![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I'm understanding you correctly the disk id's do not match up
C: drive is (000369E9) and the E: drive is (000E9230) so I would need instructions to change the XML file. https://postimg.cc/tnCkssyL I had the thought of doing a test to see if the older Mrimgs we haven't checked if they also have the have the XML error but before doing so I saw our last Mrimg we did after I downloaded an important update and it doesn't have the XML error. https://postimg.cc/SnQ86BMp Robert |
Ads |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert in CA wrote:
If I'm understanding you correctly the disk id's do not match up C: drive is (000369E9) and the E: drive is (000E9230) so I would need instructions to change the XML file. https://postimg.cc/tnCkssyL I had the thought of doing a test to see if the older Mrimgs we haven't checked if they also have the have the XML error but before doing so I saw our last Mrimg we did after I downloaded an important update and it doesn't have the XML error. https://postimg.cc/SnQ86BMp Robert You're probably backing up the first disk, containing System and Windows. The identifier applies to the whole disk, so the Macrium XML file would look like this. Partition 1 is "System" and Partition 2 is "Windows". image_entry id="1" !-- disk is the 1 based index of the disk to be imaged -- !-- id is the disk signature and is ... ... -- disk id="000369E9"1/disk !-- partition is the 1 based index of the partition on the disk -- partition1/partition /image_entry image_entry id="2" disk id="000369E9"1/disk partition2/partition /image_entry E: is probably part of the backup drive, so "000E9230" won't be in the sources section of the XML file. ******* Each backup you make, records the DiskID it found. Even if the XML file has the wrong value, the MRIMG file will have the "as recorded" value, ensuring during restoration, that the Disk ID will end up the same as it was during the backup. Somewhere along the way, you changed drives and don't remember doing that. This problem does not materially affect what's been done, so there is no reason for hair loss here. If you restore an MRIMG, if tries to put things back as recorded in the MRIMG. And when the backups are made, Macrium faithfully records what is on the disk, even if it doesn't match the XML file. Fixing up the XML file now, is for consistency and to cause the error to buzz off. A Macrium backup run today, will show the same metadata as one made yesterday. Macrium does as much consistency checking as it can, before the backup operation starts. Once it starts making a backup, the software is convinced the backup has sufficient integrity to be useful. It knows it is backing up SATA Port 1, even though the identifier didn't match. If a matching identifier had been found on any other port in the machine, that's the one that would have got backed up. The algorithm is, back up the "Disk ID" one if you can find a match, otherwise, use the port number and grab that drive, as the closest matching identifier. If there was no drive on Port 1, the Disk ID didn't match, Macrium would stop and present some red error text. Paul |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I understand what you're telling me about the Mrimg ID and backups but
I thought I identified the ID because you said it was where we check items and those were the only numbers I could find. Where else would it be? I only time I changed hd in the 780 was after I bought it I installed a new 2TB hd and I changed the external (1TB) hd for a (2TB) hd but that was ages ago almost as far back as when I started using external hd's in the first place. The only time I replaced the hd in the 780 recently was when we had that bad Win 7 hd that wouldn't boot which is why I bought all the new hd's to clone but that doesn't explain how far back the XML occurred. I still would like to clean this up by editing the XML regardless if the backup is just mismatched and we haven't even looked at the 8500 or the Windows 10 hd's to see if they also have this issue. I didn't invest all this money and effort for a backup system to have Mrimgs that are mismatched. I would like clean matched Mrimgs. Robert |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert in CA wrote:
I understand what you're telling me about the Mrimg ID and backups but I thought I identified the ID because you said it was where we check items and those were the only numbers I could find. Where else would it be? I only time I changed hd in the 780 was after I bought it I installed a new 2TB hd and I changed the external (1TB) hd for a (2TB) hd but that was ages ago almost as far back as when I started using external hd's in the first place. The only time I replaced the hd in the 780 recently was when we had that bad Win 7 hd that wouldn't boot which is why I bought all the new hd's to clone but that doesn't explain how far back the XML occurred. I still would like to clean this up by editing the XML regardless if the backup is just mismatched and we haven't even looked at the 8500 or the Windows 10 hd's to see if they also have this issue. I didn't invest all this money and effort for a backup system to have Mrimgs that are mismatched. I would like clean matched Mrimgs. Robert You can make brand-new backup plans using the GUI. I only showed you this, so you could test and see if the error message goes away. I make lots of backup definitions on my copies of Macrium, and if I have any question about what I'm doing, I just make another one :-) Paul |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I created a new Mrimg backup then I went into disk management.
