21:16, Shadow wrote:


WTF has this to do with the THREAD - USENET READERS ?????

It's the SECOND TIME you try to change the subject.
[]'s

This isn't your home turf, Shadow.

Are you STALKING me?

If so, *WHY*?


What is this ? Coronation Street ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronation_street

Paul

At last - you are beginning to understand that Usenet is a joke! :-D

--
The only people who make a difference are the people who believe they can.

On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:06:36 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

On 01/05/2017 21:16, Shadow wrote:


WTF has this to do with the THREAD - USENET READERS ?????

It's the SECOND TIME you try to change the subject.
[]'s

This isn't your home turf, Shadow.

Says the guy posting with a Mac

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11;

Most Win 7 software runs on XP, so it IS "my turf". ALL the
software mentioned in this thread is XP compatible (even if under
Wine). It DOES NOT run on a Mac.

I've been here for a long time, and made various ON TOPIC
contributions. You have NEVER posted ON TOPIC, not ONCE.

Are you STALKING me?

I've never asked for your personal details here. Do even have
any idea what STALKING means ?
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On Tue, 2 May 2017 13:24:08 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

On 02/05/2017 11:13, Paul wrote:
David B. wrote:
On 01/05/2017 21:16, Shadow wrote:


WTF has this to do with the THREAD - USENET READERS ?????

It's the SECOND TIME you try to change the subject.
[]'s

This isn't your home turf, Shadow.

Are you STALKING me?

If so, *WHY*?


What is this ? Coronation Street ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronation_street

Paul

At last - you are beginning to understand that Usenet is a joke!

He was referring to you as the joke. Usenet is still one of
the best places to get info from experts on just about any subject.
It's a pity people try to break it with off-topic posts. I
will repeat, you have NEVER made a single post on Usenet to HELP
anyone, EVER.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On Tue, 02 May 2017 09:31:23 +0100, David B. wrote:

All EXE based files begin with the letterz MZ for windows and dos
systems. Linux is slightly different.

Linux executables begin with 0x7F followed by the letters 'ELF'.

--
Wildman GNU/Linux user #557453
The cow died so I don't need your bull!

On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:31:23 +0100
"David B." wrote:

I'm getting quite good at tracking down bad guys


yet in 12+ years not a single one has been charged,arrested
or convicted.

Just you running around with cock in hand..

Wildman news:JNWdnSl2WfzZMJXEnZ2dnUU7-
Tue, 02 May 2017 16:01:08 GMT in
alt.windows7.general, wrote:

On Tue, 02 May 2017 09:31:23 +0100, David B. wrote:

All EXE based files begin with the letterz MZ for windows and dos
systems. Linux is slightly different.

Linux executables begin with 0x7F followed by the letters 'ELF'.


Hence, "Linux is slightly different"


--
I would like to apologize for not having offended you yet.
Please be patient. I will get to you shortly.

On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:00:44 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

On 01/05/2017 11:40, mechanic wrote:
On Mon, 1 May 2017 09:02:19 +0100, David B. wrote:

I feel fairly sure that I read somewhere you claim that you had
been on Usenet - on-line - since 1984. You were pretty much at
the forefront of things if what you say is true.

Seriously, I was delighted to find you he-

https://www.linkedin.com/in/charjackson/

Sure you got the right one? Linkedin lists several.

No, I am *NOT* sure. I had expected 'OUR' 'Char' to be male.

Out of the 17 or so that you found on LinkedIn, did you just pick one at
random? If you expected me to be male, why not pick one that is male?

I'd expect 'genuine' folk to correct me and provide their correct
identity if I'm mistaken. Let's see if this Usenet character DOES do
this or continues to be anonymous.

If folk are not listed on LinkedIn or Facebook, or will not have a
discussion on FaceTime or Skype, they go into my 'shady characters' folder.

You've been in my 'shady characters' folder for a long time. The least
you can do is to return the favor.

So LinkedIn, FB, FT, and Skype get your seal of approval, but everything
else does not. That's interesting.

I like folk to be open and honest, just like me! :-)

Which is it, open and honest, or just like you? You're about as shady
and dishonest as a person can get. You should just own that.

--

Char Jackson

On Tue, 02 May 2017 10:58:50 -0300, Shadow wrote in


He was referring to you as the joke. Usenet is still one of
the best places to get info from experts on just about any subject.

+1
--
Web based forums are like subscribing to 10 different newspapers
and having to visit 10 different news stands to pickup each one.
Email list-server groups and USENET are like having all of those
newspapers delivered to your door every morning.

On 03/05/2017 00:41, Char Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:00:44 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

On 01/05/2017 11:40, mechanic wrote:
On Mon, 1 May 2017 09:02:19 +0100, David B. wrote:

I feel fairly sure that I read somewhere you claim that you had
been on Usenet - on-line - since 1984. You were pretty much at
the forefront of things if what you say is true.

Seriously, I was delighted to find you he-

https://www.linkedin.com/in/charjackson/

Sure you got the right one? Linkedin lists several.

No, I am *NOT* sure. I had expected 'OUR' 'Char' to be male.

Out of the 17 or so that you found on LinkedIn, did you just pick one at
random? If you expected me to be male, why not pick one that is male?

The only folk there with an 'image' were female. There wasn't a single
example of a male LinkedIn member. I've never encounter such a situation
before.

I'd expect 'genuine' folk to correct me and provide their correct
identity if I'm mistaken. Let's see if this Usenet character DOES do
this or continues to be anonymous.

If folk are not listed on LinkedIn or Facebook, or will not have a
discussion on FaceTime or Skype, they go into my 'shady characters' folder.

You've been in my 'shady characters' folder for a long time. The least
you can do is to return the favor.

So LinkedIn, FB, FT, and Skype get your seal of approval, but everything
else does not. That's interesting.

I like folk to be open and honest, just like me! :-)

Which is it, open and honest, or just like you? You're about as shady
and dishonest as a person can get. You should just own that.

As I said - *I* am genuine. You have failed to show that you are too.

No matter. You suit yourself dear.

--
"The important thing is not to stop questioning."
- Albert Einstein