A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Windows 10 » Windows 10 Help Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

For those considering Linux...



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old December 21st 17, 11:45 AM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Lucifer Morningstar[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 368
Default For those considering Linux...

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:44:11 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

On 20 Dec 2017 17:17:34 GMT, ray carter wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:36:59 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

...

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...tu-17.10-BIOS-

Corrupter

Linux corrupts your BIOS. Brilliant stuff.


One example of why I use Debian instead of Ubuntu.


Probably a good point, but I hope you'll understand why some people
might be reluctant to use Linux in general as a result of news like
this.


I have machines running Solaris 10 and 11.
Ads
  #17  
Old December 21st 17, 12:04 PM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Chris Ahlstrom[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 169
Default For those considering Linux...

Lucifer Morningstar wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:44:11 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

On 20 Dec 2017 17:17:34 GMT, ray carter wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:36:59 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

...

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...tu-17.10-BIOS-
Corrupter

Linux corrupts your BIOS. Brilliant stuff.

One example of why I use Debian instead of Ubuntu.


Probably a good point, but I hope you'll understand why some people
might be reluctant to use Linux in general as a result of news like
this.


Why? Crap like that doesn't stop Windows users.

I have machines running Solaris 10 and 11.


--
In the plot, people came to the land; the land loved them; they worked and
struggled and had lots of children. There was a Frenchman who talked funny
and a greenhorn from England who was a fancy-pants but when it came to the
crunch he was all courage. Those novels would make you retch.
-- Canadian novelist Robertson Davies, on the generic Canadian
novel.
  #18  
Old December 21st 17, 12:45 PM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
mechanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,064
Default For those considering Linux...

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:44:11 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

On 20 Dec 2017 17:17:34 GMT, ray carter wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:36:59 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

...

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...tu-17.10-BIOS-

Corrupter

Linux corrupts your BIOS. Brilliant stuff.


One example of why I use Debian instead of Ubuntu.


Probably a good point, but I hope you'll understand why some people
might be reluctant to use Linux in general as a result of news like
this.


Seems to be an Intel driver problem that Ubuntu might/should have
caught in their testing of new kernels. See the comments on the site
listed above for more insight.
  #19  
Old December 21st 17, 02:16 PM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
chrisv
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 649
Default For those considering Linux...

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

Doomsdrzej wrote:

Probably a good point, but I hope you'll understand why some people
might be reluctant to use Linux in general as a result of news like
this.


Why? Crap like that doesn't stop Windows users.


True, but most of them feel that they really don't have a choice.
There's too much FUD about leaving the herd.

--
"(Sandman) forged a screenshot. Already proved." - some thing, lying
shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)
  #20  
Old December 21st 17, 02:31 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
John Doe[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,378
Default For those considering Linux...

Doomsdrzej wrote:

Paul wrote:
Doomsdrzej wrote:


https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa..._item&px=Ubunt
u-17.10-BIOS-Corrupter

Linux corrupts your BIOS. Brilliant stuff.


Before high-fiving yourself, also consider that UEFI has a
checkered history.

https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/25091.html

"Samsung can end up bricked

And I remember when I thought UEFI would make our lives
simpler and reduce the amount of ridiculous hacks we
needed. Sigh."

There was also a case in Windows, where some Windows thing
modifies a setting in the BIOS - and later when the user
gets into the BIOS, there *no* way to put it back. So even
Windows has a means of triggering trap-door behavior, by
flipping something in the BIOS, that cannot be corrected
from a BIOS setup screen.

UEFI is just a bad bad idea. That's the message.


I have no doubt of it. I tend to disable it entirely
whenever I install Linux on this machine. It's always more
trouble than it's worth.

