If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
With agreement through Microsoft Vista COA and sticker are removed!
http://www.ebay.com/itm/160967170402
You got to be kidding me? Microsoft wants some resellers to destroy the COA that somebody else had to pay for? What Microsoft isn't happy with just a single license for every computer sold? Now they want two licenses per machine? -- Bill Motion Computing LE1700 Tablet ('09 era) - OE-QuoteFix v1.19.2 Centrino Core2 Duo L7400 1.5GHz - 2GB RAM Windows XP Tablet PC Edition 2005 SP2 |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
With agreement through Microsoft Vista COA and sticker are removed!
"BillW50" wrote in message ... http://www.ebay.com/itm/160967170402 You got to be kidding me? Microsoft wants some resellers to destroy the COA that somebody else had to pay for? What Microsoft isn't happy with just a single license for every computer sold? Now they want two licenses per machine? The description for that pc states: "There is 2gb ram but NO HARD DRIVE OR POWER CORD" "Operating System - Not Included " COA applies to the operating system. No hard drive thus the reason for no o/s. - Thus if no operating system, no need for the sticker. Or do you think your entitled to a product key for a missing operating system (and for $59) ??? Another issue, not entirely unrelated, appeared (and applicable to XP, Vista, Win7) when MSFT revised the licensing terms for OEM editions: - the Vista OEM System Builder EULA prohibits installing an OEM license if not selling the machine to another unrelated person (i.e. you can't install an OEM version on a pc for personal use (yourself, family, friends without selling that machine to an unrelated party) qp OEM licenses must be preinstalled on a PC and sold to another unrelated party /qp Note: the above applies to XP, Vista, Win7 but not Win8. Licensing was revised for Win8 with specifc applicability to each Win8 edition (Upgrade, OEM, Personal Use for System Builder). -- ....winston msft mvp |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
With agreement through Microsoft Vista COA and sticker are removed!
"BillW50" wrote:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/160967170402 snipped the poster's misconception what the auction was selling It's an auction for hardware only. You don't get an OS. You missed the part of the auction description that says: Operating System: Not Included So, for /*WHAT*/ would they provide a COA sticker with a product key? They're not going to provide to you a means to pirate a copy of the OS by reusing the COA's product key that was for some other license that they didn't include with the hardware. Auction is selling hardware. NO SOFTWARE IS INCLUDED. No operating system, no applications. If you want an OS on this hardware, get it separately. Also, for such questions, click on "Ask the seller". They know what they're selling (you didn't or were confused). It is also a good indicator if the seller is responsive. Give them at least 3 full days *before* the auction ends for them to reply. If they reply, you know you can contact them later if there is a problem with the item (delivery, costs, condition, description mismatch). While, in this case, the seller says "no returns or exchanges", you are still covered by eBay's buyer protections; however, typically eBay likes to have the auction participants try to settle the problem before involving arbitration or involvement by eBay. Remember that the buyer is responsible for reading ALL conditions or description of an auction. If the buyer has any questions, they must ask them BEFORE bidding. Sellers are not responsible for buyers that don't bother to read an auction, don't read it all, including shipping charges, don't understand the auction, or don't ask for clarification. If there are unknowns, buyers accept any risks thereof when they bid. Caveat emptor. Sellers are not responsible for buyers. They are responsible for what they are selling. For example, the condition is merely listed as "used". Not new, not like new, not good, and not acceptable. Just used. The seller mentioned some scratches. Well, what's "some" to them maybe be monsterous to you. LOOK at the auction's pictures. They're pretty good. However, because no OS gets loaded, the pic of the display is rather useless. There is no mention about dead pixels but the seller probably doesn't know. Read the auction and you'll see at just what [lack of] testing the seller performed. It's booted and got to the POST screen. That's all the seller knows. They don't really know the condition of the display. They didn't go keyboarding to ensure that none of them stick, don't rise up all the way (so a slight pressure will close the contact), the condition of the carbon trails to know the keys make reliable contact. Hell, there's no pic of the keyboard to see if you can even read the keycaps. You'll have to add a hard disk so you can install an OS, and you'll have to use LINUX or buy Windows. Then you'll have to see if drivers are available for this unit. So is this something you really want for baseline that you'll have to build up? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
With agreement through Microsoft Vista COA and sticker are removed!
