If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Seattle used to be under a glacier.
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:22:29 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote: Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: Paul Alsing replied ( to me ): 440 million years ago, in the Earth's coldest period, carbon dioxide levels were 11 times higher than they are today. Even if it was - you don't show any evidence - there weren't many humans around then, were there? Climate change is a problem for us and our ecosystem only. The planet (and life on it) will survive as it already has done over four mass extinctions. We may not. Oh, shut up, you hysterical bitch. You are SOOOO stupid if you actually believe humanity cannot adapt to a few degrees rise in global average temperatures. Gimme a ****ing break. You liberals are definitely an evolutionary dead end. I hope you liberals ALL die off because two degrees is just way more than you can cope with. Tell that to the 70,000 Bahamians who had their houses destroyed by the most powerful hurricane ever. The uncontrolled fires in Siberia. The non-stop drought in Australia. The shrinking seas in the Middle East and Central Asia. Sure humanity will likely survive. Millions of humans will have their way of life changed forever, however. Economies will be affected, national instability will increase in many countries, conflict over food or resources, mass migration will grow. All these things are already happening and uncontrolled climate change will make it significantly worse. ****ing moron! The clarion call of someone who's got no argument. Keep lashing out if it makes you feel better. |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 2019-09-24 2:06 p.m., Snit wrote:
On 9/24/19 1:49 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: AOC is Doctor Evil; if we don't do what she says, we're toast. Her "science" is irrefutable, we're told. Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting. Her "Green New Deal" reminds me of China's "Great Leap Backward" (1958), its "Cultural Devolution" (1966), and today's "Mega Ghost Town" quotas. By all means offer quotes from it that show this. Since when was it a good idea for the government to control production ?! By all means offer quotes from it that show this. How many tons of nails must we produce this year, comrade ? put out that sniterette |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Your " irrefutable science " cult lives in the shadows.
Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:
Hugh replied ( to me ): So there you have it, all you have to do is imagine a huge downward spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide, so short-lived, we can't properly measure it. [ how precise were the measurements that said that CO2 was at ~5600 ppm 444m years ago ? ] CO2 was that high for tens of millions of years, apparently. Geologically speaking, humanity is a tiny fraction of a rounding error. Yep. So what's your point? there weren't many humans around then, were there ? That's what evangelical Christians say about dinosaurs: Wow. If that's your benchmark of salient argument then there's not much left to say. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.
On 2019-09-24 3:20 p.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas; no, what's new is all the people living there now. The entire planet shouldn't give up its sovereignty just to (notionally) "save" the fools who built shacks in "Hurricane Alley". Also, fires are natural; especially now, when there's enough warmth, water, and carbon dioxide to grow plentiful forests. does it get any better , yay , everything wreck everything |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 9/24/2019 3:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote:
On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote: Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting. What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years. From what I've read, I think it goes even further to the 1930s. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Seattle used to be under a glacier.
On 9/24/2019 3:52 PM, Chris wrote:
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:22:29 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote: Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: Paul Alsing replied ( to me ): 440 million years ago, in the Earth's coldest period, carbon dioxide levels were 11 times higher than they are today. Even if it was - you don't show any evidence - there weren't many humans around then, were there? Climate change is a problem for us and our ecosystem only. The planet (and life on it) will survive as it already has done over four mass extinctions. We may not. Oh, shut up, you hysterical bitch. You are SOOOO stupid if you actually believe humanity cannot adapt to a few degrees rise in global average temperatures. Gimme a ****ing break. You liberals are definitely an evolutionary dead end. I hope you liberals ALL die off because two degrees is just way more than you can cope with. Tell that to the 70,000 Bahamians who had their houses destroyed by the most powerful hurricane ever. The uncontrolled fires in Siberia. The non-stop drought in Australia. The shrinking seas in the Middle East and Central Asia. Sure humanity will likely survive. Millions of humans will have their way of life changed forever, however. Economies will be affected, national instability will increase in many countries, conflict over food or resources, mass migration will grow. All these things are already happening and uncontrolled climate change will make it significantly worse. ****ing moron! The clarion call of someone who's got no argument. Keep lashing out if it makes you feel better. All of this seems to point to one other alternative... Space Travel and colonization. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 9/24/19 3:26 PM, AnonLinuxUser wrote:
On 9/24/2019 3:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote: On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote: Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting. What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years. From what I've read, I think it goes even further to the 1930s. So show it. Quote her. Show where she is deeply inconsistent with, say, this link: http://climate.nasa.gov But (and this is predictable): YOU WILL NOT! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote:
On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote: Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting. What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years. Show where what she accepts in the GND is significantly different from what the science shows, say at: http://climate.nasa.gov My guess: you are going to just head to denying the science yourself. I hope I am wrong. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 2019-09-24, AnonLinuxUser wrote:
On 9/24/2019 3:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote: On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote: Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting. What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years. From what I've read, I think it goes even further to the 1930s. Climate 'scares' go back even further than the 1930s. But we have a handle on climate 'science' now, we have all the details we need so as to develop the perfect 'solution' and we know exactly how much it will cost eyeroll. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:20:45 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas; no, what's new is all the people living there now. The entire planet shouldn't give up its sovereignty just to (notionally) "save" the fools who built shacks in "Hurricane Alley". Also, fires are natural; especially now, when there's enough warmth, water, and carbon dioxide to grow plentiful forests. It's been over twenty years now that I've sailed the Bahamas and, from looking at the aerial footage of the destruction, it would appear that there is two or three times as much development there now than before. But, when you look at the demographics it's understandable. The majority of the population is of African descent (85%). And, there appears to be a large Haitian contingent there now that have settled in their own very poor communities. Not very bright - many of them. Did you know that only Bahamian citizens may own land there? Yes, foreigners and illegals cannot really own land - they can only occupy it and pay their taxes and when they die or move they have to relinquish it back to the government. But, of course the myriad squatters don't really care as they mostly live for the day. -- Yours Truly, Sir Gregory Nadegda, kensi, Fran, Pandora » these are easily ignored misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.