I *think* I'm covered, because my computer has a special
USB port, with a flasher function built right in. You plug
in a USB stick with a named BIOS file on it, push a button,
and the image is loaded into the BIOS (there is a separate
chip on the motherboard handling this). The function works
so well, that even if the CPU is not in the CPU socket and
it's "just a motherboard", the flashing function still
works. You can buy my motherboard, connect an ATX power
supply, plug in a USB stick, flash the BIOS, power off...
and insert a previously-unsupported CPU and have it work.

I haven't needed to use that, but that's my "insurance
policy" in times of trouble.


A very cool feature, I have to admit. If anything, it's
protection against malware like the dreaded CIH virus of
1999.

The traditional BIOS, also used to write to itself, but not
anywhere nearly as badly designed as UEFI. It has a
microcode cache (I loaded mine manually on my P2B-S), it
has DMI/ESCD (mostly innocuous). Whereas UEFI can be
bricked, just via the "NVRAM storage in flash" feature, an
area used to hold various variables.


I had a motherboard a few years ago which had two BIOS
chips. If the first one gets corrupted, the second is used
as a failsafe. I believe the motherboard's brand was DFI. I
don't know if their motherboards are any good but that
feature, at the very least, was very welcome.


That is GIGABYTE DualBIOS™

After losing my last motherboard to a BIOS problem, I made it a
point to get one. I suppose Paul's version would work too.




--

Groups trimmed.
  #21  
Old December 21st 17, 02:42 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
John Doe[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,378
Default For those considering Linux...

Paul wrote:

chrisv wrote:
Paul wrote:

I *think* I'm covered, because my computer has a special
USB port, with a flasher function built right in. You
plug in a USB stick with a named BIOS file on it, push a
button, and the image is loaded into the BIOS (there is a
separate chip on the motherboard handling this). The
function works so well, that even if the CPU is not in
the CPU socket and it's "just a motherboard", the
flashing function still works. You can buy my
motherboard, connect an ATX power supply, plug in a USB
stick, flash the BIOS, power off... and insert a
previously-unsupported CPU and have it work.


BIOS updates with no CPU installed? I've not heard of
that before, but it has obvious uses, as you say.

In all the motherboard reviews I've read, I've not seen
that feature mentioned. Am I not reading
carefully-enough?


P9X79 Page16

"USB BIOS Flashback

USB BIOS Flashback offers the most convenient way to
flash the BIOS ever! It allows overclockers to try new
BIOS versions easily, without even entering their
existing BIOS or operating system. Just plug in USB
storage and push the dedicated button for 3 seconds, and
the BIOS is automatically flashed using standby power.
Worry-free overclocking for the ultimate convenience!
"

For most people, the use-case for this, is gaining support
for a CPU, by using a more recent BIOS. A job we used to
solve by buying a $40 Celeron, putting it on the
motherboard, flashing up, then tossing the Celeron in the
garbage.


Assuming that is not just rhetoric... That $40 Celeron should
be kept. If it is compatible with the rest of the system, it
can be used as a swap when troubleshooting. And spending only
$40 on the CPU is a cheap way to upgrade your motherboard.

That is how I upgraded last time. I just made sure the chosen
Celeron handles all the hardware that would be installed.

By the way... Sounds like a neat method for safeguarding the
BIOS. I might look into it next time. I suppose the Gigabyte
dual BIOS works, but I am into efficiency and your method
appears to be a bit more efficient.





--

Groups trimmed.


And it apparently runs off +5VSB.

Here is the public relations material on the feature.

http://event.asus.com/2012/mb/USB_BIOS_Flashback_GUIDE/

With Asus, some of these features only last a few years,
before they turf them. I can see a Z170A board that has
FlashBack, but I don't see the button to press on that one.

Paul



  #22  
Old December 21st 17, 02:46 PM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Doomsdrzej[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 262
Default For those considering Linux...

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:11:01 -0800, Alan Baker
wrote:

On 2017-12-20 2:41 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On 20 Dec 2017 22:10:56 GMT, ray carter wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:44:11 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

On 20 Dec 2017 17:17:34 GMT, ray carter wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:36:59 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

...

