Help needed from 'Apd'

Snit
Sun, 26 Jul 2020 16:50:39 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 7/26/20 5:24 AM, David_B wrote:
On 17/08/2019 10:04, zoltan wrote:
~BD~ wrote:
[....]
Don't forget - I'm the 'good guy'....

Ok - now we’ve reached peak
psychopathy/delusion/inebriation. Fun times.


You should stop drinking, Mark.

I did! :-)

Not a drop of alcohol for me since 21st March 2018

I *AM* a 'good guy' - trying hard to catch the baddies! :-D


Actually you’re a pain in the ****ing arse.
Have you ever caught any bad guys?
Facts please, not paranoid beliefs.

Yes. You may have seen a fellow calling himself 'Diesel' posting
in various Usenet groups. His real name is Dustin J Cook and he
proudly admits that he was a Black Hat VXer - he wrote the Irok
virus amongst others.

https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/us/...dia/archive/ma
lware/irok


His earlier 'Handle' used to be Raid/SLAM - shown he-

https://www.sophos.com/en-us/threat-...alyses/viruses
-and-spyware/Irok-10000/detailed-analysis.aspx


I hope this helps.


He also has been spamming a number of groups with a bizarre
tantrum where he is begging me to lie and say I agree with him
over a pretty meaningless disagreement we had over a comment he
made. Won't go into details unless asked, but whatever his views
on it his tantrum has been insane and over-the-top. They guy has
become completely unhinged.

I've noticed that you have more than one easily noticed, double
standard, Snit. Not only are you okay with joels elementary
schoolyard level of the english language towards me, you're also
okay with David Brooks going well out of his way to lie
intentionally about me by withholing certain information he knows to
be true. Hmm. Is that why it was so easy for you to lie on me with
this:



http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100
Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot
but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was
merely the compiled code he had:


-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----

So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My
guess: he will NEVER say.
*** end of what you wrote

I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had
access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output -
atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more
information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and
finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the
"compiled code".

Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short
paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come
close to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation.


Why are you giving David Brooks a free pass for name dropping me as
he did there, Snit? And why are you allowing him to lie on me as
he's doing?

They asked if David ever caught any bad guys. The answer to that
question, if he wanted to be honest, is a "no" - but then he wouldn't have any reason to write
any of the contents of his post if honesty was the goal. Sliming me
was, so the post needed to exist.

There's no such thing as a "blackhat vxer", either. If he's going
try and pass himself off as someone who has even a small idea of
what they are writing about, please try to use the proper
terminology. I was a blackhat, and I was also a vxer. I'm now a
grayhat and an ex-vxer.

Irok was completed nearly eight years prior to his first email
attempting to 'set me up' (he denied that was his intention for
years, but in a drunk moment admitted it on usenet; I saved the
post, would you like to see it again?) but first, he wanted my help
to break into two servers he didn't own. It's not very honest of him
to exclude that information, Snit

He should also tell people how he knows about irok, and my handle
(s). He could begin by telling them he was stalking me and others
like myself who interacted with individuals on usenet.

When he emailed me, he didn't give me the impression he was out
looking for bad guys. Rather, he went well out of his way to try and
sell me on the idea that he was a good guy looking to be "my friend"
And wanted my help in understanding the more technical aspects of
malware. He admitted he'd been reading a lot about me prior to
sending his first email; and he questioned me about some things he'd
read about me, I was candid and honest with all of his questions. My
only crime upto that point Snit, was my continued refusal to break
into gear he didn't own, or have permission to be able to authorize
a pen test. He tried to con me and even offered to pay me to do it,
and I said no.

When I declined his offer of payment, that's when he tried to dox me
on usenet the first time around with the gsv of what he thought was
my house.

I've got all of our emails, and i've offered to share them with you
several times now. You've consistently declined the offer, and, I
don't blame you. You wouldn't be able to continue defending him with
a straight face if you ever read some of these... He's nuts, and I
find it hard to believe you haven't noticed he's 'off' when
interacting with him via email. Has he gotten around to getting
personal with you yet?As if you were long lost soul mates catching
up?

Or maybe you think witholding information as David did is perfectly
okay? I've already observed several double standards with you, might
this be yet another one? The poster asked him if he ever caught any
bad guys, the only correct answer is "no". There was no need to go
into a rant about things i'd already been done with, nearly eight
years prior to Davids first email. And like I told you, the only
reason David sought me out for the help was due to what he read
about me. Had I not been someone from the 'scene' you could interact
with, it would have been some other individual on the cutting board,
instead of me.

How can he justify whining about things I'd already stopped with
nearly eight years prior to him ever learning about me, Snit? He,
like you, is writing out of his ass.

And why are you taking advantage of his attack on me to initiate one
yourself? I thought you were a mature Adult, Snit. Are you showing
us that you actually have the majurity level of a small child who
lacks proper adult supervision? Knowing full well you're lying your
ass off as you do so.

I thought you knew what the definition to spamming actually was. I
see that you don't. I also see that you support a very well known
liar and stalking troll. The two of you have a lot in common.

Now then, here's those details you didn't want to 'go into'
concerning my 'tantrum' (Nobody appreciates being lied about Snit,
and it's not a tantrum when someone calls you out for it, either)
alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp. sys.mac.advocacy,ta
lk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10


http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100
Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot
but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was
merely the compiled code he had:


-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----

So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My
guess: he will NEVER say.

I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had
access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output -
atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more
information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and
finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the
"compiled code".

Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short
paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come
close to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation.


An unfounded accusation, that you made against me, because you're
****ed off about some things I wrote which have embarrassed you.

Back your accusation, or apologize for having written it, Snit.
That's what an Adult would do.

--
I've got a mind like a . . . a . . . what's that thing called?