A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Windows 10 » Windows 10 Help Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

No one and nothing could ever pry Paul Alsing's hands off his Kool-Aid.



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old September 24th 19, 10:52 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.checkmate
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 832
Default Seattle used to be under a glacier.

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:22:29 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote:

Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:
Paul Alsing replied ( to me ):

440 million years ago, in the Earth's coldest period,
carbon dioxide levels were 11 times higher than they are today.


Even if it was - you don't show any evidence - there weren't many humans
around then, were there?

Climate change is a problem for us and our ecosystem only. The planet (and
life on it) will survive as it already has done over four mass extinctions.
We may not.


Oh, shut up, you hysterical bitch. You are SOOOO stupid
if you actually believe humanity cannot adapt to a few
degrees rise in global average temperatures. Gimme
a ****ing break. You liberals are definitely an evolutionary
dead end. I hope you liberals ALL die off because two
degrees is just way more than you can cope with.


Tell that to the 70,000 Bahamians who had their houses destroyed by the
most powerful hurricane ever.

The uncontrolled fires in Siberia.

The non-stop drought in Australia.

The shrinking seas in the Middle East and Central Asia.

Sure humanity will likely survive. Millions of humans will have their way
of life changed forever, however.

Economies will be affected, national instability will increase in many
countries, conflict over food or resources, mass migration will grow. All
these things are already happening and uncontrolled climate change will
make it significantly worse.

****ing moron!


The clarion call of someone who's got no argument. Keep lashing out if it
makes you feel better.



Ads
  #17  
Old September 24th 19, 10:55 PM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,alt.checkmate
%
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 172
Default Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!

On 2019-09-24 2:06 p.m., Snit wrote:
On 9/24/19 1:49 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
AOC is Doctor Evil; if we don't do what she says, we're toast.
Her "science" is irrefutable, we're told.


Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should
accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is
not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting.

Her "Green New Deal" reminds me of China's "Great Leap Backward" (1958),
its "Cultural Devolution" (1966), and today's "Mega Ghost Town" quotas.


By all means offer quotes from it that show this.

Since when was it a good idea for the government to control production ?!


By all means offer quotes from it that show this.

How many tons of nails must we produce this year, comrade ?



put out that sniterette
  #18  
Old September 24th 19, 11:03 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.os.linux.advocacy,sci.physics,alt.checkmate
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 832
Default Your " irrefutable science " cult lives in the shadows.

Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:
Hugh replied ( to me ):
So there you have it, all you have to do is imagine
a huge downward spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide,
so short-lived, we can't properly measure it.


[ how precise were the measurements that
said that CO2 was at ~5600 ppm 444m years ago ? ]


CO2 was that high for tens of millions of years, apparently.

Geologically speaking, humanity is a tiny fraction of a rounding error.


Yep. So what's your point?

there weren't many humans around then, were there ?


That's what evangelical Christians say about dinosaurs:


Wow. If that's your benchmark of salient argument then there's not much
left to say.

  #19  
Old September 24th 19, 11:24 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.checkmate
%
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 172
Default Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.

On 2019-09-24 3:20 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas;
no, what's new is all the people living there now.

The entire planet shouldn't give up its sovereignty just to
(notionally) "save" the fools who built shacks in "Hurricane Alley".

Also, fires are natural; especially now, when there's enough
warmth, water, and carbon dioxide to grow plentiful forests.

does it get any better , yay , everything wreck everything
  #20  
Old September 24th 19, 11:26 PM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,alt.checkmate
AnonLinuxUser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 145
Default Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!

On 9/24/2019 3:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote:
On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote:
Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should
accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is
not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting.


What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly
falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type
environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years.

From what I've read, I think it goes even further to the 1930s.

  #21  
Old September 24th 19, 11:28 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.checkmate
AnonLinuxUser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 145
Default Seattle used to be under a glacier.

On 9/24/2019 3:52 PM, Chris wrote:
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:22:29 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote:

Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:
Paul Alsing replied ( to me ):

440 million years ago, in the Earth's coldest period,
carbon dioxide levels were 11 times higher than they are today.

Even if it was - you don't show any evidence - there weren't many humans
around then, were there?

