If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri URL test site query
Diesel wrote:
Mike Easter So David managed to fool three? of you into thinking he's another poster who presents a harmless and valid question or a bot copying and pasting text elsewhere. Considering the small amount of us who've posted in this thread so far, that's not too bad an average for David. Either I've under estimated him by a significant margin here, or, several of you are extremely gullible people. I really doubt it's the former. At the time I posted, I thought I was 'replying' to message content of a known SC troll I'm familiar with in linux ng/s. In fact, I have its From: as a filter to mark as read but not to make 'disappear'. I make 'replies' to a group at large; like a bulletin board. My replies are NOT a 'personal' message to whoever or whatever created the words which I use as the basis for a message I post as a 'reply'. In that sense, my message is not actually a reply (to the entity/persona) per se; it is a message to the group using some context from the message I'm citing. Even if the message had been by a DB From:, I would have replied the same. -- Mike Easter |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri URL test site query
Mike Easter
Sat, 26 May 2018 16:33:52 GMT in alt.comp.os.windows-10, wrote: Diesel wrote: Mike Easter So David managed to fool three? of you into thinking he's another poster who presents a harmless and valid question or a bot copying and pasting text elsewhere. Considering the small amount of us who've posted in this thread so far, that's not too bad an average for David. Either I've under estimated him by a significant margin here, or, several of you are extremely gullible people. I really doubt it's the former. At the time I posted, I thought I was 'replying' to message content of a known SC troll I'm familiar with in linux ng/s. In fact, I have its From: as a filter to mark as read but not to make 'disappear'. Understood. I make 'replies' to a group at large; like a bulletin board. My replies are NOT a 'personal' message to whoever or whatever created the words which I use as the basis for a message I post as a 'reply'. Also understood. I have a tendency of doing the same thing myself. In that sense, my message is not actually a reply (to the entity/persona) per se; it is a message to the group using some context from the message I'm citing. I understand. It's why I presented the ? after indicating possibly three. I was on the fence with regard to you because I suspected your replies might not be specifically only for the person you responded to. Even if the message had been by a DB From:, I would have replied the same. I may have given you the impression in the past that I have some sort of problem with you. Allow me to make it clear that despite possible confusion as a result of some of my.. less than stellar posts written in reply to something you wrote, it's not the case. I actually respect you and enjoy our occasional banter. -- To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php ================================================== = No man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money. --Samuel Johnson |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri URL test site query
On 25-May-18 11:51 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
Steve Carroll wrote: On 25/05/18 10:49, VanguardLH wrote: Steve Carroll wrote: Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this? "Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden" https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net# Is there something wrong with the Sucuri tool or is something wrong with Tekrider.net? Apparently to get more details means having to sign-up at Securi. Go read: https://sucuri.net/website-security-platform/signup Then you'll see Securi is using their so-called web site scan as a lure to get users (perhaps only the site owner) to buy into their site scan service. Dump Securi. They're a lureware site. Sucuri is much promoted on Facebook. I was not aware that anyone could submit negative feedback upon a Facebook member. Facebook ratings are WORTHLESS. You can only vote positively. You cannot vote negatively. The number of positive votes is not tallied against a count of users that could vote, would vote, or voted Nay. It's the stupidity of yes-only voting. That's like no one ever complaining at a restaurant. The manager only knows of the glowing reviews by a few of his patrons while not how many were disappointed with their experience. That's not quite what was meant. They ADVERTISE heavily. The stupidity of a Likes button is pervasive. When trying to read product reviews, lots of BOOBS think a review is just a Like post ("great", "liked it", "better than the rest", "love it"). Those are NOT reviews and exhibit voting by morons that haven't a clue how to write an actual review. Even worse is that sites will rank a product based on voting but the users are allowed to vote without qualifying (commenting) why they voted that way; for example, there could 100 5-point Likes but only 2 bothered to write a review of which you're very lucky if one of those actually wrote a review. Drive-by yes-voting sucks. A voting scheme of Likes is meaningless without contrasting Dislikes. Obviously such voting will NEVER reflect the entire populace that visits a Facebook member's page. I agree with you! They employ a lot of people too. 228 (according to Hoover's). Doesn't seem very high considering they want to present a worldwide image plus not very much to perform all the research and analysis on security issues. The own site is more reserved: https://sucuri.net/company/ says on 125 employees. Since that shows 28 corporate offices, that's only an average of 4-5 employees per office which is about the minimum what you need to have an office with "staff": a [regional or office] manager, secretary/receptionist, and a couple grunts so the manager has a purpose. Alas, no way to know how large and often they use contractors. Some "offices" may merely be a presence, a room in a building, manned by just 1 person. All understood! In passing, have you ever come across the script which was supposedly found on the Tekrider site? I took a screenshot:- https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4...29.tiff?d l=0 -- D. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri URL test site query
David B. STALKER wrote:
On 25-May-18 11:51 PM, VanguardLH wrote: {many lines} All understood! ...but forgotten by you after twenty minutes - your best attention span. In passing, have you ever come across the script which was supposedly found on the Tekrider site? I took a screenshot:- https://www.dropbox.fake-news I'm sure VanguardLH is well aware of you and your spreading of LIES all over Usenet. -- -bts |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Sucuri URL test site query
On Sun, 27 May 2018 14:32:08 +0100, "David B."
wrote: In passing, have you ever come across the script which was supposedly found on the Tekrider site? I took a screenshot:- That's strange. On more than one occasion, you've claimed to have understood the reasons for seeing what you think you saw, (faulty tool + ignorant user of said tool), but now here you are again, trying to drag someone new into your Alice in Wonderland world. Give it up, David, the horse died long ago. There's nothing left but hide and a few bones. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|