If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
On 2020-08-19 5:58 p.m., nospam wrote:
In article , Snit wrote: apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation incorrect. This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US ----- Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps ----- Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows virtualization. it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention windows. I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you canĀ¹t see that or disagree then whatever. you're moving the goalposts. the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop. you are imagining words that do not exist. A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up to try to feel better about by yourself. not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word windows was included when it was not. if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it. this should be good. the above is about *virtualization* *apps*. Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like. here's a clue: those are not windows. do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware? Here, to help educate you: lose the attitude. https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software Below you do your ego boost thing. that would be you, given your attitude displayed above. Not interested. another lie. the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your head. you ask for tech, then say you don't want it. the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong. it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex topics. in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it. it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada. Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-) Rene |
Ads |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:21:11 -0500, Rene Lamontagne
wrote: On 2020-08-19 5:58 p.m., nospam wrote: In article , Snit wrote: apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation incorrect. This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US ----- Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps ----- Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows virtualization. it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention windows. I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can¹t see that or disagree then whatever. you're moving the goalposts. the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop. you are imagining words that do not exist. A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up to try to feel better about by yourself. not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word windows was included when it was not. if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it. this should be good. the above is about *virtualization* *apps*. Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like. here's a clue: those are not windows. do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware? Here, to help educate you: lose the attitude. https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software Below you do your ego boost thing. that would be you, given your attitude displayed above. Not interested. another lie. the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your head. you ask for tech, then say you don't want it. the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong. it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex topics. in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it. it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada. Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-) Rene I think nospam is just having a little fun at snit's expense. It's hilarious watching snit squirm and froth when he gets backed into a corner. Over in ACW a poster named "Gremlin" currently has snit drooling from both corners of his mouth. More fun! -- Ron Gilmore All about snit read below: https://web.archive.org/web/20181028....com/snit.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529.../snitlist.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529...ieMethods.html |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
Rene Lamontagne wrote:
On 2020-08-19 5:58 p.m., nospam wrote: In article , Snit wrote: apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation incorrect. This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US ----- Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps ----- Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows virtualization. it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention windows. I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you canĀ¹t see that or disagree then whatever. you're moving the goalposts. the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop. you are imagining words that do not exist. A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up to try to feel better about by yourself. not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word windows was included when it was not. if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it. this should be good. the above is about *virtualization* *apps*. Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like. here's a clue: those are not windows. do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware? Here, to help educate you: lose the attitude. https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software Below you do your ego boost thing. that would be you, given your attitude displayed above. Not interested. another lie. the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your head. you ask for tech, then say you don't want it. the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong. it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex topics. in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it. it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada. Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-) Rene I am pretty good at letting those who troll ātrapā themselves. It is quite amusing. But I prefer to talk about tech. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
In article , Snit
wrote: apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation incorrect. This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US ----- Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps ----- Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows virtualization. it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention windows. I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can1t see that or disagree then whatever. Nospam avoided this. there's nothing to avoid. the above stability fix has *nothing* to do with windows. full stop. you are avoiding what the bug is actually about, which was explained in simple terms. you are intentionally avoiding that explanation, as well as how something that does not mention windows can be about windows. you're moving the goalposts. the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop. you are imagining words that do not exist. A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up to try to feel better about by yourself. Nospam avoided this. another false claim of yours, solely to avoid admitting your errors. not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word windows was included when it was not. if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it. this should be good. Specific to? You made that up. nothing is made up. you claimed the fix is for windows, despite no mention of windows. i'm sure you will avoid explaining how that can be. the above is about *virtualization* *apps*. Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like. here's a clue: those are not windows. They are used to run Windows. Sorry, I figured that was common knowledge. Did not realize I needed to explain that to you. My mistake. your mistake is claiming knowledge you do not have, a mistake you continue to make and never learn from. vm apps are used for much more than running windows. many people do not use them for windows guests at all, particularly mac users and app developers, who frequently use a vm app to virtualize older versions of mac os. https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-Fu...sion.using.doc /GUID-FF41B265-79D1-4AD8-822B-95A86A05DE8B.html Fusion supports more than 100 guest operating systems, including most versions of Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, OS X, and macOS. do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware? Here, to help educate you: lose the attitude. Nothing wrong with you learning. If you can. nothing wrong with losing the attitude and not being combative. however, it does appear that it is impossible for you to learn anything. And below you throw a tantrum. Not interested. I prefer to talk about tech. no you very definitely don't. any time anyone talks 'tech' you either do not understand it and refuse to learn why, or you simply ignore it outright. what you call 'tech' includes an explanation of the bug in easy to understand terms, at which point you replied with Not interested. https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software Below you do your ego boost thing. that would be you, given your attitude displayed above. Not interested. another lie. the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your head. you ask for tech, then say you don't want it. the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong. it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex topics. in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it. it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada. |
#200
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
In article , Rene Lamontagne
wrote: apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation incorrect. This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US ----- Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps ----- Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows virtualization. it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention windows. I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can1t see that or disagree then whatever. you're moving the goalposts. the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop. you are imagining words that do not exist. A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up to try to feel better about by yourself. not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word windows was included when it was not. if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it. this should be good. the above is about *virtualization* *apps*. Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like. here's a clue: those are not windows. do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware? Here, to help educate you: lose the attitude. https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software Below you do your ego boost thing. that would be you, given your attitude displayed above. Not interested. another lie. the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your head. you ask for tech, then say you don't want it. the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong. it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex topics. in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it. it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada. Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-) not at all. i'm well aware of his antics. he's *so* over his head he doesn't even know what he's saying. |
#201
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
In article , Snit
wrote: I am pretty good at letting those who troll ³trap² themselves. It is quite amusing. thereby proving you are nothing more than a troll. and apparently you're not that good, since you trapped yourself, big time. But I prefer to talk about tech. no you don't, since any time anyone does so, you ignore it because it shows how little you actually know. |
#202
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
In article , Ron
wrote: apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation incorrect. This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US ----- Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps ----- Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows virtualization. it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention windows. I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can¹t see that or disagree then whatever. you're moving the goalposts. the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop. you are imagining words that do not exist. A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up to try to feel better about by yourself. not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word windows was included when it was not. if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it. this should be good. the above is about *virtualization* *apps*. Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like. here's a clue: those are not windows. do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware? Here, to help educate you: lose the attitude. https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software Below you do your ego boost thing. that would be you, given your attitude displayed above. Not interested. another lie. the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your head. you ask for tech, then say you don't want it. the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong. it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex topics. in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it. it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada. Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-) Rene I think nospam is just having a little fun at snit's expense. exactly. It's hilarious watching snit squirm and froth when he gets backed into a corner. Over in ACW a poster named "Gremlin" currently has snit drooling from both corners of his mouth. More fun! some of gremlin's posts are crossposted here. |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
Snit wrote:
nospam wrote: In article , Snit wrote: apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation incorrect. This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US ----- Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps ----- Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows virtualization. it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention windows. I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you canāt see that or disagree then whatever. Nospam responded to this by bragging he knows other OSs can be run in virtualization as if that was surprising to him. At least he is learning. you are imagining words that do not exist. A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up to try to feel better about by yourself. the above is about *virtualization* *apps*. Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like. Here, to help educate you: https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software Below you do your ego boost thing. Not interested. it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex topics. in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it. it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
