If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
xp sending info microshaft
In article m,
"Kadaitcha Man" wrote: Ghost wrote: And, since M$ is an American comapny, they are bound by US law.... Total ****ing crap. A company is bound by the laws of the countries it is operating in, you stupid wankstain. If company A is based in country B and commits a crime in country C, it is certainly liable to the laws of country C. If the crime commited in country C is also a crime in country B, then company A would also be liable in country B. I take it you have absolutely no ****ing idea why companies are given legal entity status, hmmm? For example, in the US it seems quite legal to cook your books and make false statements to the tune of tens of billions of dollars... Enron, Worldcom, et al. If those US companies had offices here and those frauds were perpetrated here by those offices, the local directors would have been given an opportunity of watching endless reruns of Seinfeld for 25 to 30 years. And if the country where the crime was committed does not have specific laws to cover that crime, then the law of the home country applies. In other owrds- if a DOS was committed by M$ in a country who has no laws agaisnt DOS, then the US law could and would apply because M$ is a US based company. Why in the hell are we going on with this endless freaking thread! |
Ads |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
xp sending info microshaft
In article m,
"Kadaitcha Man" wrote: Ghost wrote: And, since M$ is an American comapny, they are bound by US law.... Total ****ing crap. A company is bound by the laws of the countries it is operating in, you stupid wankstain. If company A is based in country B and commits a crime in country C, it is certainly liable to the laws of country C. If the crime commited in country C is also a crime in country B, then company A would also be liable in country B. I take it you have absolutely no ****ing idea why companies are given legal entity status, hmmm? For example, in the US it seems quite legal to cook your books and make false statements to the tune of tens of billions of dollars... Enron, Worldcom, et al. If those US companies had offices here and those frauds were perpetrated here by those offices, the local directors would have been given an opportunity of watching endless reruns of Seinfeld for 25 to 30 years. And if the country where the crime was committed does not have specific laws to cover that crime, then the law of the home country applies. In other owrds- if a DOS was committed by M$ in a country who has no laws agaisnt DOS, then the US law could and would apply because M$ is a US based company. Why in the hell are we going on with this endless freaking thread! |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
xp sending info microshaft
Ghost wrote:
In article m, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote: And if the country where the crime was committed does not have specific laws to cover that crime, then the law of the home country applies. No. Not so. You assume that that applies to all countries. It does not. Such is your ****headedness that you make broad generalisations sufficient enough to prove that you are a ****tard. In other owrds- if a DOS was committed by M$ in a country who has no laws agaisnt DOS, then the US law could and would apply because M$ is a US based company. Which is, in essence, what I wrote, is it not, head****? Why in the hell are we going on with this endless freaking thread! Because I want it to. |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
xp sending info microshaft
Ghost wrote:
In article m, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote: And if the country where the crime was committed does not have specific laws to cover that crime, then the law of the home country applies. No. Not so. You assume that that applies to all countries. It does not. Such is your ****headedness that you make broad generalisations sufficient enough to prove that you are a ****tard. In other owrds- if a DOS was committed by M$ in a country who has no laws agaisnt DOS, then the US law could and would apply because M$ is a US based company. Which is, in essence, what I wrote, is it not, head****? Why in the hell are we going on with this endless freaking thread! Because I want it to. |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
xp sending info microshaft
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 03:34:31 GMT, (Ghost) wrote:
Stop arguing your uninformed opinion. They cannot disable the OS- it is Denial of Service, a felony. Whether it is a felony depends on the laws of the country it is in. It isnt a DOS as you well know in any case. The computer can still work. It is just a disabling of a program. If you CHOOSE to make it your ONLY OS that's your choice. If you have, say, a dual boot XP/Linux, your computer still works. They cannot do it, even if you are in Australia. I am sure the aussies have a similar law, but even if they dont, the US law will cover that action since they are an American owned corporation. Not really sure if that is a thing in Australia at all but it isnt a DOS so it is really not the subject. Likely a real DOS is against the law but I dont know for sure. Gregh... you are right about that.. you really do not know for sure... before you post, try researching and learning... it is DOS under the laws of the US. And, since M$ is an American comapny, they are bound by US law.... This is the end of this thread as far as I am concerned- you are not the type to learn- you know what you know, I will not confuse you further with the facts... lol http://boston.internet.com/news/article.php/1485861 LAW HA! |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
xp sending info microshaft
wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 03:34:31 GMT, (Ghost) wrote: Stop arguing your uninformed opinion. They cannot disable the OS- it is Denial of Service, a felony. Whether it is a felony depends on the laws of the country it is in. It isnt a DOS as you well know in any case. The computer can still work. It is just a disabling of a program. If you CHOOSE to make it your ONLY OS that's your choice. If you have, say, a dual boot XP/Linux, your computer still works. They cannot do it, even if you are in Australia. I am sure the aussies have a similar law, but even if they dont, the US law will cover that action since they are an American owned corporation. Not really sure if that is a thing in Australia at all but it isnt a DOS so it is really not the subject. Likely a real DOS is against the law but I dont know for sure. Gregh... you are right about that.. you really do not know for sure... before you post, try researching and learning... it is DOS under the laws of the US. And, since M$ is an American comapny, they are bound by US law.... This is the end of this thread as far as I am concerned- you are not the type to learn- you know what you know, I will not confuse you further with the facts... lol http://boston.internet.com/news/article.php/1485861 LAW HA! And just why would an administrator for a Bank no less, have a server with propritary/highly secure information connected to the net without an aduquate firewall in place? Sounds like one place I'm not putting any of my money. |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
xp sending info microshaft
wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 03:34:31 GMT, (Ghost) wrote: Stop arguing your uninformed opinion. They cannot disable the OS- it is Denial of Service, a felony. Whether it is a felony depends on the laws of the country it is in. It isnt a DOS as you well know in any case. The computer can still work. It is just a disabling of a program. If you CHOOSE to make it your ONLY OS that's your choice. If you have, say, a dual boot XP/Linux, your computer still works. They cannot do it, even if you are in Australia. I am sure the aussies have a similar law, but even if they dont, the US law will cover that action since they are an American owned corporation. Not really sure if that is a thing in Australia at all but it isnt a DOS so it is really not the subject. Likely a real DOS is against the law but I dont know for sure. Gregh... you are right about that.. you really do not know for sure... before you post, try researching and learning... it is DOS under the laws of the US. And, since M$ is an American comapny, they are bound by US law.... This is the end of this thread as far as I am concerned- you are not the type to learn- you know what you know, I will not confuse you further with the facts... lol http://boston.internet.com/news/article.php/1485861 LAW HA! And just why would an administrator for a Bank no less, have a server with propritary/highly secure information connected to the net without an aduquate firewall in place? Sounds like one place I'm not putting any of my money. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|