On 2019-09-24 5:32 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:20:45 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas; no, what's new is all the people living there now. The entire planet shouldn't give up its sovereignty just to (notionally) "save" the fools who built shacks in "Hurricane Alley". Also, fires are natural; especially now, when there's enough warmth, water, and carbon dioxide to grow plentiful forests. It's been over twenty years now that I've sailed the Bahamas and, from looking at the aerial footage of the destruction, it would appear that there is two or three times as much development there now than before. But, when you look at the demographics it's understandable. The majority of the population is of African descent (85%). And, there appears to be a large Haitian contingent there now that have settled in their own very poor communities. Not very bright - many of them. Did you know that only Bahamian citizens may own land there? Yes, foreigners and illegals cannot really own land - they can only occupy it and pay their taxes and when they die or move they have to relinquish it back to the government. But, of course the myriad squatters don't really care as they mostly live for the day. and you prey for the next one |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 9/24/19 4:36 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2019-09-24, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 9/24/2019 3:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote: On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote: Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting. What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years. From what I've read, I think it goes even further to the 1930s. Climate 'scares' go back even further than the 1930s. But we have a handle on climate 'science' now, we have all the details we need so as to develop the perfect 'solution' and we know exactly how much it will cost eyeroll. We know moving to green energy is a necessity. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:45:30 -0700, % wrote:
On 2019-09-24 5:32 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:20:45 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas; no, what's new is all the people living there now. The entire planet shouldn't give up its sovereignty just to (notionally) "save" the fools who built shacks in "Hurricane Alley". Also, fires are natural; especially now, when there's enough warmth, water, and carbon dioxide to grow plentiful forests. It's been over twenty years now that I've sailed the Bahamas and, from looking at the aerial footage of the destruction, it would appear that there is two or three times as much development there now than before. But, when you look at the demographics it's understandable. The majority of the population is of African descent (85%). And, there appears to be a large Haitian contingent there now that have settled in their own very poor communities. Not very bright - many of them. Did you know that only Bahamian citizens may own land there? Yes, foreigners and illegals cannot really own land - they can only occupy it and pay their taxes and when they die or move they have to relinquish it back to the government. But, of course the myriad squatters don't really care as they mostly live for the day. and you prey for the next one Learn how to spell *pray* or shut your rubber-lipped cock sucker. -- Yours Truly, Sir Gregory Nadegda, kensi, Fran, Pandora » these are easily ignored misandrists and anti-American, leftist liars. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.
On 2019-09-24 7:05 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:45:30 -0700, % wrote: On 2019-09-24 5:32 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:20:45 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas; no, what's new is all the people living there now. The entire planet shouldn't give up its sovereignty just to (notionally) "save" the fools who built shacks in "Hurricane Alley". Also, fires are natural; especially now, when there's enough warmth, water, and carbon dioxide to grow plentiful forests. It's been over twenty years now that I've sailed the Bahamas and, from looking at the aerial footage of the destruction, it would appear that there is two or three times as much development there now than before. But, when you look at the demographics it's understandable. The majority of the population is of African descent (85%). And, there appears to be a large Haitian contingent there now that have settled in their own very poor communities. Not very bright - many of them. Did you know that only Bahamian citizens may own land there? Yes, foreigners and illegals cannot really own land - they can only occupy it and pay their taxes and when they die or move they have to relinquish it back to the government. But, of course the myriad squatters don't really care as they mostly live for the day. and you prey for the next one Learn how to spell *pray* or shut your rubber-lipped cock sucker. i meant prey wang nutted goose lipped door knob delighted finger flick |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Seattle used to be under a glacier.
On 9/24/2019 4:05 PM, Sergio wrote:
On 9/24/2019 2:44 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, % wrote: ... shut your stupid mouth fat face Bugger off, wank stain for a brain. OP = Seattle should be under a glacier Let's hear it for global warming. My house used to be under a mile of Ice. It's far more livable now. PS. Is the north pole Ice-free yet? Northwest passage is Long overdue. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGZQ...feature=em-lsp |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|