If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Chris' sacred shadows.
Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:
Chris replied ( to me ): there weren't many humans around then, were there ? That's what evangelical Christians say about dinosaurs: " You weren't there, so you don't know. " Likewise, your " irrefutable science " cult lives in the shadows. Wow. If that's your benchmark of salient argument then there's not much left to say. Sorry if I shone some light into your sacred shadows, chasing your God away -- you had better avoid me. I don't have a god. I have evidence based science. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Seattle used to be under a glacier.
AnonLinuxUser wrote:
Chris wrote: Tell that to the 70,000 Bahamians who had their houses destroyed by the most powerful hurricane ever. The uncontrolled fires in Siberia. The non-stop drought in Australia. The shrinking seas in the Middle East and Central Asia. Sure humanity will likely survive. Millions of humans will have their way of life changed forever, however. Economies will be affected, national instability will increase in many countries, conflict over food or resources, mass migration will grow. All these things are already happening and uncontrolled climate change will make it significantly worse. ****ing moron! The clarion call of someone who's got no argument. Keep lashing out if it makes you feel better. All of this seems to point to one other alternative... Space Travel and colonization. Yeah, because that would cost less, and help more people, than simply taking care of the Earth. Idiot. -- "Ask anybody, if man evolved from an Ape, then why is the Ape still here?" - "AnonLinuxUser", putting his ignorance on display |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Seattle used to be under a glacier.
Chris wrote:
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: Oh, shut up, you hysterical bitch. You are SOOOO stupid if you actually believe humanity cannot adapt to a few degrees rise in global average temperatures. Gimme a ****ing break. You liberals are definitely an evolutionary dead end. I hope you liberals ALL die off because two degrees is just way more than you can cope with. Tell that to the 70,000 Bahamians who had their houses destroyed by the most powerful hurricane ever. The uncontrolled fires in Siberia. The non-stop drought in Australia. The shrinking seas in the Middle East and Central Asia. Sure humanity will likely survive. Millions of humans will have their way of life changed forever, however. Economies will be affected, national instability will increase in many countries, conflict over food or resources, mass migration will grow. All these things are already happening and uncontrolled climate change will make it significantly worse. ****ing moron! The clarion call of someone who's got no argument. Keep lashing out if it makes you feel better. Well, don't you know that they've found one glacier that's grown, in the last ten years? They claim that this proves that there is no global warning, even if the vast majority of glaciers are rapidly shrinking. That's the type of ignorant assholes (right winger) that we are dealing-with. These are the type that are in power, in many countries. They use their idiocy and their lies to attack their moral and intellectual superiors, so that they can advance their evil, selfish agendas. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Your " irrefutable science " cult lives in the shadows.
Chris wrote:
Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: CO2 was that high for tens of millions of years, apparently. Geologically speaking, humanity is a tiny fraction of a rounding error. Yep. So what's your point? there weren't many humans around then, were there ? That's what evangelical Christians say about dinosaurs: Wow. If that's your benchmark of salient argument then there's not much left to say. Relf is a kook. -- "Yah, right, like I'm going to spend the big bucks to get the latest version [of Photoshop] when I have a version I'm familiar with and a free hacked and cracked key so I can install it anywhere." - "Greg Hall", scumbag software pirate |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 9/24/2019 5:36 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2019-09-24, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 9/24/2019 3:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote: On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote: Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting. What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years. From what I've read, I think it goes even further to the 1930s. Climate 'scares' go back even further than the 1930s. But we have a handle on climate 'science' now, we have all the details we need so as to develop the perfect 'solution' and we know exactly how much it will cost eyeroll. LOL! Even further than that? Does it go back to Karl Marxs time? And they say it is settled science. No such thing. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 2019-09-25, AnonLinuxUser wrote:
On 9/24/2019 5:36 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: On 2019-09-24, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 9/24/2019 3:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote: On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote: Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting. What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years. From what I've read, I think it goes even further to the 1930s. Climate 'scares' go back even further than the 1930s. But we have a handle on climate 'science' now, we have all the details we need so as to develop the perfect 'solution' and we know exactly how much it will cost eyeroll. LOL! Even further than that? Does it go back to Karl Marxs time? And they say it is settled science. No such thing. Wait... so you're saying this ~decade 'irreversible' sales pitch may not be true?! How can that be? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Chris' sacred shadows.
On 9/25/2019 12:44 AM, Chris wrote:
Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: Chris replied ( to me ): there weren't many humans around then, were there ? That's what evangelical Christians say about dinosaurs: " You weren't there, so you don't know." Likewise, your " irrefutable science " cult lives in the shadows. Wow. If that's your benchmark of salient argument then there's not much left to say. Sorry if I shone some light into your sacred shadows, chasing your God away -- you had better avoid me. I don't have a god. I have evidence based science. And how was your science really created? LOL!!! |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Seattle used to be under a glacier.