nospam wrote:
In article , Rene Lamontagne wrote: apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation incorrect. This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US ----- Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps ----- Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows virtualization. it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention windows. I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can1t see that or disagree then whatever. you're moving the goalposts. the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop. you are imagining words that do not exist. A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up to try to feel better about by yourself. not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word windows was included when it was not. if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it. this should be good. the above is about *virtualization* *apps*. Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like. here's a clue: those are not windows. do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware? Here, to help educate you: lose the attitude. https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software Below you do your ego boost thing. that would be you, given your attitude displayed above. Not interested. another lie. the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your head. you ask for tech, then say you don't want it. the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong. it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex topics. in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it. it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada. Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-) not at all. i'm well aware of his antics. he's *so* over his head he doesn't even know what he's saying. I am saying I agree with Apple about what Apple is doing with Silicon. And you keep insisting I am wrong. It is rather funny. But, hey, you did some research and found other OSs can be run in virtualization ā something that was never in contention. Well done. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
nospam wrote:
In article , Snit wrote: I am pretty good at letting those who troll Ā³trapĀ² themselves. It is quite amusing. thereby proving you are nothing more than a troll. and apparently you're not that good, since you trapped yourself, big time. But I prefer to talk about tech. no you don't, since any time anyone does so, you ignore it because it shows how little you actually know. I respond to your trolling and you call me names. Oh well. Anyway, back to tech: I still agree with Apple about their Silicon and how it will not support the virtualization of x86 Windows. How about you? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#206
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
nospam wrote:
In article , Ron wrote: apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation incorrect. This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US ----- Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps ----- Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows virtualization. it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention windows. I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you canĀ¹t see that or disagree then whatever. you're moving the goalposts. the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop. you are imagining words that do not exist. A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up to try to feel better about by yourself. not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word windows was included when it was not. if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it. this should be good. the above is about *virtualization* *apps*. Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like. here's a clue: those are not windows. do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware? Here, to help educate you: lose the attitude. https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software Below you do your ego boost thing. that would be you, given your attitude displayed above. Not interested. another lie. the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your head. you ask for tech, then say you don't want it. the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong. it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex topics. in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it. it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada. Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-) Rene I think nospam is just having a little fun at snit's expense. exactly. It's hilarious watching snit squirm and froth when he gets backed into a corner. Over in ACW a poster named "Gremlin" currently has snit drooling from both corners of his mouth. More fun! some of gremlin's posts are crossposted here. Anyway, back to tech: I still agree with Apple about their Silicon and how it will not support the virtualization of x86 Windows. How about you? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:08:30 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Snit wrote: I am pretty good at letting those who troll ³trap² themselves. It is quite amusing. thereby proving you are nothing more than a troll. and apparently you're not that good, since you trapped yourself, big time. But I prefer to talk about tech. no you don't, since any time anyone does so, you ignore it because it shows how little you actually know. Snit's a terrible troll, in the classic sense, and much like everything else in life, he is inept at trolling as well because his socks always get outed. Ask snit about his tmelmosfire sock puppet. That one is rather interesting because it was posting the same style of gibberish posts long before snit's flood bot was unleashed. Then there was his Houston Starterpad sock puppet which was short lived because he was outed right away. The one thing snit is good at is disruption and causing chaos. When snit joins a group it won't be long before the group turns into a gigantic food fight. And that is snit's goal. He doesn't want to talk tech anymore than he wants to find a job. To him both are like a crucifix in the morning sun to a vampire. -- Ron Gilmore All about snit read below: https://web.archive.org/web/20181028....com/snit.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529.../snitlist.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529...ieMethods.html |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:08:28 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Rene Lamontagne wrote: apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation incorrect. This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US ----- Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps ----- Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows virtualization. it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention windows. I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can1t see that or disagree then whatever. you're moving the goalposts. the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop. you are imagining words that do not exist. A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up to try to feel better about by yourself. not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word windows was included when it was not. if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it. this should be good. the above is about *virtualization* *apps*. Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like. here's a clue: those are not windows. do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware? Here, to help educate you: lose the attitude. https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software Below you do your ego boost thing. that would be you, given your attitude displayed above. Not interested. another lie. the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your head. you ask for tech, then say you don't want it. the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong. it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex topics. in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it. it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada. Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-) not at all. i'm well aware of his antics. he's *so* over his head he doesn't even know what he's saying. Snit's probably mixing his medications with booze again. It's a little early in the week for him but since he's really screwed up in ACW he might need to take the edge off if you get my drift. -- Ron Gilmore All about snit read below: https://web.archive.org/web/20181028....com/snit.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529.../snitlist.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529...ieMethods.html |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:08:31 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Ron wrote: apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation incorrect. This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US ----- Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps ----- Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows virtualization. it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention windows. I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can¹t see that or disagree then whatever. you're moving the goalposts. the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop. you are imagining words that do not exist. A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up to try to feel better about by yourself. not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word windows was included when it was not. if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it. this should be good. the above is about *virtualization* *apps*. Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like. here's a clue: those are not windows. do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware? Here, to help educate you: lose the attitude. https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software Below you do your ego boost thing. that would be you, given your attitude displayed above. Not interested. another lie. the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your head. you ask for tech, then say you don't want it. the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong. it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex topics. in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it. it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada. Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-) Rene I think nospam is just having a little fun at snit's expense. exactly. It's hilarious watching snit squirm and froth when he gets backed into a corner. Over in ACW a poster named "Gremlin" currently has snit drooling from both corners of his mouth. More fun! some of gremlin's posts are crossposted here. Thanks. I just realized that. Duh!!! My bad. -- Ron Gilmore All about snit read below: https://web.archive.org/web/20181028....com/snit.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529.../snitlist.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529...ieMethods.html |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
Ha! Ads be gone!
On 20 Aug 2020 00:26:09 GMT, Snit
wrote: nospam wrote: In article , Ron wrote: apple never cared much about virtualizing windows, making your notation incorrect. This is trivial to show to be wrong... look at the most recent OS update: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL2049?...S&locale=en_US ----- Fixes a stability issue that could occur when running virtualization apps ----- Nospam claimed to not see how this was tied to the topic of Windows virtualization. it's not tied to windows virtualization. it doesn't even mention windows. I think Windows virtualization is tied to virtualization. If you can¹t see that or disagree then whatever. you're moving the goalposts. the above fix has nothing to do with windows. full stop. you are imagining words that do not exist. A fabrication on your part. You do that a lot: just make bizarre claims up to try to feel better about by yourself. not at all. claiming that something is about windows when there is no mention of windows can only be explained by imagining that the word windows was included when it was not. if you have another explanation as to why the above fix is specific to windows despite not mentioning windows, then by all means provide it. this should be good. the above is about *virtualization* *apps*. Which includes Parallels and VMWare and the like. here's a clue: those are not windows. do you really not understand the difference between windows and vmware? Here, to help educate you: lose the attitude. https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best...ation-software Below you do your ego boost thing. that would be you, given your attitude displayed above. Not interested. another lie. the below is the very 'tech' you claim to want, explaining what the bug was about in simple terms, and as expected, it sailed well over your head. you ask for tech, then say you don't want it. the only explanation is because it consistently proves you wrong. it's yet another thing you do not understand, and that was only a simple sentence. no wonder you have trouble with the more complex topics. in particular, there was a kernel bug in catalina which could affect any app, however, vm apps was the most common way to trigger it. it has absolutely nothing to do with windows. zilch. nada. Ha Ha, nospam fell into snits trap. :-) Rene I think nospam is just having a little fun at snit's expense. exactly. It's hilarious watching snit squirm and froth when he gets backed into a corner. Over in ACW a poster named "Gremlin" currently has snit drooling from both corners of his mouth. More fun! some of gremlin's posts are crossposted here. Anyway, back to tech: That's "snit speak" for my snit circus is running out of steam and I want to keep my snit circus alive. Face it snit, you have really let the genie out of the bottle this time. And besides, it's impossible to talk tech with you because other than the basics that you have Googled up, you are an idiot. And that applies to any topic. Tech or otherwise. -- Ron Gilmore All about snit read below: https://web.archive.org/web/20181028....com/snit.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529.../snitlist.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529...ieMethods.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|