Confirmed: Windows 10 Setup Now Prevents Local Account Creation

nospam wrote:
In article , Jonathan N. Little
wrote:


snip

Yeah, it's in demo stage. Not here as an option. But you knew that right?

nobody said starlink was fully deployed worldwide.

the point is that it's fast and low latency.


Again just in the demo stage and currently not *really* available, which
means what I said about current satellite latency is not wrong.
Satellite Internet is currently a lousy deal, expensive, limited,
unreliable, poor latency, and *maybe* in the future Starlink might
address some of satellite's detractors. Fixing latency will not be the
game changer if it is still expensive, metered, and susceptible to
interference from a fairy's fart.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

On 10/6/19 10:50 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
nospam wrote:
In article , Jonathan N. Little
wrote:


snip

Yeah, it's in demo stage. Not here as an option. But you knew that right?

nobody said starlink was fully deployed worldwide.

the point is that it's fast and low latency.


Again just in the demo stage and currently not *really* available, which
means what I said about current satellite latency is not wrong.
Satellite Internet is currently a lousy deal, expensive, limited,
unreliable, poor latency, and *maybe* in the future Starlink might
address some of satellite's detractors. Fixing latency will not be the
game changer if it is still expensive, metered, and susceptible to
interference from a fairy's fart.

All true, unless your only other option is dial-up.

And spotty at the same time. I know 2 ladies who live less than 100
yds. apart. One can access either Hughesnet or Dish, the other is
Hughesnet only.


--
Ken
MacOS 10.14.6
Firefox 69.0.2
Thunderbird 60.9
"My brain is like lightning, a quick flash
and it's gone!"

Jonathan N. Little wrote:
nospam wrote:
In article , Jonathan N. Little
wrote:


snip

Yeah, it's in demo stage. Not here as an option. But you knew that right?
nobody said starlink was fully deployed worldwide.

the point is that it's fast and low latency.


Again just in the demo stage and currently not *really* available, which
means what I said about current satellite latency is not wrong.
Satellite Internet is currently a lousy deal, expensive, limited,
unreliable, poor latency, and *maybe* in the future Starlink might
address some of satellite's detractors. Fixing latency will not be the
game changer if it is still expensive, metered, and susceptible to
interference from a fairy's fart.


Starlink is LEO, Hughes is GEO.

That's why the latency is lower on the
proposed "new stuff".

Since Starlink "flies past your head", it will
do handoff while you're sitting there. And
Starlink is proposed to do store and forward
in space.

I would have expected rain to affect it, but,
we'll see eventually I guess.

Paul

In article , Paul
wrote:

Starlink is LEO, Hughes is GEO.

That's why the latency is lower on the
proposed "new stuff".

correct.