Asked M$ to post ISO when they post fast track

Hi All,

I asked M$ to post their ISOs the same time they post their fast
tracks:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com...ew2014Feedback

What do you suppose my chances are of them paying attention?
0.0000000001%?

-T

T wrote:
Hi All,

I asked M$ to post their ISOs the same time they post their fast
tracks:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com...ew2014Feedback


What do you suppose my chances are of them paying attention?
0.0000000001%?

-T

About the same chance as a snowball in hell.

On 4/15/2015 3:52 PM, Dino wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

I asked M$ to post their ISOs the same time they post their fast
tracks:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com...ew2014Feedback


What do you suppose my chances are of them paying attention?
0.0000000001%?

-T

About the same chance as a snowball in hell.

Not too sure about Hell, Read this.



http://themetapicture.com/hell-expla...t-expect-that/

Regards, Rene

If you write m$ referring to son of frankstein, chances are low. I you write
to government asking for help they can see you're kidding.

"T" escreveu na mensagem ...

Hi All,

I asked M$ to post their ISOs the same time they post their fast
tracks:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com...ew2014Feedback

What do you suppose my chances are of them paying attention?
0.0000000001%?

-T

On 04/15/2015 02:10 PM, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
On 4/15/2015 3:52 PM, Dino wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

I asked M$ to post their ISOs the same time they post their fast
tracks:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com...ew2014Feedback



What do you suppose my chances are of them paying attention?
0.0000000001%?

-T

About the same chance as a snowball in hell.

Not too sure about Hell, Read this.



http://themetapicture.com/hell-expla...t-expect-that/


Regards, Rene



On my!

T wrote:
Hi All,

I asked M$ to post their ISOs the same time they post their fast
tracks:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com...ew2014Feedback


What do you suppose my chances are of them paying attention?
0.0000000001%?

-T

You might have had a marginal chance of someone noticing the request
before stating the following:
qp
And they are not letting me use the tool unless I have one of their
idiot account.
/qp

MSFT makes the rules for the Feedback program. Not choosing to accept
those requirements to provide feedback is akin to saying 'ignore my input'


--
...winston
msft mvp consumer apps

On 04/16/2015 01:28 AM, . . .winston wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

I asked M$ to post their ISOs the same time they post their fast
tracks:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com...ew2014Feedback



What do you suppose my chances are of them paying attention?
0.0000000001%?

-T

You might have had a marginal chance of someone noticing the request
before stating the following:
qp
And they are not letting me use the tool unless I have one of their
idiot account.
/qp

Nicely stated, no?

MSFT makes the rules for the Feedback program. Not choosing to accept
those requirements to provide feedback is akin to saying 'ignore my input'

If M$ paid any attention, and I mean any attention at all, Windows 8
would have never happened. So, I do feel stupid even wasting my time
providing "feedback".

And if they really wanted anyone's feedback, they wouldn't require you
to sign up for an "account". This is all about marketing you. Not
about feedback.

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:02:43 -0700, T wrote:

And if they really wanted anyone's feedback, they wouldn't require
you to sign up for an "account".

Why not? It would be an indication that the user was committed to
MSFT products and not some DLU troll.

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:02:43 -0700, T wrote:

On 04/16/2015 01:28 AM, . . .winston wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

I asked M$ to post their ISOs the same time they post their fast
tracks:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com...ew2014Feedback



What do you suppose my chances are of them paying attention?
0.0000000001%?

-T

You might have had a marginal chance of someone noticing the request
before stating the following:
qp
And they are not letting me use the tool unless I have one of their
idiot account.
/qp

Nicely stated, no?

IMHO, it has too many grammar mistakes to be considered "nicely stated", but
other than that I get your point. As others have said, though, MS gets to
make the rules for their programs.

T wrote:
On 04/16/2015 01:28 AM, . . .winston wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

I asked M$ to post their ISOs the same time they post their fast
tracks:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com...ew2014Feedback




What do you suppose my chances are of them paying attention?
0.0000000001%?

-T

You might have had a marginal chance of someone noticing the request
before stating the following:
qp
And they are not letting me use the tool unless I have one of their
idiot account.
/qp

Nicely stated, no?

MSFT makes the rules for the Feedback program. Not choosing to accept
those requirements to provide feedback is akin to saying 'ignore my
input'

If M$ paid any attention, and I mean any attention at all, Windows 8
would have never happened. So, I do feel stupid even wasting my time
providing "feedback".

And if they really wanted anyone's feedback, they wouldn't require you
to sign up for an "account". This is all about marketing you. Not
about feedback.

No, it's about soliciting feedback from Win10P users who are willing to
follow the guidelines MSFT determines appropriate.

i.e. If you disagree with those guidelines you by default are agreeing
to be ignored including any potential feedback and any complaints about
'paying any attention [at all]'.

--
...winston
msft mvp consumer apps

T wrote:
On 04/16/2015 01:28 AM, . . .winston wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

I asked M$ to post their ISOs the same time they post their fast
tracks:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com...ew2014Feedback




What do you suppose my chances are of them paying attention?
0.0000000001%?

-T

You might have had a marginal chance of someone noticing the request
before stating the following:
qp
And they are not letting me use the tool unless I have one of their
idiot account.
/qp

Nicely stated, no?

