If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
Why are you still keeping a copy of my copyrighted photo on
your dropbox account? You don't have my permission to have it. AND, you're well aware of the fact you do NOT have my permission for any of my things. Are you going to delete it yourself, or does dropbox need to do it for you? And, you can thank the remailer for bringing it to my attention. I really forgot all about it. See, David, just another example of you not being what you claim to be. A good guy doesn't take copies of other peoples things, especially when they know for a fact already they don't have permission to make any copies, or retain any copies, or upload any copies elsewhere. The law doesn't apply to you though, right David? Everyone else must follow it, but you don't need to. You're special in that regard, right, David? Dishonest hypocrite. What were you recently preaching about piracy? How many times have you had dmca notices filed on you, that were ALL upheld? Those aren't badges of honor, stupid. I wrote this initially several days ago David.. Do I really need to file off another DMCA notice to have my material removed from your dropbox account (again)? Yes, I crossposted it this time to various newsgroups you like to troll for help; I'm sure the photo people will be especially pleased to see you happily infringing other peoples photos with your dropbox account. You show what a 'good guy' you really are every time you do things like this, too. -- When cows laugh, does milk come out of their nose? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
On 14/05/2020 21:26, Diesel wrote:
Why are you still keeping a copy of my copyrighted photo on your dropbox account? You don't have my permission to have it. AND, you're well aware of the fact you do NOT have my permission for any of my things. Are you going to delete it yourself, or does dropbox need to do it for you? And, you can thank the remailer for bringing it to my attention. I really forgot all about it. I'd forgotten about it too. I'm not going to remove it from Dropbox, but you can have this copy if you've lost yours. https://upload.picpaste.me/image/ASXnP See, David, just another example of you not being what you claim to be. A good guy doesn't take copies of other peoples things, especially when they know for a fact already they don't have permission to make any copies, or retain any copies, or upload any copies elsewhere. The law doesn't apply to you though, right David? Everyone else must follow it, but you don't need to. You're special in that regard, right, David? Shagnasty has put a copy of a photograph of me on his website - which he obtained in a similar manner. If you don't want other people to see things, don't post them online - ANYWHERE! Dishonest hypocrite. What were you recently preaching about piracy? How many times have you had dmca notices filed on you, that were ALL upheld? Those aren't badges of honor, stupid. I *DO* consider them "a badge of honour". I demonstrated just how careless you had been. I wrote this initially several days ago David.. Do I really need to file off another DMCA notice to have my material removed from your dropbox account (again)? Yes, I crossposted it this time to various newsgroups you like to troll for help; I'm sure the photo people will be especially pleased to see you happily infringing other peoples photos with your dropbox account. You show what a 'good guy' you really are every time you do things like this, too. Your posts are more a reflection of YOUR poor character, Dustin. Are you still proud of being a Black-Hat hacker - a writer of real-life VIRUSES which did untold damage to the computers of folk all around the world? Was this the *BEST* one you wrote? https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/us/...e/malware/irok |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
David_B
Thu, 14 May 2020 21:53:13 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 14/05/2020 21:26, Diesel wrote: Why are you still keeping a copy of my copyrighted photo on your dropbox account? You don't have my permission to have it. AND, you're well aware of the fact you do NOT have my permission for any of my things. Are you going to delete it yourself, or does dropbox need to do it for you? And, you can thank the remailer for bringing it to my attention. I really forgot all about it. I'd forgotten about it too. I don't believe you. I'm not going to remove it from Dropbox, but you can have this copy if you've lost yours. https://upload.picpaste.me/image/ASXnP LOL, I didn't lose mine, thanks. I appreciate you being so candid with knowingly and intentionally going out of your way at this point to violate my copyright in front of all of the newsgroups I selected for you. I'm sure the professionals in the digital photography newsgroup appreciate knowing about your complete lack of concern for the concept of