If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#181
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
On 2/17/2014, Ken Blake posted:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 22:19:06 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote: In message , BillW50 writes: Vista, and 7 too. I use them (hard to find a new one now). And if you want a large screen docked tablet, I forget exactly what they are called, but they are basically 17 inch and larger screen tablets with I was going to say all-in-ones ... docks. And they are generally meant to run as a desktop, with the occasional short portable use. ... until you said that; all-in-ones seem to be basically giant laptops (or tablets, I suppose if they have touch-screen), but in most cases have done away with the portability altogether. Except for someone who really needs to save the space it takes up, I think buying an all-in-one is a terrible mistake. When components are separated, and one fails, you can replace just the failed component. With an all-in-one, you probably have to replace the entire computer. I feel the same way about laptops, unless the laptop is used for traveling. And I feel the same way about all-in-one printer/scanner combos, for exactly the same reason. One difference with all-in-ones is that you might not be able to open it, whereas laptops are (usually) openable. But maybe not recent Apple laptops, though, according to something I read somewhere recently; sorry, I don't recall where. I have an older all-in-one that I couldn't open. I wanted to change something, but I couldn't pry it apart and I couldn't find any hidden screws or extra little clippies. It felt like it was glued together... -- Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch) |
Ads |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
In message , Mayayana
writes: | Document Object Model. It's the object hierarchy for | script in a webpage. The document object, parentWindow, | etc. Each tag is an object with access to attributes | as properties, allowing the page to respond dynamically | to events like clicks, hovers, etc. | | Thanks. All Greek to me, but at least I know (for a brief interval) what | it stands for! | I guess that's getting a bit OT, but here's a simple example, for anyone who's curious. It shows how [] Thanks - kept for later study/tryout! ------------------ | Ah. I find ghostery makes short work of those. (I don't use them anyway: | mainly because I'm not enrolled with FB, but also because I object to a | system that has like but no dislike buttons.) I'm not familiar with Ghostery. If it removes the IFRAME that's good. But the point of their using the IFRAME is that you don't need to click the Like button for them to track you. You've visited their Give it a look: according to https://www.ghostery.com/features, it can work with Firefox, Chrome, one whose logo I don't recognise (I think it's Safari), Opera, and IE. I don't know _how_ it works - I just like that it blocks trackers, and I do believe that claim. [] | Ghostery puts its own little symbol for them. | Interesting. Sounds like a good design. Have a look at https://www.ghostery.com/features (bottom of page). | I block IFRAMES for the most part in FF by using the | userContent.css file. So FF doesn't load them at all. | | (Do you know of a tutorial on doing that?) | You can look it up to get examples, but it's not well documented in terms of syntax and options. In your Application Data\Mozilla folder you'll find a profile folder containing a "chrome" folder. In there are userChrome.css and userContent.css. The former Again, I've saved your post for study - thanks! provides a way to add/remove menu items, adjust the menu font, change the "throbber", etc. The latter is like a master CSS file for all pages loaded. As a sample of what you can do, here's what I use in Pale Moon: IFRAME {display: none !important;} NOSCRIPT {display: none !important;} EMBED {display: none !important;} VIDEO {display: none !important;} MARQUEE {display: none !important;} META {display: none !important;} #divRawLinkBackRow {display: none;} #sharebar_fixed {display: none;} #sharebar_fixed_social {display: none;} .footer_bar {display: none;} IMG[width="1"] {display: none !important;} IMG[width=1] {display: none !important;} IMG[width="0"] {display: none !important;} IMG[width=0] {display: none !important;} IMG[src*="1x1"] {display: none !important;} IMG[src*="0x0"] {display: none !important;} I don't know whether blocking META actually works. The rest should work fine in FF/PM. At the top you can see I've blocked particular HTML tags. In the middle are specific CSS classes and IDs that are blocked. For instance, say you visit a page daily that has an annoying header bar table with a unique ID: TABLE ID="annoying-top-box" .... You can add the following to userContent.css to remove only that item: #annoying-top-box {display: none;} The IMG entries demonstrate some of the fine tuning options possible. What you see above blocks nearly all tracking beacon images by blocking anything less than 2 px. The reason there are 6 lines is because it's very specific. Frankly I don't remember now what the * does. These things are very arcane and I often forget them between edits. The last two lines might have been to block images that don't specify width. I'm not sure. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf For this star a "night on the tiles" means winning at Scrabble - Kathy Lette (on Kylie), RT 2014/1/11-17 |
#183
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:09:48 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