Climate change is a problem for us and our ecosystem only. The planet (and
life on it) will survive as it already has done over four mass extinctions.
We may not.


Oh, shut up, you hysterical bitch. You are SOOOO stupid
if you actually believe humanity cannot adapt to a few
degrees rise in global average temperatures. Gimme
a ****ing break. You liberals are definitely an evolutionary
dead end. I hope you liberals ALL die off because two
degrees is just way more than you can cope with.


Tell that to the 70,000 Bahamians who had their houses destroyed by the
most powerful hurricane ever.

The uncontrolled fires in Siberia.

The non-stop drought in Australia.

The shrinking seas in the Middle East and Central Asia.

Sure humanity will likely survive. Millions of humans will have their way
of life changed forever, however.

Economies will be affected, national instability will increase in many
countries, conflict over food or resources, mass migration will grow. All
these things are already happening and uncontrolled climate change will
make it significantly worse.

****ing moron!


The clarion call of someone who's got no argument. Keep lashing out if it
makes you feel better.



All of this seems to point to one other alternative... Space Travel and
colonization.

  #22  
Old September 25th 19, 12:11 AM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,alt.checkmate
Snit[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,027
Default Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!

On 9/24/19 3:26 PM, AnonLinuxUser wrote:
On 9/24/2019 3:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote:
On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote:
Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should
accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is
not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting.


What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly
falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type
environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years.

From what I've read, I think it goes even further to the 1930s.


So show it. Quote her. Show where she is deeply inconsistent with, say,
this link:

http://climate.nasa.gov

But (and this is predictable): YOU WILL NOT!

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
  #23  
Old September 25th 19, 12:13 AM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,alt.checkmate
Snit[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,027
Default Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!

On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote:
On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote:
Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should
accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is
not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting.


What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly
falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type
environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years.


Show where what she accepts in the GND is significantly different from
what the science shows, say at: http://climate.nasa.gov

My guess: you are going to just head to denying the science yourself. I
hope I am wrong.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
  #24  
Old September 25th 19, 12:36 AM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,alt.checkmate
Steve Carroll[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 52
Default Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!

On 2019-09-24, AnonLinuxUser wrote:
On 9/24/2019 3:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote:
On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote:
Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should
accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is
not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting.


What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly
falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type
environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years.

From what I've read, I think it goes even further to the 1930s.


Climate 'scares' go back even further than the 1930s.

But we have a handle on climate 'science' now, we have all the details
we need so as to develop the perfect 'solution' and we know exactly how
much it will cost eyeroll.
  #25  
Old September 25th 19, 01:32 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.checkmate
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 58
Default Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.

On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:20:45 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:

Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas;
no, what's new is all the people living there now.

The entire planet shouldn't give up its sovereignty just to
(notionally) "save" the fools who built shacks in "Hurricane Alley".

Also, fires are natural; especially now, when there's enough
warmth, water, and carbon dioxide to grow plentiful forests.


It's been over twenty years now that I've sailed the Bahamas
and, from looking at the aerial footage of the destruction, it
would appear that there is two or three times as much
development there now than before.

But, when you look at the demographics it's understandable.
The majority of the population is of African descent (85%).
And, there appears to be a large Haitian contingent there
now that have settled in their own very poor communities.

Not very bright - many of them. Did you know that only
Bahamian citizens may own land there? Yes, foreigners and
illegals cannot really own land - they can only occupy it and
pay their taxes and when they die or move they have to
relinquish it back to the government. But, of course the
myriad squatters don't really care as they mostly live for
the day.

--
Yours Truly, Sir Gregory

Nadegda, kensi, Fran, Pandora » these are easily
ignored misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars.
  #26  
Old September 25th 19, 01:45 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.checkmate
%
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 172
Default Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.

On 2019-09-24 5:32 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:20:45 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:

Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas;
no, what's new is all the people living there now.

The entire planet shouldn't give up its sovereignty just to
(notionally) "save" the fools who built shacks in "Hurricane Alley".

Also, fires are natural; especially now, when there's enough
warmth, water, and carbon dioxide to grow plentiful forests.


It's been over twenty years now that I've sailed the Bahamas
and, from looking at the aerial footage of the destruction, it
would appear that there is two or three times as much
development there now than before.