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...=Ubuntu-17.10-
BIOS-
Corrupter

Linux corrupts your BIOS. Brilliant stuff.

One example of why I use Debian instead of Ubuntu.

Probably a good point, but I hope you'll understand why some people
might be reluctant to use Linux in general as a result of news like
this.

'news like this' meaning that one particular Linux distribution has an
issue with their most recent release? I guess MS never had a problem with
an initial release of any windows version.


Can you recall Windows being responsible for corrupting a BIOS, sinec
Windows 1.0?


Does this count, twitboy:

'Windows 10 corrupted my BIOS'

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-performance-winpc/windows-10-corrupted-my-bios/0a7e5acb-78b7-43be-87e9-f24aedefb4be

How about this:

'Windows10 auto-update just corrupted my DVD player, then my bios'

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-update-winpc/windows10-auto-update-just-corrupted-my-dvd-player/1d9bbcc4-c146-4cc4-b0ec-af48dad1c1ba

Or this:

'After windows update my BIOS is corrupted and system will not boot '

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/after-windows-update-my-bios-is-corrupted-and/d3da6560-bc52-4da3-9c51-4ccb675207f9


They do and I'm glad that you posted them.
  #23  
Old December 21st 17, 02:47 PM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Doomsdrzej[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 262
Default For those considering Linux...

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:27:37 -0800, mike wrote:

On 12/20/2017 3:11 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2017-12-20 2:41 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On 20 Dec 2017 22:10:56 GMT, ray carter wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:44:11 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

On 20 Dec 2017 17:17:34 GMT, ray carter wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:36:59 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

...

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...=Ubuntu-17.10-
BIOS-
Corrupter

Linux corrupts your BIOS. Brilliant stuff.

One example of why I use Debian instead of Ubuntu.

Probably a good point, but I hope you'll understand why some people
might be reluctant to use Linux in general as a result of news like
this.

'news like this' meaning that one particular Linux distribution has an
issue with their most recent release? I guess MS never had a problem
with
an initial release of any windows version.

Can you recall Windows being responsible for corrupting a BIOS, sinec
Windows 1.0?


Does this count, twitboy:

'Windows 10 corrupted my BIOS'

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-performance-winpc/windows-10-corrupted-my-bios/0a7e5acb-78b7-43be-87e9-f24aedefb4be


How about this:

'Windows10 auto-update just corrupted my DVD player, then my bios'

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-update-winpc/windows10-auto-update-just-corrupted-my-dvd-player/1d9bbcc4-c146-4cc4-b0ec-af48dad1c1ba


Or this:

'After windows update my BIOS is corrupted and system will not boot '

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/after-windows-update-my-bios-is-corrupted-and/d3da6560-bc52-4da3-9c51-4ccb675207f9

I have one uefi motherboard that once had win8.1, but wouldn't boot.
Couldn't get it to do anything.
Second motherboard booted into the uefi just fine until I installed
win8.1. 8.1 ran fine until I cycled power.
After the first power cycle, it never booted again. Supposed to have
the ability
to boot from a thumb drive to restore bios, but it wouldn't read the flash.


I've never heard of Windows doing that but yeah, that's pretty
troubling.
  #24  
Old December 21st 17, 02:48 PM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Doomsdrzej[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 262
Default For those considering Linux...

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:45:50 +1100, Lucifer Morningstar
wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:44:11 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

On 20 Dec 2017 17:17:34 GMT, ray carter wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:36:59 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

...

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...tu-17.10-BIOS-
Corrupter

Linux corrupts your BIOS. Brilliant stuff.

One example of why I use Debian instead of Ubuntu.


Probably a good point, but I hope you'll understand why some people
might be reluctant to use Linux in general as a result of news like
this.


I have machines running Solaris 10 and 11.


And some people still use Atari STs to produce music. What's your
point?
  #25  
Old December 21st 17, 04:00 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 49
Default For those considering Linux...

