A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » Printing and Faxing with Windows XP
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Colour lazer??



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old May 22nd 04, 02:29 AM
Wislu Plethora
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colour lazer??


-----Original Message-----
Wislu

Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing

quality.. there was
no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't

pre-empt that photos
would be the main output.. photos are a very small part

of the output from
my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to

lasers being expensive to
recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are

not cheap to replace,
and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that

laser printers are
cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing

color toner, a
substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my

original post was
BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the

output of others that
you have misread and misunderstood?..


The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color
laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not
true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that
would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong.

Ads
  #32  
Old May 22nd 04, 02:35 AM
Wislu Plethora
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colour lazer??


-----Original Message-----
Wislu

Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing

quality.. there was
no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't

pre-empt that photos
would be the main output.. photos are a very small part

of the output from
my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to

lasers being expensive to
recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are

not cheap to replace,
and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that

laser printers are
cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing

color toner, a
substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my

original post was
BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the

output of others that
you have misread and misunderstood?..


The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color
laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not
true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that
would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong.

  #33  
Old May 22nd 04, 02:39 AM
Wislu Plethora
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colour lazer??


-----Original Message-----
Wislu

Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing

quality.. there was
no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't

pre-empt that photos
would be the main output.. photos are a very small part

of the output from
my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to

lasers being expensive to
recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are

not cheap to replace,
and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that

laser printers are
cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing

color toner, a
substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my

original post was
BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the

output of others that
you have misread and misunderstood?..


The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color
laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not
true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that
would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong.

  #34  
Old May 22nd 04, 05:29 AM
Wislu Plethora
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colour lazer??


-----Original Message-----
Wislu

Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing

quality.. there was
no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't

pre-empt that photos
would be the main output.. photos are a very small part

of the output from
my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to

lasers being expensive to
recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are

not cheap to replace,
and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that

laser printers are
cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing

color toner, a
substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my

original post was
BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the

output of others that
you have misread and misunderstood?..


The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color
laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not
true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that
would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong.

  #35  
Old May 22nd 04, 06:02 AM
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colour lazer??

"in some applications..." is a generalization in itself


"Wislu Plethora" wrote in message
...

-----Original Message-----
Wislu

Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing

quality.. there was
no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't

pre-empt that photos
would be the main output.. photos are a very small part

of the output from
my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to

lasers being expensive to
recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are

not cheap to replace,
and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that

laser printers are
cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing

color toner, a
substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my

original post was
BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the

output of others that
you have misread and misunderstood?..


The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color
laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not
true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that
would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong.



  #36  
Old May 22nd 04, 06:05 AM
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colour lazer??

"in some applications..." is a generalization in itself


"Wislu Plethora" wrote in message
...

-----Original Message-----
Wislu

Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing

quality.. there was
no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't

pre-empt that photos
would be the main output.. photos are a very small part

of the output from
my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to

lasers being expensive to
recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are

not cheap to replace,
and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that

laser printers are
cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing

color toner, a
substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my

original post was
BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the

output of others that
you have misread and misunderstood?..


The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color
laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not
true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that
would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong.



  #37  
Old May 22nd 04, 02:18 PM
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colour lazer??

"in some applications..." is a generalization in itself


"Wislu Plethora" wrote in message
...

-----Original Message-----
Wislu

Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing

quality.. there was
no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't

pre-empt that photos
would be the main output.. photos are a very small part

of the output from
my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to

lasers being expensive to
recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are

not cheap to replace,
and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that

laser printers are
cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing

color toner, a
substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my

original post was
BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the

output of others that
you have misread and misunderstood?..


The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color
laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not
true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that
would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong.



  #38  
Old May 22nd 04, 02:24 PM
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colour lazer??

"in some applications..." is a generalization in itself


"Wislu Plethora" wrote in message
...

-----Original Message-----
Wislu

Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing

quality.. there was
no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't

pre-empt that photos
would be the main output.. photos are a very small part

of the output from
my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to

lasers being expensive to
recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are

not cheap to replace,
and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that

laser printers are
cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing

color toner, a
substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my

original post was
BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the

output of others that
you have misread and misunderstood?..


