If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.
|
Ads |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 9/25/19 10:33 AM, % wrote:
On 2019-09-25 10:28 a.m., Snit wrote: On 9/25/19 9:31 AM, chrisv wrote: AnonLinuxUser wrote: And they say it is settled science.Â* No such thing. Says the ignorant asshole right-winger who also claims that evolution is not settled science. Maybe if you weren't so fscking *ignorant*, you would agree that these issues *were* settled. The right wingers are insisting they should have an equal seat at the table even when they come to it with a pre-K level of knowledge. got any peaches Shaking the tree to get some. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.
On 2019-09-25 10:35 a.m., Skeeter wrote:
In article , says... Every year we're releasing 100,000 years' worth of CO2 into the atmosphere. That certainly is not natural. The right wing argument is the moral equivalent to we all are going to die eventually so murder should not be illegal. It is just nonsense. Who said anything about murder you rubber lipped suction cup. i like that one |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 2019-09-25 10:40 a.m., Snit wrote:
On 9/25/19 10:33 AM, % wrote: On 2019-09-25 10:28 a.m., Snit wrote: On 9/25/19 9:31 AM, chrisv wrote: AnonLinuxUser wrote: And they say it is settled science.Â* No such thing. Says the ignorant asshole right-winger who also claims that evolution is not settled science. Maybe if you weren't so fscking *ignorant*, you would agree that these issues *were* settled. The right wingers are insisting they should have an equal seat at the table even when they come to it with a pre-K level of knowledge. got any peaches Shaking the tree to get some. we have to put him in peaches the tv said |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 9/25/19 10:45 AM, % wrote:
On 2019-09-25 10:40 a.m., Snit wrote: On 9/25/19 10:33 AM, % wrote: On 2019-09-25 10:28 a.m., Snit wrote: On 9/25/19 9:31 AM, chrisv wrote: AnonLinuxUser wrote: And they say it is settled science.Â* No such thing. Says the ignorant asshole right-winger who also claims that evolution is not settled science. Maybe if you weren't so fscking *ignorant*, you would agree that these issues *were* settled. The right wingers are insisting they should have an equal seat at the table even when they come to it with a pre-K level of knowledge. got any peaches Shaking the tree to get some. we have to put him in peaches the tv said That is the pits. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 2019-09-25 10:50 a.m., Snit wrote:
On 9/25/19 10:45 AM, % wrote: On 2019-09-25 10:40 a.m., Snit wrote: On 9/25/19 10:33 AM, % wrote: On 2019-09-25 10:28 a.m., Snit wrote: On 9/25/19 9:31 AM, chrisv wrote: AnonLinuxUser wrote: And they say it is settled science.Â* No such thing. Says the ignorant asshole right-winger who also claims that evolution is not settled science. Maybe if you weren't so fscking *ignorant*, you would agree that these issues *were* settled. The right wingers are insisting they should have an equal seat at the table even when they come to it with a pre-K level of knowledge. got any peaches Shaking the tree to get some. we have to put him in peaches the tv said That is the pits. it makes your skin fuzzy |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to controlproduction ?!
On 9/25/2019 12:31 PM, chrisv wrote:
AnonLinuxUser wrote: And they say it is settled science. No such thing. Says the ignorant asshole right-winger who also claims that evolution is not settled science. Maybe if you weren't so fscking *ignorant*, you would agree that these issues *were* settled. Now that you've just proved that you have a total ignorance of science that matches you enormous drooling mouth, we all can have a big laugh at your expense and then get back to work. I suggest you stay Anon. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Hurricanes aren't new to the Bahamas.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:14:47 -0000 (UTC), Chris
wrote: Every year we're releasing 100,000 years' worth of CO2 into the atmosphere. That certainly is not natural. How does that work? -- Eric Stevens There are two classes of people. Those who divide people into two classes and those who don't. I belong to the second class. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to control production ?!
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 16:11:56 -0700, Snit
wrote: On 9/24/19 3:26 PM, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 9/24/2019 3:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote: On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote: Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting. What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years. From what I've read, I think it goes even further to the 1930s. So show it. Quote her. Show where she is deeply inconsistent with, say, this link: http://climate.nasa.gov NASA is .... disingenuous. But (and this is predictable): YOU WILL NOT! -- Eric Stevens There are two classes of people. Those who divide people into two classes and those who don't. I belong to the second class. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to control production ?!