copyright. Perhaps they'll take that into consideration if they interact with you in the future. Sure, you like to pretend you care when you attack me for copyright related matters, but, by your own words and repeated actions, it's clear you don't give two ****s about copyright law and never actually did. It was all a ruse for trolling purposes. See, David, just another example of you not being what you claim to be. A good guy doesn't take copies of other peoples things, especially when they know for a fact already they don't have permission to make any copies, or retain any copies, or upload any copies elsewhere. The law doesn't apply to you though, right David? Everyone else must follow it, but you don't need to. You're special in that regard, right, David? Shagnasty has put a copy of a photograph of me on his website - which he obtained in a similar manner. I don't know what you mean by similar, as you well know, the copyright owner of this picture granted permission for it to be shared freely: https://upload.picpaste.me/image/ASN6T OTH, At no time have I granted you permission to share or otherwise retain copies of my things. Infact, I've repeatedly denied you such permission. So, there's nothing similar about this. And, I'm not him, so what you did with my picture isn't going to cause your censored version to be removed anytime soon from your special page. If you don't want other people to see things, don't post them online - ANYWHERE! That's the same thing you told Betty when you did the same thing with her private material, too. Well, in spirit of what you wrote, here's something you shouldn't have ever shared via the registration of that now defunct website of yours. Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT) to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, local law enforcement, etc. David Brooks (BoaterDave) Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) Email(s): , Dishonest hypocrite. What were you recently preaching about piracy? How many times have you had dmca notices filed on you, that were ALL upheld? Those aren't badges of honor, stupid. I *DO* consider them "a badge of honour". I demonstrated just how careless you had been. How careless I'd been? Who registered a website with full details and didn't consider protecting them? I wrote this initially several days ago David.. Do I really need to file off another DMCA notice to have my material removed from your dropbox account (again)? Yes, I crossposted it this time to various newsgroups you like to troll for help; I'm sure the photo people will be especially pleased to see you happily infringing other peoples photos with your dropbox account. You show what a 'good guy' you really are every time you do things like this, too. Your posts are more a reflection of YOUR poor character, Dustin. One can easily say the same about your posts, your threads, and your bat**** crazy replies, such as this one of yours. Are you still proud of being a Black-Hat hacker - a writer of real-life VIRUSES which did untold damage to the computers of folk all around the world? David, that was twenty years ago. As you recently wrote, it's 'old news'. Why haven't you been able to move on from what I did that had nothing to do with you? Shadow, Would you like to take bets on whether or not Snit calls David out for continuing to violate my copyright? Not only is David refusing to remove the unauthorized copy, he went ahead and uploaded another one to another site. Where's that little hypocrite Snit now? rofl! -- I'm the boss.My cat said so!! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
On 5/14/20 3:53 PM, Diesel wrote:
David_B Thu, 14 May 2020 21:53:13 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 14/05/2020 21:26, Diesel wrote: Why are you still keeping a copy of my copyrighted photo on your dropbox account? You don't have my permission to have it. AND, you're well aware of the fact you do NOT have my permission for any of my things. Are you going to delete it yourself, or does dropbox need to do it for you? And, you can thank the remailer for bringing it to my attention. I really forgot all about it. I'd forgotten about it too. I don't believe you. I'm not going to remove it from Dropbox, but you can have this copy if you've lost yours. https://upload.picpaste.me/image/ASXnP LOL, I didn't lose mine, thanks. I appreciate you being so candid with knowingly and intentionally going out of your way at this point to violate my copyright in front of all of the newsgroups I selected for you. I'm sure the professionals in the digital photography newsgroup appreciate knowing about your complete lack of concern for the concept of copyright. Perhaps they'll take that into consideration if they interact with you in the future. Sure, you like to pretend you care when you attack me for copyright related matters, but, by your own words and repeated actions, it's clear you don't give