https://postimg.cc/pm4CGcZ1 https://postimg.cc/qt2smJgz and here's the 8500: https://postimg.cc/t7bjv2vT Robert |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert in CA wrote:
I created a new Mrimg backup then I went into disk management. https://postimg.cc/pm4CGcZ1 https://postimg.cc/qt2smJgz and here's the 8500: https://postimg.cc/t7bjv2vT Robert I don't see any complaint in the first pair. Is there supposed to be a problem there ? The second one (8500) shows me a 1TB drive and a USB stick. Paul |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No I was just showing it to you in case you saw
something that was out of order. However I thought I had changed the 8500 hd from a (1TB) hd to a (2 TB) hd so that means it's the original hd in the 8500. Which makes it all the more important we create error free Mrimg backups so that I can create Win 7 Pro clone backup hd's for both computers. So was my computer ID correct? if not then where do I find it? If it was then how do we edit the XML? Thoughts/suggestions? Robert |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert in CA wrote:
No I was just showing it to you in case you saw something that was out of order. However I thought I had changed the 8500 hd from a (1TB) hd to a (2 TB) hd so that means it's the original hd in the 8500. Which makes it all the more important we create error free Mrimg backups so that I can create Win 7 Pro clone backup hd's for both computers. So was my computer ID correct? if not then where do I find it? If it was then how do we edit the XML? Thoughts/suggestions? Robert The DiskID shows up in the Macrium Reflect backup window. Partition1 Partition2 +-----+------------+-----------+ | MBR | System | C: | Disk1 (on Macrium XML file) +-----+------------+-----------+ Disk0 (on Disk Management window) ^ ^ ^ | | | | VolumeID VolumeID DiskID +-----+------------+-----------+ | MBR | System | C: | Disk2 (on Macrium XML file) +-----+------------+-----------+ Disk1 (on Disk Management window) ^ ^ ^ | | | | VolumeID VolumeID DiskID When you place a brand new drive in a computer, then examine in Disk Management, it prompts right away for partitioning type. It is around this time, that the basic format of MBR is established and a "unique" DiskID written. Alternately, when Macrium clones Disk1 to Disk2, one of the steps afterwards is ensuring the DiskID of the clone is different than the DiskID of the source. If the DiskID on two disks is the same, if Disk1=Disk2, then Disk2 goes "Offline" and the partitions won't mount and you can't put files on it. There's no particular reason for DiskID to exist! Each drive has a serial number set at the factory, the combination Vendor : Model : SerialNumber is a unique enough number, that fabricating a DiskID isn't necessary. But, there it is, and we're stuck with it. It is, for the most part, self-maintaining. I've only edited one with a hex editor, maybe once or twice. The VolumeID can be edited with this. I've used this command a lot more over the years, but mainly when re-creating a partition and trying to make it "match" its predecessor. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sys...loads/volumeid It's possible for a USB stick to not have a serial number, and then the DiskID is the tie breaker. That should not be happening too much today. Electronics are a lot more serializable than they used to be. USB compliance is better. Paul |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I understand we can change the label but not the ID but not
how do I do it step by step? I have no clue what to do even after I download it ? I decided to do a backup on the 8500 to check it and see if it had the same XML issue. All Mrimgs looked good until the end and the earliest date! So I've had this since 2016 and there's no way how I could remember that long ago what I did to get this but we need to resolve this problem if I'm going to have clean Mrimgs for both computers This is especially true of the 8500 which has it's original hd and needs to have clones made. https://postimg.cc/CRgxByhS https://postimg.cc/yDjsDkpy https://postimg.cc/mzzspVLm https://postimg.cc/bdV6w8RS Thanks, Robert |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert in CA wrote:
I understand we can change the label but not the ID but not how do I do it step by step? I have no clue what to do even after I download it ? I decided to do a backup on the 8500 to check it and see if it had the same XML issue. All Mrimgs looked good until the end and the earliest date! So I've had this since 2016 and there's no way how I could remember that long ago what I did to get this but we need to resolve this problem if I'm going to have clean Mrimgs for both computers This is especially true of the 8500 which has it's original hd and needs to have clones made. https://postimg.cc/CRgxByhS https://postimg.cc/yDjsDkpy https://postimg.cc/mzzspVLm https://postimg.cc/bdV6w8RS Thanks, Robert What you're looking at there, is a list of backup definition files. The earliest ones were made to back up a disk configuration that existed in 2016. The backup definition is there, to back up the things you wanted at the time. There must have been a partition 4 at the time for example. Such a backup definition file would not be relevant to today in 2021. Your drive has fewer partitions on it, implying you made a configuration change. Consequently, a backup