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 01:17:27 -0800, me wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 02:41:00 -0600,
wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:36:59 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

...

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...tu-17.10-BIOS-

Corrupter

Linux corrupts your BIOS. Brilliant stuff.


This comes as no surprise to me. I wanted to try Linux some years ago.
I wrote some ISO files to flash drives to make them bootable, and
runable. I began with several brand new flash drives.

Not only did many of them not boot on any of my computers, but these ISO
files literally killed the flash drives. Most of them had 5 writes or
less. After killing 5 or 6 flash drives, I quit all linux use after
that. Even the few distros that did boot, did not impresse me.

I guess I can be thankful that my only losses were about $35 worth of
flash drives, and not a motherboard or entire computer.



I've run several versions of Linux from CDs, DVDs, flash drives, AND
more. Never had a problem.


The problem seems to be what the the iso file contains and how you burn.
The later releases contain the boot loader and I've found the best way to
burn this is using dd from the terminal.
Others do not contain the boot loader which can be added later or by
something like Rufus.
The damaged flash drives are not lost forever but getting them back can
be a struggle. Gparted doesn't always do it. I've have best luck using
the free mini partition tool for windows.
  #26  
Old December 21st 17, 04:23 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Doomsdrzej[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 262
Default For those considering Linux...

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 02:41:00 -0600,
wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:36:59 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

...

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Ubuntu-17.10-BIOS-Corrupter

Linux corrupts your BIOS. Brilliant stuff.


This comes as no surprise to me. I wanted to try Linux some years ago.
I wrote some ISO files to flash drives to make them bootable, and
runable. I began with several brand new flash drives.

Not only did many of them not boot on any of my computers, but these
ISO files literally killed the flash drives. Most of them had 5 writes
or less. After killing 5 or 6 flash drives, I quit all linux use after
that. Even the few distros that did boot, did not impresse me.

I guess I can be thankful that my only losses were about $35 worth of
flash drives, and not a motherboard or entire computer.


Generally, you can fix those USB keys by re-formatting them using a
Linux application. You basically need to re-arrange the partitions and
make sure that there is only one formatted as FAT32. I've been in that
situation for I empathize completely.

I _keep_ getting lured into the Linux beast but am learning to resist
it a lot better. It's like smoking except less satisfying.
  #28  
Old December 21st 17, 05:53 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Doomsdrzej[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 262
Default For those considering Linux...

rOn Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:31:17 -0000 (UTC), John Doe
wrote:

Doomsdrzej wrote:

Paul wrote:
Doomsdrzej wrote:


https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa..._item&px=Ubunt
u-17.10-BIOS-Corrupter

Linux corrupts your BIOS. Brilliant stuff.

Before high-fiving yourself, also consider that UEFI has a
checkered history.

https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/25091.html

"Samsung can end up bricked

And I remember when I thought UEFI would make our lives
simpler and reduce the amount of ridiculous hacks we
needed. Sigh."

There was also a case in Windows, where some Windows thing
modifies a setting in the BIOS - and later when the user
gets into the BIOS, there *no* way to put it back. So even
Windows has a means of triggering trap-door behavior, by
flipping something in the BIOS, that cannot be corrected
from a BIOS setup screen.

UEFI is just a bad bad idea. That's the message.


I have no doubt of it. I tend to disable it entirely
whenever I install Linux on this machine. It's always more
trouble than it's worth.

I *think* I'm covered, because my computer has a special
USB port, with a flasher function built right in. You plug
in a USB stick with a named BIOS file on it, push a button,
and the image is loaded into the BIOS (there is a separate
chip on the motherboard handling this). The function works
so well, that even if the CPU is not in the CPU socket and
it's "just a motherboard", the flashing function still
works. You can buy my motherboard, connect an ATX power
supply, plug in a USB stick, flash the BIOS, power off...
and insert a previously-unsupported CPU and have it work.

