If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead. This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB download. Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons behind all this. Thanks. -- Editor, Internet's Convenient and Unbiased Directory of Nutrition Software http://nutritionsoftware.org |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
Editor wrote:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394! I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead. This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB download. Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons behind all this. Thanks. Simple - manufacturers choice. Dell chose not to put a Firewire port in and/or you did not choose the option to add a firewire port(s) to your PC order. I assemble my own systems for myself - Every motherboard I have chosen to buy has had two firewire and 4 or more USB for the past two years or more. Dell could do it if they wanted, but they haven't yet. It's like Floppy drives - they are no longer STANDARD COMPONENTS of Dell PCs. -- Shenan Stanley "Just trying to help" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
I guess if that is important to someone they will order it.
Why pay for something you might never use? If needed they will add them to their standard units in the future. -- Bill Kiene Dell fan "Shenan T. Stanley" wrote in message ... Editor wrote: My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394! I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead. This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB download. Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons behind all this. Thanks. Simple - manufacturers choice. Dell chose not to put a Firewire port in and/or you did not choose the option to add a firewire port(s) to your PC order. I assemble my own systems for myself - Every motherboard I have chosen to buy has had two firewire and 4 or more USB for the past two years or more. Dell could do it if they wanted, but they haven't yet. It's like Floppy drives - they are no longer STANDARD COMPONENTS of Dell PCs. -- Shenan Stanley "Just trying to help" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
"Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org" nseditor2002 wrote in
message ... My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394! I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead. This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB download. Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons behind all this. Thanks. Probably because you didn't order it. Just go out and buy an add-in card: it'll cost about $30 and take you seconds to install. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
find a usb to firewire converter
-----Original Message----- My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394! I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead. This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB download. Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons behind all this. Thanks. -- Editor, Internet's Convenient and Unbiased Directory of Nutrition Software http://nutritionsoftware.org . |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
"Shenan T. Stanley" wrote in message ... Editor wrote: My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394! I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead. This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB download. Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons behind all this. Thanks. Simple - manufacturers choice. Dell chose not to put a Firewire port in and/or you did not choose the option to add a firewire port(s) to your PC order. I assemble my own systems for myself - Every motherboard I have chosen to buy has had two firewire and 4 or more USB for the past two years or more. Dell could do it if they wanted, but they haven't yet. It's like Floppy drives - they are no longer STANDARD COMPONENTS of Dell PCs. -- Shenan Stanley "Just trying to help" I agree with Shenan, I too also have two Firewire ports and 6 USB ports on the mother board I just built my new system with. More bang for the buck when you build your own and much easier to either upgrade or repair if ever necessary. Ed |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org wrote:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394! I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead. This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB download. Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons behind all this. Thanks. I suspect that Firewire is a bit more expensive to implement, and more popular on the Mac than the PC. However, a good Firewire board for the PC should not be more than $50. Check with CompUSA, or Fry's. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org wrote:
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394! I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead. This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB download. Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons behind all this. Thanks. The vast majority of ports you find built into a system come from one place, the main system chipset, for example Intel's i865 and i875or SiS chipsets . The capabilities of these chipsets tend to dictate what motherboard manufactures build onto the motherboard, and these chipsets don't have Firewire, but do have USB. So if the vendor wants to put Firewire on the motherboard, then they have to add an additional chipset just to support Firewire which adds cost to the motherboard in a market where their margins are razor thin already. To a degree it boils down to a decision Intel made in the late 90s when they dropped Firewire support from their chipset roadmap in favor of USB (probably over licencsing costs, but no real answer has ever been given) hence you get USB built-in but no Firwire. I think you may find that some NVIDIA/Athlon motherboard have onboard Firewire because I think the NVIDIA main system chipset does support Firewaure, but I could be wrong. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 05:52:20 -0500, "Nik Simpson"
