If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
James
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:14:12 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:13:49 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: chrisv m Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:04:37 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Diesel wrote: This is the full version; very long. (thousands of lines, snipped) This is what happens, folks, when one don't have the wisdom to ignore worthless trolls, like the "Snit" thing. In my own defense, Snit arrived to alt.computer.workshop ahead of those who could warn us about him. I'd already began interacting with him by the time the warnings were issued. I foolishly opted to ignore them and pursue the interaction. In hindsight, that was a mistake on my part. As the result has turned out being what this thread is an example of. And that is how snit sets up his snit circus in whatever group he happens to be attacking ATM. At first snit seems harmless enough but it doesn't take long for him to start his trickery combined with dishonest snipping, mis-quoting, and pathological lying. I noticed all of those actions when I first engaged him - we were discussing 3d printer technologies. He asked if I could determine what technology was in use for a particular set of miniature figurines. After a bit of back and forth, I realized he was clueless and had severe reading comprehension issues. He continued trying to claim we "Agreed" on things that we weren't even half way towards the middle on. Usually, the "agreed" was things I wrote about that he didn't understand, and that his response really had nothing to do with. He also "agreed" that I didn't know what technology was being used, but I didn't make any such statement; infact, I provided him the correct answer from the vendors site. He didn't know what technology was in use, and when I showed him he could have answered his own question, that's when he started trying to twist things around the first time. He pulled more **** with the AZ thread, and that's where he really let his reading comprehension issue see the light of day. He took the simple instructions I wrote, misunderstood them all, and took a parting shot at me for his failure to comprehend because I specified the ascii code table you should be using for the purposes of the explanation as I provided it. When I noticed he was doing that and called him out for it, he proceeded to try and turn things around into me not knowing what ASCII even was. Er, I've been writing software that made computers do "things" since I was single digit age. Why wouldn't I have a firm grasp of what ASCII is by the time I interacted with Snit, 30+ something years after the fact? This is why ignoring snit from day one drives him to crawling up the walls. Heh, There's some truth to that statement. He started writing this bull****: http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100 Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was merely the compiled code he had: ----- Do you think when you disassemble something that you're provided the original source code that was compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're given looks nothing like the original source code, but it still tells you *everything* about the program. ----- So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My guess: he will NEVER say. *** end I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output - atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the "compiled code". Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come close to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation. While I had him kf'd. When I ask about this post, Snit continues to claim I 'misunderstood' him. I don't see how I could have possibly done that. His post used very specific words, and like most words, they actually do have a very specific meaning. According to what Snit wrote, and going only by what he wrote, there should be atleast! one post calling me out about the bot, and atleast one more post where I clarified I had the compiled code. The section of a post I wrote, that he shared for 'proof' has nothing to do with the bot itself, and isn't proof of any kind. It's the 3rd paragraph of a reply I wrote, calling out his lack of actual programming knowledge in front of everyone else. I guess he doesn't handle being wrong and shown to be wrong in public well? Some people with large egos do suffer with that issue. He went out of his way to write that story about me, all because he didn't like my kf'ing him and continuing to mention him with other conversations. My bad. But, he's a damn troll, and a liar, and he's gone well out of his way to show that to not only myself, but damn near anyone with an IQ above that of say, a monkey. Mode 2 is where snit will suddenly "discover" that he made a minor error and misread something his current victim (that's you) wrote. At this point snit will offer a half assed apology for his "unintentional mistake". That won't be accepted. I've been on him for months now, slowly adding more pressure inside the vice I've got his head snuggled in. G I continue getting more and more specific with my questions. I like watching him squirm and try to weasel his way out of my trap. He really picked the wrong one this time, and he's going to learn that, one way or another, he's going to learn. G If the victim is foolish enough to fall for this ruse, and some have, snit will make sure to plaster all over the group comments such as "victim and I reached a solution to our petty disagreement, and I commend him for admitting we were both wrong on this". Yes, well, I'm not going to accept anything but a full blown apology at this point where Snit, rightfully, takes all of the blame. He's the one who went out of his way to write the bull**** story, he's the only one responsible for it's existance, he'll be the only one who can apologize and take