Microsoft Gives MVP Award to Adware Pusher

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...

Oh my, you truly don't understand do you??? How tired I have become
trying...

Cool, the perhaps we will wear you down eventually.

Roger, you just don't have the talent....sorry.

Remember, your inability to see understanding does
in no way indicate lack thereof.


Oh Roger. How you desperately try to sound intelligent...


I assure you, it is quite effortless
I will not bother drawing comparison to your extended rants

--
ra

"imhotep" wrote in message
....

Hummm....let's review this with logic (yet again). I am supposed to stop
using a perfectly valid technique that helps me reply when someone replies
to me. Yet, because your newsclient is broken, it is my fault???


Of course, it has never been an issue of broken newsreader clients,
but of usage thereof.

Now, I dare you to meaningfully explain how that response, I guess
you deem it a reaonable explaination, is any except a self-centered
viewpoint exponding a self-centered approach.

Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
....

Hummm....let's review this with logic (yet again). I am supposed to stop
using a perfectly valid technique that helps me reply when someone
replies to me. Yet, because your newsclient is broken, it is my fault???


Of course, it has never been an issue of broken newsreader clients,
but of usage thereof.

Yes. You have not read your "user manual" and choose to blame your problems
in other...

Now, I dare you to meaningfully explain how that response, I guess
you deem it a reaonable explaination, is any except a self-centered
viewpoint exponding a self-centered approach.

The only thing self centered is you complaining because you newsreader is,
dare I say, inadequate. Rather than talking about the topic of this thread,
you choose to steer it in a different direction. That is the only self
centered act I see...

Hummmm... You are a MVP but rather than helping people here with security
issues you choose to act like a clown. How exactly did you get your MVP
status? Did you write spyware apps too?

Im

Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...

Oh my, you truly don't understand do you??? How tired I have become
trying...

Cool, the perhaps we will wear you down eventually.

Roger, you just don't have the talent....sorry.

Remember, your inability to see understanding does
in no way indicate lack thereof.


Oh Roger. How you desperately try to sound intelligent...


I assure you, it is quite effortless

I am sure looking like a clown comes quite easy to you...

I will not bother drawing comparison to your extended rants

hahahaha....

I frequently email many of your post to my friends. We all get a good laugh
from you...

Keep the material flowing, Roger.

Im

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
....

Hummm....let's review this with logic (yet again). I am supposed to stop
using a perfectly valid technique that helps me reply when someone
replies to me. Yet, because your newsclient is broken, it is my fault???


Of course, it has never been an issue of broken newsreader clients,
but of usage thereof.

Yes. You have not read your "user manual" and choose to blame your
problems
in other...

Again, it is totally the result of you choice to use the
follow-ups in the way that you do which people are
objecting to. It is your actions, not nntp nor any one
implementation at issue.


Now, I dare you to meaningfully explain how that response, I guess
you deem it a reaonable explaination, is any except a self-centered
viewpoint exponding a self-centered approach.

The only thing self centered is you complaining because you newsreader is,
dare I say, inadequate. Rather than talking about the topic of this
thread,
you choose to steer it in a different direction. That is the only self
centered act I see...

Hummmm... You are a MVP but rather than helping people here with security
issues you choose to act like a clown. How exactly did you get your MVP
status? Did you write spyware apps too?


Right. And when you stop reading "your" posts you may
start to realize how childish you sound saying such.

You do perhaps need to get out more Im and discover,
no - not other posts, but the importance of holding other's
values as important.

Cheers, anyway
ra

Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
....

Hummm....let's review this with logic (yet again). I am supposed to
stop using a perfectly valid technique that helps me reply when someone
replies to me. Yet, because your newsclient is broken, it is my
fault???


Of course, it has never been an issue of broken newsreader clients,
but of usage thereof.

Yes. You have not read your "user manual" and choose to blame your
problems
in other...

Again, it is totally the result of you choice to use the
follow-ups in the way that you do which people are
objecting to. It is your actions, not nntp nor any one
implementation at issue.


Really, why is it that my "just works"??? No problems no matter how you
post...please explain this.




Now, I dare you to meaningfully explain how that response, I guess
you deem it a reaonable explaination, is any except a self-centered
viewpoint exponding a self-centered approach.

