Win10 boot problems swapping HDDs

On 23/11/2019 11:43, Wolffan wrote:
On 22 Nov 2019, David wrote
(in article ):

On 22/11/2019 21:26, Diesel wrote:
I've got you at the end of the day. I've got you, good.

The *ONLY* way, Dustin, is for you to have used your *BLACK HAT HACKER*
skillz.

*Whose* computer(s) did you hack?

Not mine of course - we have your word that you didn't hack mine! :-)

errmm... you denied that the event in question had happened. so... how,
exactly, did he manage to use ‘black hat hacker skillz’ to hack his way
onto someone’s computer and get info on something which never happened?

You'll have to ask Dustin.

The simplest explanation is that the incident did happen, that you really did
destroy at least one real-life relationship (other than that between you and
the son you murdered, filicide) and that the person in question really did
talk to Dustin.

sigh

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 14:52:16 +0000, David
wrote:

On 23/11/2019 11:43, Wolffan wrote:
On 22 Nov 2019, David wrote
(in article ):

On 22/11/2019 21:26, Diesel wrote:
I've got you at the end of the day. I've got you, good.

The *ONLY* way, redacted, is for you to have used your *BLACK HAT HACKER*
skillz.

*Whose* computer(s) did you hack?

Not mine of course - we have your word that you didn't hack mine! :-)

errmm... you denied that the event in question had happened. so... how,
exactly, did he manage to use ‘black hat hacker skillz’ to hack his way
onto someone’s computer and get info on something which never happened?

You'll have to ask redacted.

YOU made that statement.
YOU ask BD. That's you, BTW (in case you get all your fake
persona mixed up).

OT up. Look at the subject line.

---------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

62 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On 23 Nov 2019, David wrote
(in article ):

On 23/11/2019 11:43, Wolffan wrote:
On 22 Nov 2019, David wrote
(in article ):

On 22/11/2019 21:26, Diesel wrote:
I've got you at the end of the day. I've got you, good.

The *ONLY* way, Dustin, is for you to have used your *BLACK HAT HACKER*
skillz.

*Whose* computer(s) did you hack?

Not mine of course - we have your word that you didn't hack mine! :-)

errmm... you denied that the event in question had happened. so... how,
exactly, did he manage to use ‘black hat hacker skillz’ to hack his way
onto someone’s computer and get info on something which never happened?

You'll have to ask Dustin.

You’re the onre making the accusation. you’re the oner who has to provide
evidence... oh. wait. you don’t have any.


The simplest explanation is that the incident did happen, that you really
did
destroy at least one real-life relationship (other than that between you and
the son you murdered, filicide) and that the person in question really did
talk to Dustin.

sigh

and you can’t even begin to mount a defense. got it.

David
Sat, 23 Nov 2019 13:29:26 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 23/11/2019 04:57, Diesel wrote:
David
Fri, 22 Nov 2019 22:21:12
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 22/11/2019 21:26, Diesel wrote:
I've got you at the end of the day. I've got you, good.

The *ONLY* way, Dustin, is for you to have used your *BLACK HAT
HACKER* skillz.

*Whose* computer(s) did you hack?

Not mine of course - we have your word that you didn't hack
mine!
:-)

Your latest accusation doesn't even make sense, David.

So, I'll ask again:

How do I know anything about a relationship you've confirmed
existed and has been destroyed if one or more persons you know in
real life didn't tell me all about it?

*WHO* told you?

Your response doesn't answer my question. Try again.

Go ahead, David, others are wanting to know about this too; I'm
getting emails about it. G How do I know what I should not
know, could not possibly know, if one or more people you know in
real life didn't fork me the information, David?

You either hacked into someone's computer or you are lying.

You just don't know when to quit digging. Hey, you and Mike have
something in common. Why would someones computer have details such
as the ones I shared, that you disagreed with some aspects of and
provided your own 'version'

You aren't making any sense, David.

And, why did you accuse me of hacking your computers when I
originally disclosed the fact you're a real life, drunkard, using
your own real life details to prove it; details I'd have no
knowledge of, if I was as you claimed, lying. The problem for you
is, I'm not lying about it, and the more you try and state
otherwise, but contradict yourself with your side of the story;
while avoiding my question, the more obvious it is for others
that you are indeed, lying your ****ing ass off, and I have
breached your inner circle.

You have *NOT* "breached my inner circle".

So the answer to how I know someone you have confirmed is a lost
relationship is? I've only asked a few times, recently, now. How much
longer must I wait for you to come up with a believable answer that
explains it?

If you *HAD* done so, you would KNOW that I don't drink alcohol.

David, if I hadn't of done so, I wouldn't know anything about that
relationship.


--
Cats must shred the kitchen sponge all over the carpet.