A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows XP » Hardware and Windows XP
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

XP setup vs. partition table on secondary master



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 16th 06, 03:23 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment,microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware
No_Name
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default XP setup vs. partition table on secondary master

I have lost my E: partition(table) twice after running windows setup.
First loss occured when I tried to repair the Windows installation and
the second happened after a complete reinstall. When the setup finishes
I'm left with two volumes (C: and D, the third disk is reporting
unallocated space.
In the meantime I've found out that the partition can be brought to
life using small program called testdisk, but I'm still curious to know
why this happens.

It's a default setup, with C: as target, nothing special.
IDE 0:0 - C: (maxtor 80)
IDE 0:1 - D: (seagate 160)
IDE 1:0 - E: (maxtor 300) !!
IDE 1:1 - F: (DVD)
All jumpers double checked.

Also, the setup reports the problem drive on same bus location as the
primary master.

Thanks for any help.

Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.