two ****s about copyright law and never actually did. It was all a ruse for trolling purposes. See, David, just another example of you not being what you claim to be. A good guy doesn't take copies of other peoples things, especially when they know for a fact already they don't have permission to make any copies, or retain any copies, or upload any copies elsewhere. The law doesn't apply to you though, right David? Everyone else must follow it, but you don't need to. You're special in that regard, right, David? Shagnasty has put a copy of a photograph of me on his website - which he obtained in a similar manner. I don't know what you mean by similar, as you well know, the copyright owner of this picture granted permission for it to be shared freely: https://upload.picpaste.me/image/ASN6T OTH, At no time have I granted you permission to share or otherwise retain copies of my things. Infact, I've repeatedly denied you such permission. So, there's nothing similar about this. And, I'm not him, so what you did with my picture isn't going to cause your censored version to be removed anytime soon from your special page. If you don't want other people to see things, don't post them online - ANYWHERE! That's the same thing you told Betty when you did the same thing with her private material, too. Well, in spirit of what you wrote, here's something you shouldn't have ever shared via the registration of that now defunct website of yours. Don't become the next David Brooks cyberstalking victim! Visit https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php (10/10 WOT) to learn more. If you've already become a victim or know someone who has, you can provide the following information to them, your lawyer, local law enforcement, etc. David Brooks (BoaterDave) Jersey Cottage 86 Granary Lane Budleigh Salterton Devon EX9 6ER United Kingdom Phone: 44-1395-443340 (H) 07974-193550 (M) Email(s): , Dishonest hypocrite. What were you recently preaching about piracy? How many times have you had dmca notices filed on you, that were ALL upheld? Those aren't badges of honor, stupid. I *DO* consider them "a badge of honour". I demonstrated just how careless you had been. How careless I'd been? Who registered a website with full details and didn't consider protecting them? I wrote this initially several days ago David.. Do I really need to file off another DMCA notice to have my material removed from your dropbox account (again)? Yes, I crossposted it this time to various newsgroups you like to troll for help; I'm sure the photo people will be especially pleased to see you happily infringing other peoples photos with your dropbox account. You show what a 'good guy' you really are every time you do things like this, too. Your posts are more a reflection of YOUR poor character, Dustin. One can easily say the same about your posts, your threads, and your bat**** crazy replies, such as this one of yours. Are you still proud of being a Black-Hat hacker - a writer of real-life VIRUSES which did untold damage to the computers of folk all around the world? David, that was twenty years ago. As you recently wrote, it's 'old news'. Why haven't you been able to move on from what I did that had nothing to do with you? Shadow, Would you like to take bets on whether or not Snit calls David out for continuing to violate my copyright? Not only is David refusing to remove the unauthorized copy, he went ahead and uploaded another one to another site. Where's that little hypocrite Snit now? rofl! You were pretending to not read my posts. I do not support anyone violating anyone's copyright -- but in this case seems both sides are doing so and neither is willing to stop. I can put in my two cents: I wish it would stop. I do not agree. Period. My speaking of it though is not likely to change anything, nor will it stop me from speaking kindly to you, Shadow, or David. But keep in mind you just made it VERY clear your claims to have me in your KF are a lie (as if it was not already clear!) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
On 14/05/2020 23:53, Diesel wrote:
I don't know what you mean by similar, as you well know, the copyright owner of this picture granted permission for it to be shared freely: The copyright owner of the image did NOT grant permission for it to be shared freely. Andrew Taylor put the image up on an Annexcafe newsgroup - from whence it was *STOLEN*! He should NEVER have done that without seeking my permission. OTH, At no time have I granted you permission to share or otherwise retain copies of my things. Infact, I've repeatedly denied you such permission. So, there's nothing similar about this. You put your photograph in the public domain. More fool you. I'm not surprised, though, that you don't want folk to see what you looked like! And the give-away grassy 'tufts' I found on Google StreetView! ;-) And, I'm not him, so what you did with my picture isn't going to cause your censored version to be removed anytime soon from your special page. Do you know, Dustin - it sounds as if *you* are CONTROLLING what happens on someone else's website. I've been led to believe that HACKERS can do such things - as can people who have no need to use AV software when using Windows XP - someone "beyond a Power User" I believe you said! Has Apd seen the Google StreetView - the one which you had to get Google to blur out? But where they left the grassy tufts showing - and a small part of your tatty white van too? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