wrote: In message , Ken Blake writes: [] Except for someone who really needs to save the space it takes up, I think buying an all-in-one is a terrible mistake. When components are separated, and one fails, you can replace just the failed component. With an all-in-one, you probably have to replace the entire computer. On the whole, I agree with you, but the overall reliability of PC components in general has improved greatly in the last few years. I was thinking particularly of things like the monitor failing. Also, sometimes it gets the PC into a more-used room, allowing the person to get over the threshold that actually gets them into using computers. (And - though I've not looked - I suspect that components _are_ replaceable to a greater extent than you'd think, though you may have to look harder to find ones of the right shape.) I feel the same way about laptops, unless the laptop is used for traveling. And I feel the same way about all-in-one printer/scanner Well, though I use this (actually a large netbook) mostly here at home (actually on my lap!), the fact that I _can_ carry it has its attraction - when I visit friends I can take it with, which I couldn't really do with a desktop, however compact. Whether you carry it on vacations, as I do, or to visit friends, as you do, I agree. Its portability is what makes that format desirable. But I know some people who use a laptop and never move it off their desks, and that's what I think is a poor choice. A laptop is more expensive than a desktop, harder to repair, most costly to buy parts for, more vulnerable to damage from dropping, more vulnerable to theft, etc. If you want to carry it around (for any reason), fine. Otherwise it's a poor choice. combos, for exactly the same reason. I'm more with you there - especially as it's the printer part that's most likely to die. Though conversely, they tend to take up the same amount of desk as either a printer or a scanner anyway (and cost about the same as either), so maybe the disadvantages aren't that great. Still, any inkjet printer is problematical IMO, unless used with a continuous feed system. Yep, and I don't use an inkjet. I greatly prefer a laser printer. |
#184
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
In message , Ken Blake
writes: On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:09:48 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote: [] On the whole, I agree with you, but the overall reliability of PC components in general has improved greatly in the last few years. I was thinking particularly of things like the monitor failing. Yes, I agree that would do for an all-in-one. Assuming it wasn't repairable such as just the backlight. Also, sometimes it gets the PC into a more-used room, allowing the person to get over the threshold that actually gets them into using computers. (And - though I've not looked - I suspect that components _are_ replaceable to a greater extent than you'd think, though you may have to look harder to find ones of the right shape.) I feel the same way about laptops, unless the laptop is used for traveling. And I feel the same way about all-in-one printer/scanner Well, though I use this (actually a large netbook) mostly here at home (actually on my lap!), the fact that I _can_ carry it has its attraction - when I visit friends I can take it with, which I couldn't really do with a desktop, however compact. Whether you carry it on vacations, as I do, or to visit friends, as you do, I agree. Its portability is what makes that format desirable. But I know some people who use a laptop and never move it off their desks, and that's what I think is a poor choice. A laptop is more expensive than a desktop, harder to repair, most costly to buy parts for, more vulnerable to damage from dropping, more vulnerable to theft, etc. If you want to carry it around (for any reason), fine. Otherwise it's a poor choice. All those are true. The fact remains, though, that laptops (and all in ones) are less "threatening" for a lot of people. Remember you and I like playing with computers anyway, just for themselves as well as what they can do for us (like accessing the web); for a lot of people, especially the elderly* and other groups who might find computers intimidating, a laptop (or AI1) is less so, to the extent that they might use it enough to realise how useful it is. I've known too many people who are sort of afraid of their computer - it sits in a separate room, and using it is an occasion/performance. combos, for exactly the same reason. I'm more with you there - especially as it's the printer part that's most likely to die. Though conversely, they tend to take up the same amount of desk as either a printer or a scanner anyway (and cost about the same as either), so maybe the disadvantages aren't that great. Still, any inkjet printer is problematical IMO, unless used with a continuous feed system. Yep, and I don't use an inkjet. I greatly prefer a laser printer. My next will probably be a laser too. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf "The thing that impresses me most about America is the way parents obey their children." - Duke of Windsor |
#185
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
Gene E. Bloch wrote:
On 2/17/2014, Ken Blake posted: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 22:19:06 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote: In message , BillW50 writes: Vista, and 7 too. I use them (hard to find a new one now). And if you want a large screen docked tablet, I forget exactly what they are called, but they are basically 17 inch and larger screen tablets with I was going to say all-in-ones ... docks. And they are generally meant to run as a desktop, with the occasional short portable use. ... until you said that; all-in-ones seem to be basically giant laptops (or tablets, I suppose if they have touch-screen), but in most cases have done away with the portability altogether. Except for someone who really needs to save the space it takes up, I think buying an all-in-one is a terrible mistake. When components are separated, and one fails, you can replace