![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is possible that some sort of malware is un-registering the Volume
Shadow Copy service, and, as a matter of course, I would run both MRT.exe and MalwareBytes (both "full" scan - not the "quick"). This would explain the behaviour. What service pack are you running - if you have not already done so, would you consider upgrading to service pack 3 ??...... Windows XP Service Pack 3 Network Installation Package for IT Professionals and Developers (316.4MB) http://www.microsoft.com/downloadS/d...displaylang=en Windows XP Service Pack 3 - ISO-9660 CD Image File (544.9MB) http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en == Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-) "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote in message ... In message , Twayne writes: [] Having read all your reponses to date here, it sounds very much like you Are you sure you have done so, because: 1. it is not my AV, but the OS's own trap, that is objecting. You know how when you add new hardware, and the system asks for a driver, and you load the driver that came with it, as often as not you get a popup warning you that said driver is not "Microsoft signed" or something like that. What was happening was that - despite not having added any new hardware - the "new hardware found" thing was popping up (saying the new hardware was this "... shadow copy"), and when I let it find drivers for it, the "not signed" box popped up. 2. I already had several restore points present; presumably the shadow copy thing must have already been there in order to make those. So why is it popping up again? [] just won't do it. A good firewall (ZoneAlarm?), a good AV package (not I have a firewall (plus what's in the routers of course). Avira) and good malware detectors are the "norm" for protection. Some will claim that programs like Super AntiMalware & such are all that's needed; don't beleive them. Many programs may catch many of them, but no single program yet will catch all of them; there are just too many of them and increasing every day. Agreed. (How many of each [AV, firewall, detector] - and which ones - do _you_ run?) HTH, Twayne` (Why the lines at the end?) -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf If vegetarians eat vegetables,..beware of humanitarians! |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What I was saying was; that at times, when you A the "New Hardware
wizard" popping-up to re-install the service, could indicate that "Volume Shadow Copy" had [at that point] been un-registered. However, obviously, if you are using the System Restore or NT Backup utilities normally, then the "Volume Shadow Copy" service is registered properly. Nonetheless, it could indicate some malware / virus on the system, even if the I effect of having to re-install the service doesn't happen all the time and is quite intermittent. I still recommend that you do a [full] scan with MRT.exe and Malwarebytes as soon as is practicable == Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-) "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote in message ... In message , Twayne writes: [] Having read all your reponses to date here, it sounds very much like you Are you sure you have done so, because: 1. it is not my AV, but the OS's own trap, that is objecting. You know how when you add new hardware, and the system asks for a driver, and you load the driver that came with it, as often as not you get a popup warning you that said driver is not "Microsoft signed" or something like that. What was happening was that - despite not having added any new hardware - the "new hardware found" thing was popping up (saying the new hardware was this "... shadow copy"), and when I let it find drivers for it, the "not signed" box popped up. 2. I already had several restore points present; presumably the shadow copy thing must have already been there in order to make those. So why is it popping up again? [] just won't do it. A good firewall (ZoneAlarm?), a good AV package (not I have a firewall (plus what's in the routers of course). Avira) and good malware detectors are the "norm" for protection. Some will claim that programs like Super AntiMalware & such are all that's needed; don't beleive them. Many programs may catch many of them, but no single program yet will catch all of them; there are just too many of them and increasing every day. Agreed. (How many of each [AV, firewall, detector] - and which ones - do _you_ run?) HTH, Twayne` (Why the lines at the end?) -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf If vegetarians eat vegetables,..beware of humanitarians! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In ,
J. P. Gilliver (John) typed: In message , Twayne writes: [] Having read all your reponses to date here, it sounds very much like you Are you sure you have done so, because: 1. it is not my AV, but the OS's own trap, that is objecting. You know how when you add new hardware, and the system asks for a driver, and you load the driver that came with it, as often as not you get a popup warning you that said driver is not "Microsoft signed" or something like that. What was happening was that - despite not having added any new hardware - the "new hardware found" thing was popping up (saying the new hardware was this "... shadow copy"), and when I let it find drivers for it, the "not signed" box popped up. 2. I already had several restore points present; presumably the shadow copy thing must have already been there in order to make those. So why is it popping up again? [] just won't do it. A good firewall (ZoneAlarm?), a good AV package (not I have a firewall (plus what's in the routers of course). Avira) and good malware detectors are the "norm" for protection. Some will claim that programs like Super AntiMalware & such are all that's needed; don't beleive them. Many programs may catch many of them, but no single program yet will catch all of them; there are just too many of them and increasing every day. Agreed. (How many of each [AV, firewall, detector] - and which ones - do _you_ run?) Router Gateway: Westell 327W & comes with NAT - almost as good as a firewall Firewall: Norton 2010 AV: Norton's AV (real time monitoring) and AVG (used separately, is NOT set to real time monitor. Backup: Norton Ghost 14: Full once/month, incrementals nightly. Spyware/Malwa *WinPatrol; SuperAnti Spyware; Spybot Search & Destroy; Norton Internet Security; Adaware; Malware Bytes. Probably a couple others I've missed. *WinPatrol isn't per sae a scanner, but it WILL stop ANY application it hasn't seen before from running, so it needs a short training course as you use your machine. It does so many other things too that I won't go into them; see their web site if interested. I run the malware detectors in the approximate sequence as listed, first one first run. Unless I have a really nasty problem I stop after usinig Norton Internet Security. I've had both Adaware and MalwareBytes catch something all the others miss, but not very often. Thus, I keep them around. I keep AVG around likewise; just a tool for comparisons sometimes but Norton's AV always catches, historycally, everything and more than AVAST and AVG. Its heuristics are better than any other I've tried, and their new, smaller memory footprint makes them faster and useful for the smaller machines that always had speed complaints. A not on AV programs: If they find something and fix it for you, run them again. There is a possibbility the removal may have exposed something else that was previously hidden. Always run them until they find nothing. My only claim to "success" with these applications are that I have not had a viral infection in almost three years now so I'm doing something right. Ymmv of course because different grographic areas get different knds of viruses quite often. The last problem I had was a GAIN infection that I stupidly downloaded myself in another application. I now check reputations for any sites I haven't visited before and I also use Google's attributes about various web sites. HTH, Twayne` HTH, Twayne` (Why the lines at the end?) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been getting warnings about "Generic Volume Shadow Copy" for several days, SINCE INSTALLING CARBONITE PRO. So far I have stopped the warning by saying STOP PROCESS. Now, I called my Carbonite rep, and she said it's OK to allow the process. Here goes....
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|