MSFT makes the rules for the Feedback program. Not choosing to accept
those requirements to provide feedback is akin to saying 'ignore my
input'

If M$ paid any attention, and I mean any attention at all, Windows 8
would have never happened. So, I do feel stupid even wasting my time
providing "feedback".

And if they really wanted anyone's feedback, they wouldn't require you
to sign up for an "account". This is all about marketing you. Not
about feedback.

Have you ever worked in a development environment ?

How much time do you think is set aside in a day to
read "social.technet.microsoft.com" ?

Probably less time than is set aside to read the
comic strip in the local daily newspaper.

The only person who might consider your opinion:

1) A social scientist outside the development organization.
2) Tasked to track customer opinion.
3) And make PowerPoint slides with neat little histograms
on them.
4) That nobody reads.

Paul

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 23:24:26 -0400, Paul wrote:

T wrote:
On 04/16/2015 01:28 AM, . . .winston wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

I asked M$ to post their ISOs the same time they post their fast
tracks:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com...ew2014Feedback




What do you suppose my chances are of them paying attention?
0.0000000001%?

-T

You might have had a marginal chance of someone noticing the request
before stating the following:
qp
And they are not letting me use the tool unless I have one of their
idiot account.
/qp

Nicely stated, no?

MSFT makes the rules for the Feedback program. Not choosing to accept
those requirements to provide feedback is akin to saying 'ignore my
input'

If M$ paid any attention, and I mean any attention at all, Windows 8
would have never happened. So, I do feel stupid even wasting my time
providing "feedback".

And if they really wanted anyone's feedback, they wouldn't require you
to sign up for an "account". This is all about marketing you. Not
about feedback.

Have you ever worked in a development environment ?

How much time do you think is set aside in a day to
read "social.technet.microsoft.com" ?

Probably less time than is set aside to read the
comic strip in the local daily newspaper.

The only person who might consider your opinion:

1) A social scientist outside the development organization.
2) Tasked to track customer opinion.
3) And make PowerPoint slides with neat little histograms
on them.
4) That nobody reads.

#1 is probably an intern.

On 04/16/2015 10:39 AM, mechanic wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:02:43 -0700, T wrote:

And if they really wanted anyone's feedback, they wouldn't require
you to sign up for an "account".

Why not? It would be an indication that the user was committed to
MSFT products and not some DLU troll.


The only purpose is to market you. If you think M$ listens to
your feedback, you are deluded. Back when "Frankenstein the Elder"
(w8) was previewing, the roar was deafening. M$ didn't care.

And I might posit that the only reason behind Frankenstein and Sons
is the Microsoft Store. Apple is eating M$'s lunch with the
Apple Store.

On 04/16/2015 10:54 AM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:02:43 -0700, T wrote:

On 04/16/2015 01:28 AM, . . .winston wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

I asked M$ to post their ISOs the same time they post their fast
tracks:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com...ew2014Feedback



What do you suppose my chances are of them paying attention?
0.0000000001%?

-T

You might have had a marginal chance of someone noticing the request
before stating the following:
qp
And they are not letting me use the tool unless I have one of their
idiot account.
/qp

Nicely stated, no?

IMHO, it has too many grammar mistakes to be considered "nicely stated", but
other than that I get your point. As others have said, though, MS gets to
make the rules for their programs.


True. And I get to bitch about it too.

On 04/16/2015 03:14 PM, . . .winston wrote:
T wrote:
On 04/16/2015 01:28 AM, . . .winston wrote:
T wrote:
Hi All,

I asked M$ to post their ISOs the same time they post their fast
tracks:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com...ew2014Feedback





What do you suppose my chances are of them paying attention?
0.0000000001%?

-T

You might have had a marginal chance of someone noticing the request
before stating the following:
qp
And they are not letting me use the tool unless I have one of their
idiot account.
/qp

Nicely stated, no?

MSFT makes the rules for the Feedback program. Not choosing to accept
those requirements to provide feedback is akin to saying 'ignore my
input'

If M$ paid any attention, and I mean any attention at all, Windows 8
would have never happened. So, I do feel stupid even wasting my time
providing "feedback".

And if they really wanted anyone's feedback, they wouldn't require you
to sign up for an "account". This is all about marketing you. Not
about feedback.

No, it's about soliciting feedback from Win10P users who are willing to
follow the guidelines MSFT determines appropriate.

i.e. If you disagree with those guidelines you by default are agreeing
to be ignored including any potential feedback and any complaints about
'paying any attention [at all]'.


They don't pay any attention anyway. They just want you signed up
so they can market you.

You will notice that the name of the forum is "WinPreview2014Feedback".
And, they themselves admit they don't take "feedback" on their
"feedback" forum.

I feel stupid even attempting it.

I have to tell myself that when Frankenstein the Elder (w8) was
previewing, that the feedback anger was deafening. M$ ignored
all of it. I even remember Info World running an article
where they stated that yup, M$ just deletes their feedback.

I was hoping that m$ had turned a new leaf on
social.technet.microsoft.com = "WinPreview2014Feedback", but
they did not.

I should have known better.