just the failed component. With an all-in-one, you probably have to replace the entire computer. I feel the same way about laptops, unless the laptop is used for traveling. And I feel the same way about all-in-one printer/scanner combos, for exactly the same reason. One difference with all-in-ones is that you might not be able to open it, whereas laptops are (usually) openable. But maybe not recent Apple laptops, though, according to something I read somewhere recently; sorry, I don't recall where. I have an older all-in-one that I couldn't open. I wanted to change something, but I couldn't pry it apart and I couldn't find any hidden screws or extra little clippies. It felt like it was glued together... I worked on an all-in-one, and it used compression tabs all around the perimeter. The trick was, not to leave marks all over it, while easing it open. They couldn't of course, just rely on the also-present screws, to hold it together. Not enough "fun factor". I had to open it several times, to remove defective RAM and add more. And also to add a cooling fan for the poor Northbridge (surface temperature 75C, with the unit open). Another adventure, was my computer speakers. My computer speakers were glued, and when I needed to get the one open that had the amp inside, I used a saw. Still looks good... for something with a big saw hole in the top :-) Still works good, after all these years. Had to fix a cold solder joint inside. Paul |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
Ken Blake has written on 2/17/2014 5:36 PM:
I was thinking particularly of things like the monitor failing. When was the last time you saw a failed monitor? Yep, and I don't use an inkjet. I greatly prefer a laser printer. Too expensive for me. :-) Do you have a separate scanner and fax? |
#187
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
Gene E. Bloch has written on 2/17/2014 5:19 PM:
One difference with all-in-ones is that you might not be able to open it, whereas laptops are (usually) openable. But maybe not recent Apple laptops, though, according to something I read somewhere recently; sorry, I don't recall where. I have an older all-in-one that I couldn't open. I wanted to change something, but I couldn't pry it apart and I couldn't find any hidden screws or extra little clippies. It felt like it was glued together... Modern ones are "openable". At least the ones from HP and Lenovo are. |
#188
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
In ,
Paul typed: I worked on an all-in-one, and it used compression tabs all around the perimeter. The trick was, not to leave marks all over it, while easing it open. There is a special plastic tool that doesn't leave any marks to pop them open. I forget what the technical term for them is, but I call them as plastic pry bars, as that is what they look like. Although unlike a pry bar, they usually have like a 45 degree hook on them. They are common with cell phone tool kits and such. -- Bill Gateway M465e ('06 era) - OE-QuoteFix v1.19.2 Centrino Core2 Duo T5600 1.83GHz - 4GB - Windows XP SP2 |
#189
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
On 2/17/2014, Paul posted:
Gene E. Bloch wrote: On 2/17/2014, Ken Blake posted: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 22:19:06 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote: In message , BillW50 writes: Vista, and 7 too. I use them (hard to find a new one now). And if you want a large screen docked tablet, I forget exactly what they are called, but they are basically 17 inch and larger screen tablets with I was going to say all-in-ones ... docks. And they are generally meant to run as a desktop, with the occasional short portable use. ... until you said that; all-in-ones seem to be basically giant laptops (or tablets, I suppose if they have touch-screen), but in most cases have done away with the portability altogether. Except for someone who really needs to save the space it takes up, I think buying an all-in-one is a terrible mistake. When components are separated, and one fails, you can replace just the failed component. With an all-in-one, you probably have to replace the entire computer. I feel the same way about laptops, unless the laptop is used for traveling. And I feel the same way about all-in-one printer/scanner combos, for exactly the same reason. One difference with all-in-ones is that you might not be able to open it, whereas laptops are (usually) openable. But maybe not recent Apple laptops, though, according to something I read somewhere recently; sorry, I don't recall where. I have an older all-in-one that I couldn't open. I wanted to change something, but I couldn't pry it apart and I couldn't find any hidden screws or extra little clippies. It felt like it was glued together... I worked on an all-in-one, and it used compression tabs all around the perimeter. The trick was, not to leave marks all over it, while easing it open. They couldn't of course, just rely on the also-present screws, to hold it together. Not enough "fun factor". I had to open it several times, to remove defective RAM and add more. And also to add a cooling fan for the poor Northbridge (surface temperature 75C, with the unit open). Another adventure, was my computer speakers. My computer speakers were glued, and when I needed to get the one open that had the amp inside, I used a saw. Still looks good... for something with a big saw hole in the top :-) Still works good, after all these years. Had to fix a cold solder joint inside. Paul You call them compression tabs, I call them clippies; let's Karl the whole thing Orff. :-) I decided not to use a saw or Dremel on the all-in-one. Or even a solvent, for that matter. -- Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch) |
#190
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:03:46 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