I haven't needed to use that, but that's my "insurance
policy" in times of trouble.


A very cool feature, I have to admit. If anything, it's
protection against malware like the dreaded CIH virus of
1999.

The traditional BIOS, also used to write to itself, but not
anywhere nearly as badly designed as UEFI. It has a
microcode cache (I loaded mine manually on my P2B-S), it
has DMI/ESCD (mostly innocuous). Whereas UEFI can be
bricked, just via the "NVRAM storage in flash" feature, an
area used to hold various variables.


I had a motherboard a few years ago which had two BIOS
chips. If the first one gets corrupted, the second is used
as a failsafe. I believe the motherboard's brand was DFI. I
don't know if their motherboards are any good but that
feature, at the very least, was very welcome.


That is GIGABYTE DualBIOS™

After losing my last motherboard to a BIOS problem, I made it a
point to get one. I suppose Paul's version would work too.


Maybe Gigabyte does it too, but I checked and the model I had was a
DFI LANParty for AMD Athlon XP processors. I ran an Athlon 3500+ and
then 4800+ on it.
  #29  
Old December 21st 17, 05:55 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Doomsdrzej[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 262
Default For those considering Linux...

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:00:55 -0000 (UTC), Dave
wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 01:17:27 -0800, me wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 02:41:00 -0600,
wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:36:59 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

...

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...tu-17.10-BIOS-

Corrupter

Linux corrupts your BIOS. Brilliant stuff.

This comes as no surprise to me. I wanted to try Linux some years ago.
I wrote some ISO files to flash drives to make them bootable, and
runable. I began with several brand new flash drives.

Not only did many of them not boot on any of my computers, but these ISO
files literally killed the flash drives. Most of them had 5 writes or
less. After killing 5 or 6 flash drives, I quit all linux use after
that. Even the few distros that did boot, did not impresse me.

I guess I can be thankful that my only losses were about $35 worth of
flash drives, and not a motherboard or entire computer.



I've run several versions of Linux from CDs, DVDs, flash drives, AND
more. Never had a problem.


The problem seems to be what the the iso file contains and how you burn.
The later releases contain the boot loader and I've found the best way to
burn this is using dd from the terminal.
Others do not contain the boot loader which can be added later or by
something like Rufus.
The damaged flash drives are not lost forever but getting them back can
be a struggle. Gparted doesn't always do it. I've have best luck using
the free mini partition tool for windows.


It's stuff like that which encourages me to just forget about the
operating system entirely and keep using Windows with all of its
faults.
  #30  
Old December 21st 17, 06:00 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Sjouke Burry[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 275
Default For those considering Linux...

On 21-12-2017 17:52, Doomsdrzej wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 01:17:27 -0800, wrote:

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 02:41:00 -0600,
wrote:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:36:59 -0500, Doomsdrzej wrote:

...

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Ubuntu-17.10-BIOS-Corrupter

Linux corrupts your BIOS. Brilliant stuff.

This comes as no surprise to me. I wanted to try Linux some years ago.
I wrote some ISO files to flash drives to make them bootable, and
runable. I began with several brand new flash drives.

Not only did many of them not boot on any of my computers, but these
ISO files literally killed the flash drives. Most of them had 5 writes
or less. After killing 5 or 6 flash drives, I quit all linux use after
that. Even the few distros that did boot, did not impresse me.

I guess I can be thankful that my only losses were about $35 worth of
flash drives, and not a motherboard or entire computer.



I've run several versions of Linux from CDs, DVDs, flash drives, AND
more. Never had a problem.


All the better if that's the case, but even the most delusional of
Linux advocates has to admit that it's not perfect and that the
situation might end up being less than ideal on some hardware.

All the better if that's the case, but even the most delusional of
Windows advocates has to admit that it's not perfect and that the
situation might end up being less than ideal on some hardware.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.