In ,
VanguardLH typed: "BillW50" wrote: http://www.ebay.com/itm/160967170402 snipped the poster's misconception what the auction was selling It's an auction for hardware only. You don't get an OS. You missed the part of the auction description that says: Operating System: Not Included Actually I watch a lot of auctions and many off lease machines doesn't include a hard drive or OS. But they do include a COA. So, for /*WHAT*/ would they provide a COA sticker with a product key? They're not going to provide to you a means to pirate a copy of the OS by reusing the COA's product key that was for some other license that they didn't include with the hardware. No, in my case I often don't care if there is a hard drive or not. Nor do I care if there is an OS or not. But what I do care is if it has a COA or not. As if I am interested in a model I already have, I also already have the recovery disc for it anyway. And I have plenty of unused hard drives, so I don't care about that either. But without a COA, I can't restore it back to a factory state. And I must purchase or use one of my unused OEM or full version keys for the machine. Having over 30 machines here, we are talking like over $5000 more being paid to Microsoft. And that would be a problem. Auction is selling hardware. NO SOFTWARE IS INCLUDED. No operating system, no applications. If you want an OS on this hardware, get it separately. Many auctions are the same, but includes the original COA that was sold with the machine. I had no idea that Microsoft makes some destroy the COA. I was never asked to sign any contract with Microsoft, nor would I ever want to. And the more and more I hear about these contracts, the more it sounds like signing a contract with the devil. If everybody just said no, this nonsense would end. Also, for such questions, click on "Ask the seller". They know what they're selling (you didn't or were confused). It is also a good indicator if the seller is responsive. Give them at least 3 full days *before* the auction ends for them to reply. If they reply, you know you can contact them later if there is a problem with the item (delivery, costs, condition, description mismatch). While, in this case, the seller says "no returns or exchanges", you are still covered by eBay's buyer protections; however, typically eBay likes to have the auction participants try to settle the problem before involving arbitration or involvement by eBay. Yes this is an option I was going to do. But first I wanted some insight to hidden Microsoft rules I didn't know about first. Remember that the buyer is responsible for reading ALL conditions or description of an auction. If the buyer has any questions, they must ask them BEFORE bidding. Sellers are not responsible for buyers that don't bother to read an auction, don't read it all, including shipping charges, don't understand the auction, or don't ask for clarification. If there are unknowns, buyers accept any risks thereof when they bid. Caveat emptor. Sellers are not responsible for buyers. They are responsible for what they are selling. For example, the condition is merely listed as "used". Not new, not like new, not good, and not acceptable. Just used. The seller mentioned some scratches. Well, what's "some" to them maybe be monsterous to you. LOOK at the auction's pictures. They're pretty good. However, because no OS gets loaded, the pic of the display is rather useless. There is no mention about dead pixels but the seller probably doesn't know. Read the auction and you'll see at just what [lack of] testing the seller performed. It's booted and got to the POST screen. That's all the seller knows. They don't really know the condition of the display. They didn't go keyboarding to ensure that none of them stick, don't rise up all the way (so a slight pressure will close the contact), the condition of the carbon trails to know the keys make reliable contact. Hell, there's no pic of the keyboard to see if you can even read the keycaps. You'll have to add a hard disk so you can install an OS, and you'll have to use LINUX or buy Windows. Then you'll have to see if drivers are available for this unit. So is this something you really want for baseline that you'll have to build up? Yes of course. I know all of this. Although sometimes you find a seller who is far less than honest. Like recently I purchased a machine that they said was a Core Duo in the title (I want nothing less with Windows 7). When I got it, it was really a Core Solo. And they said the battery is unwarranted. Fine, I didn't care if it only had 5% of the full capacity or not. Just good enough to save my work if the power fails. But what they didn't mention was that the battery voltage fell below safe charging. And thus the machine totally ignores it and it is only good for a door stop. The only saving grace is that the machine looks like it was just taken out of the box just yesterday. And for a battery to fall that low in voltage, it had to sit for years without a recharge. So it probably did see very little use anyway. -- Bill Motion Computing LE1700 Tablet ('09 era) - OE-QuoteFix v1.19.2 Centrino Core2 Duo L7400 1.5GHz - 2GB RAM Windows XP Tablet PC Edition 2005 SP2 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
With agreement through Microsoft Vista COA and sticker are removed!
"BillW50" wrote:
VanguardLH typed: "BillW50" wrote: http://www.ebay.com/itm/160967170402 snipped the poster's misconception what the auction was selling It's an auction for hardware only. You don't get an OS. You missed the part of the auction description that says: Operating System: Not Included Actually I watch a lot of auctions and many off lease machines doesn't include a hard drive or OS. But they do include a COA. So you're finding a lot of lazy or ignorant eBay sellers. If you've been monitoring lots of auctions there, this shouldn't be a surprise. There is no requirement that sellers are much more educated than buyers. If you need more info, you're supposed to contact the seller BEFORE placing a bid. So, for /*WHAT*/ would they provide a COA sticker with a product key? They're not going to provide to you a means to pirate a copy of the OS by reusing the COA's product key that was for some other license that they didn't include with the hardware. No, in my case I often don't care if there is a hard drive or not. Nor do I care if there is an OS or not. But what I do care is if it has a COA or not. A COA for *what*? You just said you didn't care if there is an OS or not. Well, if there is no OS, just what would the COA be for? To facilitate pirating another copy of Windows that did NOT come with the hardware? As if I am interested in a model I already have, I also already have the recovery disc for it anyway. And I have plenty of unused hard drives, so I don't care about that either. So you're going to move a license from one host to another of the same type. What does the Windows 8 EULA for whatever version you got say about migrating that license to another host? Microsoft overhauled their license agreements for Windows 8 and I haven't bothered memorizing any of it for any versions of that product. You want to migrate your Win8 license from your old computer to a replacement computer. That the replacement is the same brand and model is irrelevant (except for ease on your part, not regarding the license). *IF* the EULA for you particular version of Win8 permits that migration then you get to migrate THAT license, not steal one that didn't even come on the replacement computer. Since they specifically say that they are NOT providing an operating system then they also cannot provide you a COA for a non-existent license. Being sloppy by leaving on the COA sticker when Windows is not included in the sale doesn't obviate that use of the COA sticker would be illegal. You don't have THAT license of Windows. You didn't buy it. If you're walking through a parking lot and notice an unlocked car with the keys in the ignition, do you really think that car is now yours? Just because some boob left the COA on the case for a sale that did NOT include a license of Windows still means you're not allowed to use THAT licence for that COA. But without a COA, I can't restore it back to a factory state. And I must purchase or use one of my unused OEM or full version keys for the machine. Having over 30 machines here, we are talking like over $5000 more being paid to Microsoft. And that would be a problem. Although not allowed for OEM versions of Windows, you could use your *own* COA sticker to install YOUR license of Windows. Move the hard disk from your old same-type host to the replacement one, create the rescue discs the manual told you about to migrate the OEM install (still not legit, however), or call the host maker to get them to send you replacement installation media (you'll probably have to pay the shipping & handling charges for something like a cost of $20). Auction is selling hardware. NO SOFTWARE