The only thing self centered is you complaining because you newsreader
is, dare I say, inadequate. Rather than talking about the topic of this
thread,
you choose to steer it in a different direction. That is the only self
centered act I see...

Hummmm... You are a MVP but rather than helping people here with security
issues you choose to act like a clown. How exactly did you get your MVP
status? Did you write spyware apps too?


Right. And when you stop reading "your" posts you may
start to realize how childish you sound saying such.
You do perhaps need to get out more Im and discover,
no - not other posts, but the importance of holding other's
values as important.

Cheers, anyway
ra

Again, "ra", you have done nothing but hijack this post and other, which had
a serious topic, and turn it into a discussion about your broken
newsreader. An you say I am childish? Hahahahahahaha....

Again, I challenge you to help people with their security problems rather
than hijack them...

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
....

Hummm....let's review this with logic (yet again). I am supposed to
stop using a perfectly valid technique that helps me reply when
someone
replies to me. Yet, because your newsclient is broken, it is my
fault???


Of course, it has never been an issue of broken newsreader clients,
but of usage thereof.

Yes. You have not read your "user manual" and choose to blame your
problems
in other...

Again, it is totally the result of you choice to use the
follow-ups in the way that you do which people are
objecting to. It is your actions, not nntp nor any one
implementation at issue.


Really, why is it that my "just works"??? No problems no matter how you
post...please explain this.


My NG client has no problems. How do you explain that?

And, what is it that you needed to do to place the follow-up
on your reply to my posting? If it was automatic by KNode
then either you defined a preference for it to do so for you or
KNode is broken in volunteering a follow-up header.
In either case, many, not just I, find it obnoxious.

Again, the issue is you (or your instance of KNode),
not the software of others.
But you will never see that, and I do not care to see you
attempt to explain that once more.

"imhotep" wrote in message
...

Again, "ra", you have done nothing but hijack this post and others, which
had a serious topic, and turn it into a discussion about your broken
newsreader. You say I am childish? Hahahahahahaha....


Yes, you do appear quite selfish, and your occassional rants childish
I did not hijack this thread, although I did note it to be inapproriate.

Again, I challenge you to help people with their security problems rather
than hijack them...

I believe I do assist.
That you can say that makes you appear to read only your threads

As far as I have seen during the past year plus, you rarely attempt
to do so, lest it is with a "get Linux" style comment. Talk of hijack!

However, just to reassure myself, I looked. (see below)
I notice that right about 50% of your postings under this name in
msnews hosted newsgroups in 2006 are replies in your own threads.
I wonder why.

You need to get these post counts up before you attempt to make
claims over your great helpfulness in solving real problems as actually
experienced by people.

(oh - in case you are unfamilar with the public origin of this info, yes,
one can simply click into any one of the threads to each of your posts)


Author Profile : Metrics are for the calendar year spanning the search date
Author:
First Seen: 9/3/2005
Last Seen: 10/12/2006
Aliases: Imhotep

Newsgroups Days Active
Posts Threads Initiated Threads Touched
Day / Last Day 5 / 4
20 / 13 0 / 0 9 / 7
Week / Last Week 11 / 12 5 / 4 62 /
75 4 / 5 21 / 32
Month / Last Month 13 / 11 9 / 19 137 /
134 9 / 11 4 / 36
Quarter / Last Quarter 13 / 15 9 / 49 137 /
295 9 / 36 44 / 98
Year / Last Year 19 / 38 58 / 64 432 /
476 45 / 62 136 / 196