In article
David_B wrote: On 14/05/2020 21:26, Diesel wrote: Why are you still keeping a copy of my copyrighted photo on your dropbox account? You don't have my permission to have it. AND, you're well aware of the fact you do NOT have my permission for any of my things. Are you going to delete it yourself, or does dropbox need to do it for you? And, you can thank the remailer for bringing it to my attention. I really forgot all about it. I'd forgotten about it too. I'm not going to remove it from Dropbox, but you can have this copy if you've lost yours. I would like it very much to be kept online so that the general populace of Usenet can see what a sad, weak looking p.o.s. the KARATE KILLER/DOXER BOI really is. I'm sure more than a few enjoyed my recent posts of DuckFarts pic. Please don't remove. The locked down world needs a good laugh these days. ) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
In article
David_B wrote: On 14/05/2020 21:26, Diesel wrote: Why are you still keeping a copy of my copyrighted photo on your dropbox account? You don't have my permission to have it. AND, you're well aware of the fact you do NOT have my permission for any of my things. Are you going to delete it yourself, or does dropbox need to do it for you? And, you can thank the remailer for bringing it to my attention. I really forgot all about it. I'd forgotten about it too. I'm not going to remove it from Dropbox, but you can have this copy if you've lost yours. I would like it very much to be kept online so that the general populace of Usenet can see what a sad, weak looking p.o.s. the KARATE KILLER/DOXER BOI really is. I'm sure more than a few enjoyed my recent posts of DuckFarts pic. Please don't remove. The locked down world needs a good laugh these days. ) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
In article David_B wrote: On 14/05/2020 21:26, Diesel wrote: Why are you still keeping a copy of my copyrighted photo on your dropbox account? You don't have my permission to have it. AND, you're well aware of the fact you do NOT have my permission for any of my things. Are you going to delete it yourself, or does dropbox need to do it for you? And, you can thank the remailer for bringing it to my attention. I really forgot all about it. I'd forgotten about it too. I'm not going to remove it from Dropbox, but you can have this copy if you've lost yours. I would like it very much to be kept online so that the general populace of Usenet can see what a sad, weak looking p.o.s. the KARATE KILLER/DOXER BOI really is. I'm sure more than a few enjoyed my recent posts of DuckFarts pic. Please don't remove. The locked down world needs a good laugh these days. ) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
In article
David_B wrote: On 14/05/2020 21:26, Diesel wrote: Why are you still keeping a copy of my copyrighted photo on your dropbox account? You don't have my permission to have it. AND, you're well aware of the fact you do NOT have my permission for any of my things. Are you going to delete it yourself, or does dropbox need to do it for you? And, you can thank the remailer for bringing it to my attention. I really forgot all about it. I'd forgotten about it too. I'm not going to remove it from Dropbox, but you can have this copy if you've lost yours. I would like it very much to be kept online so that the general populace of Usenet can see what a sad, weak looking p.o.s. the KARATE KILLER/DOXER BOI really is. I'm sure more than a few enjoyed my recent posts of DuckFarts pic. Please don't remove. The locked down world needs a good laugh these days. ) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
David_B