On 9/25/2019 5:55 AM, chrisv wrote:
AnonLinuxUser wrote: Chris wrote: Tell that to the 70,000 Bahamians who had their houses destroyed by the most powerful hurricane ever. The uncontrolled fires in Siberia. The non-stop drought in Australia. The shrinking seas in the Middle East and Central Asia. Sure humanity will likely survive. Millions of humans will have their way of life changed forever, however. Economies will be affected, national instability will increase in many countries, conflict over food or resources, mass migration will grow. All these things are already happening and uncontrolled climate change will make it significantly worse. ****ing moron! The clarion call of someone who's got no argument. Keep lashing out if it makes you feel better. All of this seems to point to one other alternative... Space Travel and colonization. Yeah, because that would cost less, and help more people, than simply taking care of the Earth. Idiot. Fool! The only alternative is to just croak. No, if we had space colonization and could move a lot of people else where that is habitable, the earth wouldn't have to bear the burden of too many people. You , as usual , are an idiot. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:04:24 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; AnonLinuxUser
determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in : ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 9/24/2019 5:36 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 2019-09-24, AnonLinuxUser wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 9/24/2019 3:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ type environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ From what I've read, I think it goes even further to the 1930s. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Climate 'scares' go back even further than the 1930s. But we have a ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ handle on climate 'science' now, we have all the details we need so as ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ to develop the perfect 'solution' and we know exactly how much it will ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ cost eyeroll. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ LOL! Even further than that? Does it go back to Karl Marxs time? ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ And they say it is settled science. No such thing. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ hey did anybody in this entire thread address the subject of the thread? -- [THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECK® VALIDATION] THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last ****ing mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD ****heads, March 2016 |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to control production ?!
AnonLinuxUser wrote:
And they say it is settled science. No such thing. Says the ignorant asshole right-winger who also claims that evolution is not settled science. Maybe if you weren't so fscking *ignorant*, you would agree that these issues *were* settled. -- "Ask anybody, if man evolved from an Ape, then why is the Ape still here?" - "AnonLinuxUser", putting his ignorance on display |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Seattle used to be under a glacier.
AnonLinuxUser wrote:
chrisv wrote: AnonLinuxUser wrote: Chris wrote: Tell that to the 70,000 Bahamians who had their houses destroyed by the most powerful hurricane ever. The uncontrolled fires in Siberia. The non-stop drought in Australia. The shrinking seas in the Middle East and Central Asia. Sure humanity will likely survive. Millions of humans will have their way of life changed forever, however. Economies will be affected, national instability will increase in many countries, conflict over food or resources, mass migration will grow. All these things are already happening and uncontrolled climate change will make it significantly worse. ****ing moron! The clarion call of someone who's got no argument. Keep lashing out if it makes you feel better. All of this seems to point to one other alternative... Space Travel and colonization. Yeah, because that would cost less, and help more people, than simply taking care of the Earth. Idiot. Fool! The only alternative is to just croak. No, if we had space colonization and could move a lot of people else where that is habitable, the earth wouldn't have to bear the burden of too many people. You , as usual , are an idiot. How does one respond, to such shameless idiocy? |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.
Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote:
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas; no, what's new is all the people living there now. The entire planet shouldn't give up its sovereignty just to (notionally) "save" the fools who built shacks in "Hurricane Alley". Also, fires are natural; especially now, when there's enough warmth, water, and carbon dioxide to grow plentiful forests. Death, disease, earthquakes, flooding are also all natural. Does that mean we shouldn't do anything about them? Of course not, otherwise we'd still be living in caves. Every year we're releasing 100,000 years' worth of CO2 into the atmosphere. That certainly is not natural. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.
On 9/25/19 10:14 AM, Chris wrote:
Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas; no, what's new is all the people living there now. The entire planet shouldn't give up its sovereignty just to (notionally) "save" the fools who built shacks in "Hurricane Alley". Also, fires are natural; especially now, when there's enough warmth, water, and carbon dioxide to grow plentiful forests. Death, disease, earthquakes, flooding are also all natural. Does that mean we shouldn't do anything about them? Of course not, otherwise we'd still be living in caves. Every year we're releasing 100,000 years' worth of CO2 into the atmosphere. That certainly is not natural. The right wing argument is the moral equivalent to we all are going to die eventually so murder should not be illegal. It is just nonsense. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 9/25/19 9:31 AM, chrisv wrote:
AnonLinuxUser wrote: And they say it is settled science. No such thing. Says the ignorant asshole right-winger who also claims that evolution is not settled science. Maybe if you weren't so fscking *ignorant*, you would agree that these issues *were* settled. The right wingers are insisting they should have an equal seat at the table even when they come to it with a pre-K level of knowledge. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 2019-09-25 10:28 a.m., Snit wrote:
On 9/25/19 9:31 AM, chrisv wrote: AnonLinuxUser wrote: And they say it is settled science.Â* No such thing. Says the ignorant asshole right-winger who also claims that evolution is not settled science. Maybe if you weren't so fscking *ignorant*, you would agree that these issues *were* settled. The right wingers are insisting they should have an equal seat at the table even when they come to it with a pre-K level of knowledge. got any peaches |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|