Newsgroups (Ordered by Posts, descending)
First Seen Last Seen Days Active Posts Replies Threads
Initiated Threads Touched
microsoft.public.security
9/8/2005 10/12/2006 49 255 217 30
57
microsoft.public.security.homeusers
7/17/2006 10/12/2006 46 189 152 29
59
microsoft.public.internetexplorer.security
9/17/2005 10/12/2006 39 178 142 26
43
microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
7/17/2006 10/12/2006 39 151 115 27
48
alt.security
9/11/2005 10/10/2006 32 63 29 16
39
comp.security.misc
9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 49 14 16
37
comp.security
9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 44 10 16
34
comp.os.linux.security
7/17/2006 10/10/2006 11 13 4 5
11
comp.security.firewalls
9/22/2005 10/10/2006 9 11 2 5
10
microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general
7/29/2006 8/6/2006 2 3 3
0 1
microsoft.public.windows.server.security
9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2
0 1
comp.security.unix
10/7/2005 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
comp.security.pgp.test
8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
alt.computer.security
9/3/2005 10/3/2006 1 2 2
0 1
microsoft.public.win2000.security
9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2
0 1
sci.crypt
10/2/2006 10/9/2006 2 2 1
0 2
alt.security.pgp
8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
soc.culture.canada
10/2/2006 10/2/2006 1 1 1
0 1
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
9/11/2005 10/12/2006 1 1 1
0 1

Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...

Again, "ra", you have done nothing but hijack this post and others, which
had a serious topic, and turn it into a discussion about your broken
newsreader. You say I am childish? Hahahahahahaha....


Yes, you do appear quite selfish, and your occassional rants childish
I did not hijack this thread, although I did note it to be inapproriate.

Seems you *still* are...

Again, I challenge you to help people with their security problems rather
than hijack them...

I believe I do assist

Not when you hijack.

That you can say that makes you appear to read only your threads

English please.

As far as I have seen during the past year plus, you rarely attempt
to do so, lest it is with a "get Linux" style comment. Talk of hijack!

Like your endless rants of newsclients here in a thread about a new MVP who
supported malware?

However, just to reassure myself, I looked. (see below)
I notice that right about 50% of your postings under this name in
msnews hosted newsgroups in 2006 are replies in your own threads.
I wonder why.

Easy to deduce. How many time have you hijack the topic, like here, forcing
me to try and steer the conversation back on topic for the sake of the many
users here. What don't you investage that? Ah, I guess the truth hurts now,
doesn't it.

You need to get these post counts up before you attempt to make
claims over your great helpfulness in solving real problems as actually
experienced by people.

Maybe that is why you hijack posts like this one? Don't feel you can
contrube but *also* want to increase you news post counts?

Listen, I do not get evaluated for the number of news posts. I believe an
MVP does.

If I was getting evaluated for the number of news posts, I would use my real
name, *like* *you*...


Im

(oh - in case you are unfamilar with the public origin of this info, yes,
one can simply click into any one of the threads to each of your posts)


Author Profile : Metrics are for the calendar year spanning the search
date
Author:
First Seen: 9/3/2005
Last Seen: 10/12/2006
Aliases: Imhotep

Newsgroups Days Active
Posts Threads Initiated Threads Touched
Day / Last Day 5 / 4
20 / 13 0 / 0 9 / 7
Week / Last Week 11 / 12 5 / 4 62 /
75 4 / 5 21 / 32
Month / Last Month 13 / 11 9 / 19 137 /
134 9 / 11 4 / 36
Quarter / Last Quarter 13 / 15 9 / 49 137
/
295 9 / 36 44 / 98
Year / Last Year 19 / 38 58 / 64 432
/
476 45 / 62 136 / 196

Newsgroups (Ordered by Posts, descending)
First Seen Last Seen Days Active Posts Replies
Threads
Initiated Threads Touched
microsoft.public.security
9/8/2005 10/12/2006 49 255 217 30
57
microsoft.public.security.homeusers
7/17/2006 10/12/2006 46 189 152 29
59
microsoft.public.internetexplorer.security
9/17/2005 10/12/2006 39 178 142 26
43
microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
7/17/2006 10/12/2006 39 151 115 27
48
alt.security
9/11/2005 10/10/2006 32 63 29
16
39
comp.security.misc
9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 49 14
16
37
comp.security
9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 44 10
16
34
comp.os.linux.security
7/17/2006 10/10/2006 11 13 4
5
11
comp.security.firewalls
9/22/2005 10/10/2006 9 11 2
5
10
microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general
7/29/2006 8/6/2006 2 3 3
0 1
microsoft.public.windows.server.security
9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2
0 1
comp.security.unix
10/7/2005 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
comp.security.pgp.test
8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
alt.computer.security
9/3/2005 10/3/2006 1 2 2
0 1
microsoft.public.win2000.security
9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2
0 1
sci.crypt
10/2/2006 10/9/2006 2 2 1
0 2
alt.security.pgp
8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
soc.culture.canada
10/2/2006 10/2/2006 1 1 1
0 1
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
9/11/2005 10/12/2006 1 1 1
0 1

Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
....

