![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 09/12/2020 11:04 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote: If the CPU is locked, then you can't even run tools that can modify the firmware. Surely you can if you leave the original cpu in the server, or how do you ever upgrade the bios? I have an MSI Tomahawk Max (Ryzen) motherboard which can flash its BIOS without a CPU or RAM installed. It only needs a power supply connected. |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Corvid wrote:
On 09/12/2020 11:04 AM, Andy Burns wrote: Yousuf Khan wrote: If the CPU is locked, then you can't even run tools that can modify the firmware. Surely you can if you leave the original cpu in the server, or how do you ever upgrade the bios? I have an MSI Tomahawk Max (Ryzen) motherboard which can flash its BIOS without a CPU or RAM installed. It only needs a power supply connected. I have an Asus motherboard (Intel CPU), with the same feature. Board does not need a CPU or RAM, to upgrade the BIOS. Place a BIOS file on a USB stick, plug in USB stick, push the button, it flashes up the BIOS chip. The USB slot has a white tab, indicating it is different than the slots above it. https://i.postimg.cc/5ycg0V3V/biosflash.gif Paul |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/13/2020 1:25 AM, Corvid wrote:
On 09/12/2020 11:04 AM, Andy Burns wrote: Yousuf Khan wrote: If the CPU is locked, then you can't even run tools that can modify the firmware. Surely you can if you leave the original cpu in the server, or how do you ever upgrade the bios? I have an MSI Tomahawk Max (Ryzen) motherboard which can flash its BIOS without a CPU or RAM installed. It only needs a power supply connected. Very unlikely that a server motherboard would make their BIOS this easy to hack. Yousuf Khan |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Corvid wrote:
Andy Burns wrote: Yousuf Khan wrote: If the CPU is locked, then you can't even run tools that can modify the firmware. Surely you can if you leave the original cpu in the server, or how do you ever upgrade the bios? I have an MSI Tomahawk Max (Ryzen) motherboard which can flash its BIOS without a CPU or RAM installed. It only needs a power supply connected. Yep, and every server motherboard worth the name has a baseboard management controller that could handle locking it down, without involving the cpu. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul wrote:
Corvid wrote: On 09/12/2020 11:04 AM, Andy Burns wrote: Yousuf Khan wrote: If the CPU is locked, then you can't even run tools that can modify the firmware. Surely you can if you leave the original cpu in the server, or how do you ever upgrade the bios? I have an MSI Tomahawk Max (Ryzen) motherboard which can flash its BIOS without a CPU or RAM installed. It only needs a power supply connected. I have an Asus motherboard (Intel CPU), with the same feature. Board does not need a CPU or RAM, to upgrade the BIOS. Place a BIOS file on a USB stick, plug in USB stick, push the button, it flashes up the BIOS chip. The USB slot has a white tab, indicating it is different than the slots above it. https://i.postimg.cc/5ycg0V3V/biosflash.gif Since many mobos support this, (and for good reason such as building with a newer CPU that requires bios update for support), then I sand by my statement that 'As with all things "Secure [whatever]" has nothing to do with security and everything to do with vendor-lock-in.' -- Take care, Jonathan ------------------- LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/13/2020 5:19 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
Yep, and every server motherboard worth the name has a baseboard management controller that could handle locking it down, without involving the cpu. Well, server motherboards would rather use the CPU to lock it down, since that's the most powerful piece of silicon on the board, and it reduces costs, not having to put a separate management controller. Yousuf Khan |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/12/2020 1:51 AM, Yousuf Khan wrote:
AMD's server Epyc processors have a security feature that doesn't even exist in Intel yet: vendor-locked CPU's! If you install an Epyc processor into certain servers from vendors like HP or Dell, that processor will lock itself into that vendor and never work on any other manufacturer's system again. So here's an example of exactly why this type of security is being implemented, it's to prevent hardware hacks from being implemented in the motherboards. In 2015, a bunch of servers were found with hardware spyware installed directly in Supermicro server motherboards, that were being sold to Amazon, Apple, and others. The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate U.S. Companies - Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/featu...-top-companies Yousuf Khan |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Yousuf Khan
wrote: AMD's server Epyc processors have a security feature that doesn't even exist in Intel yet: vendor-locked CPU's! If you install an Epyc processor into certain servers from vendors like HP or Dell, that processor will lock itself into that vendor and never work on any other manufacturer's system again. So here's an example of exactly why this type of security is being implemented, it's to prevent hardware hacks from being implemented in the motherboards. In 2015, a bunch of servers were found with hardware spyware installed directly in Supermicro server motherboards, that were being sold to Amazon, Apple, and others. no they weren't. The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate U.S. Companies - Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/featu...ow-china-used- a-tiny-chip-to-infiltrate-america-s-top-companies fabricated article with zero proof. amazon, apple and supermicro have been unable to find *any* evidence. the fbi, nsa, dhs and various other entities claim it's false. nobody has been able to provide a hacked board or even a photo of one with the chip, plus several of the sources cited in the article have stated their statements were twisted and taken out of context. it's yet another bogus bloomberg articles intended to deliberately manipulate the stock market. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|