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:30:02 -0700, Snit
wrote: On 9/24/19 4:36 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: On 2019-09-24, AnonLinuxUser wrote: On 9/24/2019 3:41 PM, Roger Blake wrote: On 2019-09-24, Snit wrote: Not quite... you call it "her" science... really she is saying we should accept well understood science, just as we should accept the world is not flat. That is not HER science... it is science she is accepting. What she is accepting is junk science based on manipulated and blatantly falsified data, as well as egregious lies and fear-mongering of the type environmentalists have been engaging in for over 50 years. From what I've read, I think it goes even further to the 1930s. Climate 'scares' go back even further than the 1930s. But we have a handle on climate 'science' now, we have all the details we need so as to develop the perfect 'solution' and we know exactly how much it will cost eyeroll. We know moving to green energy is a necessity. Yep. Pebble bed or thorium reactors are the way to go. -- Eric Stevens There are two classes of people. Those who divide people into two classes and those who don't. I belong to the second class. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to control production ?!
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:31:10 -0500, chrisv
wrote: AnonLinuxUser wrote: And they say it is settled science. No such thing. Says the ignorant asshole right-winger who also claims that evolution is not settled science. Maybe if you weren't so fscking *ignorant*, you would agree that these issues *were* settled. You will become ignorant if you insist any scientific issues are settled. -- Eric Stevens There are two classes of people. Those who divide people into two classes and those who don't. I belong to the second class. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Since when was it a good idea for the government to control production ?!
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:28:08 -0700, Snit
wrote: On 9/25/19 9:31 AM, chrisv wrote: AnonLinuxUser wrote: And they say it is settled science. No such thing. Says the ignorant asshole right-winger who also claims that evolution is not settled science. Maybe if you weren't so fscking *ignorant*, you would agree that these issues *were* settled. The right wingers are insisting they should have an equal seat at the table even when they come to it with a pre-K level of knowledge. Why not? It's worked for the left wingers. -- Eric Stevens There are two classes of people. Those who divide people into two classes and those who don't. I belong to the second class. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Seattle used to be under a glacier.
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:52:23 -0000 (UTC), Chris
wrote: Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:22:29 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote: Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: Paul Alsing replied ( to me ): 440 million years ago, in the Earth's coldest period, carbon dioxide levels were 11 times higher than they are today. Even if it was - you don't show any evidence - there weren't many humans around then, were there? Climate change is a problem for us and our ecosystem only. The planet (and life on it) will survive as it already has done over four mass extinctions. We may not. Oh, shut up, you hysterical bitch. You are SOOOO stupid if you actually believe humanity cannot adapt to a few degrees rise in global average temperatures. Gimme a ****ing break. You liberals are definitely an evolutionary dead end. I hope you liberals ALL die off because two degrees is just way more than you can cope with. Tell that to the 70,000 Bahamians who had their houses destroyed by the most powerful hurricane ever. That last bit is bull****. The uncontrolled fires in Siberia. They have always happened. The non-stop drought in Australia. It will stop. Just as the much more severe droughts (plural) in the 1800s and early 1900s did. The shrinking seas in the Middle East and Central Asia. The Middle East is plate tectonics. If you mean what I think you mean by Central Asia, that's man made interference with the river flows. Sure humanity will likely survive. Millions of humans will have their way of life changed forever, however. They always do. Economies will be affected, national instability will increase in many countries, conflict over food or resources, mass migration will grow. All these things are already happening and uncontrolled climate change will make it significantly worse. It's always uncontrolled. ****ing moron! The clarion call of someone who's got no argument. Keep lashing out if it makes you feel better. -- Eric Stevens There are two classes of people. Those who divide people into two classes and those who don't. I belong to the second class. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Seattle used to be under a glacier.
Not so long ago, where I currently live was underwater.
(Ancient) Lake Lahontan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Lahontan It was at its peak 12,700 years ago. And since our Indian population settled this area approximately 12,000 to 14,000 years ago, they had a nice swimming and fishing hole. The land bridge they came over on was probably coincident with the glaciers that eventually melted and flooded the area. My back yard is full of decomposed sandstone -- like decomposed granite, only uglier -- and tons of round rocks. Makes it hell to try to establish a garden. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|