If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
What is your exact version of Windows XP.
Have you downloaded TV programmes of the Internet? -- Hope this helps. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ rroentgen wrote: "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:44:01 -0700, rroentgen wrote: This thread concerns low disk space. I was raising the possibility that failure of proper cleanup of temporary files is one possible reason for a full hard drive. If anybody's hard drive gets full because of undeleted temporary files, he is in *dire* need of more hard drive space. For almost anyone, simply deleting temp files would makes so small a difference as to be inconsequential. I've never seen any drive with enough undeleted temporary files to make a significant difference in amount of free space. My winows/temp folder currently occupies 25Gigbytes and Disk Cleanup tool will not remove them. If the original poster has a regular virus scan in operation then it seems to me possible that temporary files will never be removed. Gerry, do you have any opinion on my postulate that a virus scan, of whatever brand (be it OneCare, Norton, McAfee, Whatever) results in a file being marked as having been accessed at the time that it is scanned. I'm not Gerry, but let me point out that running a virus scan followed by a quick look at your temp folder would demonstrate that your "postulate" is false. I can't speak for *every* anti-virus program, but I've never seen this occur. I have done exactly this. After running Tuneup from Windows Live OneCare(which includes a virus scan which it runs after running disk cleanup) every one of the several hundred files in the Windows/temp folder and all other files on the computer are marked as Date Accessed as the date on which tune up was run. I am now waiting until 7 days have lapsed to run tuneup again to see if disk cleanup removes the temporary files. If it does, then the disk cleanup utility that comes with windows XP will not remove the temporary files if a virus scan has been done in the last 7 days. As I said above, anti-virus programs don't do that, so it doesn't matter when the last scan was done. But where did you get the idea that disk cleanup won't remove a temporary file that's been accessed within the last seven days? please cite a web page that states that, if you know one. If that's true, it's news to me. As far as I know, the only rule preventing the deletion of a temporary file is that it can't be deleted if it is currently in use (open). http://support.microsoft.com/kb/261897#top Says that "The Disk Cleanup tool does not delete temporary files that are less than seven days old" (although it says that this KB article applies to windows Millenium) http://www.pctipsbox.com/force-disk-...mporary-files/ Says... "If you've ever run the Windows XP's Disk Cleanup utility, you probably discovered that your temporary files occupy a significant amount of space. You might select the Temporary Files check box in order to allow the Disk Cleanup utility to delete the files in the Temp folder, but the Disk Cleanup utility will not remove all of the files. The reason for this oddity is that the configuration for the Disk Cleanup utility does not allow deletion of files accessed in the last seven days." -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:44:00 -0700, rroentgen
wrote: "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:44:01 -0700, rroentgen wrote: This thread concerns low disk space. I was raising the possibility that failure of proper cleanup of temporary files is one possible reason for a full hard drive. If anybody's hard drive gets full because of undeleted temporary files, he is in *dire* need of more hard drive space. For almost anyone, simply deleting temp files would makes so small a difference as to be inconsequential. I've never seen any drive with enough undeleted temporary files to make a significant difference in amount of free space. My winows/temp folder currently occupies 25Gigbytes and Disk Cleanup tool will not remove them. Why not? What happens when you try? Have you tried to remove them manually? What happens when you try that? 25GB is an enormous size. I've never seen one that big. But where did you get the idea that disk cleanup won't remove a temporary file that's been accessed within the last seven days? please cite a web page that states that, if you know one. If that's true, it's news to me. As far as I know, the only rule preventing the deletion of a temporary file is that it can't be deleted if it is currently in use (open). http://support.microsoft.com/kb/261897#top Says that "The Disk Cleanup tool does not delete temporary files that are less than seven days old" (although it says that this KB article applies to windows Millenium) http://www.pctipsbox.com/force-disk-...mporary-files/ Says... "If you’ve ever run the Windows XP’s Disk Cleanup utility, you probably discovered that your temporary files occupy a significant amount of space. You might select the Temporary Files check box in order to allow the Disk Cleanup utility to delete the files in the Temp folder, but the Disk Cleanup utility will not remove all of the files. The reason for this oddity is that the configuration for the Disk Cleanup utility does not allow deletion of files accessed in the last seven days." Then it looks like I am wrong about the seven days. Thanks for the information. The second link you provide talks about how to perform a registry edit to remove the seven day restriction. That's probably a good thing to do. The restriction makes no sense to me. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