IS INCLUDED. No operating system, no applications. If you want an OS on this hardware, get it separately. Many auctions are the same, but includes the original COA that was sold with the machine. If a license for Windows was not included then they SHOULD have removed the COA sticker with the product key. There are lots of sellers, even large companies, that dump off their old hardware by selling it rather than contract a jobber for disposal and they omit to wipe the hard disks. Especially for companies, they are not allowed to slice up their volume license to dole out instances outside their organization to whom the volume license was sold. The recipient (buyer) gets just hardware with a polluted hard disk (i.e., there's still an instance of Windows on it). That doesn't mean it is a legit license of Windows. If the OS was not specifically included in the sale then any files existing on the hard disk meant they didn't bother or remember to wipe the hard disk. I had no idea that Microsoft makes some destroy the COA. They don't. The seller was not including an operating system. Therefore they couldn't legally provide a COA for an instance of Windows that is not included in the sale. If Windows was included in the sale, leaving the COA sticker is valid. If Windows was not included in the sale, leaving the COA sticker means they would be illegally doling out a product key for some OTHER instance of Windows than the one installed on THAT host. Doesn't matter that you are using one host to repair another. They're still different hosts. But first I wanted some insight to hidden Microsoft rules I didn't know about first. There are no hidden Microsoft rules. No rules apply because no OS was included in the sale. You don't get a product key for a license of Windows that you didn't buy. You'll have to figure out how to get Windows from your old host to the replacement one using your own old COA sticker and its product key. It it's for an OEM version of Windows, such migration is illegal per the EULA contract to which you agreed by using the software. Hint: nothing bars you from upgrading your current host to which is bound an OEM license, so you can "upgrade" a computer until it is basically a new computer although doing so will probably spur the activation wizard. No OS was included in the sale hence not only would it be inane to include a COA sticker and product for an OS that wasn't included but also illegal if it were an OEM license or a retail license that the seller kept. Use your own old Windows license. Yes of course. I know all of this. Well, you didn't know that no OS was included in the sale hence the absence of the COA sticker, so there might be other conditions of the sale of which you are unaware. Although sometimes you find a seller who is far less than honest. Like recently I purchased a machine that they said was a Core Duo in the title (I want nothing less with Windows 7). When I got it, it was really a Core Solo. If the auction description said Core Duo and that's not what you got then it was a fraudulent auction or the seller sent the wrong item. If the seller refused to exchange the item for the correct one then you'd be covered by eBay's buyer protection. Contact eBay to issue a complaint to start the arbitration process. The Core Solo uses the same 2-core die as the Core Duo except only one of the cores is left active. Could be you read that auction incorrectly, too. Auctions hang around for awhile so users can search on "completed listings" to see what something sold for before. I use it sometimes to figure out what an item of mine previously sold for rather than guess at a starting bid price. What's the URL of that old auction? And they said the battery is unwarranted. Fine, I didn't care if it only had 5% of the full capacity or not. Just good enough to save my work if the power fails. But what they didn't mention was that the battery voltage fell below safe charging. So you're complaining the seller said the battery's condition was unknown and you expected the battery to work? That was a risk that YOU chose to make. You knew up front the battery condition was suspect. They probably didn't waste the time to test it for uptime duration. They probably didn't know how old it was. I don't see the seller misled you. You risked it. You lost. Then you chose not to get a replacement battery. Not their fault. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
With agreement through Microsoft Vista COA and sticker are removed!
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal...s/default.aspx
From the Windows 8 retail license: http://download.microsoft.com/Docume...6e0e0260a6.pdf Can I transfer the software to another computer or user? You may transfer the software to another computer that belongs to you. You may also transfer the software (together with the license) to a computer owned by someone else if a) you are the first licensed user of the software and b) the new user agrees to the terms of this agreement. To make that transfer, you must transfer the original media, the certificate of authenticity, the product key and the proof of purchase directly to that other person, without retaining any copies of the software. The retail license let you migrate YOUR license of Windows to another computer that you own (i.e., the replacement you intend to get). You can transfer the Windows 8 license to another user *if* you are the FIRST licensee. That means a reseller of goods, like the eBay auction you mention, wasn't a licensee at all. The FIRST licensee was from whomever they eBay seller the hardware. That FIRST licensee could've sold the license to the reseller at eBay but (1) they probably didn't, especially if it was a volume license (since they're not allowed to slice up a volume license), and (2) the reseller has no need for the license since they aren't the one that will use that hardware (they're receiving the hardware and then turning around to sell it off to someone else). The FIRST licensee (1st user) could sell it to the eBay seller (2nd user) but the eBay seller is *not* permitted to to sell it to you (3rd user). The eBay seller is not an escrow service facilitating the sale between the FIRST licensee and you. The hardware was SOLD to the eBay user who is now reselling it. First licensee - eBay seller: transfer legit First licensee - eBay seller - you: transfer not legit First licensee (via escrow agent) -- you: transfer legit You would have to be the SECOND license, not their third one, or later. The eBay seller knows better Microsoft's licensing than you do. It's not the same as before for prior versions of Windows. You're disappointed that this seller is not sloppy by leaving the COA with product key on the case for a license of an operating system that is *not* included in the sale. They're not going to facilitate your illegal migration of Windows 8 by using a license that you didn't get. They're doing their job right. They are a good seller. What you want is a sloppy, bad, or ignorant seller. To be legit, either you'll have to buy Windows 8 with the hardware or you'll have to figure out how to migrate your own license of Windows 8 to the replacement computer -- provided you have a retail license. From the OEM/system builder (pre-installed) license: http://download.microsoft.com/Docume...7f449f0d88.pdf Can I transfer the software to another user? You may transfer the software directly to another user, only with the licensed computer. You cannot migrate Windows 8 from your old computer to the new one if what you have is an OEM or system builder license. The license sticks to the first computer on which it is installed. Doesn't matter if that computer burns up in a fire, lost in a divorce settlement, stolen, or your dog at your computer. If that first-install computer is lost then so is the OEM/system builder license that was on it. You're not allowed to migrate that license to a replacement computer. However, the OEM/system builder license doesn't obstruct users from upgrading their computers. A computer on which an OEM/system builder license was installed can still be upgraded, so much so that it is basically a new computer. So you can fudge that licensing a bit through an "upgrade" process. Since the eBay seller is not including a license for Windows (and probably is not allowed to include one) then you'll have to figure out how to get your old license of Windows 8 off your old computer. You didn't describe the state of your old computer or inquire how to get a legit *retail* license off of it. If an OEM license is on your old computer and your old computer is unusable then so too is that OEM license. Most users of pre-builts, like this one, end up getting OEM versions of Windows not realizing they can't migrate it to another computer like they can with the more expensive retail license. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
With agreement through Microsoft Vista COA and sticker are removed!