But, when you look at the demographics it's understandable.
The majority of the population is of African descent (85%).
And, there appears to be a large Haitian contingent there
now that have settled in their own very poor communities.

Not very bright - many of them. Did you know that only
Bahamian citizens may own land there? Yes, foreigners and
illegals cannot really own land - they can only occupy it and
pay their taxes and when they die or move they have to
relinquish it back to the government. But, of course the
myriad squatters don't really care as they mostly live for
the day.

and you prey for the next one
  #27  
Old September 25th 19, 02:30 AM posted to comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,alt.checkmate
Snit[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,027
Default Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!

On 9/24/19 4:36 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2019-09-24, AnonLinuxUser wrote:
On 9/24/2019 3:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote:
On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote:
Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should
accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is
not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting.

What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly
falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type
environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years.

From what I've read, I think it goes even further to the 1930s.


Climate 'scares' go back even further than the 1930s.

But we have a handle on climate 'science' now, we have all the details
we need so as to develop the perfect 'solution' and we know exactly how
much it will cost eyeroll.


We know moving to green energy is a necessity.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
  #28  
Old September 25th 19, 03:05 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.checkmate
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 58
Default Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.

On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:45:30 -0700, % wrote:
On 2019-09-24 5:32 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:20:45 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:

Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas;
no, what's new is all the people living there now.

The entire planet shouldn't give up its sovereignty just to
(notionally) "save" the fools who built shacks in "Hurricane Alley".

Also, fires are natural; especially now, when there's enough
warmth, water, and carbon dioxide to grow plentiful forests.


It's been over twenty years now that I've sailed the Bahamas
and, from looking at the aerial footage of the destruction, it
would appear that there is two or three times as much
development there now than before.

But, when you look at the demographics it's understandable.
The majority of the population is of African descent (85%).
And, there appears to be a large Haitian contingent there
now that have settled in their own very poor communities.

Not very bright - many of them. Did you know that only
Bahamian citizens may own land there? Yes, foreigners and
illegals cannot really own land - they can only occupy it and
pay their taxes and when they die or move they have to
relinquish it back to the government. But, of course the
myriad squatters don't really care as they mostly live for
the day.

and you prey for the next one


Learn how to spell *pray* or shut your rubber-lipped
cock sucker.

--
Yours Truly, Sir Gregory

Nadegda, kensi, Fran, Pandora » these are easily
ignored misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars.
  #29  
Old September 25th 19, 03:23 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.checkmate
%
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 172
Default Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.

On 2019-09-24 7:05 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:45:30 -0700, % wrote:
On 2019-09-24 5:32 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:20:45 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:

Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas;
no, what's new is all the people living there now.

The entire planet shouldn't give up its sovereignty just to
(notionally) "save" the fools who built shacks in "Hurricane Alley".

Also, fires are natural; especially now, when there's enough
warmth, water, and carbon dioxide to grow plentiful forests.

It's been over twenty years now that I've sailed the Bahamas
and, from looking at the aerial footage of the destruction, it
would appear that there is two or three times as much
development there now than before.

But, when you look at the demographics it's understandable.
The majority of the population is of African descent (85%).
And, there appears to be a large Haitian contingent there
now that have settled in their own very poor communities.

Not very bright - many of them. Did you know that only
Bahamian citizens may own land there? Yes, foreigners and
illegals cannot really own land - they can only occupy it and
pay their taxes and when they die or move they have to
relinquish it back to the government. But, of course the
myriad squatters don't really care as they mostly live for
the day.

and you prey for the next one


Learn how to spell *pray* or shut your rubber-lipped
cock sucker.

i meant prey wang nutted goose lipped door knob delighted finger flick
  #30  
Old September 25th 19, 04:39 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,sci.physics,alt.checkmate
benj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Seattle used to be under a glacier.

On 9/24/2019 4:05 PM, Sergio wrote:
On 9/24/2019 2:44 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, % wrote:

...

shut your stupid mouth fat face


Bugger off, wank stain for a brain.



OP = Seattle should be under a glacier

Let's hear it for global warming. My house used to be under a mile of
Ice. It's far more livable now.

PS. Is the north pole Ice-free yet? Northwest passage is Long overdue.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGZQ...feature=em-lsp
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.