"rroentgen" wrote in message ... "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:44:01 -0700, rroentgen wrote: This thread concerns low disk space. I was raising the possibility that failure of proper cleanup of temporary files is one possible reason for a full hard drive. If anybody's hard drive gets full because of undeleted temporary files, he is in *dire* need of more hard drive space. For almost anyone, simply deleting temp files would makes so small a difference as to be inconsequential. I've never seen any drive with enough undeleted temporary files to make a significant difference in amount of free space. My winows/temp folder currently occupies 25Gigbytes and Disk Cleanup tool will not remove them. If the original poster has a regular virus scan in operation then it seems to me possible that temporary files will never be removed. Gerry, do you have any opinion on my postulate that a virus scan, of whatever brand (be it OneCare, Norton, McAfee, Whatever) results in a file being marked as having been accessed at the time that it is scanned. I'm not Gerry, but let me point out that running a virus scan followed by a quick look at your temp folder would demonstrate that your "postulate" is false. I can't speak for *every* anti-virus program, but I've never seen this occur. I have done exactly this. After running Tuneup from Windows Live OneCare(which includes a virus scan which it runs after running disk cleanup) every one of the several hundred files in the Windows/temp folder and all other files on the computer are marked as Date Accessed as the date on which tune up was run. I am now waiting until 7 days have lapsed to run tuneup again to see if disk cleanup removes the temporary files. If it does, then the disk cleanup utility that comes with windows XP will not remove the temporary files if a virus scan has been done in the last 7 days. As I said above, anti-virus programs don't do that, so it doesn't matter when the last scan was done. But where did you get the idea that disk cleanup won't remove a temporary file that's been accessed within the last seven days? please cite a web page that states that, if you know one. If that's true, it's news to me. As far as I know, the only rule preventing the deletion of a temporary file is that it can't be deleted if it is currently in use (open). http://support.microsoft.com/kb/261897#top Says that "The Disk Cleanup tool does not delete temporary files that are less than seven days old" (although it says that this KB article applies to windows Millenium) http://www.pctipsbox.com/force-disk-...mporary-files/ Says... "If you've ever run the Windows XP's Disk Cleanup utility, you probably discovered that your temporary files occupy a significant amount of space. You might select the Temporary Files check box in order to allow the Disk Cleanup utility to delete the files in the Temp folder, but the Disk Cleanup utility will not remove all of the files. The reason for this oddity is that the configuration for the Disk Cleanup utility does not allow deletion of files accessed in the last seven days." -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup So, Disk Cleanup for whatever reason cannot clean out the windows\temp folder on the OP's computer. What happens when you try to delete the files manually? What are the permissions on these files? Jim |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
Ken
If you are advocating no restriction ( changing 7 to 0 ) then it could important to advocate restarting the computer before running Disk CleanUp. cCleaner defaults to 2 days. SFAIK AVG 7.5 Free does not change access dates, which supports your earlier comments about anti-virus programmes. -- Regards. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ken Blake, MVP wrote: On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:44:00 -0700, rroentgen wrote: The second link you provide talks about how to perform a registry edit to remove the seven day restriction. That's probably a good thing to do. The restriction makes no sense to me. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:22:11 +0100, "Gerry" wrote:
Ken If you are advocating no restriction ( changing 7 to 0 ) then it could important to advocate restarting the computer before running Disk CleanUp. Nope. Although I frequently see that advice, I disagree with it. Restarting isn't necessary. The only temp file you should shouldn't delete is one that is in use. And since Windows won't let you delete an open file, it's safe to (try to) delete them all. But one caveat to the above: note that there are some program installations which work in two steps. The first step concludes by writing temporary files and rebooting. The second step starts automatically after rebooting and needs to find those files there (and then deletes them when it's done). As long as you're not doing the temp file deletion while in the middle of such an installation, rebooting isn't necessary. cCleaner defaults to 2 days. SFAIK AVG 7.5 Free does not change access dates, which supports your earlier comments about anti-virus programmes. -- Regards. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ken Blake, MVP wrote: On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:44:00 -0700, rroentgen wrote: The second link you provide talks about how to perform a registry edit to remove the seven day restriction. That's probably a good thing to do. The restriction makes no sense to me. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