"VanguardLH" wrote in message ...
Although not allowed for OEM versions of Windows, you could use your *own* COA sticker to install YOUR license of Windows. Move the hard disk from your old same-type host to the replacement one, create the rescue discs the manual told you about to migrate the OEM install (still not legit, however), or call the host maker to get them to send you replacement installation media (you'll probably have to pay the shipping & handling charges for something like a cost of $20) Well...since that unit isn't going to run Win8 anytime soon (then XP/Vista/Win7 OEM licensing would apply)...but.....if using an OEM o/s the machine has to be sold (i.e. not for personal use) qp OEM licenses must be preinstalled on a PC and sold to another unrelated party qp A full retail license (not OEM) for XP, Vista, Win7 (assuming the hardware supports one) would be a different scenario (of course after installing a hard drive and purchasing or using an *unused* license). -- ....winston msft mvp consumer apps |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
With agreement through Microsoft Vista COA and sticker are removed!
In ,
VanguardLH typed: "BillW50" wrote: VanguardLH typed: "BillW50" wrote: http://www.ebay.com/itm/160967170402 snipped the poster's misconception what the auction was selling It's an auction for hardware only. You don't get an OS. You missed the part of the auction description that says: Operating System: Not Included Actually I watch a lot of auctions and many off lease machines doesn't include a hard drive or OS. But they do include a COA. So you're finding a lot of lazy or ignorant eBay sellers. If you've been monitoring lots of auctions there, this shouldn't be a surprise. There is no requirement that sellers are much more educated than buyers. If you need more info, you're supposed to contact the seller BEFORE placing a bid. Yes of course. I just asked one seller today if that was a SXGA or a XGA screen. They said it was a XGA screen and don't ask any more questions and to look elsewhere. I guess they were only interested in suckers as buyers or something. So, for /*WHAT*/ would they provide a COA sticker with a product key? They're not going to provide to you a means to pirate a copy of the OS by reusing the COA's product key that was for some other license that they didn't include with the hardware. No, in my case I often don't care if there is a hard drive or not. Nor do I care if there is an OS or not. But what I do care is if it has a COA or not. A COA for *what*? You just said you didn't care if there is an OS or not. Well, if there is no OS, just what would the COA be for? To facilitate pirating another copy of Windows that did NOT come with the hardware? What? No! Microsoft wanted every PC to be running Microsoft. And they did a fine job (some call it the Microsoft tax). As virtually every PC manufactured comes with some licensed version of Windows. And the proof of that license has been the COA. As if I am interested in a model I already have, I also already have the recovery disc for it anyway. And I have plenty of unused hard drives, so I don't care about that either. So you're going to move a license from one host to another of the same type. What does the Windows 8 EULA for whatever version you got say about migrating that license to another host? Microsoft overhauled their license agreements for Windows 8 and I haven't bothered memorizing any of it for any versions of that product. Whoa! I am not moving licenses or even interested in doing so. You want to migrate your Win8 license from your old computer to a replacement computer. That the replacement is the same brand and model is irrelevant (except for ease on your part, not regarding the license). *IF* the EULA for you particular version of Win8 permits that migration then you get to migrate THAT license, not steal one that didn't even come on the replacement computer. Since they specifically say that they are NOT providing an operating system then they also cannot provide you a COA for a non-existent license. Being sloppy by leaving on the COA sticker when Windows is not included in the sale doesn't obviate that use of the COA sticker would be illegal. You don't have THAT license of Windows. You didn't buy it. If you're walking through a parking lot and notice an unlocked car with the keys in the ignition, do you really think that car is now yours? Just because some boob left the COA on the case for a sale that did NOT include a license of Windows still means you're not allowed to use THAT licence for that COA. I don't know what you are rambling about? If I purchase a XP machine with a XP COA. It is licensed for XP. Nobody is moving licenses. But without a COA, I can't restore it back to a factory state. And I must purchase or use one of my unused OEM or full version keys for the machine. Having over 30 machines here, we are talking like over $5000 more being paid to Microsoft. And that would be a problem. Although not allowed for OEM versions of Windows, you could use your *own* COA sticker to install YOUR license of Windows. Move the hard disk from your old same-type host to the replacement one, create the rescue discs the manual told you about to migrate the OEM install (still not legit, however), or call the host maker to get them to send you replacement installation media (you'll probably have to pay the shipping & handling charges for something like a cost of $20). You are confused! Say I buy a Gateway M465 without a recovery disc or a hard drive. I already have many of them and I have many recovery discs. This one I buy has a COA. I just add a spare drive and use one of the recovery disc I already have and use the COA as the license. It is all perfectly legal. Auction is selling hardware. NO SOFTWARE IS INCLUDED. No operating system, no applications. If you want an OS on this hardware, get it separately. Many auctions are the same, but includes the original COA that was sold with the machine. If a license for Windows was not included then they SHOULD have removed the COA sticker with the product key. There are lots of sellers, even large companies, that dump off their old hardware by selling it rather than contract a jobber for disposal and they omit to wipe the hard disks. Especially for companies, they are not allowed to slice up their volume license to dole out instances outside their organization to whom the volume license was sold. The recipient (buyer) gets just hardware with a polluted hard disk (i.e., there's still an instance of Windows on it). That doesn't mean it is a legit license of Windows. If the OS was not specifically included in the sale then any files existing on the hard disk meant they didn't bother or remember to wipe the hard disk. That is totally different and I would understand that. I had no idea that Microsoft makes some destroy the COA. They don't. The seller was not including an operating system. Therefore they couldn't legally provide a COA for an instance of Windows that is not included in the sale. Bull! The licensee goes with the hardware, whether the OS is there or not. Are you telling me if I pull the drive out of this machine I am typing on, the COA is now invalid? Bull! If Windows was included in the sale, leaving the COA sticker is valid. If Windows was not included in the sale, leaving the COA sticker means they would be illegally doling out a product