Hummm....let's review this with logic (yet again). I am supposed to
stop using a perfectly valid technique that helps me reply when
someone
replies to me. Yet, because your newsclient is broken, it is my
fault???


Of course, it has never been an issue of broken newsreader clients,
but of usage thereof.

Yes. You have not read your "user manual" and choose to blame your
problems
in other...

Again, it is totally the result of you choice to use the
follow-ups in the way that you do which people are
objecting to. It is your actions, not nntp nor any one
implementation at issue.


Really, why is it that my "just works"??? No problems no matter how you
post...please explain this.


My NG client has no problems. How do you explain that?

If it works flawlessly why do you cry so much. Explain that, spanky.

And, what is it that you needed to do to place the follow-up
on your reply to my posting? If it was automatic by KNode
then either you defined a preference for it to do so for you or
KNode is broken in volunteering a follow-up header.
In either case, many, not just I, find it obnoxious.

I find your constant hijacking obnoxious but you don't seem to want to
change anything either. Maybe you should take you own advice???

Again, the issue is you (or your instance of KNode),
not the software of others.
But you will never see that, and I do not care to see you
attempt to explain that once more.

Funny, my newsclient just works. No problems what-so-ever....I guess if
yours did, you would never have brought it up, or even noticed, a problem
now would you? However, you did. So you *did* have a problem but you just
don't want to admit it...now that is funny!

Im

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

Again, I challenge you to help people with their security problems
rather
than hijack them...

I believe I do assist

Not when you hijack.


And you, not when you fragment threads

That you can say that makes you appear to read only your threads

English please.

It is. I do not care to diagram for you.


As far as I have seen during the past year plus, you rarely attempt
to do so, lest it is with a "get Linux" style comment. Talk of hijack!

Like your endless rants of newsclients here in a thread about a new MVP
who
supported malware?


That topic was dead out of the starting gate.

However, just to reassure myself, I looked. (see below)
I notice that right about 50% of your postings under this name in
msnews hosted newsgroups in 2006 are replies in your own threads.
I wonder why.

Easy to deduce. How many time have you hijack the topic, like here,
forcing
me to try and steer the conversation back on topic for the sake of the
many
users here. What don't you investage that? Ah, I guess the truth hurts
now,
doesn't it.


I like the truth. I just do not see you displaying it much, certainly not
here/now.

You need to get these post counts up before you attempt to make
claims over your great helpfulness in solving real problems as actually
experienced by people.

Maybe that is why you hijack posts like this one? Don't feel you can
contrube but *also* want to increase you news post counts?

Listen, I do not get evaluated for the number of news posts. I believe an
MVP does.

If I was getting evaluated for the number of news posts, I would use my
real
name, *like* *you*...


You clear do not understand how it works.

As I see you are quite difficult to wear down, I guess just ignoring you
would be the best way to minimize your presence, ey?


(oh - in case you are unfamilar with the public origin of this info, yes,
one can simply click into any one of the threads to each of your posts)


Author Profile : Metrics are for the calendar year spanning the search
date
Author:
First Seen: 9/3/2005
Last Seen: 10/12/2006
Aliases: Imhotep

Newsgroups Days Active
Posts Threads Initiated Threads Touched
Day / Last Day 5 / 4
20 / 13 0 / 0 9 / 7
Week / Last Week 11 / 12 5 / 4 62
/
75 4 / 5 21 / 32
Month / Last Month 13 / 11 9 / 19 137
/
134 9 / 11 4 / 36
Quarter / Last Quarter 13 / 15 9 / 49 137
/
295 9 / 36 44 / 98
Year / Last Year 19 / 38 58 / 64
432
/
476 45 / 62 136 / 196