full responsibility for it, or it doesn't go away; it'll just keep coming up, like a bad mcdonalds burger. (assuming they ever served a decent one) This isn't my first rodeo with a troll. I've been 0wning David Brooks for years, I don't have a problem making a two for one combo deal. Notice how snit drags his victim into the admission of a mistake being made so IOW snit AND his victim both screwed up. Yes, I have noticed this routine tried with others, and he gets mixed results with it. He won't "wear me down" about this. I'm not going to let it go, until I get that ****ing apology. No compromise, no "agreement", an apology is the only thing that will get me off his ass about that series of lies he told. And the longer he delays, the more of his lies I'll find and question him over, right here, in public. I'll continue getting specific with my questions as I isolate more lies he's written (he's been here for months now, he's provided all kinds of material I can use) about me, too. With me, the longer he takes to comply, the hotter the kitchen is going to get. Snit being the extreme narcissist that he is has never been capable of admitting that he is solely to blame for some error being made so he attempts to convert it into a group error so that the blame is shared. Yep. In this case, there's no blame to be shared. No blame to be passed around. No misunderstanding on anyones part, at this point, either. I won't even let him use that excuse as a way out at this point, I already offered it; he declined. Now, my questions are more specific. A misunderstanding didn't take place. Snit told a series of lies, and I'm asking for an apology about them: http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100 Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was merely the compiled code he had: ----- Do you think when you disassemble something that you're provided the original source code that was compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're given looks nothing like the original source code, but it still tells you *everything* about the program. ----- So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My guess: he will NEVER say. *** I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output - atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the "compiled code". Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come close to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation. As you can see, Snit used very specific words in his claim; I've since began narrowing the focus of my beam and asking about them, specifically. He made very specific claims, there should be no problem with him finding the MIDs to the posts to back them up, right? Watch for it, because after snit tires of his current rainman routine, he will shift to the profuse apology routine, Mode 2. He's already been given the chance, multiple times now, to do the right thing. He declined to do so, he tried to twist it into my having a severe reading comprehension issue (I don't), and he's tried to claim that he didn't lie about anything, I "misunderstood". I misnderstood, nothing. And he did lie, and i'm going to continue requesting that apology, a full apology for the lie, not a misunderstanding, but a series of lies, he wrote about me concerning the google flood bot. You can bet your left testicle on it. I'd rather not bust up a matching set. G -- A cat is only domestic in so far as suits its own needs. |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
Snit
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:31:30 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 7/24/20 6:37 AM, David_B wrote: On 24/07/2020 13:14, James wrote: Â* And this is snit's goal and has been from the day he appears in a given group. You may be interested to learn that I INVITED Snit to join me here. Our views on many things differ, be he's a straight-forward and honest family man who has helped me in so many different ways. :-) What about you, James? Where have YOU sprung from? Interestingly, you only the second other person I've ever met online who uses blocknews.net as their newsserver. It's very good, isn't it? Tell me how you know Snit so well? Another "new" person who sounds exactly like Carroll and tells the same lies Carroll does. And Diesel will pretend to not see that it is almost surely Carroll. Why do you continue involving me in your nonsense accusations? I wonder if they both know how predictable their trolling is? It's not hard to predict that I'd take an issue with your lying on me. You already know I have a problem with you for doing that, previously. A problem that's still unresolved: http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100 Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was merely the compiled code he had: ----- Do you think when you disassemble something that you're provided the original source code that was compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're given looks nothing like the original source code, but it still tells you *everything* about the program. ----- So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My guess: he will NEVER say. I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output - atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the "compiled code". Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come close to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation. Where are those posts, Snit? -- Hapiness is a warm stone circle. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
Ron Riggins
