A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Windows 10 » Windows 10 Help Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sucuri URL test site query



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old May 26th 18, 05:33 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Mike Easter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,064
Default Sucuri URL test site query

Diesel wrote:
Mike Easter

So David managed to fool three? of you into thinking he's another
poster who presents a harmless and valid question or a bot copying
and pasting text elsewhere. Considering the small amount of us who've
posted in this thread so far, that's not too bad an average for
David. Either I've under estimated him by a significant margin here,
or, several of you are extremely gullible people. I really doubt it's
the former.


At the time I posted, I thought I was 'replying' to message content of a
known SC troll I'm familiar with in linux ng/s. In fact, I have its
From: as a filter to mark as read but not to make 'disappear'.

I make 'replies' to a group at large; like a bulletin board. My replies
are NOT a 'personal' message to whoever or whatever created the words
which I use as the basis for a message I post as a 'reply'.

In that sense, my message is not actually a reply (to the
entity/persona) per se; it is a message to the group using some context
from the message I'm citing.

Even if the message had been by a DB From:, I would have replied the same.



--
Mike Easter
Ads
  #17  
Old May 27th 18, 06:08 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Diesel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 937
Default Sucuri URL test site query

Mike Easter
Sat, 26 May 2018 16:33:52 GMT
in alt.comp.os.windows-10, wrote:

Diesel wrote:
Mike Easter

So David managed to fool three? of you into thinking he's another
poster who presents a harmless and valid question or a bot
copying and pasting text elsewhere. Considering the small amount
of us who've posted in this thread so far, that's not too bad an
average for David. Either I've under estimated him by a
significant margin here, or, several of you are extremely
gullible people. I really doubt it's the former.


At the time I posted, I thought I was 'replying' to message
content of a known SC troll I'm familiar with in linux ng/s. In
fact, I have its From: as a filter to mark as read but not to make
'disappear'.


Understood.

I make 'replies' to a group at large; like a bulletin board. My
replies are NOT a 'personal' message to whoever or whatever
created the words which I use as the basis for a message I post as
a 'reply'.


Also understood. I have a tendency of doing the same thing myself.

In that sense, my message is not actually a reply (to the
entity/persona) per se; it is a message to the group using some
context from the message I'm citing.


I understand. It's why I presented the ? after indicating possibly
three. I was on the fence with regard to you because I suspected your
replies might not be specifically only for the person you responded
to.

Even if the message had been by a DB From:, I would have replied
the same.


I may have given you the impression in the past that I have some sort
of problem with you. Allow me to make it clear that despite possible
confusion as a result of some of my.. less than stellar posts written
in reply to something you wrote, it's not the case. I actually
respect you and enjoy our occasional banter.


--
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
================================================== =
No man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money. --Samuel Johnson
  #18  
Old May 27th 18, 02:32 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
David B.[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 195
Default Sucuri URL test site query

On 25-May-18 11:51 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
Steve Carroll wrote:

On 25/05/18 10:49, VanguardLH wrote:
Steve Carroll wrote:

Why does the Sucuri URL test site now report this?

"Site returning error (40x): HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden"

https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.tekrider.net#

Is there something wrong with the Sucuri tool or is something wrong with
Tekrider.net?

Apparently to get more details means having to sign-up at Securi. Go
read:

https://sucuri.net/website-security-platform/signup

Then you'll see Securi is using their so-called web site scan as a lure
to get users (perhaps only the site owner) to buy into their site scan
service. Dump Securi. They're a lureware site.


Sucuri is much promoted on Facebook.


I was not aware that anyone could submit negative feedback upon a
Facebook member. Facebook ratings are WORTHLESS. You can only vote
positively. You cannot vote negatively. The number of positive votes
is not tallied against a count of users that could vote, would vote, or
voted Nay. It's the stupidity of yes-only voting. That's like no one
ever complaining at a restaurant. The manager only knows of the glowing
reviews by a few of his patrons while not how many were disappointed
with their experience.


That's not quite what was meant. They ADVERTISE heavily.

The stupidity of a Likes button is pervasive. When trying to read
product reviews, lots of BOOBS think a review is just a Like post
("great", "liked it", "better than the rest", "love it"). Those are NOT
reviews and exhibit voting by morons that haven't a clue how to write an
actual review. Even worse is that sites will rank a product based on
voting but the users are allowed to vote without qualifying (commenting)
why they voted that way; for example, there could 100 5-point Likes but
only 2 bothered to write a review of which you're very lucky if one of
those actually wrote a review. Drive-by yes-voting sucks.

A voting scheme of Likes is meaningless without contrasting Dislikes.
Obviously such voting will NEVER reflect the entire populace that visits
a Facebook member's page.


I agree with you!

They employ a lot of people too.


228 (according to Hoover's). Doesn't seem very high considering they
want to present a worldwide image plus not very much to perform all the
research and analysis on security issues. The own site is more
reserved: https://sucuri.net/company/ says on 125 employees. Since that
shows 28 corporate offices, that's only an average of 4-5 employees per
office which is about the minimum what you need to have an office with
"staff": a [regional or office] manager, secretary/receptionist, and a
couple grunts so the manager has a purpose. Alas, no way to know how
large and often they use contractors. Some "offices" may merely be a
presence, a room in a building, manned by just 1 person.


All understood!

In passing, have you ever come across the script which was supposedly
found on the Tekrider site? I took a screenshot:-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nj382qhv4...29.tiff?d l=0

--
D.

  #19  
Old May 27th 18, 04:12 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Beauregard T. Shagnasty[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 137
Default Sucuri URL test site query

David B. STALKER wrote:

On 25-May-18 11:51 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
{many lines}


All understood!


...but forgotten by you after twenty minutes - your best attention span.

In passing, have you ever come across the script which was supposedly
found on the Tekrider site? I took a screenshot:-

https://www.dropbox.fake-news


I'm sure VanguardLH is well aware of you and your spreading of LIES all
over Usenet.

--
-bts
  #20  
Old May 27th 18, 04:19 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Char Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,449
Default Sucuri URL test site query

On Sun, 27 May 2018 14:32:08 +0100, "David B."
wrote:

In passing, have you ever come across the script which was supposedly
found on the Tekrider site? I took a screenshot:-


That's strange. On more than one occasion, you've claimed to have
understood the reasons for seeing what you think you saw, (faulty tool +
ignorant user of said tool), but now here you are again, trying to drag
someone new into your Alice in Wonderland world. Give it up, David, the
horse died long ago. There's nothing left but hide and a few bones.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.