key for some OTHER instance of Windows than the one installed on THAT host. Doesn't matter that you are using one host to repair another. They're still different hosts. Bull! The COA is tied to hardware. But first I wanted some insight to hidden Microsoft rules I didn't know about first. There are no hidden Microsoft rules. No rules apply because no OS was included in the sale. You don't get a product key for a license of Windows that you didn't buy. The license is tied to the hardware. Why is this so hard to understand? You'll have to figure out how to get Windows from your old host to the replacement one using your own old COA sticker and its product key. It it's for an OEM version of Windows, such migration is illegal per the EULA contract to which you agreed by using the software. Hint: nothing bars you from upgrading your current host to which is bound an OEM license, so you can "upgrade" a computer until it is basically a new computer although doing so will probably spur the activation wizard. Bull! The COA is tied to the hardware. What the hell is wrong with you? No OS was included in the sale hence not only would it be inane to include a COA sticker and product for an OS that wasn't included but also illegal if it were an OEM license or a retail license that the seller kept. Use your own old Windows license. Bull! The COA is tied to the hardware. This is the rule in the license agreement. Yes of course. I know all of this. Well, you didn't know that no OS was included in the sale hence the absence of the COA sticker, so there might be other conditions of the sale of which you are unaware. Maybe, that is why I asked. Although sometimes you find a seller who is far less than honest. Like recently I purchased a machine that they said was a Core Duo in the title (I want nothing less with Windows 7). When I got it, it was really a Core Solo. If the auction description said Core Duo and that's not what you got then it was a fraudulent auction or the seller sent the wrong item. If the seller refused to exchange the item for the correct one then you'd be covered by eBay's buyer protection. Contact eBay to issue a complaint to start the arbitration process. Yes I am thinking about it. The Core Solo uses the same 2-core die as the Core Duo except only one of the cores is left active. Could be you read that auction incorrectly, too. Auctions hang around for awhile so users can search on "completed listings" to see what something sold for before. I use it sometimes to figure out what an item of mine previously sold for rather than guess at a starting bid price. What's the URL of that old auction? Yes I use completed auctions all of the time. http://www.ebay.com/itm/181063168205 And they said the battery is unwarranted. Fine, I didn't care if it only had 5% of the full capacity or not. Just good enough to save my work if the power fails. But what they didn't mention was that the battery voltage fell below safe charging. So you're complaining the seller said the battery's condition was unknown and you expected the battery to work? That was a risk that YOU chose to make. You knew up front the battery condition was suspect. They probably didn't waste the time to test it for uptime duration. They probably didn't know how old it was. I don't see the seller misled you. You risked it. You lost. Then you chose not to get a replacement battery. Not their fault. Oh knock it off! I thought it was billed as a Core Duo machine and not a Core Solo. That in itself makes it worth 50 bucks less to me and only useful as a XP machine. The battery is no big deal. But I would never sell a machine with a totally dead battery and just say it is unwarranted. I would say it is totally dead. -- Bill Gateway M465e ('06 era) - OE-QuoteFix v1.19.2 Centrino Core2 Duo T5600 1.83GHz - 4GB - Windows XP SP2 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
With agreement through Microsoft Vista COA and sticker are removed!
"BillW50" wrote:
Bull! The licensee goes with the hardware, Bull! The COA is tied to hardware. The license is tied to the hardware. Why is this so hard to understand? Bull! The COA is tied to the hardware. What the hell is wrong with you? Bull! The COA is tied to the hardware. This is the rule in the license agreement. No one has to sell you anything they don't want to or they never got to resell to you or are not allowed to resell to you. You don't have the COA so you do not know what type of license for Windows was used with that hardware. Maybe it was a retail license and the original owner kept the OS and its license. That is, the eBay seller NEVER got the license. It stayed with whomever sold the hardware to him. Obviously the eBay seller cannot sell you a license they didn't get with the hardware. Without the COA, you cannot prove that it was not a retail license. There's even one more gotcha: the eBay seller was not some agent between the original PC owner and you. They aren't an auctioneer or arbiter setting up the sale where only the original owner and you are listed as parties in the sale. The eBayer bought the hardware from the 1st licensee. That made the eBay the 2nd licensee. He could use the retail license if it was included in the first sale. That eBayer can NOT resell that same license. He is the 2nd licensee. You would be the 3rd licensee. Now go read my other reply that cites the critical mandates for the conditions of transfer of license. First licensee can transfer to a 2nd licensee, and that as far as it goes. The 2nd licensee cannot transfer to a 3rd licensee. There have been lots of articles for quite awhile regarding the changes Microsoft made regarding transfer of retail licenses. So you can blame Microsoft that the eBay seller could not sell you the retail license but that presume the retail license was ever included in the transfer of the hardware in the first place. Maybe it was a volume license which means that YOU would never get a legit copy with hardware transfer. You are not part of the organization to which the volume license was originally sold. Volume licenses go by "seat" count: you can move them around as long as you don't exceed your max seat count. Without the COA, you cannot prove that it was not a volume license. As for OEM, sure the license sticks to the first computer on which it is installed. That only means it *cannot be installed* anywhere ELSE! It doesn't mean the owner or seller must include it in the sale of the hardware. If they want, they can just sell the hardware. They cannot legally use the OEM license once the hardware to which it was bound went somewhere else but what do they care if they don't want that OS or another license for it? I can go to BestBuy or Newegg and buy a ****load of pre-built computers with pre-installed OEM licenses of Windows and I can legally erase the hard disks to put on Linux and then sell the hardware to someone else WITHOUT ever transferring the OEM license for Windows. *IF* the OEM license is transfered then it follows the hardware. If the OEM license is not transferred, you can do anything you want with the hardware. Selling the hardware does not mandate license transfer. Just go read the license about OEM *transfers*. It'll take you less time than composing another reply to mine declaring what you want is how it should be. Stop making up conditions of transfer of license for the software. The OEM software license is bound to