|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
January 21st 16, 11:27 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
Is BING the image sesarch to die for?
It's better than Google Image because it gives intuitive alternate
images to follow. Peter 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
January 21st 16, 11:45 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is BING the image sesarch to die for?
On 01/21/2016 06:27 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
It's better than Google Image because it gives intuitive alternate images to follow. Peter I prefer google images. Clicking on 'search tools' allows you to specify things like 512x512, types, color, date etc. I think it filters better. Never knew bing had an image search to tell you the truth!
|
|
#3
January 22nd 16, 12:11 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is BING the image sesarch to die for?
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:45:40 -0500, Big Al wrote:
On 01/21/2016 06:27 PM, Peter Jason wrote: It's better than Google Image because it gives intuitive alternate images to follow. Peter I prefer google images. Clicking on 'search tools' allows you to specify things like 512x512, types, color, date etc. I think it filters better. Never knew bing had an image search to tell you the truth! It's he http://www.bing.com/images?FORM=HDRSC2 It gives clickable image trails to related images. (Very useful). Also, it has size, color, etc.
|
|
#4
January 22nd 16, 01:25 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is BING the image sesarch to die for?
On 22/01/2016 00:27, Peter Jason wrote:
It's better than Google Image because it gives intuitive alternate images to follow. Peter Speaking of Bing in general (not just images), I used to think I didn't like it. When I tried a blind comparison test though (Bing versus Google, but you don't know which is which) I was surprised. Looks like I voted for Bing result pages 4 times out of 5. http://www.bingiton.com/
|
|
#5
January 22nd 16, 10:51 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is BING the image sesarch to die for?
On 01/21/16 15:27, Peter Jason so wittily quipped:
It's better than Google Image because it gives intuitive alternate images to follow. this one searches for similar images: http://tineye.com/ give it an image, look for similar ones. better than BING.
|
|
#6
January 23rd 16, 02:18 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is BING the image sesarch to die for?
On 2016-01-22, Big Bad Bob wrote:
On 01/21/16 15:27, Peter Jason so wittily quipped: It's better than Google Image because it gives intuitive alternate images to follow. this one searches for similar images: http://tineye.com/ give it an image, look for similar ones. better than BING. Best Buy uses Bing to locate their stores. I did a search & the address for the Best Buy in a nearby town was found BUT I did a check using their aerial photo of the place; it was a vacant lot. Used Google Maps to find the address & then checked the aerial photo which showed a nice shopping area. Best Buy can be seen using street level photos; Home Depot & BedandBath was there; the parking lots were quite filled. Aerial photos for routes are nice as it shows whether a road is divided or has a painted median; also can see if there are left turn lanes when left turns are needed. Also nice to see if one can even do a left turn onto a place since non-photos don't show blocked entrances by a concrete median. Bing's maps are quite out of date and doesn't look to be updated frequently.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