Ken
I have noted your comments. I posted feedback on Ramesh's web site earlier. There is a good Article there about the Registry edit. It will be interesting to hear what he has to say about the risks in setting it to zero. -- Regards. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .. Ken Blake, MVP wrote: On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:22:11 +0100, "Gerry" wrote: Ken If you are advocating no restriction ( changing 7 to 0 ) then it could important to advocate restarting the computer before running Disk CleanUp. Nope. Although I frequently see that advice, I disagree with it. Restarting isn't necessary. The only temp file you should shouldn't delete is one that is in use. And since Windows won't let you delete an open file, it's safe to (try to) delete them all. But one caveat to the above: note that there are some program installations which work in two steps. The first step concludes by writing temporary files and rebooting. The second step starts automatically after rebooting and needs to find those files there (and then deletes them when it's done). As long as you're not doing the temp file deletion while in the middle of such an installation, rebooting isn't necessary. cCleaner defaults to 2 days. SFAIK AVG 7.5 Free does not change access dates, which supports your earlier comments about anti-virus programmes. -- Regards. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ken Blake, MVP wrote: On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:44:00 -0700, rroentgen wrote: The second link you provide talks about how to perform a registry edit to remove the seven day restriction. That's probably a good thing to do. The restriction makes no sense to me. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
Ken, Gerry,
Here is a discussion dating from 2005 in which it is noted and proved that Norton Antivirus DOES modify the "Date Accessed" property of a file. http://forums.techguy.org/windows-nt...erties-qu.html "Gerry" wrote: Ken If you are advocating no restriction ( changing 7 to 0 ) then it could important to advocate restarting the computer before running Disk CleanUp. cCleaner defaults to 2 days. SFAIK AVG 7.5 Free does not change access dates, which supports your earlier comments about anti-virus programmes. -- Regards. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ken Blake, MVP wrote: On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:44:00 -0700, rroentgen wrote: The second link you provide talks about how to perform a registry edit to remove the seven day restriction. That's probably a good thing to do. The restriction makes no sense to me. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
Well AVG 7.5 Free does not!
Two people in the Forum "thought" it did! That's not conclusive evidence. How did they check? -- Hope this helps. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ rroentgen wrote: Ken, Gerry, Here is a discussion dating from 2005 in which it is noted and proved that Norton Antivirus DOES modify the "Date Accessed" property of a file. http://forums.techguy.org/windows-nt...erties-qu.html |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:14:01 -0700, rroentgen
wrote: Ken, Gerry, Here is a discussion dating from 2005 in which it is noted and proved that Norton Antivirus DOES modify the "Date Accessed" property of a file. http://forums.techguy.org/windows-nt...erties-qu.html "Proved"? You call that "proved"? That's a long way from proof to me. It's *possible* that these people are correct that that particular version of Norton (whatever it was; nobody says), back in 2005, did this. I still doubt it. And even if it did, that's a long way from saying that all antivirus program do this. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:30:05 -0700, "Ken Blake, MVP"
wrote: On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:14:01 -0700, rroentgen wrote: Ken, Gerry, Here is a discussion dating from 2005 in which it is noted and proved that Norton Antivirus DOES modify the "Date Accessed" property of a file. http://forums.techguy.org/windows-nt...erties-qu.html "Proved"? You call that "proved"? That's a long way from proof to me. It's *possible* that these people are correct that that particular version of Norton (whatever it was; nobody says), back in 2005, did this. I still doubt it. And even if it did, that's a long way from saying that all antivirus program do this. By the way, I use Avast! here. I just checked the date accessed field of a large folder with many files I access seldom. There are lots of files there with dates from last year, and I know that I've done many virus scans this year. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
I let Windows Live OneCare run its Tuneup this morning (this does