Sat, 16 May 2020 21:11:38 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 16/05/2020 21:38, Diesel wrote: David_B Sat, 16 May 2020 08:41:18 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] nothing to fear - he's frightened of his very shadow, to the point of having to obfuscate his message headers on Usenet. How sad is that? :-( Just how much have you been drinking today David? Zilch! Nothing since 21st March 2018. Liar. What specifically do you think is being obfuscated in my headers by me? I don't think you even know what you accused me of. You 'doctor' your headings - you've said so yourself - so that it's more difficult to track you. That's not actually what I wrote, in either case. You should re-read what I wrote for comprehension, this time. Why are you so bothered about anyone 'following you'? If you are frightened of repercussions, simply disappear from Usenet. I've been on usenet for longer than your IT experience, heh, I'll come and go as I like, as I have for the last nearly thirty years. Are you going to remove my picture from your dropbox account, or do I need to file another dmca and have them do it for you, David? It's a simple question. -- A cap of good acid costs $5.00, and for that you can hear the Universal Symphony with God singing solo and the Holy Ghost on drums. --Hunter S. Thompson |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
On 5/17/20 8:59 PM, Diesel wrote:
David_B Sat, 16 May 2020 21:11:38 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 16/05/2020 21:38, Diesel wrote: David_B Sat, 16 May 2020 08:41:18 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] nothing to fear - he's frightened of his very shadow, to the point of having to obfuscate his message headers on Usenet. How sad is that? :-( Just how much have you been drinking today David? Zilch! Nothing since 21st March 2018. Liar. See: here you show you are insecure enough to attack someone with speculation about their life. You make clearly fraudulent claims. What specifically do you think is being obfuscated in my headers by me? I don't think you even know what you accused me of. You 'doctor' your headings - you've said so yourself - so that it's more difficult to track you. That's not actually what I wrote, in either case. You should re-read what I wrote for comprehension, this time. Why are you so bothered about anyone 'following you'? If you are frightened of repercussions, simply disappear from Usenet. I've been on usenet for longer than your IT experience, heh, I'll come and go as I like, as I have for the last nearly thirty years. Are you going to remove my picture from your dropbox account, or do I need to file another dmca and have them do it for you, David? It's a simple question. You lie about him non-stop... I do not approve of his RESPONSE to your poor behavior, but why don't you grow a pair and stop crying about how insecure you are. Do that and you might find kind people treat you better. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
On 18/05/2020 04:59, Diesel wrote:
David_B Sat, 16 May 2020 21:11:38 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 16/05/2020 21:38, Diesel wrote: David_B Sat, 16 May 2020 08:41:18 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] nothing to fear - he's frightened of his very shadow, to the point of having to obfuscate his message headers on Usenet. How sad is that? :-( Just how much have you been drinking today David? Zilch! Nothing since 21st March 2018. Liar. False - It's the *TRUTH*. :-) What specifically do you think is being obfuscated in my headers by me? I don't think you even know what you accused me of. You 'doctor' your headings - you've said so yourself - so that it's more difficult to track you. That's not actually what I wrote, in either case. You should re-read what I wrote for comprehension, this time. I checked with Wolfgang - he knows from the header the name of the poster. He also said, in response to my question:- May I also ask why the Message ID is so much longer than the norm? That's the way XNews creates message-ids :-( = There *IS* an extra 'space' as shown he- Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Why are you so bothered about anyone 'following you'? If you are frightened of repercussions, simply disappear from Usenet. I've been on usenet for longer than your IT experience, heh, I'll come and go as I like, as I have for the last nearly thirty years. I started with computers before you were BORN, Dustin! ;-) Are you going to remove my picture from your dropbox account, or do I need to file another dmca and have them do it for you, David? It's a simple question. I'm going to take no further action. Don't take life so seriously! :-D *Never assume - CHECK*! D. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
David_B
Mon, 18 May 2020 13:51:44 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 18/05/2020 04:59, Diesel wrote: David_B Sat, 16 May 2020 21:11:38 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 16/05/2020 21:38, Diesel wrote: David_B Sat, 16 May 2020 08:41:18 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] nothing to fear - he's frightened of his very shadow, to the point of having to obfuscate his message headers on Usenet. How sad is that? :-( Just how much have you been drinking today David? Zilch! Nothing since 21st March 2018. Liar. False - It's the *TRUTH*. :-) I don't believe you, but that shouldn't matter to you. What specifically do you think is being obfuscated in my headers by me? I don't think you even know what you accused me of. You 