A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » General XP issues or comments
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Virtual Memory Too Small" in XP



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 26th 04, 02:27 PM
Glenn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Virtual Memory Too Small" in XP

I've recently been using a photo editing software
package. When manipulating an image I get an error
message, "Windows Virtual Memory Size Too Low". I've
reset the Virtual Memory size in Performance Options to
Min: 965 and Max. 1000 but still see the same error.

When I run Task Manager during the time I'm use the
application I notice that CPU usage is usually around 4%
and PF Usage is at around 740Meg. If I stop manipulating
a photo image the PF Usage never seems to drop. If I
continue to manipulate a photo (i.e. continue using the
application) the PF usage continues to increase but never
drops regardless of what I do. I suspect that this is
the problem. How do I get my system to release the PF
usage if this indeed the problem?

I'm running a P IV 3.06 MHz processor (Hyper threading)
with 512Megs. Of RAM. There is over 60 Gig. of free
hard disk space so this shouldn't be an issue.

Any ideas on how to resolve this would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks.
Glenn.

Ads
  #2  
Old September 26th 04, 02:30 PM
Will Denny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Virtual Memory Too Small" in XP

Hi

Please have a look at the following article by Alex Nichol:

"Virtual Memory in Windows XP"
http://aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.php

--

Will Denny
MVP - Windows Shell/User
Please reply to the News Groups


"Glenn" wrote in message
...
I've recently been using a photo editing software
package. When manipulating an image I get an error
message, "Windows Virtual Memory Size Too Low". I've
reset the Virtual Memory size in Performance Options to
Min: 965 and Max. 1000 but still see the same error.

When I run Task Manager during the time I'm use the
application I notice that CPU usage is usually around 4%
and PF Usage is at around 740Meg. If I stop manipulating
a photo image the PF Usage never seems to drop. If I
continue to manipulate a photo (i.e. continue using the
application) the PF usage continues to increase but never
drops regardless of what I do. I suspect that this is
the problem. How do I get my system to release the PF
usage if this indeed the problem?

I'm running a P IV 3.06 MHz processor (Hyper threading)
with 512Megs. Of RAM. There is over 60 Gig. of free
hard disk space so this shouldn't be an issue.

Any ideas on how to resolve this would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks.
Glenn.



  #3  
Old September 26th 04, 02:47 PM
R. McCarty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Virtual Memory Too Small" in XP

That PF level meter isn't a real Pagefile usage indicator. XP
combines physical memory and Virtual memory into a pool.
You can use Perfmon.Msc (Microsoft Console) to actually
see the "True" pagefile usage. The PF Meter essentially shows
total mapped memory at the moment.

Windows XP doesn't immediately relinquish memory space
when an application is closed. What's noteworthy about your
post is the seemingly high memory use. You should check your
Startups and Services and see what is consuming such a high
amount of memory. I would boot fresh and run TaskMgr &
check the processes (Tab). Not all of the columns show by
default and I would add (View, Select Columns) for:
Peak Memory Usage
VM Size
Page Faults
Priority
Examine the processes (Total count) and which are using the
Lion's share of memory. You may need to trim back Startups
to keep your idle memory use lower. Normally, a average PC
with Anti-Virus and Firewall should have a Performance level
(TaskMgr Tab) between 175-240.

It's also possible that the image editing program has "Memory
Leaks", but that's unlikely.

"Glenn" wrote in message
...
I've recently been using a photo editing software
package. When manipulating an image I get an error
message, "Windows Virtual Memory Size Too Low". I've
reset the Virtual Memory size in Performance Options to
Min: 965 and Max. 1000 but still see the same error.

When I run Task Manager during the time I'm use the
application I notice that CPU usage is usually around 4%
and PF Usage is at around 740Meg. If I stop manipulating
a photo image the PF Usage never seems to drop. If I
continue to manipulate a photo (i.e. continue using the
application) the PF usage continues to increase but never
drops regardless of what I do. I suspect that this is
the problem. How do I get my system to release the PF
usage if this indeed the problem?

I'm running a P IV 3.06 MHz processor (Hyper threading)
with 512Megs. Of RAM. There is over 60 Gig. of free
hard disk space so this shouldn't be an issue.

Any ideas on how to resolve this would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks.
Glenn.



  #4  
Old September 26th 04, 05:43 PM
pip22
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Virtual Memory Too Small" in XP

I should like to add that I've seen this 'low memory' warning on a few XP
systems, most of which have had several (4 or more) created user accounts,
and that's not including the default ones. My son's is a case in point. I
removed three of the accounts he had created (which were rarely used anyway,
but he got carried away with the novelty of it so gave all his family
separate accounts). He now had just one user account (his own) and has had no
more memory issues since. Besides, it can get very confusing with
multi-account systems.