definition prepared in more modern times, is likely to be correct for a job in 2021. You don't have to use the old definitions, in the year 2021. What's important, is the partitions you need to back up, are getting backed up. To check that, you go to Restore, Browse for files to restore, select one, pretend you're going to Restore it. There will be a graphical representation on the screen, including a DiskID. That tells you what actually got recorded. If there is a System and a C: , then that's the OS portion secured. If there is a 24GB Restore partition, that's the Dell Restore for putting a clean OS back. Maybe you've captured that too. That would be part of keeping a Dell 8500 in order perhaps. I don't see anything particularly wrong here. Computers change. We make new definition files in the Backup menu, to account for change, and capture the disk as it is today. Perhaps you would not want to even restore an image from 2016. When the image does not match, there are some things you can do. 1) Select an MRIMG file, like double click on one in File Explorer, and you should be prompted, via a small window with a tick box per backed-up partition, to mount the MRIMG file as if it is a virtual disk drive. The letter C: you backed up, you can, via that menu, tell the machine to temporarily make that drive letter W: . Once mounted, you can traverse W: and copy out your BookMarks file from 2016 and put it on a current partition of the hard drive. This is the so-called "Random Access" option, in which you go fishing inside a backup, for a specific file or folder you need. There is no need to restore every blasted MRIMG collected. Some images collected are so old, they may not be desirable as fully restorable images. They can be treated like a USB stick with select-files stored in them. I gave an example, where the oldest one I fully restored, was two years old. And I only went back two years, for a specific driver issue. Eventually, I returned the machine to the present day. It's unlikely you would return the machine to 2016, to fix a malware problem. 2) You can restore just a single partition from an old backup. As long as the partition isn't marked Active, it won't blow up the boot-ability of the computer. But there is only room for four primary partitions (with MSDOS partitioning). You could for example, examine the 2016 image collected (if you still have one), and pull the "partition 4" from it that is currently missing. Again, no reason to restore the whole thing. You can be more selective. This is a lot like looking at old manuscripts at the library. You expect old items to look "crusty" from the perspective of today. Examining the images, by Browsing them, can help you discover what changes happened to the drive setup over time. This is why, picking names for MRIMGs, putting comments in the Comment Field, is important for future archaeological purposes. A backup is as useful, as the effort you put into cataloging it. And don't panic, because you've collected "lots of something". For example, I doubt you've lost a single BookMarks file. C: is probably in every one of those backups. If a backup completes too quickly, that's a hint something is wrong. For example, one backup test I did, I was expecting the backup to take 2 hours and it took 10 minutes. That was a hint to me, that the preference I'd selected, hadn't worked. And that's the only time to be really concerned, is if the output isn't big enough to contain what you think it contains. You have many backup definition files. You made them for a reason. The "name" of the backup, the text you enter, that's your hint for later as to what you were doing. Backup Definitions Existing MRIMG files ------------------ -------------------- Don't have to match Contain a self sufficient existing MRIMG files snapshot. Backup Definition 1.XML Can be examine, mounted, Backup Definition 2.XML restored, as they stand, .... independent of anything else. These are like cooking recipes. "If you don't want a 2016 cake, Via Comments you keep in don't use a 2016 recipe." the file, such a Comment helps later, when figuring them out. There is no reason to panic. This is Forensics 101, leave enough evidence *somewhere* so that if there is any discrepancy, you've taken note of what happened and why you did it. I keep a notes file on my computer, for this purpose. That's the central control for my machine. Think of it as a log book. It doesn't have to be "pretty" to work, it just needs hints. I occasionally transfer the notes file to the other machine, so I have two copies of the log. Paul |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I started a fake restore to check partitions and hopefully
found what you meant? Is the image ID the same as the disk ID? and I see a backup ID? https://postimg.cc/HVPQzXHx https://postimg.cc/DS91khS3 I was just going through the Mrimgs looking to see if any had the XML alert and it just happened to be 2016. You're correct, I wouldn't want to use it anyway. I remember we tried random access awhile ago to access my folders files. I seemed to have difficulty with it. I thought again about what you said about mismatched Mrimgs which would explain the lost of some of my bookmarks on the 8500 and this happened recently not back in 2016 but I have 99% of what I had so it's not a great loss and I'm still using the Patriot Key for documents I'm working on so I don't loose them but I might as well move them all back to the 8500. However, that being said if we change the I.D. labels it's only to stop the VML error from appearing but from what I see it has already stopped on both computers as the recent Mrimgs show on the 780 and all the Mrimgs on the 8500 are good after the VML alert. So I'm now inclined to go with your thinking and that the Mrimgs are alright but it still doesn't fix the backspace key which started all of this and we'll see if the new keyboard fixes this issue. Then we can move forward and clone the hd for the 780 and 8500. What do you think? Robert |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert in CA wrote:
I started a fake restore to check partitions and hopefully found what you meant? Is the image ID the same as the disk ID? and I see a backup ID? https://postimg.cc/HVPQzXHx https://postimg.cc/DS91khS3 I was just going through the Mrimgs looking to see if any had the XML alert and it just happened to be 2016. You're correct, I wouldn't want to use it anyway. I remember we tried random access awhile ago to access my folders files. I seemed to have difficulty with it. I thought again about what you said about mismatched Mrimgs which would explain the lost of some of my bookmarks on the 8500 and this happened recently not back in 2016 but I have 99% of what I had so it's not a great loss and I'm still using the Patriot Key for documents I'm working on so I don't loose them but I might as well move them all back to the 8500. However, that being said if we change the I.D. labels it's only to stop the VML error from appearing but from what I see it has already stopped on both computers as the recent Mrimgs show on the 780 and all the Mrimgs on the 8500 are good after the VML alert. So I'm now inclined to go with your thinking and that the Mrimgs are alright but it still doesn't fix the backspace key which started all of this and we'll see if the new keyboard fixes this issue. Then we can move forward and clone the hd for the 780 and 8500. What do you think? Robert That sounds like a good plan. Your most recent XML file likely matches the machine config with its single disk, and that's why no partition errors are showing. I still don't have a way to debug the backspace key. I was investigating a method, but Microsoft has kinda shut the door on the tools, and if I got it working, it would only work in Windows 10. Which is not part of my plans particularly. I want tools that work on multiple OSes, I don't like broken/restrictive stuff. Paul |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed about the backspace key but I still don't understand how
it can function while typing yet not function for websites like eBay where I used it allot. However, we'll see if the new keyboard fixes it like the mouse did. At least that's my hope. If not, we can look at other things but as you say Microsoft has kinda tied our hands on the matter. The only other option that I can see is to buy another non-Microsoft keyboard that would load new non-Microsoft drivers e.g. Logitech K310 or a wired version of it. I still think it's weird that both computers have the exact same problems, e.g. XML alert, and backspace keys not functioning yet I barely use the 780. It's only there as a backup for the 8500. I run scan on it and do Mrimgs and that's about it. I do open this site and Dell Imaging, and Notepad occasionally like when doing Mrimgs. Once we finish creating clones for the 780 I think I would like to check the Win 10 hd's to make sure they are OK Also we can re- visit the PCI cars and see if we can find one for the 780. Thoughts/suggestions? Robert |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert in CA wrote:
Agreed about the backspace key but I still don't understand how it can function while typing yet not function for websites like eBay where I used it allot. However, we'll see if the new keyboard fixes it like the mouse did. At least that's my hope. If not, we can look at other things but as you say Microsoft has kinda tied our hands on the matter. The only other option that I can see is to buy another non-Microsoft keyboard that would load new non-Microsoft drivers e.g. Logitech K310 or a wired version of it. I still think it's weird that both computers have the exact same problems, e.g. XML alert, and backspace keys not functioning yet I barely use the 780. It's only there as a backup for the 8500. I run scan on it and do Mrimgs and that's about it. I do open this site and Dell Imaging, and Notepad occasionally like when doing Mrimgs. Once we finish creating clones for the 780 I think I would like to check the Win 10 hd's to make sure they are OK Also we can re- visit the PCI cars and see if we can find one for the 780. Thoughts/suggestions? Robert When using your browser, don't forget to click outside the text box so the backspace key is not considered text input. Paul |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not exactly sure what you mean? I understand the concept
your suggesting but I don't understand what you mean by 'clicking outside of the text box so it's not considered part of the test input'. What text box? When I'm writing in Word the space key functions on the same line as the text to remove it. If I'm on eBay I look at an item and then press backspace to return to the previous screen. Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|