wrote: In message , Ken Blake writes: On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:09:48 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote: [] On the whole, I agree with you, but the overall reliability of PC components in general has improved greatly in the last few years. I was thinking particularly of things like the monitor failing. Yes, I agree that would do for an all-in-one. Assuming it wasn't repairable such as just the backlight. Also, sometimes it gets the PC into a more-used room, allowing the person to get over the threshold that actually gets them into using computers. (And - though I've not looked - I suspect that components _are_ replaceable to a greater extent than you'd think, though you may have to look harder to find ones of the right shape.) I feel the same way about laptops, unless the laptop is used for traveling. And I feel the same way about all-in-one printer/scanner Well, though I use this (actually a large netbook) mostly here at home (actually on my lap!), the fact that I _can_ carry it has its attraction - when I visit friends I can take it with, which I couldn't really do with a desktop, however compact. Whether you carry it on vacations, as I do, or to visit friends, as you do, I agree. Its portability is what makes that format desirable. But I know some people who use a laptop and never move it off their desks, and that's what I think is a poor choice. A laptop is more expensive than a desktop, harder to repair, most costly to buy parts for, more vulnerable to damage from dropping, more vulnerable to theft, etc. If you want to carry it around (for any reason), fine. Otherwise it's a poor choice. All those are true. The fact remains, though, that laptops (and all in ones) are less "threatening" for a lot of people. Remember you and I like playing with computers anyway, just for themselves as well as what they can do for us (like accessing the web); for a lot of people, especially the elderly* and other groups who might find computers intimidating, a laptop (or AI1) is less so, to the extent that they might use it enough to realise how useful it is. I've known too many people who are sort of afraid of their computer - it sits in a separate room, and using it is an occasion/performance. Yes, I know lots of people like that too. But I'm not so sure that they like an all-in-one better than a regular desktop. |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
Gene E. Bloch wrote:
You call them compression tabs, I call them clippies; let's Karl the whole thing Orff. :-) I decided not to use a saw or Dremel on the all-in-one. Or even a solvent, for that matter. If you drink the solvent, you'll find that just about any tool will "open" it :-) Paul |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
On 2/17/2014, Paul posted:
Gene E. Bloch wrote: You call them compression tabs, I call them clippies; let's Karl the whole thing Orff. :-) I decided not to use a saw or Dremel on the all-in-one. Or even a solvent, for that matter. If you drink the solvent, you'll find that just about any tool will "open" it :-) Paul Gee, Paul, you make troubleshooting sound like FUN! Which solvent do you think is best? Thanks for the new perspective :-) -- Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch) |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
dBase, GeoFile, Works, and Access [ Atlantis Word Processor]
On 2/15/14 2:51 PM, Monty wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:38:51 -0700, Ken Springer wrote: I would like to install it in VM program here, just haven't gotten to it. HP had a competing desktop environment called HP New Wave. I'd like to find a copy of that, as well as DesqView. I do have a copy of Norton Desktop, and actually installed it at work, on a government computer. Really liked it over Windows for Workgroups. You might find a suitable version of Desqview at: http://vetusware.com/manufacturer/Qu...ck/?author=438 That's a great site!!!! Just wish I didn't have to register to download, though. Bookmarked. -- Ken Mac OS X 10.8.5 Firefox 24.0 Thunderbird 24.0 |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
Atlantis Word Processor
Gene E. Bloch wrote:
On 2/17/2014, Paul posted: Gene E. Bloch wrote: You call them compression tabs, I call them clippies; let's Karl the whole thing Orff. :-) I decided not to use a saw or Dremel on the all-in-one. Or even a solvent, for that matter. If you drink the solvent, you'll find that just about any tool will "open" it :-) Paul Gee, Paul, you make troubleshooting sound like FUN! Which solvent do you think is best? Thanks for the new perspective :-) I recommend different kinds of mix, to go with. And maybe a tiny umbrella to go in the glass. Bon appetit. Any solvent in a storm... http://ts2.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.48540...24237&pid=15.1 Paul |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
dBase, GeoFile, Works, and Access [ Atlantis Word Processor]
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:34:51 -0700, Ken Springer
wrote: On 2/15/14 2:51 PM, Monty wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:38:51 -0700, Ken Springer wrote: http://vetusware.com/manufacturer/Qu...ck/?author=438 That's a great site!!!! Just wish I didn't have to register to download, though. Bookmarked. I registered more than 10 years ago and the only time I have had any correspondence eith them was when they sent me a password. Registration is no different to supplying your wmail address to anyone who allows you to access their site. This applies to nearly all the software that I purchase. A Google search brings up this report from AVG, similar to many others: " 30-day safety report for: vetusware.com Currently Safe No active malware was reported recently by users anywhere on this website. (updated Feb 18, 2014 GMT) " |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|