the hardware. The hardware is NOT bound to the software license. And they said the battery is unwarranted. Fine, I didn't care if it only had 5% of the full capacity or not. Just good enough to save my work if the power fails. But what they didn't mention was that the battery voltage fell below safe charging. So you're complaining the seller said the battery's condition was unknown and you expected the battery to work? That was a risk that YOU chose to make. You knew up front the battery condition was suspect. They probably didn't waste the time to test it for uptime duration. They probably didn't know how old it was. I don't see the seller misled you. You risked it. You lost. Then you chose not to get a replacement battery. Not their fault. Oh knock it off! I thought it was billed as a Core Duo machine and not a Core Solo. Oh, diversion, I see. You bring up the subject of the battery condition and I discuss your risk in expecting an unwarranted battery to function and suddenly it's back to the prior mention about the wrong CPU in the auction's description. Focus. That in itself makes it worth 50 bucks less to me and only useful as a XP machine. The battery is no big deal. Um, now just who was it that introduced the topic about *hoping* an unwarranted battery would still be [partially] usable? Yep, must be my fault that you brought this up. Go read my reply (to my reply) about the Windows 8 EULA. Then you'll see why the eBay seller would not be allowed (as the 2nd licensee) to transfer to you (as the 3rd licensee) a retail license. Regardless on what OS was installed on the hardware, the seller does not have to include it in a subsequent sale of the hardware. If the seller wants to include the OEM license then it has to go with the hardware. As for transfer of a retail license, Microsoft screwed you. It's not the eBay seller's fault as they are being compliant (assuming the eBay seller even got the license when they bought the hardware). From the auction, it looks like the eBay seller never got a license so they cannot transfer it to you. There was no transfer of license from original hardware owner to the eBay seller. Transfer of hardware does NOT mandate transfer of license. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
With agreement through Microsoft Vista COA and sticker are removed!
On 2/4/2013 8:35 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
"BillW50" wrote: Bull! The licensee goes with the hardware, Bull! The COA is tied to hardware. The license is tied to the hardware. Why is this so hard to understand? Bull! The COA is tied to the hardware. What the hell is wrong with you? Bull! The COA is tied to the hardware. This is the rule in the license agreement. No one has to sell you anything they don't want to or they never got to resell to you or are not allowed to resell to you. You don't have the COA so you do not know what type of license for Windows was used with that hardware. Really? Call up Dell, Gateway, HP, or whomever and tell them you want to order 100 computers without Windows. And they tell you they can't do that. Either way Microsoft will get paid for OEM licenses for all of those 100 machines you order. Maybe it was a retail license and the original owner kept the OS and its license. That is, the eBay seller NEVER got the license. It stayed with whomever sold the hardware to him. Obviously the eBay seller cannot sell you a license they didn't get with the hardware. Without the COA, you cannot prove that it was not a retail license. That would be a valid reason. Although the seller didn't say that. They said due to the contract with Microsoft, they have to remove the COA. There's even one more gotcha: the eBay seller was not some agent between the original PC owner and you. They aren't an auctioneer or arbiter setting up the sale where only the original owner and you are listed as parties in the sale. The eBayer bought the hardware from the 1st licensee. That made the eBay the 2nd licensee. He could use the retail license if it was included in the first sale. That eBayer can NOT resell that same license. He is the 2nd licensee. You would be the 3rd licensee. Now go read my other reply that cites the critical mandates for the conditions of transfer of license. First licensee can transfer to a 2nd licensee, and that as far as it goes. The 2nd licensee cannot transfer to a 3rd licensee. There have been lots of articles for quite awhile regarding the changes Microsoft made regarding transfer of retail licenses. So you can blame Microsoft that the eBay seller could not sell you the retail license but that presume the retail license was ever included in the transfer of the hardware in the first place. Maybe it was a volume license which means that YOU would never get a legit copy with hardware transfer. You are not part of the organization to which the volume license was originally sold. Volume licenses go by "seat" count: you can move them around as long as you don't exceed your max seat count. Without the COA, you cannot prove that it was not a volume license. Volume licenses would be a valid reason why the COA could not be included. As for OEM, sure the license sticks to the first computer on which it is installed. That only means it *cannot be installed* anywhere ELSE! It doesn't mean the owner or seller must include it in the sale of the hardware. If they want, they can just sell the hardware. They cannot legally use the OEM license once the hardware to which it was bound went somewhere else but what do they care if they don't want that OS or another license for it? I can go to BestBuy or Newegg and buy a ****load of pre-built computers with pre-installed OEM licenses of Windows and I can legally erase the hard disks to put on Linux and then sell the hardware to someone else WITHOUT ever transferring the OEM license for Windows. *IF* the OEM license is transfered then it follows the hardware. If the OEM license is not transferred, you can do anything you want with the hardware. Selling the hardware does not mandate license transfer. Sure, but the seller said they had to remove the COA as per contact with Microsoft. So all indications say everybody would be happy including the COA, except Microsoft. And why does Microsoft have a problem? Microsoft already gets paid for virtually every PC ever manufactured. So what problem would Microsoft have? Just go read the license about OEM *transfers*. It'll take you less time than composing another reply to mine declaring what you want is how it should be. Stop making up conditions of transfer of license for the software. The OEM software license is bound to the hardware. The hardware is NOT bound to the software license. You are the one going off on a tangent. All I want to know is why the seller can't include the COA and why Microsoft won't let them. And you go off on a rant about nobody has to include the COA if they don't want to. Or one is free to remove the COA if they want too. Or talk about Windows 8 license agreements which has nothing to do with the original question, etc. You have side stepped the question totally. And they said the battery is unwarranted. Fine, I didn't care if it only had 5% of the full capacity or not. Just good enough to save my work if the power fails. But what they didn't mention was that the battery voltage fell below safe charging. So you're complaining the seller said the battery's condition