wrote: Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org wrote: My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394! I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead. This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB download. Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons behind all this. Thanks. The vast majority of ports you find built into a system come from one place, the main system chipset, for example Intel's i865 and i875or SiS chipsets . The capabilities of these chipsets tend to dictate what motherboard manufactures build onto the motherboard, and these chipsets don't have Firewire, but do have USB. So if the vendor wants to put Firewire on the motherboard, then they have to add an additional chipset just to support Firewire which adds cost to the motherboard in a market where their margins are razor thin already. Yes, the vendors assume that you'll use a card slot to add firewire, or use a soundcard or video card which has it on it, if you're into video. Pretty much, only camcorders *require* firewire. You can get USB2 hard drives and many other devices which also are available with firewire interfaces, but the main purpose is camcorder interfacing. To a degree it boils down to a decision Intel made in the late 90s when they dropped Firewire support from their chipset roadmap in favor of USB (probably over licencsing costs, but no real answer has ever been given) hence you get USB built-in but no Firwire. I think you may find that some NVIDIA/Athlon motherboard have onboard Firewire because I think the NVIDIA main system chipset does support Firewaure, but I could be wrong. NVIDIA's nForce motherboards, Athlon or Pentium, include firewire and a host of other ports, including a very excellent onboard sound system. Pretty much, the inclusion of motherboard ports dictates what will be included for free on a low end system. The MB ports are included at no extra cost. Cards require extra work to install, and use slots which are in short supply on most cheaper motherboards -- so the maker isn't going to force buyers to give up a slot for a port they'll never use. -- *-__Jeffery Jones__________| *Starfire* |____________________-* ** Muskego WI Access Channel 14/25 http://www.execpc.com/~jeffsj/mach7/ *Starfire Design Studio* http://www.starfiredesign.com/ |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
"Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org" nseditor2002 wrote in message ... My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394! I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead. This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB download. Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons behind all this. Thanks. There are comparatively few devices that utilize firewire over USB, and since USB 2.0 is fully compatible with the zillions of existing USB 1.0 devices, it makes sense for all computers to come equipped with 2.0. If you need firewire (I do too), simply purchase an inexpensive 1394 card. It shouldn't take you more than five or ten minutes to install in an empty slot. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
In rec.video.desktop Ron Hunter wrote:
I suspect that Firewire is a bit more expensive to implement, and more popular on the Mac than the PC. However, a good Firewire board for the It's a cost-cutting thing, no doubt. I don't think it would be "more" expensive to implement on a PC, but in a cut-throat competitive world of hundreds of PC makers, any way to shave a few pennies is going to make a significant difference in sales. So they keep costs down by not giving you Firewire. Apple, on the other hand, is free to put whatever hardware they want onto their machines, knowing that people will buy (not like they really have a choice) -- and in so doing also give themselves a reputation for being an innovator and market leader ("first to have Firewire as a standard feature!") |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
"Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org" nseditor2002 wrote in
message ... My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394! I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead. This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB download. Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons behind all this. Intel decided not to include 1394 in their chip sets. They actually did have a southbridge with 1394, but did not productize it. As to the reason, the speculation is that they didn't want to contribute to the success of a standard invented by Apple. USB is fast enough for uploading still photos, but not fast enough for video, so Intel came up with USB 2.0, though of course USB 2.0 isn't used in camcorders. There are many PCs available with 1394 built in, including most of the higher end models from HP/Compaq, and Sony. It would add a couple of dollars to the cost of a PC so Dell doesn't include it. A PCI Firewire card is only $10-20. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
"Shenan T. Stanley" wrote in message ... Editor wrote: My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394! I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead. This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB download. Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons behind all this. Thanks. Simple - manufacturers choice. Dell chose not to put a Firewire port in and/or you did not choose the option to add a firewire port(s) to your PC order. I assemble my own systems for myself - Every motherboard I have chosen to buy has had two firewire and 4 or more USB for the past two years or more. Dell could do it if they wanted, but they haven't yet. It's like Floppy drives - they are no longer STANDARD COMPONENTS of Dell PCs. Thing change - my "new" PC is 2 years old. I've been looking at a new 2nd PC for my wife. Turns out I can get one damn near twice as fast as my old one for a third the money! None of them have floppy drives, or CR drives, for that matter. The Gateway guy said they don't even sell a CD "player" anymore. Everything is CD-R, starting at $50. Life is good. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Why most new PCs have USB 2.0 but not Firewire builtin?
Just bought a firewire card for $18 and it came with a DV editor program. BTW I
have 1394 ports on two old Compaqs circa 1998 or 9 a PII 400 and PII450. About Apple and SCSI they were the first to have it and the first to drop it then charge $200 for a card every one else was selling for $100. Tom In article , says... Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org wrote: My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394! I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead. This distinction seems to apply to digicams and cameras: my 2 Sony camcorders both have Firewire to download to PCs. My cameras all have USB download. Could someone explain why this is so? I am sure there are good reasons behind all this. Thanks. I suspect that Firewire is a bit more expensive to implement, and more popular on the Mac than the PC. However, a good Firewire board for the PC should not be more than $50. Check with CompUSA, or Fry's. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|