'doctor' your headings - you've said so yourself - so that it's more difficult to track you. That's not actually what I wrote, in either case. You should re-read what I wrote for comprehension, this time. I checked with Wolfgang - he knows from the header the name of the poster. He also said, in response to my question:- May I also ask why the Message ID is so much longer than the norm? That's the way XNews creates message-ids :-( = There *IS* an extra 'space' as shown he- Organization: A noiseless patient Spider That's not an MID, and, the extra space isn't present on any of the posts I recently checked. If you'd like to repost the MID you're questioning, I'll look into it. Why are you so bothered about anyone 'following you'? If you are frightened of repercussions, simply disappear from Usenet. I've been on usenet for longer than your IT experience, heh, I'll come and go as I like, as I have for the last nearly thirty years. I started with computers before you were BORN, Dustin! ;-) Your definition of started would differ from mine, then, David. I don't consider the time you spent with introduction to vacuum tube computers in royal navy as having an IT experience. Atleast, not one of any significance since the PC revolution. Point is, you have decades on me, but you've nothing to show for it knowledge wise concerning the machine in front of you, or how the interaction with, say, you and I takes place here on usenet. Are you going to remove my picture from your dropbox account, or do I need to file another dmca and have them do it for you, David? It's a simple question. I'm going to take no further action. I'll take care of it myself, then. I appreciate your refusal to honor my request and delete a copy of something you don't own and have no right to. Do keep your decision in mind in the future should you ask anything of me. I might remember how things went in this civil discussion and tell you to pound sand, instead. Don't take life so seriously! :-D Your hypocrisy is a serious matter, and, your stalking isn't a joke to be taken lightly, either. -- 'Stupid' is a boundless concept. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
On 20/05/2020 09:47, Diesel wrote:
David_B Mon, 18 May 2020 13:51:44 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 18/05/2020 04:59, Diesel wrote: David_B Sat, 16 May 2020 21:11:38 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 16/05/2020 21:38, Diesel wrote: David_B Sat, 16 May 2020 08:41:18 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] nothing to fear - he's frightened of his very shadow, to the point of having to obfuscate his message headers on Usenet. How sad is that? :-( Just how much have you been drinking today David? Zilch! Nothing since 21st March 2018. Liar. False - It's the *TRUTH*. :-) I don't believe you, but that shouldn't matter to you. I don't CARE what you choose to believe - it *IS* the truth! :-D What specifically do you think is being obfuscated in my headers by me? I don't think you even know what you accused me of. You 'doctor' your headings - you've said so yourself - so that it's more difficult to track you. That's not actually what I wrote, in either case. You should re-read what I wrote for comprehension, this time. I checked with Wolfgang - he knows from the header the name of the poster. He also said, in response to my question:- May I also ask why the Message ID is so much longer than the norm? That's the way XNews creates message-ids :-( = There *IS* an extra 'space' as shown he- Organization: A noiseless patient Spider That's not an MID, and, the extra space isn't present on any of the posts I recently checked. If you'd like to repost the MID you're questioning, I'll look into it. My post to Eternal-September 'abuse' email address:- Hello I’d like to check if this message header is genuine. I’d be grateful for your help. = Path: ....!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder7. news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Diesel Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,alt.comp.os.windows-10,uk.comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Comparison of Anti-Virus software Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 09:12:35 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 216 Message-ID: XnsABBB3579D46CCHT1@cv40pa2k83n4lW661EB2igwB7T5C5 100SR32r.01xgMdbspTJ45ZPBAPui References: Injection-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 09:12:35 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="98b9d815f9d3f72d7d10ab6eaf62e918"; logging-data="12793"; "; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8kqvxdyhNM6FSLzAV/PrWJZNkpgRGz8o=" User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 Cancel-Lock: sha1:di01Ba6HIU6kHv4DUq8ukZoclOA= Bytes: 9305 == The extra 'space' between "patient" and "Spider" is quite evident. Why are you so bothered about anyone 'following you'? If you are