was unknown and you expected the battery to work? That was a risk that YOU chose to make. You knew up front the battery condition was suspect. They probably didn't waste the time to test it for uptime duration. They probably didn't know how old it was. I don't see the seller misled you. You risked it. You lost. Then you chose not to get a replacement battery. Not their fault. Oh knock it off! I thought it was billed as a Core Duo machine and not a Core Solo. Oh, diversion, I see. You bring up the subject of the battery condition and I discuss your risk in expecting an unwarranted battery to function and suddenly it's back to the prior mention about the wrong CPU in the auction's description. Focus. No I mentioned it only in passing. The seller stated the machine was a Core Duo machine when in fact it wasn't. So we know a bit about this seller's character. That in itself makes it worth 50 bucks less to me and only useful as a XP machine. The battery is no big deal. Um, now just who was it that introduced the topic about *hoping* an unwarranted battery would still be [partially] usable? Yep, must be my fault that you brought this up. Go read my reply (to my reply) about the Windows 8 EULA. Then you'll see why the eBay seller would not be allowed (as the 2nd licensee) to transfer to you (as the 3rd licensee) a retail license. There you go off again. The Windows 8 EULA has nothing to do with the Vista COA sticker that the seller had to remove. Why do you mention about Windows 8 EULA when the question has to do with Vista's EULA? They are not the same. Regardless on what OS was installed on the hardware, the seller does not have to include it in a subsequent sale of the hardware. If the seller wants to include the OEM license then it has to go with the hardware. As for transfer of a retail license, Microsoft screwed you. It's not the eBay seller's fault as they are being compliant (assuming the eBay seller even got the license when they bought the hardware). From the auction, it looks like the eBay seller never got a license so they cannot transfer it to you. There was no transfer of license from original hardware owner to the eBay seller. Transfer of hardware does NOT mandate transfer of license. Man you never looked the item up, did you? Where do you get this crap that the seller doesn't have to include the COA if they didn't want too? That isn't what the seller stated! The seller stated they *had* to remove the COA due to the contract they had with Microsoft. Geez! http://www.ebay.com/itm/160967170402 -- Bill Gateway M465e ('06 era) - Thunderbird v12.0.1 Centrino Core2 Duo T5600 1.83GHz - 4GB - Windows XP SP2 |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
UPDATE ON DEAD BATTERY PART... [ With agreement through MicrosoftVista COA and sticker are removed!]
On 2/5/2013 7:01 AM, BillW50 wrote:
On 2/4/2013 8:35 PM, VanguardLH wrote: "BillW50" wrote: UPDATE ON DEAD BATTERY PART... And they said the battery is unwarranted. Fine, I didn't care if it only had 5% of the full capacity or not. Just good enough to save my work if the power fails. But what they didn't mention was that the battery voltage fell below safe charging. So you're complaining the seller said the battery's condition was unknown and you expected the battery to work? That was a risk that YOU chose to make. You knew up front the battery condition was suspect. They probably didn't waste the time to test it for uptime duration. They probably didn't know how old it was. I don't see the seller misled you. You risked it. You lost. Then you chose not to get a replacement battery. Not their fault. Oh knock it off! I thought it was billed as a Core Duo machine and not a Core Solo. Oh, diversion, I see. You bring up the subject of the battery condition and I discuss your risk in expecting an unwarranted battery to function and suddenly it's back to the prior mention about the wrong CPU in the auction's description. Focus. No I mentioned it only in passing. The seller stated the machine was a Core Duo machine when in fact it wasn't. So we know a bit about this seller's character. When you have a dead lithium battery which the voltage drops too low (due to sitting too long without being charged), which the machine will refuse to charge for safety reasons. One has a few options. One is to charge it manually and thus bypassing the safety. This is pretty dangerous since lithium batteries can burst into flames if the voltage is too low and you try to recharge them. If it does burst into flames, I believe water makes this chemical fire only worse. So to be safe, I guess to do this outside and if it does burst into flames, do it in an area where nothing else around will burn. As I don't know if you can stop it from burning without special equipment for chemical fires. Another trick is to put the battery in the freezer. I don't know why this sometimes works. I'm guessing as the battery voltage is higher when cold. Then drop it into the machine. And it might be enough to convince the safety circuits it is ok to charge. I tried the latter trick first with this dead battery and it brought it back to life. So this is something one can try if they find themselves in a similar situation. -- Bill Gateway M465e ('06 era) - Thunderbird v12 Centrino Core2 Duo T7400 2.16 GHz - 4GB - Windows 8 Pro w/Media Center |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
UPDATE ON DEAD BATTERY PART... [ With agreement through MicrosoftVista COA and sticker are removed!]
BillW50 wrote:
When you have a dead lithium battery which the voltage drops too low (due to sitting too long without being charged), which the machine will refuse to charge for safety reasons. One has a few options. One is to charge it manually and thus bypassing the safety. This is pretty dangerous since lithium batteries can burst into flames if the voltage is too low and you try to recharge them. If it does burst into flames, I believe water makes this chemical fire only worse. So to be safe, I guess to do this outside and if it does burst into flames, do it in an area where nothing else around will burn. As I don't know if you can stop it from burning without special equipment for chemical fires. Another trick is to put the battery in the freezer. I don't know why this sometimes works. I'm guessing as the battery voltage is higher when cold. Then drop it into the machine. And it might be enough to convince the safety circuits it is ok to charge. I tried the latter trick first with this dead battery and it brought it back to life. So this is something one can try if they find themselves in a similar situation. I like this site, for it's in-depth articles. http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/a..._ion_batteries http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/a...w_temperatures "Many battery users are unaware that consumer-grade lithium-ion batteries cannot be charged below 0°C (32°F). Although the pack appears to be charging normally, plating of metallic lithium can occur on the anode during a subfreezing charge. The plating is permanent and cannot be removed with cycling. Batteries with lithium plating are known to be more vulnerable to failure if exposed to vibration or other stressful conditions." HTH, Paul |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
UPDATE ON DEAD BATTERY PART... [ With agreement through Microsoft Vista COA and sticker are removed!]