Newsgroups (Ordered by Posts, descending)
First Seen Last Seen Days Active Posts Replies
Threads
Initiated Threads Touched
microsoft.public.security
9/8/2005 10/12/2006 49 255 217
30
57
microsoft.public.security.homeusers
7/17/2006 10/12/2006 46 189 152 29
59
microsoft.public.internetexplorer.security
9/17/2005 10/12/2006 39 178 142 26
43
microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
7/17/2006 10/12/2006 39 151 115 27
48
alt.security
9/11/2005 10/10/2006 32 63 29
16
39
comp.security.misc
9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 49 14
16
37
comp.security
9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 44 10
16
34
comp.os.linux.security
7/17/2006 10/10/2006 11 13 4
5
11
comp.security.firewalls
9/22/2005 10/10/2006 9 11 2
5
10
microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general
7/29/2006 8/6/2006 2 3 3
0 1
microsoft.public.windows.server.security
9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2
0 1
comp.security.unix
10/7/2005 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
comp.security.pgp.test
8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
alt.computer.security
9/3/2005 10/3/2006 1 2 2
0 1
microsoft.public.win2000.security
9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2
0 1
sci.crypt
10/2/2006 10/9/2006 2 2 1
0 2
alt.security.pgp
8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
soc.culture.canada
10/2/2006 10/2/2006 1 1 1
0 1
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
9/11/2005 10/12/2006 1 1 1
0 1

Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

Again, I challenge you to help people with their security problems
rather
than hijack them...

I believe I do assist

Not when you hijack.


And you, not when you fragment threads

It only is fragmented when you do not know what you are doing! So from your
point of view, I guess it is....

That you can say that makes you appear to read only your threads

English please.

It is. I do not care to diagram for you.

Oh please...


As far as I have seen during the past year plus, you rarely attempt
to do so, lest it is with a "get Linux" style comment. Talk of hijack!

Like your endless rants of newsclients here in a thread about a new MVP
who
supported malware?


That topic was dead out of the starting gate.

That Microsoft gave a MVP to a spyware pusher? Not at all. If nothing else,
it signifies that the MVP does not mean much. You have one right?


However, just to reassure myself, I looked. (see below)
I notice that right about 50% of your postings under this name in
msnews hosted newsgroups in 2006 are replies in your own threads.
I wonder why.

Easy to deduce. How many time have you hijack the topic, like here,
forcing
me to try and steer the conversation back on topic for the sake of the
many
users here. What don't you investage that? Ah, I guess the truth hurts
now,
doesn't it.


I like the truth. I just do not see you displaying it much, certainly not
here/now.

The truth is you *do* hijack the topic of this and other threads. You know
as do I.

You need to get these post counts up before you attempt to make
claims over your great helpfulness in solving real problems as actually
experienced by people.

Maybe that is why you hijack posts like this one? Don't feel you can
contrube but *also* want to increase you news post counts?

Listen, I do not get evaluated for the number of news posts. I believe an
MVP does.

If I was getting evaluated for the number of news posts, I would use my
real
name, *like* *you*...


You clear do not understand how it works.

Funny, mine works flawlessly without any problems. I simply click and go.
You are having problems but, *I* don't understand?

Hahahahahahahahahahaha....

Thanks, for the chuckle!

As I see you are quite difficult to wear down, I guess just ignoring you
would be the best way to minimize your presence, ey?

I don't really care what you do. I never have. You're just learning that
now? You really are slow....

Roger, let's be honest here. Your whole rant here was not about anything
more than the fact that Microsoft messed up and gave a spyware pusher a
MVP. You being a MVP felt your had to somehow defend/protect Microsoft. I
would respect you more if you were just honest from the beginning. However,
you are not. As such, I view you, and your posts, as pretty much worthless.

In either case, ignore me if you wish. Never did care much what you did...

Im




(oh - in case you are unfamilar with the public origin of this info,
yes, one can simply click into any one of the threads to each of your
posts)


Author Profile : Metrics are for the calendar year spanning the search
date
Author:
First Seen: 9/3/2005
Last Seen: 10/12/2006
Aliases: Imhotep

Newsgroups Days Active
Posts Threads Initiated Threads Touched
Day / Last Day 5 / 4
20 / 13 0 / 0 9 / 7
Week / Last Week 11 / 12 5 / 4 62
/
75 4 / 5 21 / 32
Month / Last Month 13 / 11 9 / 19 137
/
134 9 / 11 4 / 36
Quarter / Last Quarter 13 / 15 9 / 49
137 /
295 9 / 36 44 / 98
Year / Last Year 19 / 38 58 / 64
432
/
476 45 / 62 136 / 196