frightened of repercussions, simply disappear from Usenet. I've been on usenet for longer than your IT experience, heh, I'll come and go as I like, as I have for the last nearly thirty years. I started with computers before you were BORN, Dustin! ;-) Your definition of started would differ from mine, then, David. I don't consider the time you spent with introduction to vacuum tube computers in royal navy as having an IT experience. At least, not one of any significance since the PC revolution. I *started* when I was about 7 or 8 building such things as Crystal Sets - winding copper wire around a toilet-roll tube to make a coil! A bit like this:- https://www.buildcircuit.com/how-to-...tal-set-radio/ Point is, you have decades on me, but you've nothing to show for it knowledge wise concerning the machine in front of you, or how the interaction with, say, you and I takes place here on usenet. I'm not in a competition with you. I'm trying to help you to become a nicer person. Are you going to remove my picture from your dropbox account, or do I need to file another dmca and have them do it for you, David? It's a simple question. I'm going to take no further action. I'll take care of it myself, then. I appreciate your refusal to honor my request and delete a copy of something you don't own and have no right to. Do keep your decision in mind in the future should you ask anything of me. I might remember how things went in this civil discussion and tell you to pound sand, instead. Sometime you behave as if you are as thick as two short planks! sigh Don't take life so seriously! :-D Your hypocrisy is a serious matter, and, your stalking isn't a joke to be taken lightly, either. I have an eye for detail. Sometimes things just don't add up. How did Mark Allan react when you contacted him? You do recall saying you would do so a while back?) D. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
David Brooks - copyright infringer *multiple*
Diesel wrote:
David_B Mon, 18 May 2020 13:51:44 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 18/05/2020 04:59, Diesel wrote: David_B Sat, 16 May 2020 21:11:38 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 16/05/2020 21:38, Diesel wrote: David_B Sat, 16 May 2020 08:41:18 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] nothing to fear - he's frightened of his very shadow, to the point of having to obfuscate his message headers on Usenet. How sad is that? :-( Just how much have you been drinking today David? Zilch! Nothing since 21st March 2018. Liar. False - It's the *TRUTH*. :-) I don't believe you, but that shouldn't matter to you. What specifically do you think is being obfuscated in my headers by me? I don't think you even know what you accused me of. You 'doctor' your headings - you've said so yourself - so that it's more difficult to track you. That's not actually what I wrote, in either case. You should re-read what I wrote for comprehension, this time. I checked with Wolfgang - he knows from the header the name of the poster. He also said, in response to my question:- May I also ask why the Message ID is so much longer than the norm? That's the way XNews creates message-ids :-( = There *IS* an extra 'space' as shown he- Organization: A noiseless patient Spider That's not an MID, and, the extra space isn't present on any of the posts I recently checked. If you'd like to repost the MID you're questioning, I'll look into it. Why are you so bothered about anyone 'following you'? If you are frightened of repercussions, simply disappear from Usenet. I've been on usenet for longer than your IT experience, heh, I'll come and go as I like, as I have for the last nearly thirty years. I started with computers before you were BORN, Dustin! ;-) Your definition of started would differ from mine, then, David. I don't consider the time you spent with introduction to vacuum tube computers in royal navy as having an IT experience. Atleast, not one of any significance since the PC revolution. Point is, you have decades on me, but you've nothing to show for it knowledge wise concerning the machine in front of you, or how the interaction with, say, you and I takes place here on usenet. Are you going to remove my picture from your dropbox account, or do I need to file another dmca and have them do it for you, David? It's a simple question. I'm going to take no further action. I'll take care of it myself, then. I appreciate your refusal to honor my request and delete a copy of something you don't own and have no right to. Do keep your decision in mind in the future should you ask anything of me. I might remember how things went in this civil discussion and tell you to pound sand, instead. Don't take life so seriously! :-D Your hypocrisy is a serious matter, and, your stalking isn't a joke to be taken lightly, either. How should yours and Carroll’s be taken? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|