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:02:39 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:44:45 +0000, Arlen Holder wrote: Yet, Alan Baker is as Dunning Kruger Quadrant 1 as is Snit, Arlen, I'm susprised various people in acf and other newsgroups are still electing to feed you. especially when you go and insult people as you're doing here. Did I somehow get removed from your list of people you think don't know anything? If so, please add me back. I don't want to correspond with you, I was content with you having ****ed off. I'd like things to go back to that. I credit snit with encouraging me to learn how to use slrn. His trolling an massive sock puppetry got so bad that it was getting tiresome setting up kill filters using 40tude Dialog. Ron, Just be glad you aren't a working resident of AZ. If you were, you'd be partially footing the bill for Snit to stay home all day and troll around usenet. We're all technically, helping to foot the bill for him and those just like him, but, if you live in the same state, you're paying more out for it than I am. That actually bugs me a bit from time to time, too. I work for a living, uncle sam doesn't pay me to sit on my ass and **** off all day. Uncle sam rewards me by working for a living by taking monies from me to give to people like snit. Damn morals and work ethics I was raised with. As much as I'd like a free to ****off day, I wouldn't be productive because I know it's not right and I wouldn't be able to chill out and relax. I was raised to earn my money, by working for it. With slrn under Linux it's trivial to kill file snit and easily add his various socks as they appear. It's **** easy with Xnews under Windows or Wine if used on linux, too. The usenet bot is pathetic, I really don't know why Snit is so interested in it. His IRC bot isn't much better - they're both a terrible example of programming; neither should be used as a programming skill level demonstration; unless you want people to think you just started the semester in college first year, programing. And he took exceptional offense over something I wrote concerning the ease in which his efforts could be duplicated by those of us who have real experience writing software. He likes to remind people that he's not a programmer, but is quick as hell, to try and correct people, like myself, apd, etc, who are programmers over something one of us wrote about, of all things, programming. It doesn't make sense to me that a normally thinking person who's already stated they aren't experts in such and such a field, would proceed to try and talk down to people who actually are experts n such a such fields. But, that's exactly what Snit does. And it's not a one time event. I've been on usenet for about 15 years and the only person I have encountered who rivals snit for the title of uber troll is Tholen and maybe that sicko with the goatse site. Give David Brooks a little time, he'll convince you he should be on your list too. And you'll ask yourself why he isn't already once he does. The only person who has so much trouble follow him/her everywhere he/she lands is Hillary Clinton who seems to have a talent for associating with people who eventually kill themselves. Hey, maybe we can introduce snit to Hillary? vbg! The question then becomes, who will go first? And the next question is obviously going to be, does it really matter? vbg -- Any sufficiently advanced technology looks like magic. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
David_B
news in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 24/07/2020 17:32, Snit wrote: On 7/24/20 5:07 AM, David_B wrote: On 24/07/2020 08:46, Snit wrote: I just worry for you. I sincerely hope you are okay. It's so good to see someone write pleasant and meaningful things here in ACW. Thanks for caring. :-) I suspect Diesel will take it as my being sarcastic -- but I am not. He is clearly becoming unhinged, and as much as I do poke fun at his tantrum a fair amount, I also am sincere in hoping he is OK. I am truly impressed that you are not in the least bit fearful of Dustin - someone who has the unique ability to completely destroy the life of you and your family. Why are you attacking me like this, David? He's like a *God* in the APVC (HAVP -sp) scene (whatever THAT is!) hpavc. I'm not a god, i'm known and respected. There's a difference. -- Faith is good, but scepticism is better. - Giuseppe Verdi |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
Snit
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:09:31 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 7/24/20 5:59 AM, Diesel wrote: David_B Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:18:17 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 24/07/2020 08:13, Diesel wrote: chrisv Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:04:37 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Diesel wrote: This is the full version; very long. (thousands of lines, snipped) This is what happens, folks, when one don't have the wisdom to ignore worthless trolls, like the "Snit" thing. In my own defense, Snit arrived to alt.computer.workshop ahead of those who could warn us about him. I'd already began interacting with him by the time the warnings were issued. I foolishly opted to ignore them and pursue the interaction. In hindsight, that was a mistake on my part. As the result has turned out being what this thread is an example of. *Everyone*, who has been paying attention, already knows that the "Snit" thing is a pathological liar. There is no need to convince anyone. My intentions weren't so much as trying to convince anyone vs defending my good name. Snit wrote the following, but, none of it's true: You don't HAVE a good name, Dustin. :-( Heh. When you seperate the truth from the bull**** written about me, David, I actually have a pretty decent rep on both sides of the fence. And yet when you showed yourself to be less than honorable you added to the evidence by lying and insisting I was blindly trusting David and not doing what I was -- just reading your comments and understanding what they say about your actions. You never did explain why you told that lie about me -- but I am mature enough to not need you to in order to move forward in peace. Snit, for what it's worth, I find your desperate efforts to twist the subject concerning your efforts to lie on me around, somewhat