defragmentation disk cleanup and then a virus scan and some other odds and ends). Before it ran I changed the virus scan option to exclude the Windows/temp folder from the virus scan. RESULT: checking a random selection of files this morning I find that EVERY file on the computer is marked with "Date Accessed" as 16 August 2007 EXCEPT for the files in the Windows/temp folder which by the way cleanup has not removed. Ken could you make enquiries of the OneCare team to see if they know anuthing about this. I will start a thread on the OneCare forum but from experience so far I expect it will take some time to convince anyone there that there may be a problem. Kenneth Cooke Strathfield, Australia "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:30:05 -0700, "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:14:01 -0700, rroentgen wrote: Ken, Gerry, Here is a discussion dating from 2005 in which it is noted and proved that Norton Antivirus DOES modify the "Date Accessed" property of a file. http://forums.techguy.org/windows-nt...erties-qu.html "Proved"? You call that "proved"? That's a long way from proof to me. It's *possible* that these people are correct that that particular version of Norton (whatever it was; nobody says), back in 2005, did this. I still doubt it. And even if it did, that's a long way from saying that all antivirus program do this. By the way, I use Avast! here. I just checked the date accessed field of a large folder with many files I access seldom. There are lots of files there with dates from last year, and I know that I've done many virus scans this year. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:05:26 -0700, rroentgen
wrote: I let Windows Live OneCare run its Tuneup this morning (this does defragmentation disk cleanup and then a virus scan and some other odds and ends). Before it ran I changed the virus scan option to exclude the Windows/temp folder from the virus scan. RESULT: checking a random selection of files this morning I find that EVERY file on the computer is marked with "Date Accessed" as 16 August 2007 EXCEPT for the files in the Windows/temp folder which by the way cleanup has not removed. Ken could you make enquiries of the OneCare team to see if they know anuthing about this. Sorry, no. I don't know anybody on the OneCare team, and have no special access to anyone there. Lest you think I'm a Microsoft employee, let me explain that I am not. "Microsoft MVP" is an honorary title for having provided consistently helpful advice, typically in these newsgroups. I will start a thread on the OneCare forum but from experience so far I expect it will take some time to convince anyone there that there may be a problem. Kenneth Cooke Strathfield, Australia "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:30:05 -0700, "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:14:01 -0700, rroentgen wrote: Ken, Gerry, Here is a discussion dating from 2005 in which it is noted and proved that Norton Antivirus DOES modify the "Date Accessed" property of a file. http://forums.techguy.org/windows-nt...erties-qu.html "Proved"? You call that "proved"? That's a long way from proof to me. It's *possible* that these people are correct that that particular version of Norton (whatever it was; nobody says), back in 2005, did this. I still doubt it. And even if it did, that's a long way from saying that all antivirus program do this. By the way, I use Avast! here. I just checked the date accessed field of a large folder with many files I access seldom. There are lots of files there with dates from last year, and I know that I've done many virus scans this year. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
You ask your questions about Windows Live OneCare he
http://forums.microsoft.com/windowso....aspx?siteid=2 -- Hope this helps. Gerry ~~~~ FCA Stourport, England Enquire, plan and execute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ rroentgen wrote: I let Windows Live OneCare run its Tuneup this morning (this does defragmentation disk cleanup and then a virus scan and some other odds and ends). Before it ran I changed the virus scan option to exclude the Windows/temp folder from the virus scan. RESULT: checking a random selection of files this morning I find that EVERY file on the computer is marked with "Date Accessed" as 16 August 2007 EXCEPT for the files in the Windows/temp folder which by the way cleanup has not removed. Ken could you make enquiries of the OneCare team to see if they know anuthing about this. I will start a thread on the OneCare forum but from experience so far I expect it will take some time to convince anyone there that there may be a problem. Kenneth Cooke Strathfield, Australia "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:30:05 -0700, "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote: On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:14:01 -0700, rroentgen wrote: Ken, Gerry, Here is a discussion dating from 2005 in which it is noted and proved that Norton Antivirus DOES modify the "Date Accessed" property of a file. http://forums.techguy.org/windows-nt...erties-qu.html "Proved"? You call that "proved"? That's a long way from proof to me. It's *possible* that these people are correct that that particular version of Norton (whatever it was; nobody says), back in 2005, did this. I still doubt it. And even if it did, that's a long way from saying that all antivirus program do this. By the way, I use Avast! here. I just checked the date accessed field of a large folder with many files I access seldom. There are lots of files there with dates from last year, and I know that I've done many virus scans this year. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Low Disk Space every boot
Gerry, Ken,
Thanks for the interest you have both shown. I will do further experimentation and then try the OneCare forum (thanks for forum url Gerry). I will also try Avast. I understand what an MVP is Ken. I assumed that Microsoft would have given you guys some privileged line of contact to their software developers. See you around and about. Thanks Kenneth Cooke |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|