"R. McCarty" wrote:

That PF level meter isn't a real Pagefile usage indicator. XP
combines physical memory and Virtual memory into a pool.
You can use Perfmon.Msc (Microsoft Console) to actually
see the "True" pagefile usage. The PF Meter essentially shows
total mapped memory at the moment.

Windows XP doesn't immediately relinquish memory space
when an application is closed. What's noteworthy about your
post is the seemingly high memory use. You should check your
Startups and Services and see what is consuming such a high
amount of memory. I would boot fresh and run TaskMgr &
check the processes (Tab). Not all of the columns show by
default and I would add (View, Select Columns) for:
Peak Memory Usage
VM Size
Page Faults
Priority
Examine the processes (Total count) and which are using the
Lion's share of memory. You may need to trim back Startups
to keep your idle memory use lower. Normally, a average PC
with Anti-Virus and Firewall should have a Performance level
(TaskMgr Tab) between 175-240.

It's also possible that the image editing program has "Memory
Leaks", but that's unlikely.

"Glenn" wrote in message
...
I've recently been using a photo editing software
package. When manipulating an image I get an error
message, "Windows Virtual Memory Size Too Low". I've
reset the Virtual Memory size in Performance Options to
Min: 965 and Max. 1000 but still see the same error.

When I run Task Manager during the time I'm use the
application I notice that CPU usage is usually around 4%
and PF Usage is at around 740Meg. If I stop manipulating
a photo image the PF Usage never seems to drop. If I
continue to manipulate a photo (i.e. continue using the
application) the PF usage continues to increase but never
drops regardless of what I do. I suspect that this is
the problem. How do I get my system to release the PF
usage if this indeed the problem?

I'm running a P IV 3.06 MHz processor (Hyper threading)
with 512Megs. Of RAM. There is over 60 Gig. of free
hard disk space so this shouldn't be an issue.

Any ideas on how to resolve this would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks.
Glenn.




  #5  
Old September 26th 04, 05:54 PM
R. McCarty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Virtual Memory Too Small" in XP

That condition could be due to "Fast User Switching". Profiles
are kept in sort of a hibernated state while another user logs on
and does something. It's OK in theory, but I've seen cases of
PCs with 4 or 5 background profiles that have run for days if
not weeks. I generally setup PCs without FUS and just have
people take the few extra seconds to actually log off their accounts.

"pip22" wrote in message
...
I should like to add that I've seen this 'low memory' warning on a few XP
systems, most of which have had several (4 or more) created user accounts,
and that's not including the default ones. My son's is a case in point. I
removed three of the accounts he had created (which were rarely used
anyway,
but he got carried away with the novelty of it so gave all his family
separate accounts). He now had just one user account (his own) and has had
no
more memory issues since. Besides, it can get very confusing with
multi-account systems.

"R. McCarty" wrote:

That PF level meter isn't a real Pagefile usage indicator. XP
combines physical memory and Virtual memory into a pool.
You can use Perfmon.Msc (Microsoft Console) to actually
see the "True" pagefile usage. The PF Meter essentially shows
total mapped memory at the moment.

Windows XP doesn't immediately relinquish memory space
when an application is closed. What's noteworthy about your
post is the seemingly high memory use. You should check your
Startups and Services and see what is consuming such a high
amount of memory. I would boot fresh and run TaskMgr &
check the processes (Tab). Not all of the columns show by
default and I would add (View, Select Columns) for:
Peak Memory Usage
VM Size
Page Faults
Priority
Examine the processes (Total count) and which are using the
Lion's share of memory. You may need to trim back Startups
to keep your idle memory use lower. Normally, a average PC
with Anti-Virus and Firewall should have a Performance level
(TaskMgr Tab) between 175-240.

It's also possible that the image editing program has "Memory
Leaks", but that's unlikely.

"Glenn" wrote in message
...
I've recently been using a photo editing software
package. When manipulating an image I get an error
message, "Windows Virtual Memory Size Too Low". I've
reset the Virtual Memory size in Performance Options to
Min: 965 and Max. 1000 but still see the same error.

When I run Task Manager during the time I'm use the
application I notice that CPU usage is usually around 4%
and PF Usage is at around 740Meg. If I stop manipulating
a photo image the PF Usage never seems to drop. If I
continue to manipulate a photo (i.e. continue using the
application) the PF usage continues to increase but never
drops regardless of what I do. I suspect that this is
the problem. How do I get my system to release the PF
usage if this indeed the problem?

I'm running a P IV 3.06 MHz processor (Hyper threading)
with 512Megs. Of RAM. There is over 60 Gig. of free
hard disk space so this shouldn't be an issue.