Newsgroups (Ordered by Posts, descending)
First Seen Last Seen Days Active Posts Replies
Threads
Initiated Threads Touched
microsoft.public.security
9/8/2005 10/12/2006 49 255 217
30
57
microsoft.public.security.homeusers
7/17/2006 10/12/2006 46 189 152
29
59
microsoft.public.internetexplorer.security
9/17/2005 10/12/2006 39 178 142
26
43
microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
7/17/2006 10/12/2006 39 151 115
27
48
alt.security
9/11/2005 10/10/2006 32 63 29
16
39
comp.security.misc
9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 49 14
16
37
comp.security
9/17/2005 10/10/2006 26 44 10
16
34
comp.os.linux.security
7/17/2006 10/10/2006 11 13 4
5
11
comp.security.firewalls
9/22/2005 10/10/2006 9 11 2
5
10
microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general
7/29/2006 8/6/2006 2 3 3
0 1
microsoft.public.windows.server.security
9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2
0 1
comp.security.unix
10/7/2005 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
comp.security.pgp.test
8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
alt.computer.security
9/3/2005 10/3/2006 1 2 2
0 1
microsoft.public.win2000.security
9/20/2006 9/21/2006 2 2 2
0 1
sci.crypt
10/2/2006 10/9/2006 2 2 1
0 2
alt.security.pgp
8/10/2006 8/10/2006 1 2 2
0 1
soc.culture.canada
10/2/2006 10/2/2006 1 1 1
0 1
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
9/11/2005 10/12/2006 1 1 1
0 1

Leythos wrote:

In article ,
says...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...

Oh my, you truly don't understand do you??? How tired I have become
trying...

Cool, the perhaps we will wear you down eventually.

Roger, you just don't have the talent....sorry.

Remember, your inability to see understanding does
in no way indicate lack thereof.


Oh Roger. How you desperately try to sound intelligent...


I assure you, it is quite effortless

I am sure looking like a clown comes quite easy to you...

I wonder if you are related to PC BUTTS 1.


Legos,

Recess is over. Go inside.

Imhotep

Leythos wrote:

In article ,
says...
Leythos wrote:

In article ,
says...
Why don't one of you try to describe the problem so at least I
understand what your problem is? See, this whole "issue" started by a
couple of people accusing me of using a broken newsreader, etc, etc.
Now, fair is fair, if anyone starts a conversation with such rudeness
I am really not going to take them very seriously, especially when it
*is* their newsclient after all...

What about the people that don't have the group to force the follow-up
to from their ISP?

Which is exactly why I set the "followup-to" a very common generalized
newsgroup. In this case "microsoft.public.security". This newsgroup just
about all newsservers carry.

By doing what you are doing, the reply will never be seen from you and
they will never be able to reply properly.


Read above...This would only be true if I set the followup-to to a
specialized, and hence non-popular, newsgroup...

Except you don't know what groups are carried by what ISP, and you state
you are trying to reach the masses with your message, but you don't seem
to care that the non-technical will not be able to properly reply to
your message due to the way you break the chain for your own personal
pleasure.


Legos,

Again, read my post. I intentionally place a very common group in within
the "followup-to" field. In fact the most common newsgroup. Did you not
even read my previous post?

Im

Leythos wrote:

In article ,
says...
Leythos wrote:

In article ,
says...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...
Roger Abell [MVP] wrote:

"imhotep" wrote in message
...

Oh my, you truly don't understand do you??? How tired I have
become trying...

Cool, the perhaps we will wear you down eventually.

Roger, you just don't have the talent....sorry.

Remember, your inability to see understanding does
in no way indicate lack thereof.


Oh Roger. How you desperately try to sound intelligent...


I assure you, it is quite effortless

I am sure looking like a clown comes quite easy to you...

I wonder if you are related to PC BUTTS 1.


Legos,

Recess is over. Go inside.

At least I'm not immature enough to not spell your name properly.



Legos,

So, ah, "...PC BUTTS 1" is mature? Nothing worse than a hypocrite.

Go away the amateur hour is over.

Im