The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color
laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not
true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that
would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong.



  #39  
Old May 22nd 04, 02:34 PM
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colour lazer??

"in some applications..." is a generalization in itself


"Wislu Plethora" wrote in message
...

-----Original Message-----
Wislu

Please note that I used the word 'generally' re printing

quality.. there was
no mention of photos in the original post, so I didn't

pre-empt that photos
would be the main output.. photos are a very small part

of the output from
my color inkjet printer.. I also made reference to

lasers being expensive to
recharge, that is to say that the toner cartridges are

not cheap to replace,
and indeed they are not cheap.. I have no doubt that

laser printers are
cheaper per page to run, but when it comes to replacing

color toner, a
substantial outlay has to be made.. so what part of my

original post was
BALONEY, or is that just a term that you use for the

output of others that
you have misread and misunderstood?..


The part of it that was baloney was that "generally" color
laser printers produce higher quality output. Just not
true. If you had said, "in some applications..." that
would be different. As a generalization it's just wrong.



  #40  
Old May 22nd 04, 05:58 PM
Wislu Plethora
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colour lazer??


-----Original Message-----
"in some applications..." is a generalization in itself


You are a top-posting moron. Permit me to explain. When
one states that an idea is true "generally," it means that
it is not true in all cases, but is in most. "In some
applications" is clearly *not* a generalization, because
it means that there are *specific* cases where the
statement is not true (i.e., the statement "Laser printers
are better than inkjet printers"). They are in fact *not*
generally better than inkjet printers, which was *your*
stupid statement.

Because I'm disinclined to extend a battle of wits with
an unarmed man, feel free to have the last word. You seem
to be doing a much better job of arguing against yourself
anyway. Remember, though: better to remian silent and be
thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
  #41  
Old May 22nd 04, 05:58 PM
Wislu Plethora
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colour lazer??


-----Original Message-----
"in some applications..." is a generalization in itself


You are a top-posting moron. Permit me to explain. When
one states that an idea is true "generally," it means that
it is not true in all cases, but is in most. "In some
applications" is clearly *not* a generalization, because
it means that there are *specific* cases where the
statement is not true (i.e., the statement "Laser printers
are better than inkjet printers"). They are in fact *not*
generally better than inkjet printers, which was *your*
stupid statement.

Because I'm disinclined to extend a battle of wits with
an unarmed man, feel free to have the last word. You seem
to be doing a much better job of arguing against yourself
anyway. Remember, though: better to remian silent and be
thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
  #42  
Old May 22nd 04, 05:58 PM
Wislu Plethora
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colour lazer??


-----Original Message-----
"in some applications..." is a generalization in itself


You are a top-posting moron. Permit me to explain. When
one states that an idea is true "generally," it means that
it is not true in all cases, but is in most. "In some
applications" is clearly *not* a generalization, because
it means that there are *specific* cases where the
statement is not true (i.e., the statement "Laser printers
are better than inkjet printers"). They are in fact *not*
generally better than inkjet printers, which was *your*
stupid statement.

Because I'm disinclined to extend a battle of wits with
an unarmed man, feel free to have the last word. You seem
to be doing a much better job of arguing against yourself
anyway. Remember, though: better to remian silent and be
thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
  #43  
Old May 26th 04, 01:06 AM
Box134
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Colour lazer??

****lu, in your case you're equally a fool whether you speak or not, you
useless parasite. Who cares about your long-winded logic BS anyway?

BTW it's "remain" not "remian" bozo.

"Wislu Plethora" wrote in message
...

You are a top-posting moron. Permit me to explain. When
one states that an idea is true "generally," it means that
it is not true in all cases, but is in most. "In some
applications" is clearly *not* a generalization, because
it means that there are *specific* cases where the
statement is not true (i.e., the statement "Laser printers
are better than inkjet printers"). They are in fact *not*
generally better than inkjet printers, which was *your*
stupid statement.

Because I'm disinclined to extend a battle of wits with
an unarmed man, feel free to have the last word. You seem
to be doing a much better job of arguing against yourself
anyway. Remember, though: better to remian silent and be
thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.