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:28:02 -0500, Paul wrote:
BillW50 wrote: When you have a dead lithium battery which the voltage drops too low (due to sitting too long without being charged), which the machine will refuse to charge for safety reasons. One has a few options. One is to charge it manually and thus bypassing the safety. This is pretty dangerous since lithium batteries can burst into flames if the voltage is too low and you try to recharge them. If it does burst into flames, I believe water makes this chemical fire only worse. So to be safe, I guess to do this outside and if it does burst into flames, do it in an area where nothing else around will burn. As I don't know if you can stop it from burning without special equipment for chemical fires. Another trick is to put the battery in the freezer. I don't know why this sometimes works. I'm guessing as the battery voltage is higher when cold. Then drop it into the machine. And it might be enough to convince the safety circuits it is ok to charge. I tried the latter trick first with this dead battery and it brought it back to life. So this is something one can try if they find themselves in a similar situation. I like this site, for it's in-depth articles. http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/a..._ion_batteries http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/a...w_temperatures "Many battery users are unaware that consumer-grade lithium-ion batteries cannot be charged below 0°C (32°F). Although the pack appears to be charging normally, plating of metallic lithium can occur on the anode during a subfreezing charge. The plating is permanent and cannot be removed with cycling. Batteries with lithium plating are known to be more vulnerable to failure if exposed to vibration or other stressful conditions." HTH, Paul Such as Boeing 787s? -- Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
UPDATE ON DEAD BATTERY PART... [ With agreement through MicrosoftVista COA and sticker are removed!]
Gene E. Bloch wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:28:02 -0500, Paul wrote: BillW50 wrote: When you have a dead lithium battery which the voltage drops too low (due to sitting too long without being charged), which the machine will refuse to charge for safety reasons. One has a few options. One is to charge it manually and thus bypassing the safety. This is pretty dangerous since lithium batteries can burst into flames if the voltage is too low and you try to recharge them. If it does burst into flames, I believe water makes this chemical fire only worse. So to be safe, I guess to do this outside and if it does burst into flames, do it in an area where nothing else around will burn. As I don't know if you can stop it from burning without special equipment for chemical fires. Another trick is to put the battery in the freezer. I don't know why this sometimes works. I'm guessing as the battery voltage is higher when cold. Then drop it into the machine. And it might be enough to convince the safety circuits it is ok to charge. I tried the latter trick first with this dead battery and it brought it back to life. So this is something one can try if they find themselves in a similar situation. I like this site, for it's in-depth articles. http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/a..._ion_batteries http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/a...w_temperatures "Many battery users are unaware that consumer-grade lithium-ion batteries cannot be charged below 0°C (32°F). Although the pack appears to be charging normally, plating of metallic lithium can occur on the anode during a subfreezing charge. The plating is permanent and cannot be removed with cycling. Batteries with lithium plating are known to be more vulnerable to failure if exposed to vibration or other stressful conditions." HTH, Paul Such as Boeing 787s? Are they still grounded, or flying again ? Paul |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
UPDATE ON DEAD BATTERY PART... [ With agreement through MicrosoftVista COA and sticker are removed!]
On 2/15/2013 9:28 AM, Paul wrote:
BillW50 wrote: When you have a dead lithium battery which the voltage drops too low (due to sitting too long without being charged), which the machine will refuse to charge for safety reasons. One has a few options. One is to charge it manually and thus bypassing the safety. This is pretty dangerous since lithium batteries can burst into flames if the voltage is too low and you try to recharge them. If it does burst into flames, I believe water makes this chemical fire only worse. So to be safe, I guess to do this outside and if it does burst into flames, do it in an area where nothing else around will burn. As I don't know if you can stop it from burning without special equipment for chemical fires. Another trick is to put the battery in the freezer. I don't know why this sometimes works. I'm guessing as the battery voltage is higher when cold. Then drop it into the machine. And it might be enough to convince the safety circuits it is ok to charge. I tried the latter trick first with this dead battery and it brought it back to life. So this is something one can try if they find themselves in a similar situation. I like this site, for it's in-depth articles. http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/a..._ion_batteries http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/a...w_temperatures "Many battery users are unaware that consumer-grade lithium-ion batteries cannot be charged below 0°C (32°F). Although the pack appears to be charging normally, plating of metallic lithium can occur on the anode during a subfreezing charge. The plating is permanent and cannot be removed with cycling. Batteries with lithium plating are known to be more vulnerable to failure if exposed to vibration or other stressful conditions." HTH, Paul I am not sure if it was batteryuniversity.com saying things that were seriously wrong or not. It was one of them anyway. And I have found many who pretend to know a lot about batteries who really don't. Now having said this. People who has a lithium battery that sat too long that the safety circuits will refuse to charge it. What can most users do? Most will just probably dispose of them. Or they could throw it in the freezer for an hour and give it a shot. And if it works, they have their battery back. Surely it is far better than what they had before. And the battery I brought back to life through freezing appears to have seen very little use if any at all. Because it has its full rated capacity back and it is working just fine today. -- Bill Gateway M465e ('06 era) - Thunderbird v12 Centrino Core2 Duo T7400 2.16 GHz - 4GB - Windows 8 Pro w/Media Center |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|