amusing. You actually think more than one? of the regulars here still trusts anything you write at face value. I would like to take this opportunity to tell you, with a big smile on my face, that you've probably been in the dog house here for awhile now, and you pretty much sealed your fate with it when you continued to play games about the lies you wrote he http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100 Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was merely the compiled code he had: ----- Do you think when you disassemble something that you're provided the original source code that was compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're given looks nothing like the original source code, but it still tells you *everything* about the program. ----- So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My guess: he will NEVER say. I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output - atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the "compiled code". Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come close to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation. I told you, didn't I.. continuing to dance around what I was asking wasn't going to benefit you, no matter how much wiggling and flossing of your ass cheeks you did. It would have better far better for you to come out and meet that head on, but you being you, opted to duck and dodge and spin instead. It didn't work. You aren't in a newsgroup full of primarily stupid, easily conned and otherwise gullible individuals. David Brooks is the noted exception. Can you imagine growing to that level of maturity? Is it something you are interested in doing? Snit, let's stop projecting maturity issues around. You seem to be lacking, significantly in that dept too: http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100 Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was merely the compiled code he had: ----- Do you think when you disassemble something that you're provided the original source code that was compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're given looks nothing like the original source code, but it still tells you *everything* about the program. ----- So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My guess: he will NEVER say. I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output - atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the "compiled code". Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come close to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation. -- "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words. On occasion English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary." -- James Nicoll, rasfw |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
Snit
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:41:25 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 7/24/20 1:02 PM, Ron Riggins wrote: Other than those 2 and that's really a toss, snit is in a league of his own when it comes to idiocy, dishonesty and truly a waste of human life. I bet Diesel is not coherent enough to understand why the sock I am replying to is almost certainly Carroll. Come on, Diesel... show you have even basic understanding. I bet you won't. Your efforts to troll are a very nice example of that superior maturity you've claimed you have, there, Snit. Should I be impressed with that lame as **** all attempt to be insulting? And what, specifically, is not accurate concerning you in that post? Be specific. -- The cats let us live here. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
On 26/07/2020 21:17, Diesel wrote:
Snit has quite the reputation in cola, David. Maybe you should bring yourself upto speed? If I want to know something about Snit I ask him. He's never yet failed to provide a truthful and straight-forward answer. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
On 26/07/2020 21:17, Diesel wrote:
David_B news in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 24/07/2020 17:32, Snit wrote: On 7/24/20 5:07 AM, David_B wrote: On 24/07/2020 08:46, Snit wrote: I just worry for you. I sincerely hope you are okay. It's so good to see someone write pleasant and meaningful things here in ACW. Thanks for caring. :-) I suspect Diesel will take it as my being sarcastic -- but I am not. He is clearly becoming unhinged, and as much as I do poke fun at his tantrum a fair amount, I also am sincere in hoping he is OK. I am truly impressed that you are not in the least bit fearful of Dustin - someone who has the unique ability to completely destroy the life of you and your family. Why are you attacking me like this, David? It's important for Snit to understand how ruthless you can be. What makes you think this post was an attack? Have you lost your prowess? He's like a *God* in the APVC (HAVP -sp) scene (whatever THAT is!) hpavc. I'm not a god, i'm known and respected. There's a difference. Thanks for the reminder. https://caughq.wordpress.com/category/hpavc/ Who else might I know there, Diesel? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
David_B
Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:23:03 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 26/07/2020 21:17, Diesel wrote: David_B news GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 24/07/2020 17:32, Snit wrote: On 7/24/20 5:07 AM, David_B wrote: On 24/07/2020 08:46, Snit wrote: I just worry for you. I sincerely hope you are okay. It's so good to see someone write pleasant and meaningful things here in ACW. Thanks for caring. :-) I suspect Diesel will take it as my being sarcastic -- but I am not. He is clearly becoming unhinged, and as much as I do poke fun at his tantrum a fair amount, I also am sincere in hoping he is OK. I am truly impressed that you are not in the least bit fearful of Dustin - someone who has the unique ability to completely destroy the life of you and your family. Why are you attacking me like this, David? It's important for Snit to understand how ruthless you can be. He seems very confident where he thinks he stands with me, David: Message-ID: As far as any tantrum is concerned, uhh, no, I've just wasted months now effectively, asking for an apology that you owe me for some lies you wrote about me. You are desperate to have me lie and say I agree with your perspective -- which of course, if you could understand what you read, you would *** end David, how many months did I let Jenn (Muggles) go off with nonsense like that about me before I took a big chunk out of her arse and slapped her around like a total bitch all over usenet, and someplaces well outside of usenet? I ask because I forgot. It was awhile though, right? I mean, I did take the time, just as I have with Snit, trying to educate her didn't I? Do you remember how much time eagle got to do his **** before I umm, did some things which resulted in a not so fun time for him? Do you by chance remember how many times both of them tried to get the law dogs on me? Ah well, I don't suppose it matters. Snit thinks i've been blowing smoke up his ass the entire time anyway. I suspect if you told him the truth (heh, if you do, it's because there's something in it for you) which is that I've been 100% honest with him this entire time.. I didn't even come close to trying to BS him. He'd disagree with you, or claim you misunderstood something or other. He wouldn't accept the facts for what they are, David. No, Snit actually thinks he is a peer of mine, that we're actually on the same level, etc. I doubt you can convince him otherwise at this point in time, David. You propped him up with a comment you wrote awhile back, and he's not about to let either of us show he's wrong now. He's far too invested. The only way he will learn and understand differently is when he goes far enough with me that he becomes another name on my wall of stupid ****ers who should have known better, but had to be taught later. And, as with eagle, and jenn, it will be your fault at the end of the day. You mislead them just as you did Snit concerning me. You are fully responsible for what I suspect will eventually have to be done to settle things properly. I'm simply defending myself and my reputation. What makes you think this post was an attack? Have you lost your prowess? David, I considered it to be an attack because I read it with a bit of sarcasm to it. If that wasn't intentional on your part, then I apologize. You haven't taken the time before to do any warning for him, why begin now? He's like a *God* in the APVC (HAVP -sp) scene (whatever THAT is!) hpavc. I'm not a god, i'm known and respected. There's a difference. Thanks for the reminder. https://caughq.wordpress.com/category/hpavc/ Who else might I know there, Diesel? Oh, when you want something from me, you're using the proper posting nym. When you want to be an arsemunching cretin (which is what you are most of the time during your waking hours), you pretend to show a little respect..When it becomes real, I might actually humour some of your questions. -- I'd rather have a life than a living. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
On 7/26/20 3:11 PM, David_B wrote:
On 26/07/2020 21:17, Diesel wrote: Snit has quite the reputation in cola, David. Maybe you should bring yourself upto speed? If I want to know something about Snit I ask him. He's never yet failed to provide a truthful and straight-forward answer. And I will for most people -- though the honest answer might be "none of your business" for some personal questions, such as when Carroll pushes lies about my health in an effort to get the focus on me and off his obvious trolling. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
David_B
Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:11:50 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 26/07/2020 21:17, Diesel wrote: Snit has quite the reputation in cola, David. Maybe you should bring yourself upto speed? If I want to know something about Snit I ask him. Okay. He's never yet failed to provide a truthful and straight-forward answer. Can you provide evidence of that? He has a very well known track record of doing the opposite. He's even tried it with me, David. I know you won't say anything to him about it, because we're not friends, but even your rather dumbass knows what he's doing, and can see it just as well as FTR and Apd. And yes, David, as you know, they are both aware of his lack of honesty and integrity. They're also well aware of his profound reading comprehension problem. He shouldn't be on usenet with the nearly illiterate reading level he's shown us. -- He who places head in sand, will get kicked in the end! |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
On Aug 4, 2020 at 6:12:43 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
Snit Sun, 26 Jul 2020 20:23:47 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 7/26/20 1:17 PM, Diesel wrote: Snit Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:09:31 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] Snit, for what it's worth, Until you learn to understand what you read, there is no reason to think your comments are worth ANYTHING other, perhaps, than a source of amusement. Snit, I'm not the one who's already demonstrated they have severe reading comprehension issues. Not that you have bene able to understand, despite so many examples being shown. The irony is amazing. .... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
On 05/08/2020 02:12, Gremlin wrote:
Can you provide evidence of that? Of course. Just read ANY of his responses to me in ACW. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Snit busted - Lied about the bot
David_B wrote:
On 05/08/2020 02:12, Gremlin wrote: Can you provide evidence of that? Of course. Just read ANY of his responses to me in ACW. Read and understand. That second part seems his bigger challenge. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|