Any ideas on how to resolve this would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks.
Glenn.






  #6  
Old September 26th 04, 07:03 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Virtual Memory Too Small" in XP


Good suggestion. I have four accouts as well, three of
which I never use. I'll try getting rid of the unused
accounts.

Thanks.
Glenn.

-----Original Message-----
I should like to add that I've seen this 'low memory'

warning on a few XP
systems, most of which have had several (4 or more)

created user accounts,
and that's not including the default ones. My son's is a

case in point. I
removed three of the accounts he had created (which were

rarely used anyway,
but he got carried away with the novelty of it so gave

all his family
separate accounts). He now had just one user account

(his own) and has had no
more memory issues since. Besides, it can get very

confusing with
multi-account systems.

"R. McCarty" wrote:

That PF level meter isn't a real Pagefile usage

indicator. XP
combines physical memory and Virtual memory into a

pool.
You can use Perfmon.Msc (Microsoft Console) to actually
see the "True" pagefile usage. The PF Meter

essentially shows
total mapped memory at the moment.

Windows XP doesn't immediately relinquish memory space
when an application is closed. What's noteworthy about

your
post is the seemingly high memory use. You should

check your
Startups and Services and see what is consuming such a

high
amount of memory. I would boot fresh and run TaskMgr &
check the processes (Tab). Not all of the columns show

by
default and I would add (View, Select Columns) for:
Peak Memory Usage
VM Size
Page Faults
Priority
Examine the processes (Total count) and which are

using the
Lion's share of memory. You may need to trim back

Startups
to keep your idle memory use lower. Normally, a

average PC
with Anti-Virus and Firewall should have a Performance

level
(TaskMgr Tab) between 175-240.

It's also possible that the image editing program

has "Memory
Leaks", but that's unlikely.

"Glenn" wrote in message
...
I've recently been using a photo editing software
package. When manipulating an image I get an error
message, "Windows Virtual Memory Size Too Low". I've
reset the Virtual Memory size in Performance

Options to
Min: 965 and Max. 1000 but still see the same error.

When I run Task Manager during the time I'm use the
application I notice that CPU usage is usually

around 4%
and PF Usage is at around 740Meg. If I stop

manipulating
a photo image the PF Usage never seems to drop. If I
continue to manipulate a photo (i.e. continue using

the
application) the PF usage continues to increase but

never
drops regardless of what I do. I suspect that this

is
the problem. How do I get my system to release the

PF
usage if this indeed the problem?

I'm running a P IV 3.06 MHz processor (Hyper

threading)
with 512Megs. Of RAM. There is over 60 Gig. of free
hard disk space so this shouldn't be an issue.

Any ideas on how to resolve this would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks.
Glenn.




.

  #7  
Old September 27th 04, 11:48 AM
Alex Nichol
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Virtual Memory Too Small" in XP

Glenn wrote:

I've recently been using a photo editing software
package. When manipulating an image I get an error
message, "Windows Virtual Memory Size Too Low". I've
reset the Virtual Memory size in Performance Options to
Min: 965 and Max. 1000 but still see the same error.


Which package? It is known that some Adobe ones grab a section of the
page file to manipulate for themselves (deplorable, but there it is).
I am not sure of best settings for them,. but would suggest a rather
lower Initial size (to define the area they will grab - say 250 or 400)
while keeping plentiful headroom above it by keeping Max where you have
it. The important point is to have Max several hundred MB bigger than
init

--
Alex Nichol MS MVP (Windows Technologies)
Bournemouth, U.K. (remove the D8 bit)
  #8  
Old September 27th 04, 11:52 AM
Alex Nichol
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Virtual Memory Too Small" in XP

wrote:


Good suggestion. I have four accouts as well, three of
which I never use. I'll try getting rid of the unused
accounts.


Having the accounts is OK, but don't use Fast User Switching between
them. As was said, that means that each user's 'workspace' has to be
parked in page file when you switch to a different user. Provided they
have to log off and on this does not arise. Change at Control Panel -
User Accounts - Change way users log on and uncheck 'Use Fast User
Switching'


--
Alex Nichol MS MVP (Windows Technologies)
Bournemouth, U.K. (remove the D8 bit)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
System is low on virtual memory Paul Koluvek General XP issues or comments 7 September 14th 04 07:01 AM
Fixed Virtual Memory Not Setting PageFile.sys Sindarian General XP issues or comments 1 August 10th 04 06:05 PM
Too Much Memory Michael Soland Performance and Maintainance of XP 18 July 22nd 04 01:51 PM
Virtual memory Dr Evil Performance and Maintainance of XP 0 July 18th 04 03:47 PM






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.